Aims. Manual impaction, with a mallet and introducer, remains the standard method of installing cementless acetabular cups during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to quantify the accuracy and precision of manual impaction strikes during the seating of an acetabular component. This understanding aims to help improve impaction surgical techniques and inform the development of future technologies. Methods. Posterior approach THAs were carried out on three cadavers by an expert orthopaedic surgeon. An instrumented mallet and introducer were used to insert cementless acetabular cups. The motion of the mallet, relative to the introducer, was analyzed for a total of 110 strikes split into low-, medium-, and high-effort strikes. Three parameters were extracted from these data: strike vector, strike offset, and mallet face alignment. Results. The force vector of the mallet strike, relative to the introducer axis, was misaligned by an average of 18.1°, resulting in an average wasted strike energy of 6.1%. Furthermore, the mean strike offset was 19.8 mm from the centre of the introducer axis and the mallet face, relative to the introducer strike face, was misaligned by a mean angle of 15.2° from the introducer strike face. Conclusion. The direction of the impact vector in manual impaction lacks both accuracy and precision. There is an opportunity to improve this through more advanced impaction instruments or surgical training. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(4):193–200

It is not unusual for patients prior to their total hip arthroplasty (THA) to indicate that their symptoms worsen with certain meteorological conditions. However, the prevalence and evolution of weather-related pain (WRP) following THA remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of WRP both before and after primary THA, to assess the impact of THA on pre-existing WRP, and to identify potential risk factors associated with WRP. An in-person survey was conducted on 442 primary THAs, in 327 consecutive patients at the time of their postoperative follow-up. Each patient was assessed using a questionnaire specifically designed to address weather-related joint pain before and after their THA. The clinical evaluation included patient-reported outcome scores (PROMS). Preoperatively, 17% of THA hips experienced WRP, with 71% achieving complete resolution postoperatively (p < 0.001). In patients with WRP in multiple joints and their hip, the THA failed to alleviate the WRP in 31% of the cases. In addition, 8% of the THA patients developed de-novo WRP after surgery. Although the overall prevalence of WRP in hips post-THA was 12%, the prevalence was 29% in hips with WRP preoperatively and 31% in the hips of patients with WRP in multiple joints as well as their hip. WRP in other joints, the initial diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), and age were correlated with WRP following THA. WRP is not uncommon prior to and after THA. Although THA can effectively alleviate WRP in specific patient populations, it does not universally eliminate preoperative WRP or prevent the emergence of new WRP after surgery

Aims. The aim of this study was to understand the experience of mature patients who undergo a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), a major hip-preserving surgical procedure that treats symptomatic hip dysplasia by realigning the acetabulum. Our aim was to improve our understanding of how the operation affected the lives of patients and their families, with a long-term goal of improving their experience. Methods. We used a phenomenological approach with in-depth, semi-structured interviews to investigate the experience of seven female patients, aged between 25 and 40 years, who underwent a PAO. A modified homogeneity sampling approach coupled with criterion sampling was used. Inclusion criteria involved having at least one child at home and being in a committed relationship with a spouse or partner. Results. Analysis of interview transcripts revealed five major themes: feelings of frustration before having a treatment plan; fear of the operation; the importance of understanding the procedure in order to feel in control of their care; feelings of helplessness, dependence, and depression during recovery; and the need for support during recovery. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that both the physical and psychosocial burdens of undergoing a PAO are great, with a major impact on the patient and their family. Many important issues lie outside the scope of what healthcare teams currently address. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):781–785

There is little known about how patient socioeconomic status impacts clinical outcomes in hip preservation surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between indices of multiple deprivation, funding provider (NHS Funded or Private Funded) and clinical outcomes following surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The study analysed the data of 5590 patients recorded in the NAHR who underwent primary hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI between November 2013 and July 2023. Records were matched to the UK National index of multiple deprivation using the lower layer super output area. Using iHOT12 score, patient reported outcome measures were analysed at base line and 1 year following surgery. 2358 records were matched to LLSOA deciles. Between the lowest (most deprived) 3 deciles and the highest (least deprived) the average baseline iHOT12 score was 28.98 (n=366) and 35.33 (n=821). The proportion of patients receiving treatment through NHS funding compared to independent funding for the most deprived, 292 (90%) 37 (10%) respectively compared to the least deprived 515 (70%) and 244 (30%) respectively. At 1year, iHOT12 scores for each group were 51.64 (29.1 SD) compared to 61.5 (28.06 SD) respectively. The study demonstrates that patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had poorer baseline and one-year post-surgery iHOT12 scores compared to those from higher socioeconomic strata. Furthermore, a higher reliance on NHS funding was observed among the most deprived, while more affluent patients predominantly opted for private funding. These findings underscore the significant influence of socioeconomic status on both the quality of healthcare received and recovery outcomes in hip preservation surgery, calling attention to the need for more equitable healthcare solutions

Recently, some smart media devices including portable accelerometers have been used to measure objective physical activity (OPA) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to longitudinally assess OPA changes in patients who underwent THA using a compact triaxial accelerometer and to investigate the impact of this recovery process on patient-reported outcomes. This prospective cohort study involved 163 consecutive patients who had unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip and were followed up for 12 months after THA. There were 132 women and 31 men with average age of 66 years. OPA was measured using a compact triaxial accelerometer preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. This study investigated the recovery process of OPA in four patient groups classified by the median of age and preoperative activity levels (younger and higher activity (YH), younger and lower activity (YL), older and higher activity (OH), and older and lower activity (OL)), and examined its impact on patient-reported outcomes, including forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12). The target period for regaining preoperative activity levels was approximately 3 months for patients with lower preoperative activity, and about 6 months for those with higher preoperative activity. The OPA at 12 months postoperatively was higher in the patients with higher preoperative activity levels than in those with lower preoperative activity levels. In patients with higher preoperative activity levels, FJS-12 scores significantly increased between 6 and 12 months postoperatively (p=0.018). FJS-12 at 12 months postoperatively was best in YH (81.7±18.9), followed by YL (73.5±22.9), OH (73.2±17.4), and OL (66.3±21.8). Differences in the recovery process of postoperative activity levels impacted the duration required for improvement in FJS-12 scores. These results can serve as indicators for setting activity goals in patients undergoing THA

Aims. The aim of this study is to report the long-term outcomes of instrumented femoral revisions with impaction allograft bone grafting (IBG) using the X-change femoral revision system at 30 years after introduction of the technique. Methods. We updated the outcomes of our previous study, based on 208 consecutive revisions using IBG and the X-change femoral revision system in combination with a cemented polished stem, performed in our tertiary care institute between 1991 and 2007. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to determine the survival rate of the revisions with endpoint revision for any reason and aseptic loosening. Secondary outcomes were radiological loosening and patient-reported outcome measures. Results. Mean age at revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) was 64.9 years (30 to 86). The most prevalent diagnosis for the femoral revision was aseptic loosening. At review in May 2021, 81 patients (85 hips) were still alive and 118 patients (120 hips; 58%) had died. Three patients (3 hips; 1%) were lost to follow-up at 11, 15, and 16 years after surgery, respectively. Data of all deceased and lost patients were included until final follow-up. The mean follow-up was 13.4 years (0 to 28). During the follow-up, 22 re-revisions were performed. The most common reason for re-revision was infection (n = 12; 54%). The survival with endpoint re-revision for any reason was 86% (95% confidence interval (CI) 79 to 91) at 20 years and 74% (95% CI 43 to 89) at 25 years after surgery. The survival for endpoint re-revision for aseptic loosening was 97% (95% CI 91 to 99) after both 20 and 25 years. Conclusion. We conclude that femoral IBG is a valuable technique that can reconstitute femoral bone loss in the long term. After 25 years of follow-up, few re-revisions for aseptic loosening were required. Also, the overall revision rate is very acceptable at a long follow-up. This technique is especially attractive for younger patients facing femoral revisions with extensive bone loss. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1039–1046

Alcohol hand rubs, endorsed by WHO and NICE guidelines, are integral to modern surgical practices. Our objective was to assess how different scrubbing methods impact overall water usage by the surgical team, shedding light on variations among team members and their environmental implications. Over three consecutive arthroplasty lists spanning a week, water usage during scrubbing was observed for the operating team. Blinding all team members, including the anesthetist, consultant surgeon, orthopaedic registrar, orthopaedic SHO, and scrub nurse, during water usage calculations was implemented. Automated taps, using motion sensors, posed a challenge due to variable water quantity, necessitating water flow calculations per sensor movement. The senior surgeon, with over 20 years of experience, follows a traditional approach, starting with a morning prescrub and using an alcohol tub for each case, except when hands are soiled. We observed a total of 14 cases of lower limb primary arthroplasty. The cumulative water usage for scrubbing by the entire team was 193 liters, yielding a mean of 13.8 liters (±1.85) per case. The anaesthetist demonstrated the most conservative water usage, utilizing a total of 11.85 liters with a mean of 0.84 liters per case. Notably, alcohol rub was employed for half of the observed time, contributing to this efficient use. The senior operating surgeon used a total of 15.6 liters, averaging 1.1 liters per case. In contrast, the SHO and the registrar exhibited the highest water consumption, totaling 121.6 liters and yielding a mean of 5.7 liters per case. The nurses’ collective water usage for scrubbing amounted to 44.8 liters. Adopting alcohol rub, as endorsed by WHO, results in a remarkable 10-fold reduction in water usage, aligning with global health guidelines. This highlights significant potential for resource conservation in surgical procedures, presenting a practical and environmentally conscious approach to surgical scrubbing practices

Dislocations have impact on quality of life, but it is difficult to quantify this impact for each patient. The Quality-of-Life Time Trade-Off assesses the percentage of a patient's remaining life that the patient would be willing to trade for perfect health [1]. This technique has been used for non-unions [2], but never proposed for dislocation. 154 patients (with 3 recurrent dislocations) undergoing revision were asked to choose between living with their associated dislocation risk or trading a portion of their life expectancy for a period of perfect health without dislocation, thus determining their Quality-of-Life score. This score may range from 0.1 (willing to trade nine years among 10) to 1.0 (unwilling to trade any years). Additionally, patients were assessed on their willingness to trade implant survival time for a reduced risk of dislocation, considering various implant options that might offer lower (but not necessary) survival time before revision than the theoretical best (for the surgeon) “standard” implant, thus determining a “Survival Implant Quality” score. Patients diagnosed with 3 hip dislocations have a low health-related quality of life. The score of our “dislocation” cohort was average 0.77 with patients willing to trade average 23% of remaining lifespan for perfect health (range 48% to 12%). This score is below that (0.88) of illnesses type-I diabetes mellitus [3] and just higher than tibial non-union (0.68) score [2]. The mean “Survival Implant Quality” score of our recurrent dislocation cohort was 0.71 (range 0.59 to 0.78) which means that patients accept to trade average 3 years (range 2 to 4 years) among 10 theoretical years of survival of the implant. Hip dislocation has a devastating impact that can be quantified for each patient when discussing revision and choice of implants for instability. For references, please contact the author directly

Following the establishment of regional Major Trauma Networks in England in 2012, there were concerns that pressures regarding resource allocation in Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) may have a detrimental impact on the care of patients with hip fractures in these hospitals. This study aimed to compare outcomes in hip fracture care between MTCs and trauma units (TUs). National Hip Fracture Database data was extracted from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2022 for all hospitals in England. Outcome measures included perioperative medical and physiotherapy assessments, time to surgery, consultant supervision in theatre, Best Practice Tariff (BPT) compliance, discharge to original residence, and mortality. Data was pooled and weighted for MTCs and remaining hospitals (TUs). A total of 487,089 patients with hip fractures were included from 167 hospitals (23 MTCs and 144 TUs). MTCs achieved marginally higher rates of orthogeriatrician assessment within 72 hours of admission (91.1% vs 90.4%, p<0.001) and mobilisation out of bed by first postoperative day (81.9% vs 79.7%, p<0.001). A lower proportion of patients underwent surgery by the day after admission in MTCs (65.2% vs 69.7%, p<0.001). However, there was significantly higher consultant surgeon and anaesthetist supervision rates during surgery in MTCs (71.8% vs 61.6%, p<0.001). There was poorer compliance with BPT criteria in MTCs (57.3% vs 60.4%, p<0.001), and proportionately fewer MTC patients were discharged to their original residence (63.5% vs 60.4%, p<0.001). There was no difference between MTCs and TUs in 30-day mortality (6.8% vs 6.8%, p=0.825). This study demonstrates that MTCs have greater difficulty in providing prompt surgery to hip fracture patients. However, their marginally superior perioperative care outcomes appear to compensate for this, as their mortality rates are similar to TUs. These findings suggest that the regionalisation of major trauma in England has not significantly compromised the overall care of hip fracture patients

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have benefits for hospitals and uptake in the UK is increasing. The National Joint Registry (NJR) monitors implant and surgeon performance and relies on accuracy of data. NJR data are used for identification of potential outliers for both mortality and revision; analyses are adjusted for age, sex, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA) and cases with some indications are excluded from analyses. In October 2020, the Royal Devon University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust “went live” on an EHR, almost eradicating paper from the Trust. This included stopping use of paper NJR forms by creating a bespoke electronic template. We sought to identify discrepancies between operation notes and data input to the NJR in variables that may influence potential outlier analyses. Data input to the NJR from 15/10/2020 to 18/10/2022 for hip procedures were provided by NEC Software Solutions. NJR data were compared to those recorded on operation notes. There were 1067 hip procedures recorded in the NJR (946 primary THRs). Of the primary THRs, discrepancies in indication between NJR and operation note were identified in 139 (15%) cases. Common discrepancies included cases being recorded as osteoarthritis where the true indication was acute trauma (n=63), avascular necrosis (n=14), metastatic cancer/malignancy (n=6) and 21 cases with no recorded indication. We identified 88 cases where the ASA recorded in the NJR differed from the anaesthetic chart. Other inaccuracies were identified including 23 cases missing type of procedure (e.g., primary or revision) and one where revision surgery had been recorded as primary. We identified at least 83 cases that should have been excluded from NJR mortality analyses but were not. Given the low incidence of mortality following primary THR, these cases (with increased risk of death) have the potential to incorrectly identify the hospital as a potential outlier. Discrepancies in ASA may also impact on both revision and mortality outlier calculations. We urge caution to hospitals in the implementation of EHRs and advise regular audit of data sent to the NJR

We determined the impact of deprivation and frailty at the time of diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis (OA) on the likelihood of receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA). We used routinely collected primary care data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics. Frailty was assessed at the time of hip OA diagnosis using a validated frailty index based on coded data in the primary care record and categorised as fit, mild, moderate, and severe frailty. The association between quintile of index of multiple deprivation (IMD), frailty category and likelihood of receiving THA was assessed in separate Cox regression models, adjusted for year of OA diagnosis, age, and sex. 104,672 individuals with hip OA contributed. Compared to those in the first quintile of IMD (least deprived), those in the fourth and fifth quintile of IMD (most deprived), respectively, were less likely to receive THA, hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI), 0.92 (0.89, 0.95) and 0.80 (0.77, 0.83). Increasing frailty at OA diagnosis was associated with reduced likelihood of receiving THA. Compared to fit individuals, the HR (95% CI) for receiving THA among those with: mild frailty was 0.80 (0.78, 0.82); moderate frailty was 0.60 (0.58, 0.62); and severe frailty was 0.42 (0.39, 0.45). Increasing deprivation was associated with increasing frailty at the time of hip OA diagnosis, independent of age, sex, and year of OA diagnosis. However, those in the two most deprived quintiles were still less likely to receive THA after additionally adjusting for frailty category. Greater deprivation and greater frailty were associated with lower likelihood of receiving THA among people with hip osteoarthritis. Greater frailty among those most deprived did not explain the reduced likelihood of receiving THA among those most deprived

We determined the association between frailty and 30-day mortality following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the impact of THA on 30-day mortality compared to a control population. We used primary care data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), linked secondary care data (Hospital Episode Statistics) and Office for National Statistics mortality data. Frailty was assessed using a validated frailty index based on coded data in the primary care record and categorised as fit, mild, moderate, and severe frailty. The association between frailty and 30-day mortality following THA due to osteoarthritis was assessed using Cox regression, adjusted for year of birth, sex, quintile of index of multiple deprivation and year of surgery. Mortality following THA was also compared to a control population who had osteoarthritis but no previous THA, matched on year of birth, sex, and quintile of index of multiple deprivation. 103,563 cases who had a THA and their matched controls contributed data. Among those who had THA, compared to fit participants, 30-day mortality increased with increasing frailty; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) among mild frailty, 0.87 (0.66, 1.15); moderate frailty 1.73 (1.26, 2.38); and severe frailty, 2.85 (1.84, 4.39). Compared to fit controls who did not have surgery, 30-day mortality was higher among fit people who had THA, adjusted HR 1.60 (1.15, 2.21). There was, however, no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality among cases with mild, moderate and severe frailty compared to controls in the same frailty category. Among people who had THA, 30-day mortality increased with increasing frailty. While 30-day mortality was increased among fit individuals who had THA compared to fit controls who did not have surgery, there did not appear to be increased mortality among individuals with mild, moderate or severe frailty compared to controls in the same frailty category. A healthy surgery (selection) effect may have impacted on the comparison of mortality among cases and controls

The purpose of this study is to understand the lived experience of mature patients who undergo a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), a major surgical procedure that treats symptomatic hip dysplasia by realigning the acetabulum. Our aim was to better understand how the PAO impacted the lives of the patients and their families, with a long-term goal of improving the experience. We utilized a phenomenological approach with in-depth, semi-structured interviews to investigate the experience of seven women, ages 25–40, who underwent a PAO. A modified intensity sampling method coupled with criterion sampling was used. Inclusion criteria included raising at least one child and being in a committed relationship with a partner. Analysis of interview transcripts revealed eight themes, each of which falls into one of three chronological periods. From the start of dysplasia symptoms until meeting the PAO surgeon: (1) frustration with symptoms disrupting daily activities, (2) discouragement from misdiagnoses and lack of explanation for symptoms, and (3) fear of the PAO operation. During the PAO decision-making process: (1) the importance of education regarding the PAO procedure and full understanding of its purpose, and (2) the utility of social media to learn from past PAO patients in order to feel more confident about the decision to undergo PAO. Post-operation through recovery: (1) feelings of helplessness, isolation and difficulty asking for help, (2) relying heavily on family and/or close friends for assistance, and (3) desire for more support and communication from the healthcare team. Our findings suggest that the psychosocial burden of PAO surgery is great, with major impact on the patient and family. Many important issues lie outside the scope of what healthcare teams currently address

Hip fracture principally affects the frailest in society, many of whom are care dependent, and are disproportionately at risk of contracting COVID-19. We examined the impact of COVID-19 infection on hip fracture mortality in England. We conducted a cohort study of patients with hip fracture recorded in the National Hip Fracture Database between 1st February 2019 and 31st October 2020, in England. Data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics to quantify patient characteristics and comorbidities, Office for National Statistics mortality data, and Public Health England's SARS-CoV-2 testing results. Multivariable Cox regression examined determinants of 90-day mortality. Excess mortality attributable to COVID-19 was quantified using Quasi-Poisson models. Analysis of 102,900 hip fractures (42,630 occurring during the pandemic) revealed that amongst those with COVID-19 infection at presentation (n=1,120) there was a doubling of 90-day mortality; hazard ratio (HR) 2.05 (95%CI 1.86–2.26), while for infections arising between 8–30 days after presentation (n=1,644) the figure was even higher at 2.52 (2.32–2.73). Malnutrition [1.44 (1.19–1.75)] and non-operative treatment [2.89 (2.16–3.86)] were the only modifiable risk factors for death in COVID-19 positive patients. Patients with previous COVID-19 initially had better survival compared to those who contracted COVID-19 around the time of their hip fracture; however, survival rapidly declined and by 365 days the combination of hip fracture and COVID-19 infection was associated with a 50% mortality rate. Between 1st January and 30th June 2020, 1,273 (99.7%CI 1,077–1,465) excess deaths occurred within 90 days of hip fracture, representing an excess mortality of 23% (20%–26%), with most deaths occurring within 30 days. COVID-19 infection more than doubled early hip fracture mortality; the first 30-days after injury were most critical, suggesting that targeted interventions in this period may have most benefit in improving survival

In March 2020, the World Health Organisation declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. Multiple new guidelines were proposed and existing models of social, domestic and hospital care altered. Most healthcare systems were largely unprepared for this and this pandemic has tested their adaptability. This study is aimed at assessing the impact of covid-19 on the demographics, presentation and clinical management of patients with proximal femoral (hip) fractures. This retrospective multi-centre cohort study compared all patients admitted with hip fractures, between 1. st. March and 30th May 2019 (Group PC: Pre-Covid) with hip fracture patients admitted over the same time period during the pandemic in 2020 (Group C: Covid). The data was obtained from the hospitals' local and National Hip Fracture Databases. Mortality data was checked with the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Primary outcomes were time to theatre, in-patient length of stay and 30-day mortality. 580 patients were included (304 PC, 276 C). Patient Charlson comorbidity index and Nottingham Hip Fracture scores were broadly similar across the two cohorts. There was a significant reduction in percentage of total hip replacements in Group C (11% to 5%, p=0.006). There was an increase in conservative management in group C (1% to 5%, p=0.002). The time to theatre was significantly delayed in Group C (43.7 hours C versus 34.6 hours PC, p<0.001). Overall length of hospital stay was similar in both groups (16.6 days PC versus 15 days C, p=0.089). 30-day mortality rate in Group C was 9.8% compared to 8.2% in Group PC (p=0.431), but for covid (+) patients it was significantly higher at 38.2% versus 5.8% in covid (−) patients (p<0.001). This is one of the largest multi-centre comparative cohort study in the literature to date, examining the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the management of hip fracture patients. Whilst mortality rates were similar in both groups, covid patients were almost seven times more likely to die, reflecting the seriousness of the covid-19 infection and its sequelae in such elderly, vulnerable patients

Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most common and cost-effective elective surgical procedures. In the National Health Service (NHS) of England and Wales a myriad of implants for THR are offered at a variety of locally negotiated prices. This study aims to estimate the total burden of elective THR to the NHS, expenditure on implants, and different scenarios of cost changes if implant selection changed for different patient groups. Using National Joint Registry (NJR) data and NHS reference costs, we estimated the number and expenditure of NHS funded primary and revision THR in the 10-year period 2008–2017 and forecasted the number and expenditure on THR over the next decade. Using NJR average NHS Trust prices for the different implant combinations we estimated the average cost of implants used in THRs and estimated the budget impact on NHS providers from switching to alternative implants. The NHS spent over £4.76 billion performing 702,381 THRs between 2008–2017. The average cost of implants was £1,260 per surgery, almost a fifth of the cost of primary THR. Providing cemented implant combinations in primary elective THRs may potentially save up to £281 million over the next 10 years, whilst keeping 10-year revision risks low. The NHS is likely to spend over £5.6 billion providing primary elective THR over the next decade. There are efficiency savings to realise in the NHS by switching to more cost-effective implant combinations available for patients undergoing primary elective THR surgery, but these will need to be balanced against the risks inherent to a change in selection of implants and surgical practice. The HIPPY programme will be conducting practice surveys, discrete choice experiments and a large randomised controlled trial of cemented, uncemented and hybrid fixation in THR for patients under 70 to answer uncertainties

Aims. Femoral impaction bone grafting was first developed in 1987 using morselised cancellous bone graft impacted into the femoral canal in combination with a cemented, tapered, polished stem. We describe the evolution of this technique and instrumentation since that time. . Patients and Methods. Between 1987 and 2005, 705 revision total hip arthroplasties (56 bilateral) were performed with femoral impaction grafting using a cemented femoral stem. All surviving patients were prospectively followed for a mean of 14.7 years (9.8 to 28.3) with no loss to follow-up. By the time of the final review, 404 patients had died. Results. There were 76 further revisions (10.8%) involving the stem; seven for aseptic loosening, 23 for periprosthetic fracture, 24 for infection, one for malposition, one for fracture of the stem and 19 cement-in-cement exchanges of the stem during acetabular revision. The 20-year survival rate for the entire series was 98.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.8 to 99.8) with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, and 87.7% (95% CI 82.8 to 92.6) for revision for any reason. Survival improved with the evolution of the technique, although this was not statistically significant due to the overall low rate of further revision. Conclusion. This is the largest series of revision total hip arthroplasties with femoral impaction grafting, and the results support the continued use of this technique. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1611–19

Aims. The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic forced an unprecedented period of challenge to the NHS in the UK where hip fractures in the elderly population are a major public health concern. There are approximately 76,000 hip fractures in the UK each year which make up a substantial proportion of the trauma workload of an average orthopaedic unit. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hip fracture care service and the emerging lessons to withstand any future outbreaks. Methods. Data were collected retrospectively on 157 hip fractures admitted from March to May 2019 and 2020. The 2020 group was further subdivided into COVID-positive and COVID-negative. Data including the four-hour target, timing to imaging, hours to operation, anaesthetic and operative details, intraoperative complications, postoperative reviews, COVID status, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), length of stay, postoperative complications, and the 30-day mortality were compiled from computer records and our local National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) export data. Results. Hip fractures and inpatient falls significantly increased by 61.7% and 7.2% respectively in the 2020 group. A significant difference was found among the three groups regarding anaesthetic preparation time, anaesthetic time, and recovery time. The mortality rate in the 2020 COVID-positive group (36.8%) was significantly higher than both the 2020 COVID-negative and 2019 groups (11.5% and 11.7% respectively). The hospital stay was significantly higher in the COVID-positive group (mean of 24.21 days (SD 19.29)). Conclusion. COVID-19 has had notable effects on the hip fracture care service: hip fracture rates increased significantly. There were inefficiencies in theatre processes for which we have recommended the use of alternate theatres. COVID-19 infection increased the 30-day mortality and hospital stay in hip fractures. More research needs to be done to reduce this risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:530–540

Aims. This single-centre observational study aimed to describe the results of extensive bone impaction grafting of the whole acetabular cavity in combination with an uncemented component in acetabular revisions performed in a standardized manner since 1993. Methods. Between 1993 and 2013, 370 patients with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 79 years) underwent acetabular revision surgery. Of these, 229 were more than ten years following surgery and 137 were more than 15 years. All revisions were performed with extensive use of morcellized allograft firmly impacted into the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented component with supplementary screw fixation. All types of reoperation were captured using review of radiographs and medical charts, combined with data from the local surgical register and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Results. Among patients with possible follow-up of ten and 15 years, 152 and 72 patients remained alive without revision of the acetabular component. The number of deaths was 61 and 50, respectively. Of those who died, six patients in each group had a reoperation performed before death. The number of patients with a reoperation was 22 for those with ten-year follow-up and 21 for those with 15 years of follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier implant survival rate for aseptic loosening among all 370 patients in the cohort was 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1 to 98.5) after ten years and 92.8% (95% CI 89.2 to 96.6) after 15 years. Conclusion. Extensive bone impaction grafting combined with uncemented revision components appears to be a reliable method with favourable long-term survival. This technique offers the advantage of bone stock restoration and disputes the long-standing perception that uncemented components require > 50% of host bone contact for successful implant survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):198–204

Aims. The aim of this study was to report the medium-term outcomes of impaction bone allograft and fibular grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and to define the optimal indications. Methods. A total of 67 patients (77 hips) with ONFH were enrolled in a single centre retrospective review. Success of the procedure was assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and rate of revision to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk factors were studied, including age, aetiology, duration of hip pain, as well as two classification systems (Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) and Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) systems). Results. After a mean follow-up period of 8.61 years (SD 1.45), 81.3% (52/64) of enrolled cases had a good or excellent HHS at latest follow-up (declining to 76.0% (38/50) for those with more than eight years of follow-up). Overall survival was 92.1% at eight years’ follow-up (95% CI 83.2% to 96.4%). A total of 12 hips (19.0%) failed (reoperation or HHS < 70 points) at final follow-up. Rate of success was adversely affected by increasing age, duration of pain, and more severe disease as measured using the ARCO and JIC classifications, but not by aetiology of the ONFH. Conclusion. We report favourable medium-term results of this procedure. Best outcomes can be expected in patients matching the following indications: younger than 40 years; less 12-month hip pain before surgery; femoral head collapse being less than 2 mm; and integrated lateral wall of femoral head. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):838–844