Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 40 - 40
1 Jan 2013
Bhattacharyya R Wallace W
Full Access

Introduction. Health Economists in Denmark have recently reported low and delayed return to work for patients treated for Sub-Acromial Impingement syndrome (SAIS) by Arthroscopic Sub-Acromial Decompression (ASAD). Surgeons however are reporting that patients achieve good pain relief and a high standard of activities of daily living (ADL) after surgery. Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of ASAD for patients with SAIS and correlate clinical outcome with rate of return to work. Methods. Prospective cohort study and retrospective review of data from the Nottingham Shoulder database (presentation: 01/04/2008–30/06/2011). Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed clinically with SAIS by an experienced shoulder surgeon, who have failed conservative treatment (physiotherapy and sub-acromial injection), undergoing ASAD. Pre-operative and 6-month follow-up Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Constant Score (CS) were compared. The rates of return to pre-operative level of work were also analysed. Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results. 73 patients with OSS (51 also with CS documentation) were included. The improvement in median OSS between pre-operative (24) and 6-month follow-up (39) was +15 (Z = −6.726, ∗∗∗, T=6, r=0.55). The difference in median CS between pre-operative (39) and 6-month follow-up (67) was +28 (Z=−5.435, T=6, r=0.59, ∗∗∗). Improvement in median pain score was +5 (7,12, ∗∗∗) median ADL was +5.5 (10.5,16, ∗∗∗) median ROM was +13 (18,31, ∗∗∗) and median strength was +4 (3,7, ∗∗∗). 76% returned to their pre-operative level of work (mean time = 11.5 weeks post surgery). 79% returned to their pre-operative hobbies (mean time = 11.8 weeks post surgery). Conclusion. There is a significant improvement in OSS and CS, 6 months after ASAD in patients with SAIS who have had previous failed conservative treatment. The rate of return to work was good for these patients in contrast to that reported for Danish patients. (∗∗∗ = p< 0.0001 = Highly statistically significant)


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 93 - 93
10 Feb 2023
Wang A Hughes J Fitzpatrick J Breidhahl W Ebert J Zheng M
Full Access

Interstitial supraspinatus tears can cause persistent subacromial impingement symptoms despite non operative treatment. Autologous tendon cell injection (ATI) is a non-surgical treatment for tendinopathies and tear. We report a randomised controlled study of ATI compared to corticosteroid injection (CS) as treatment for interstitial supraspinatus tears and tendinopathy.

Inclusion criteria were patients with symptom duration > 6 months, MRI confirmed intrasubstance supraspinatus tear, and prior treatment with physiotherapy and ≥ one CS or PRP injection. Participants were randomised to receive ATI to the interstitial tear or corticosteroid injection to the subacromial bursa in a 2:1 ratio, under ultrasound guidance. Assessments of pain (VAS) and function (ASES) were performed at baseline, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post treatment.

30 participants (19 randomised to ATI) with a mean age of 50.5 years (10 females) and a mean duration of symptoms of 23.5 months. Baseline VAS pain and ASES scores were comparable between groups. While mean VAS pain scores improved in both groups at 3 months after treatment, pain scores were superior with ATI at 6 months (p=0.01). Mean ASES scores in the ATI group were superior to the CS group at 3 months (p=0.026) and 6 months (p=0.012). Seven participants in the CS group withdrew prior to 12 months due to lack of improvement. At 12 months, mean VAS pain in the ATI group was 1.6 ± 1.3. The improvements in mean ASES scores in the ATI group at 6 and 12 months were greater than the MCID (12.0 points). At 12 months, 95% of ATI participants had an ASES score > the PASS (patient acceptable symptom state).

This is the first level one study using ATI to treat interstitial supraspinatus tear. ATI results in a significant reduction in pain and improvement in shoulder function.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 132 - 132
1 Jan 2016
Watts A Williams B Krishnan J Wilson C
Full Access

Background

Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common debilitating condition, treated across multiple health disciplines including Orthopaedics, Physiotherapy, and Rheumatology. There is little consistency in diagnostic criteria with ‘Shoulder impingement syndrome’ being used for a broad spectrum of complex pathologies. We assessed patterns in diagnostic procedures for SIS across multiple disciplines.

Methods

This is a systematic review of electronic databases MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL five years of publications, January 2009 - January 2014. Search terms for SIS included subacromial impingement syndrome, subacromial bursitis. Searches were delimited to articles written in English. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, data was then extracted by one reviewer and twenty percent of the extraction was independently assessed by the co-reviewer. Studies included were intervention studies examining individuals diagnosed with SIS and we were interested in the process and method used for the diagnosis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 126 - 126
1 Feb 2012
Norton M Veitch S Mathews J Fern D
Full Access

Introduction

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) causes anterior hip pain, labral tears and damage to the articular cartilage leading to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Surgical hip dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and acetabular rim is a technique pioneered by the Bernese group for the treatment of FAI. We present and discuss our results of this technique.

Methods

Functional outcome was measured in hips with over 12 month follow-up using the Oxford hip and McCarthy non-arthritic hip scores pre- and post-operatively.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 42 - 42
1 Jan 2013
Serna S Kumar V Fairbairn K Wiltshire K Edwards K Wallace W
Full Access

Introduction. The conservative management of Sub-Acromial Impingement Syndrome (SAIS) of the shoulder includes both physiotherapy treatment and subacromial injection with local anaesthetic and steroids. The outcome from injection treatment has rarely been evaluated scientifically. Methods. Patients attending a designated shoulder clinic and diagnosed by an experienced shoulder surgeon as having a SAIS between January 2009 and December 2011 were considered for inclusion in the study. 67 of 86 patients screened completed the study (3 did not meet inclusion criteria; 9 declined to participate; 3 lost to follow-up; 4 developed frozen shoulder syndrome). Each patient had a pre-injection Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and was given one subacromial injection of 10ml 0.25% levobupivacaine(Chirocaine) + 40 mg triamcinolone(Kenalog) through the posterior route. Radiograph imaging was also assessed. Follow-up was carried out at 6 to 12 weeks post injection when OSS was repeated. A 6 month follow-up assessment to assess if the patient's improvement in functionality and absence of symptoms indicated that a subacromial decompression operation was not necessary. The percentage of patients showing improvement in OSS was calculated and the difference in OSS pre- and post-injection assessed using a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Results. The median OSS pre-injection was 29 (range 2–43) and post-injection was 40 (range 2–48) (p=< 0.001; z=−6.0; r=−0.5). 45/69 (71%) of patients benefited significantly from subacromial injection at 6 to 12 weeks post-injection. However only 28/53 (53%) benefited significantly from injection by 6 months post-injection. These results support the continued use of sub-acromial corticosteroid injections in the treatment of SAIS. 31% of these patients were subsequently treated with an arthroscopic subacromial decompression operation. Previous injection history had no impact on the results. Conclusions. We recommend that all patients with SAIS should be offered at least one subacromial injection before being considered for an arthroscopic subacromial decompression operation