You have a great research question or an idea for an innovation that will change your field. You have worked tirelessly to develop the project and are excited with the outcome. Now it is time to disseminate your findings to the world. This talk will give some insight into how to maximise the impact of your writing to reach the largest possible audience. It will discuss what makes a great paper, and provide pointers for navigating the editorial process, from your initial interactions with the editor to handling the sometimes-difficult process of peer review.

Introduction. The heterogeneity of outcomes used in the field of lower limb lengthening surgery (LLLS) affects our ability to synthesize evidence. This hampers robust systematic reviews and treatment recommendations for clinical practice. Ultimately this reduces the impact of research for both patients and healthcare professionals. This scoping review aimed to describe the outcomes and outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) used within the field of LLLS. Method. A systematic literature search of WOS, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library identified all studies reporting outcomes in children and adults after LLLS. All outcomes and OMIs were extracted verbatim. An iterative process was used to group outcome terms under standardized outcome headings categorized using the COMET Taxonomy of Outcomes. Result. Data saturation was achieved in 2020. A total of 142 studies were included between 2024-2020, reporting 2964 verbatim outcomes with 663 standardized outcome terms collapsed into 119 outcome headings (subdomains). A total of 29 patient-reported and 26 clinician-reported outcome instruments were identified. The most commonly reported outcome was “Lengthening amount”, reported in over 72% of the included studies, while “health-related quality of life” was measured in 16% and all life impact outcomes were reported in 19% of the included studies. Conclusion. A large number of peer-reviewed publications are available, demonstrating that significant resources are being devoted to research on LLLS. However, reported outcomes for people with LLLS are heterogeneous, subject to reporting bias, and vary widely in the definitions and measurement tools used to collect them. Outcomes likely to be important to patients, such as quality of life and measures of physical function, have been neglected. This scoping review identifies a need to standardize outcomes and outcome measures reported on patients recovering from lower limb lengthening surgery; this can be addressed by creating a core set of outcomes

Aims

Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice.

The October 2024 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: Circumferential casting versus plaster splinting in preventing redisplacement of distal radial fractures; Comparable outcomes for operative versus nonoperative treatment of scapholunate ligament injuries in distal radius fractures; Perceived pain during the reduction of Colles fracture without anaesthesia; Diagnostic delays and physician training are key to reducing scaphoid fracture nonunion; Necrotizing fasciitis originating in the hand: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Study design influences outcomes in distal radial fracture research; Long-term results of index finger pollicization for congenital thumb anomalies: a systematic review; Enhancing nerve injury diagnosis: the evolving role of imaging and electrodiagnostic tools.

Aims

To map literature on prognostic factors related to outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), to identify extensively studied factors and to guide future research into what domains need further exploration.

There has been considerable activity in the past year as a result of the Justice Department Investigation into the medical device industry. There has been an over reaction by many which may negatively impact future research, development and reporting of clinical outcomes. This paper will review some of these activities. A review of professional standards and guidelines has been conducted looking at health care compliance issues as they related to commercial relationships, professional medical societies, individual surgeons, and health care workers with specific focus on disclosure. Within any important issue, there are always aspects no one wishes to discuss: conflict of interest. Perception of a conflict of interest is often enough to bring about a review of activity. Overreaction has occurred as a result of government intervention into the medical device industry. Continuing medical education, professional societies by-laws, clinical/surgical publications, medical/legal exposure, product research, development and industry marketing activities have all been impacted. When professionals fail to provide a proper review process on standards and guidelines on ethical behavior they set themselves up for government oversight and restrictions on their behavior. Be informed and disclose. Know what, when and how to disclose. Protect yourself, no one else will

Introduction. Given the predominant functional role which aggrecan has in the intervertebral disc, particularly within the nucleus pulposus, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of aggrecan produced by cells within tissue engineered disc constructs. The aim here was to characterise the nanostructure of aggrecan synthesised by nucleus pulposus cells treated with growth differentiation factor [GDF]-6) seeded in hydrogels in comparison to aggrecan isolated from healthy disc. Methods. Aggrecan was isolated from bovine nucleus pulposus (NP) tissue (n=3 [<18 months old]) and primary bovine NP cells cultured with (+GDF6) or without GDF6 (−GDF6) for 28 days (n=2) in type I collagen hydrogels. Isolated aggrecan monomers were visualised by atomic force microscopy and categorised as either intact (globular domains visible at both the N and C termini) or non-intact. Core protein contour length (L. CP. ) was calculated for intact molecules. The proportion of non-intact/fragmented to intact aggrecan and the molecular area of all monomers was determined. Results. Very few aggrecan molecules were intact (1.3% in NP compared to 4.3% +GDF6 and 0% -GDF6). There was no significant difference in the mean L. CP. between NP (389 ± 37 nm) compared to +GDF6 (379.2 ± 26 nm) or the molecular area between NP (3560 ± 2179 nm. 2. ) and –GDF6 (3586 ± 2071 nm. 2. ). However, the molecular area in both cases was significantly lower than +GDF6 (4774 ± 3715 nm. 2. ) p≤0.0001. Discussion & conclusions. Aggrecan structure can be altered by culture conditions. GDF6 treatment promoted the synthesis of more intact monomers, with greater over all molecular area. Conflicts of interest: None. Funding: Impact Research Scholarship and the Presidents Doctoral Scholarship, provided by the University of Manchester

Aims

The primary aim was to determine the influence of COVID-19 on 30-day mortality following hip fracture. Secondary aims were to determine predictors of COVID-19 status on presentation and later in the admission; the rate of hospital acquired COVID-19; and the predictive value of negative swabs on admission.

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess the independent association of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative mortality for patients undergoing orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The secondary aim was to identify factors that were associated with developing COVID-19 during the postoperative period.

Aims

The primary aim was to assess the independent influence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on 30-day mortality for patients with a hip fracture. The secondary aims were to determine whether: 1) there were clinical predictors of COVID-19 status; and 2) whether social lockdown influenced the incidence and epidemiology of hip fractures.

The ability to edit DNA at the nucleotide level using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems is a relatively new investigative tool that is revolutionizing the analysis of many aspects of human health and disease, including orthopaedic disease. CRISPR, adapted for mammalian cell genome editing from a bacterial defence system, has been shown to be a flexible, programmable, scalable, and easy-to-use gene editing tool. Recent improvements increase the functionality of CRISPR through the engineering of specific elements of CRISPR systems, the discovery of new, naturally occurring CRISPR molecules, and modifications that take CRISPR beyond gene editing to the regulation of gene transcription and the manipulation of RNA. Here, the basics of CRISPR genome editing will be reviewed, including a description of how it has transformed some aspects of molecular musculoskeletal research, and will conclude by speculating what the future holds for the use of CRISPR-related treatments and therapies in clinical orthopaedic practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):351–359.

Aims

The primary aim of the survey was to map the current provision of simulation training within UK and Republic of Ireland (RoI) trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) specialist training programmes to inform future design of a simulation based-curriculum. The secondary aims were to characterize; the types of simulation offered to trainees by stage of training, the sources of funding for simulation, the barriers to providing simulation in training, and to measure current research activity assessing the educational impact of simulation.