The goal of this paper is to compare the results and complication namely infection rates, of the techniques of Standard Ilizarov lengthening, lengthening over nail (LON) and lengthening then nailing (LTN) utilizing a standard nail (STD) and a special nail with a core of cement releasing antibiotics (SAFE). In a first study done between 1993 and 2008, we have compared 25 patients treated with lengthening with a Ilizarov frame (LIF) with 26 patients where a standard nail was used to do a lengthening over nail technique (LON). From 2009 and 2012 we have utilized the SAFE nail in 17 patients to perform lengthening over nail (SAFE-LON) and lengthening then nailing (SAFE-LTN) techniques. 7 patients had a pseudarthrosis, 5 a malconsolidation with shortening and or axial deviation and 5 a bone loss after infection of total knee replacements. We used a lengthening over nail in 4 cases, a lengthening and axial correction then nailing in three, acute compression and proximal lengthening then nailing in five patients and knee arthrodesis and femoral or tibial lengthening then nailing in another 5 cases. We have used a Ilizarov frame in all cases. We found that with LON technique, the external fixation time was 3 times lower, promoting the recovery of full range of knee mobility in half the time, comparatively with LIF technique, with statistically very significant differences. We found a rate of 30% of intercurrences on the LON group and 24% in the Ilizarov, difference that was not statistically significant. 3 patients got bone infection after LON technique, a rate of 11.5%. Late consolidation and fracture of regenerate appeared only in the Ilizarov technique group, whereas in the LON technique we had 3 cases of premature consolidation of the regenerate. In the SAFE-LON and SAFE-LTN techniques utilizing the SAFE nail with antibiotics, we found a decrease of the overall intercurrence rate from 30% to 12% and namely, bone infection was cured or didn't appeared after nailing with this new device in all cases. LON and LTN techniques are somehow more demanding, but much more comfortable for the patient, which need to carry the frame for less time, It permits an earlier return to activity, about half the time, it controls better delayed regenerate and its fracture does not increase complication rate and costs of treatment and prevents infection when converting from external to internal fixation

Aim. To delineate which of four common and easily constructed Ilizarov frame configurations is best at resisting shear displacement. Methods. Four Ilizarov frames were constructed on Sawbones™ Tibiae taking into account soft tissue and neuro-vascular limitations in frame design. The designs consisted of a standard all wire frame, an opposing olive wire standard frame, a perpendicular trans-fracture opposing olive wire frame and a perpendicular half pin frame. These were tested over three cycles in compression on a load-testing machine with movement in the plane of the fracture measured using a clip gauge. Each frame was tested to the maximum displacement of the clip gauge or a total single cycle compressive load of 700N, whichever limit occurred first. Results. The perpendicular trans-fracture olive wire frame showed the least displacement in shear. The half pin frame, followed by the opposing olive standard frame and finally the all wire frame were least stable to shear displacement. Conclusion. For this fracture pattern, this study recommends the use of the perpendicular trans-fracture olive wire frame. Further investigation of immediate post-operative limb loading in patients will allow practical application of this data. Further frame motion analysis and bending analysis will allow validation of these results and allow for future frame design. The next steps in this project involve validation against FE Analysis in order to create a design software to allow mechanical templating of frame designs pre-operatively

Introduction

By utilising the inherent variability achievable with circular frames, surgeons can manage a wide spectrum of complex injuries, and can deal with deformity at multiple levels, in multiple planes. The aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes utilising patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients being treated with circular (Ilizarov) frame fixation for complex lower limb injuries and assess these results in conjunction with the observed postoperative alignment of the patients’ limbs.

Introduction

The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of using Ilizarov technique for correcting the post traumatic lower limb deformities.

Introduction

The Ilizarov (IF) and Taylor Spatial (TSF) external fixator frames are commonly used to manage complex fractures and bone deformities and a dedicated Frame Service Team at our unit supports patients during pre- and post-operative period. Few studies have assessed the satisfaction of patients who have been treated with Circular frames.

Introduction. This study aims to evaluate the effect of using different types of fixator on the quality of callus and complications during distraction osteogenesis in patients with achondroplasia. Materials and Methods. Forty-nine achondroplasia patients with a minimum follow-up of 36 months who underwent limb lengthening between 2005 and 2017 with external fixator only were included. Thirty-three of the patients underwent lengthening using classical Ilizarov frame, while spatial frame used for sixteen. Regenerate quality is evaluated according to the Li classification on the X-ray taken one month after the end of the distraction. Complications were noted in the follow-up period. Results. The mean age at the time of surgery was 8,6 years. The mean external fixation index (EFI) was 34,3 and 30,1 day/cm for spatial frame and Ilizarov frame respectively. Mean follow-up period of 161,62 months and mean fixator period of 257 days. Amount of lengthening was 7,2 cm for Ilizarov frame, and 7,5 cm for spatial frame. Rate of callus with good morphological quality seen at consolidation was 72,4% and 50% for Ilizarov and spatial frames respectively. Two groups show similar results of complication rates in terms of pin site infection, premature fibular consolidation, regenerate fracture, plastic deformation, knee contracture. However fibular nonunion rates were higher for Ilizarov-type fixator. Conclusions. Although spatial frame with computer assistance brings easier follow-up for deformity correction, Ilizarov-type external fixator show slightly higher rates of good quality callus during consolidation for patients with achondroplasia

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Ilizarov frame fixation and total contact casting on the complications of Charcot arthropathy. The diabetic charcot foot or ankle is a potentially limb threatening disorder. This progressive disorder is characterised by osteopenia, bone fragmentation and joint subluxation. The risk of significant deformity and osteomyelitis lead to high rates of amputation in these patients. We analysed patients with acute charcot arthropathy attending the Rowley Bristow Unit between 2008 and 2012. We assessed 48 patients with a mean age of 59 years. Mean follow up was 24 months. 12 patients were managed with Ilizarov frame fixation and 36 using total contact casting. The duration of management was determined using serial infrared temperature monitoring to ensure the temperature of the limb normalised before patients were deemed safe to remove their immobilisation. The mean duration of Iliazarov frame fixation was 6.2 months and 5.3 months duration for total contact casting. In the Ilizarov group pin site infections were common and treated with a short course of antibiotics. In total one patient required below knee amputation following Ilizarov frame fixation. No patients suffered with osteomyelitis. We feel that prompt management of acute charcot arthropathy with either total contact casting where appropriate or Ilizarov frame fixation can reduce serious complications of this disorder

Humerus non-unions are difficult to treat, especially those with infected non-unions, bone loss, deformity, previous multiple surgeries and/or broken hardware. This paper presents our experience with the use of the Ilizarov frame with humerus non- unions. Eight consecutive humerus non-unions were treated using the Ilizarov frame. Only loose or infected hardware was removed. The Ilizarov frame was applied using safe zones principles of Ilizarov, Catagni and Paley. Aspetic non-unions were treated with deformity correction, sequential compression and distraction, bone grafting and intramedullary stabilisation for diaphyseal nonunions. Infected diaphyseal non-unions were treated intra-medullary reaming with or without excision of infected necrotic bone segment, followed by insertion of antibiotic cement rod and compression. Elbow spanning frames were avoided for supracondylar non-unions. Fine wire fixation of the distal fragment was preferred instead. Free elbow movement was allowed. There were two infected (diaphyseal) and six aseptic non-unions (four diaphyseal and two supracondylar) treated with this technique. Broken hardware was left in-situ in five cases. The average time from the index injury was 14 months, with each case having had an average of 3.2 procedures, prior to the application of the Ilizarov frame. Union was obtained in all cases. The average humerus shortening was 1.5 cm. There was no residual angular or rotational deformity. Infection was eliminated in both the infected non-unions. Primary bone grafting was used in all aseptic nonunions. Additional bone grafting was needed as a secondary procedure in four cases prior to frame removal. T he average time spent in the frame was 4.5 months. The Ilizarov method is a useful option for the management of complex humerus non-unions. Patients learn to tolerate the fixator and can achieve functional shoulder and elbow range with the fixator

Introduction. Traditionally, radiological union of fractures treated with an Ilizarov frame is confirmed by a period of dynamization - destabilisation of the frame for a period prior to removal. Reduced clinic availability during the COVID-19 pandemic caused a shift to selective dynamisation in our department, whereby lower risk patients had their frames removed on the same day as destabilisation. This study investigates the effects of this change in practice on outcomes and complication rates. Materials & Methods. Adult patients treated with circular frames between April 2020 and February 2022 were identified from our Ilizarov database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: - “dynamised” if their frame was destabilised for a period to confirm union prior to removal; or “not dynamised” if the decision was taken to remove the frame without a period of dynamisation, other than a short period in the clinic. A retrospective review of clinical notes was conducted to determine outcome. Results. 175 patients were included in the final analysis, 70 in the dynamised and 103 in the not dynamised groups, median follow-up was 33 months. 3 patients in the dynamised group failed dynamisation and had their period of fixation extended, subsequently having their frames removed without complication. Two patients suffered a refracture or non-union after frame removal in the dynamised group and none in the not dynamised group, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions. In our practice, selective frame removal without a period of dynamisation appears safe. This has the potential to shorten frame time and reduce the number of clinic appointments and radiographic investigations for these patients. Some patients find the period of dynamisation uncomfortable and associated with pin site infection, which can be avoided. We plan to continue this practice and collect further data to confirm these findings in a larger dataset

Aim. This study assessed quality of life (QoL) in patients having external fixation for treatment of osteomyelitis and fracture-related infection (OM/FRI). Method. Patients who had surgery for OM/FRI and who completed the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L or EQ-5D- 3L questionnaires, were identified between 2010 and 2020. Patients were followed-up for 2 years after surgery. QoL was compared between patients who had either an Ilizarov frame or a monolateral external fixator with those who did not receive external fixation. Results. 165 patients were included. Of these, 37 (22.4%) underwent application of external fixation which included 23 circular frames and 14 monolateral external fixators. Patients in the frame group had more BACH ‘Complex’ infections (34/37; 91.9%), compared to non-frame patients (57/81; 70.3%). Pre-operatively, the mean EQ-index score for patients planned to receive a frame (0.278 SD 0.427) was worse compared to other treatments (0.453 SD 0.338, p=0.083). At 6 weeks after surgery, the EQ-index score remained significantly lower in frame patients compared to non-frame patients (frame: 0.379 SD 0.363; no frame: 0.608 SD 0.326, p=0.016). By 6 months, 26/37 patients had undergone frame removal. The patients who had frames in situ at 6 months had lower EQ-index scores when compared to patients who had their frames removed (frame in situ: 0.187 SD 0.213; frame removed 0.674 SD 0.206, p=0.076). At one year, 36/37 (97.3%) patients had their frame removed. QoL had greatly improved, to levels similar to non-frame patients (no frame: 0.652 SD 0.357; frame removed: 0.657 SD 0.247, p=0.949). Conclusions. Frame treatment leads to significant improvement in Quality of Life in patients suffering from osteomyelitis, with similar results in EQ5D scores after 1 year compared to patients who did not need an external fixator. These effects cannot be felt until after the frame has been removed with impaired QoL during frame treatment, especially in those patients with frames in situ for more than 6 months. This underlines the need for close and professional patient support during frame treatment for bone infection

Introduction. Orthopaedic rehabilitation of adolescences and young adults with high dislocation of the femur is rather challenging. The role of palliative salvage procedures is controversial enough in the cohort of patients. Materials and Methods. Treatment outcomes of 10 patients with congenital hip dislocation were analyzed. Mean age at intervention was 17,8 years (15–22). The grade of dislocation were assessed according to Eftekhar: type C − 2, type D − 8. The mean baseline shortening was 4.7±0.36 cm. All subjects underwent PSO with the Ilizarov method. Another osteotomy for lengthening and realignment was produced at the boundary of the upper and middle third of the femur. The mean time in the Ilizarov frame was 5.3 months. Results. The mean follow-up was 2.6±.1 years (range, 15 to 32 years). Limb shortening of 1 cm to 1. 1. /. 2. cm was observed in four cases. Functional outcomes according to d'Aubigne-Postel were: Pain 4,4±0,15 points. ROM − 4,1±0,3 points. Walking ability − 4,5±0,2 points. Two cases had good results (15–17 points), and seven patients had fair outcomes (12–14 points). A poor result (7 points) was recorded in one female patient 28 years after PSO followed by THA. Conclusions. Hip reconstruction with the Ilizarov method can be used in specific clinical situations as an alternative salvage procedure to delay THR in young patients with high dislocation of the femur

Background. The new Fassier-Duval Telescopic IM System (FD-rod) has the advantage of a single entry point over the traditional telescopic rods such as the Bailey-Dubow or Sheffield rods. Although encouraging early results were presented by François Fassier, there is no formal publication in the literature as yet. Methods. The first 24 consecutive cases (age 1.5-12.5 years) with a minimum of 1 year follow-up (1-2.4 years) after femoral and/or tibial FD-rods were reviewed to assess complications involving migration, non-telescoping, joint intrusion, infections and re-operation rates in patients with Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI, 15 cases), congenital tibial pseudarthrosis (CPT) in Neurofibromatosis Type1 (NF1, 2 cases), and Epidermal Naevus syndrome (1 case). In 6 cases of patients with Hypophosphataemic Rickets FD-rods were combined with an Ilizarov frame. Results. The OI patient group had a 13% re-operation rate (2/15) for proximal rod migration and a 40% complication rate (6/15 cases): rod migration and limited telescoping (5), intra-operative joint intrusion (1). There were no infections. All NF1 CPT (2) and Epidermal Naevus syndrome (1) cases required several re-operations for non-union, loss of fixation, shortening (negative telescoping), migration and/or joint intrusion – mainly due to the severe underlying pathology with insufficient longitudinal or torsional stability and diminished healing capacity. The 6 cases with Hypophosphataemic Rickets, combined with Ilizarov frame fixation, had a 50% complication rate (3/6) and a 17% re-operation rate (1/6): 2 cases did not telescope and 1 case of peroneal neuropraxia required neurolysis. Conclusion. In our experience the technique of using Fassier-Duval rods is demanding and associated with some intra- and post-operative pitfalls. We are happy to continue its use in OI patients when there is longitudinal stability and sufficient bone healing. However, in circumstances of insufficient stability and bone healing potential, further stabilisation e.g. with an Ilizarov frame may be beneficial

Introduction. In my paediatric Orthopaedic practice I use Kirchner wires for the fixation of the TSF on bone. I noted a significant percentage of wire loosening during the post-operative period. The aim of this project was to establish the effectiveness of the wire clamping mechanism and find ways to reduce the incidence of wire loosening when using the TSF. Materials and Methods. In the first instance wire slippage was measured intra-operatively after the tensioner was removed using an intra-operative professional camera. Following this study mechanical tests were performed in the lab measuring the pull out properties of Kirchner wires using different bolts and different torque levels in order to tighten the wire on the fixator. Results. Our clinical study confirmed wire slippage intra-operatively immediately after the tensioner was removed. Wire slippage after the tensioner was removed was found to vary from 0.01 mm to 0.51 mm (mean 0.19 mm). Our mechanical tests showed that the ideal torque for tightening the wire on the frame using a bolt was around 15 N.m. A comparison between cannulated and slotted bolts suggested that cannulated bolts are more effective as a clamping mechanism. A comparison between aluminium made Taylor Spatial frame rings and stainless steel made Ilizarov rings suggested that the Taylor Spatial frame rings are more effective as part of a clamping mechanism. Conclusions. It is important that clinicians routinely measure the torque they use to clamp wires on circular external fixators. Clinicians and manufacturers are informed that the type of bolt used is important in maintaining wire tension. Manufacturers should design the ideal bolt which effectively grips the wire without the risk of fracture. The Ilizarov frame clamping mechanism can be effectively used with the Taylor Spatial frame

Introduction. Ashford and St Peter's Hospital (ASPH) is a district general hospital in Chertsey, Surrey. It is a tertiary referral unit offering a circular frame service to manage complex trauma patients in the South East of England. This study analyses the patient pathway in 66 consecutive tertiary referrals from 2015–2020. All patients were managed with an Ilizarov frame for either a tibial plateau fracture or pilon fracture. Materials and Methods. The patient journey of 66 consecutive tertiary referrals for tibial plateau and pilon fractures were analysed. The following data was captured: patient demographics; type of injury; referring centre; date of injury; date of referral; date of arrival at ASPH; date of surgery and date of discharge. Using this data we aimed to identify areas of the pathway that can be improved. In addition, the 66 patients were split into two groups of 33 patients. 33 patients were referred via an electronic referral platform and 33 patients were referred verbally prior to the implementation of the electronic referral platform. The groups were compared to see the impact of an electronic referral platform on the patient's journey. Results. Average age 45 (range 17–88 years), Male percentage 54.55%, 45 tibial plateau patients, 21 pilon patients. Injury to Admission at ASPH- 6 days (median), Injury to Surgery 8 days (median), Surgery to Discharge 4 days (median), Total stay in ASPH 6 days (median). Conclusions. The biggest delay in our tertiary referral pathway is from referral to arrival at ASPH. The implementation of an electronic referral pathway has not improved times from referral to arrival at ASPH. Ring fenced beds for tertiary referrals would be the greatest way to improve flow through the pathway and reduce the complications related to delayed surgery

The aim of the study is to evaluate how patients over 65 years of age cope with the Ilizarov method of treatment, compared with patients a decade younger. Two age groups were selected, 50–65 years versus 65 years and over. 20 consecutive patients were recruited for each group. SF36 scores were completed pre-operatively, at 6 weeks post op and 6 weeks post frame removal. 41 patients were recruited in total. Seven patients were lost to follow up – 2 died, 2 became too ill to continue with treatment, 3 did not complete the SF36. This left 34 patients. T test was used to analyse the results. Both age groups showed an equal and statistically significant drop in SF36 scores whilst the Ilizarov frame was on (p<0.01 for each group). After frame removal, SF36 in the >65 group was not significantly different to pre-operative values. In the younger group, SF36 after frame removal was still significantly lower than pre-operative values (p<0.01). Age makes no difference in how patients cope with the ilizarov frame during treatment. Older patients have low pre-injury function levels, but appear to return to this level quickly after frame removal. Younger patients do not recover pre-injury function in 6 weeks after completion of treatment

Introduction. Deformity influences the weight bearing stresses on the knee joint. Correction of mechanical alignment is performed to offload the knee and slow the rate of degenerative change. Fixator assisted deformity correction facilitates accurate correction prior to internal fixation. We present our results with standard Ilizarov and UNYCO system assisted deformity correction of the lower limb. Materials and Methods. Retrospective analysis of adult surgical cases of mechanical re-alignment performed between 2010 and 2019 in a tertiary referral centre. We recorded standard demographics and operative time from the electronic patient record. We analysed digitalised radiographs to record pre- and post-operative measurements of: Mechanical axis deviation (MAD), femoral tibial angle (FTA), Medial Proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA). The accuracy of the correction was analysed. Time to healing, secondary interventions and complications were also recorded. Results. 7 patients underwent fixator assisted deformity correction with the UNYCO system and 11 with a standard Ilizarov frame. Mean pre-op MAD was 45.8mm in the UNYCO group and 43.4mm in Ilazrov; Mean post-op MAD was 9.5mm in the UNYCO group (5–15) and 12.3 in the Ilizarov group (1–25) p=0.07. The average surgical time in the UNYCO group was 200 minutes (128–325) and 252 minutes (203–301) in the Ilizarov group p=0.07. The mean post op MPTA was 90.2 (87–96) in the UNYCO group and 87.4 (81–94) in the Ilizarov group. The mean mLDFA was 90.0(81–93.5) in the UNYCO group and 87.3(82.2–93.9) in the Ilizarov group. All the corrections involved a plate or nail fixation and mean time to union was 76.3 days in the UNYCO and 117.3 in the Ilizarov group. Conclusions. Both systems allowed accurate correction of deformity and limb alignment. In this small series we were unable to show a difference in theatre time. The application of the principles of deformity correction are as important as the surgical methods

UK Objective. To evaluate the technique of transverse debridement, acute shortening and subsequent distraction histiogenesis in the management of open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss thus avoiding the need for flap coverage. Methods. We present a retrospective review of 18 patients with Gustillo grade III open tibial fractures between 2006 and 2011. Initially managed with debridement to provide bony apposition through transverse wound excision. This allowed primary wound closure without tension, or mobilization of local muscle followed by split skin graft to provide cover. Temporary mono-lateral external fixation was utilized to allow soft tissue resuscitation, followed by Ilizarov frame for definitive fracture stabilization. In some cases it was possible to apply an Ilizarov frame at the time of initial debridement. Leg length discrepancy was subsequently corrected by corticotomy and distraction histiogenesis. Union was evaluated radiologically and clinically. Results. Mean age 36.4 years (18.4–59.2 years). Mean bone defect 3.5 cm (0.5–10 cm). Mean soft tissue defect 4.1 cm (1.8–10 cm). Mean follow up was 81 weeks (30–174 weeks). 16 fractures united, with a mean time to union of 38 weeks (24–79 weeks). There was one hypertrophic nonunion which united after a second frame. One patient was lost to follow up before fracture union. Three patients had pin site infections, two of which required intravenous antibiotics. One patient developed chronic osteomyelitis but manages with a discharging sinus. There were no amputations. Conclusion. Acute shortening followed by distraction histiogenesis is a safe method for the treatment of severe open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss. The technique also avoids the morbidity, cost and logistical issues associated with the use of local or free tissue flaps

Aim. The treatment of relapsed clubfeet presents a significant challenge. The Ilizarov method of gradual correction has been shown to provide satisfactory outcome. Since 2001 we have employed a newer differential soft tissue distraction using an Ilizarov frame in relapsed feet based on the Ponseti principles. The aim of our study was to analyse the outcome of this treatment. Material and Methods. All feet treated with soft tissue distraction only were studied. The feet were assessed using international clubfoot study group evaluation, pedobarography, and gait analysis, X-rays and ASK (activity scale for kids) questionnaire. Results. Out of 35 feet, 16 children with 27 feet attended for follow-up. The indications for surgery were failed multiple surgeries in 19 feet and failed Ponseti in 8 feet. The average age at operation was 5 years and the median follow-up was 5 years. The average duration of the frame was 5 months. Using international club foot scoring evaluation 25 feet scored ‘good’ and 2 scored ‘fair’. The pedobarography and gait analysis showed improvement when compared to the pre-operative assessment. The ASK functional questionnaire showed all 16 children were able to be independent most of the time. Grade 1 infection was noted in all cases. There were no physeal disruptions, growth arrest or joint subluxations. Five feet needed tibialis anterior transfer, 2 underwent supramalleolar osteotomy, 1 needed percutaneous tendo achilles lengthening and 1 needed scar revision as further surgical procedures. The deformity has recurred in 1 foot and is waiting for bony correction. Conclusion. We conclude that the Ponseti principles of soft tissue differential distraction with Ilizarov frame give reasonable results

Introduction. Ankle fusion presents a difficult problem in the presence of infection, inadequate soft tissue, poor bone stock and deformity. Nonunion and infection remains a problem even with internal fixation. Ilizarov frame provides an elegant solution to the problem with stable remote fixation while allowing lengthening, deformity correction and weight bearing. Patients and methods. Twenty-one consecutive patients were studied. The mean age at onset of disease was 52 years (range 4-70). Mean duration of the problem was 59.9 months (6-372). Aetiology included traumatic arthritis in 5, traumatic arthritis with osteomyelitis in 1, failed ankle fusion in 8, septic arthritis in 1, infected ankle fracture nonunion in 1, avascular necrosis of talus in 1, congenital deformity in 3 and failed ankle arthroplasty in 1. 15 patients had deformity of the ankle at the time of presentation. 15 of the 21 patients had either clinical or radiological evidence of infection. Treatment principles involved local excision, deformity correction with good alignment and soft tissue management. Static Compression was achieved with an Ilizarov frame while dynamic fixation was performed in 3 cases for lengthening. Antibiotics treatment was continued until union in the infected cases. On achieving union the frame was removed and a below knee cast was applied for 4 weeks. Results. Fusion was achieved in all cases at an average time of 5 months. One patient had below knee amputation for chronic pain. There was no recurrence of infection. Complications included pin site infection, lateral impingement, drug reaction and hind-foot pain. The results were assessed in terms of SF36 and Modified foot and ankle score. Conclusion. The Ilizarov ankle fusion is a reliable salvage procedure in difficult ankle problems

Early methods of treating high-energy tibial plateau fractures by open reduction and internal fixation led to high infection rates and complications. Alternative treatment methods include minimally invasive techniques and implants, external fixator stabilisation (monolateral and circular) and temporary external fixation followed by delayed definitive surgery. A clear understanding of the different fracture types is critical in achieving optimum results with minimally invasive techniques. The Chertsey classification system is based on the direction of force at the time of injury and helps with surgical planning. There are three groups: valgus, varus or axial fracture patterns. 124 tibial plateau fractures have been surgically treated in our hospital since 1995; there were 62 valgus, 14 varus and 48 axial type fracture patterns. Seventy-nine underwent open reduction with internal fixation, and forty-five had an Ilizarov frame. For valgus fractures the average IOWA knee score was 88 if internally fixed or 86 with an Ilizarov frame, range of motion was 140 and 131 degrees and time to union was 81 versus 126 days respectively. Varus fractures had an IOWA score of 83 (ORIF) and 95 (Ilizarov), ROM of 138 and 130 degrees and time to union of 95 versus 82 days. For axial fractures the average IOWA knee score was 85 (ORIF) compared to 82 (Ilizarov), the ROM was 124 degrees for both groups and time to union was 102 days and 141 days respectively. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 9% of cases with an Ilizarov and one patient required a total knee replacement for painful post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The infection rate for those internally fixed was 2.5%, three patients required a total knee replacement and 2.5% suffered a DVT. Our results are comparable to the literature and the Chertsey classification of tibial plateau fractures helps with surgical planning