Aim

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). As preoperative diagnosis can be difficult, some patients who undergo planned aseptic revision surgery might have positive intraoperative cultures and later be classified as infected. In this retrospective study we analyzed the influence of intraoperative positive cultures and possible underlying risk factors in patients undergoing planned aseptic THA revision.

INTRODUCTION

Trabecular Titanium is an open-cell regular structure composed by hexagonal cells of controlled pore, manufactured by Electron Beam Melting (EBM) technology, that allows moulding of cellular solid structures. The Lima Delta TT revision cups are One and Revision, which is characterized by a caudal hook and fins. Both allow internal modularity and cranial TT augments.

The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the short to medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular revision cups in TT.

Background:

Massive acetabular defects remain an unresolved challenge in revision arthroplasty surgery of the hip. We report on 7 patients treated with custom made acetabular components to manage these massive boney defects.

Large studies have reported high dislocation rates (7 to 24%) following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly when the revision is undertaken in the presence of pre-existing instability. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcome of 155 consecutive revision THA's that had been performed using an unconstrained dual-mobility acetabular implant. It features a mobile polyethylene liner articulating with both the prosthesis head and a metal acetabular cup, such that the liner acts as the femoral head in extreme positions. It can be implanted in either a press fit or cemented manner. Mean follow-up was 40 months (18–66) and average age 77 (42–89). Uncemented (n=122) and cemented (n=33) implants with a reinforcing cage, were used. Indications were aseptic loosening (n=113), recurrent instability (n=29), periprosthetic fracture (n=11) and sepsis (n=2). Three of the 155 cases (1.9%) dislocated within 6 weeks of surgery and were successfully managed with closed reduction. The 3 dislocations occurred in the groups revised for recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. There were no cases of recurrent dislocation and no revisions for implant failure. Despite a pantheon of options available, post-operative dislocation remains a challenge especially in patients with risk factors for instability. The use of large diameter heads is proven to improve stability but there are concerns regarding wear rates, metal toxicity and recurrent dislocation in the presence of abductor dysfunction. With constrained liners there are concerns regarding device failure and aseptic loosening due to implant overload. Our dislocation rates of 1.9% and survivorship to date compare favourably with alternative techniques and are also in line with studies from France using implants of a similar design. In our hands, where there are risk factors for dislocation, the use of a dual-mobility implant has been very effective at both restoring and maintaining stability in patients undergoing revision THA.

Background. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is the most frequently used implant in management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There is a known statistical relationship between a tip-apex distance (TAD) >25mm and higher rate of implant failure. Our aim was to analyse all DHS procedures performed in our trust from seventeen months and compare their TAD values to the acceptable standard of ≤25mm. Methods. All patients undergoing DHS between April 2020-August 2021 were identified from our theatre system. Additionally, those presenting to hospital with implant failures were included. Patient demographics, date of surgery, fracture classification (AO) and date/mode of failure were recorded. Intraoperative fluoroscopy images were reviewed to calculate TAD, screw location and neck shaft angles by two independent observers. Results. 215 patients were identified, five of which were excluded due to inadequate fluoroscopy. Failure was seen in 3.3% of the cohort (n=7), of which 71.4% had an unacceptable TAD. In total, 21 patients (10%) had TAD >25mm, of whom 12 had superiorly and 15 had posteriorly placed screws. There were no failures in patients with a TAD of <20mm whereas a TAD >30mm had 50% failure rate. Conclusion. This audit reinforces the importance of aiming for a low TAD (preferably <20mm) intraoperatively. It is also desirable to avoid superiorly and significantly posteriorly placed screws. Implications. Complex hip revision surgery in the elderly bears substantial financial implications to the NHS and, more importantly, causes prolonged morbidity to the patient. Adhering to established standards will ensure reduced implant failure and best patient care

Aim. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of unexpected intraoperative cultures on the outcome of total presumed aseptic knee and hip revision surgery. Method. Data regarding patients prospectively recruited in our center, who had undergone elective complete hip and knee revision surgery from January 2003 to July 2017 with a preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening was retrospectively reviewed. Partial revisions and patients with follow up below 60 months were excluded from the study. The protocol of revision included at least 3 intraoperative cultures. Failure was defined as the need for re-revision due to any-cause at 5 years and/or the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy. Results. A total of 608 cases were initially included in the study, 53 patients were excluded. 123 hip and 432 knee revision surgeries were included. 420 cases (75.7%) had all cultures negative, 114 (20.5%) a single positive culture or two of different microorganisms and 21 (3.8%) had at least 2 positive cultures for the same microorganism. Early failure was found in 4.8% (1/21) of the patients with missed low grade infection. The presence of positive cultures during total exchange was not associated with a higher failure rate than in those with negative cultures (44 of 420, 10.5%). In contrast, patients revised before 24 months had a significant higher rate of re-revision, 18% (15/83) vs. 8.4%. Conclusions. Total hip and knee revisions with unexpected positive cultures were not significantly associated with a higher re-revision risk at 5 years of follow-up. Representing an overall good prognosis. However, revision surgeries performed within the first 24 months have a higher rate of failure

Aim. Aim of this monocentric, prospective study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, clinical and radiographical results at 24-month follow-up (N = 6 patients) undergoing hip revision surgery with severe acetabular bone defects (Paprosky 2C-3A-3B) using a combination of a novel phase-pure betatricalciumphosphate - collagen 3D matrix with allograft bone chips. Method. Prospective follow-up of 6 consecutive patients, who underwent revision surgery of the acetabular component in presence of massive bone defects between April 2018 and July 2019. Indications for revision included mechanical loosening in 4 cases and history of hip infection in 2 cases. Acetabular deficiencies were evaluated radiographically and CT and classified according to the Paprosky classification. Initial diagnosis of the patients included osteoarthritis (N = 4), a traumatic fracture and a congenital hip dislocation. 5 patients underwent first revision surgery, 1 patient underwent a second revision surgery. Results. All patients were followed-up radiographically with a mean of 25,8 months. No complications were observed direct postoperatively. HHS improved significantly from 23.9 preoperatively to 81.5 at the last follow-up. 5 patients achieved a defined good result, and one patient achieved a fair result. No periprosthetic joint infection, no dislocations, no deep vein thrombosis, no vessel damage, and no complaint about limbs length discrepancy could be observed. Postoperative dysmetria was found to be + 0.2cm (0cm/+1.0cm) compared to the preoperative dysmetria of − 2.4 cm (+0.3cm/−5.7cm). Conclusions. Although used in severe acetabular bone defects, the novel phase-pure betatricalciumphosphate - collagen 3D matrixshowed complete resorption and replacement by newly formed bone, leading to a full implant integration at 24 months follow-up and thus represents a promising method with excellent bone regeneration capacities for complex cases, where synthetic bone grafting material is used in addition to autografts

BACKGROUND. Total hip revision surgery in cases with previous multiple reconstructive procedures is a challenging treatment due to difficulties in treatment huge bone defects with standard revision prosthetic combinations. A new specially made production system in Electron-Beam Melting (EBM) technology based on a precise analysis of patients' preoperative CT scans has been developed. METHODS. Objectives of design customization in difficult cases are to correctly evaluate patient's anatomy, to plan a surgical procedure and to obtain an optimal fixation to a poor bone stock. The 3D Printing (EBM) technology permits to create an extremely flexible patient matching implant and instrument, with material performances not viable with standard manufacturing process. Dedicated visual 3D tools and instrumentations improve implants congruency according to preoperative plan. Primary stability is enhanced and tailored on patient's anatomy by means of press-fit, iliac stems and the high friction performances of Trabecular Titanium matrix. The use of bone screws and their position is designed to enhance primary stability, even in critical bone conditions, avoiding implant stress shielding and allowing bone integration. 4 cases (2 men and 2 women) of acetabular customized implants were performed. Mean age at surgery was 51.5 years (range 25–72). Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at follow-up. RESULTS. No signs of miss-match between intraoperative bone conditions and pre-operative planning were observed. No additional bone grafts or further native bone removal were needed. Biomechanical parameters were restored by using internal modularity (i.e. face-changers / angled spacers). Face-changers allow to correct coverage and anteversion of the acetabular system. Incompatibility or impingement between the stems and new acetabular component was not observed and stem revision was performed in one case. On-table stability proved excellent and no intraoperative complications were observed. All patients underwent an immediate mobilization with full weight-bearing. Mean Harris Hip Score increased significantly from 13.9 (range 6.9–20.6) preoperatively to 75.8 (range 53.9–94) at last follow-up (mean 17.5, range: 10–33), showing an improvement in terms of both pain relief, function and joint mobility. Radiographically neither signs of instability, migration nor tilting were observed. No case of dislocation nor infection were recorded. CONCLUSION. A detailed anatomical reconstruction, in-depth preoperative planning, custom-implant design, high performance of the 3D-printing technology, system modularity and patient-specific surgical tools permitted an effective restoration of the biomechanical joint parameters in these complex revision cases. The optimal primary stability of the implants promoted an early osseointegration with the remaining bone stock. Further studies shall be necessary to assess the performance of these Implants at long-term follow-up

INTRODUCTION. Ceramic heads are used in hip revision surgery to mitigate corrosion concerns. Manufacturers recommend using a pristine titanium sleeve in conjunction with a well-fixed metal stem to prevent early failure of the ceramic head. However, the influence of impact force, head size, and sleeve offset on pull-off strength and seating displacement of a revision head assembly is not fully understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the pull-off strength and displacement of commercially available revision ceramic heads and titanium taper sleeve offsets (BIOLOX OPTION, CeramTec GmbH, Plochingen, Germany) while covering a range of clinically relevant impaction forces. METHODS. Two head sizes (28 mm, n = 12 and 36 mm, n = 12) and two taper adapter sleeve offsets (small, n = 12 and extra-large, n =12) were tested in this study. A dynamic impaction rig was constructed to seat the head, sleeve, and stem assembly. Consistent impaction forces were achieved by a dropping a hammer fixed to a lever arm from a pre-determined height onto a standard impactor instrumented with a piezoelectric force sensor (PCB Piezotronics Inc.). Axially applied forces of 2 kN and 6 kN were used to cover a range of typical impaction forces. Three non-contact differential variable reluctance transducers (LORD Sensing Systems) were used to track the displacement of the head relative to the stem. Subsequently, samples were transferred a servo hydraulic testing machine, and a pull-off test was carried out per ISO 7206- 10 to measure the disassembly force. RESULTS. For all head and sleeve combinations assembled at 6 kN, pull-off forces and assembly displacements were over two times the values measured at 2 kN. As expected, an increased assembly force resulted in increased pull-offs and displacements. Head size did not play a significant role on measured outcomes. Regarding sleeve offsets, at assembly of 6 kN mean pull-off forces for extra-large sleeves were reduced by approximately 25% relative to small sleeves. However, at a 2 kN assembly, sleeve offsets did not appear to influence pull-off forces. DISCUSSION. This study assessed the effect of impact assembly force, head size, and sleeve offset on pull-off strength and seating displacement of revision ceramic heads. The data suggests assembly force and sleeve offset may influence the pull-off strength and seating displacement of modular heads used in revision hip arthroplasty. Mean pull-off forces for revision heads were comparable in magnitude and trend to previous studies assessing the linear relationship between assembly force and pull-off force in primary heads (Krull et al., 2017, Rehmer et al., 2012). Lower pull-off forces were observed for extra-large sleeves when compared to small sleeves, indicating, decreased contact at the sleeve and stem interface for extra-large offsets may play a role in reducing pull-off forces

Introduction. The number of total hip arthroplasties has been increasing worldwide, and it is expected that revision surgeries will increase significantly in the near future. Although reconstructing normal hip biomechanics with extensive bone loss in the revision surgery remains challenging. The custom−made acetabular component produced by additive manufacturing, which can be fitted to a patient's anatomy and bone defect, is expected to be a predominant reconstruction material. However, there have been few reports on the setting precision and molding precision of this type of material. The purpose of this study was to validate the custom−made acetabular component regarding postoperative three−dimensional positioning and alignment. Methods. Severe bone defects (Paprosky type 3A and 3B) were made in both four fresh cadaveric hip joints using an acetabular reamer mimicking clinical cases of acetabular component loosening or osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. On the basis of computed tomography (CT) after making the bone defect, two types of custom−made acetabular components (augmented type and tri−flanged type) that adapted to the bone defect substantially were produced by an additive manufacturing machine. A confirmative CT scan was taken after implantation of the component, and then the data were installed in an analysis workstation to compare the postoperative component position and angle to those in the preoperative planning. Results. The mean absolute deviations of the center of the hip joint between preoperative planning and the actual component position in the augmented type were 0.7 ± 0.4 mm for the horizontal position, 0.2 ± 0.1 mm for the vertical position, and 0.5 ± 0.3 mm for the antero−posterior position. The mean absolute deviations of the center of the hip joint in the tri−flanged type in the horizontal, vertical, and antero−posterior positions were 1.0 ± 0.4 mm, 0.4 ± 0.2 mm, 0.3 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. The mean absolute deviations of the component angle were 3.5° ± 0.9° at inclination and 2.0° ± 1.7° at anteversion in the augmented type and 0.6° ± 0.5° at inclination and 0.9° ± 0.3° at anteversion in the tri−flanged type. Conclusion. Since custom−made orthopaedic implants produced by additive manufacturing can support individual anatomy and bone defect, this type of implant is expected to be applied to revision surgery and bone tumor surgery for severe bone defects. The present study demonstrated that preoperative planning of the center of the hip joint was successfully reproduced after the implantation of both types of custom−made acetabular components. In the tri−flanged type, better satisfactory results were provided in the component position and angle by comparing the past CAOS tools such as a surgical navigation system and a patient−specific guide. There is scope for further improvement, but the custom−made acetabular component produced by additive manufacturing may become very useful reconstruction material in hip revision surgeries. Problems to be addressed in the future include the improvement of the reproducibility of the preoperative planning and investigation of long−term clinical results

Purpose. To describe a 10-year long history of recurrent displacement and infection in a 37 yo female patient, HIV+/HCV+, with an history of drug addiction. Clinical History. Starting from avascular necrosis of the hip (caused by prolonged HAART therapy), the patient underwent first uncemented THA in 2003. One month after implant a septic mobilization due to local abscess was treated with first two stage revision surgery (modular stem with use of retention liner for intraoperatory instability and dislocation of the implant) that lasted for almost 6 years. After 6 years of apparent good clinical condition and stability of the implants, the patient came back with a septic state of the hip, and recurrent instability, caused by complete abruption of the cup from acetabulum (Figure 1) Another two stage revision was planned; patient suffered dislocation of the spacer in first hours after intervention and 3 months later was performed second stage revision (stem with modular neck and head, cup with augmentation metal liner). Three days later patient suffered from another dislocation, so implant was further revised (change of modular neck + dual mobility head/cup), and a pelvipodalic cast was even made, considering the poor compliance of the patient,. One month later, due to another local septic state of the hip and in consideration of clinical history, a DAIR procedure was performed with revision of limited modular components until intraoperative stability was assessed (metal spacer + metal liner + dual mobility head and cup). For further assurance, an external fixator was placed around the hip (Figure 2). Results. After last intervention no dislocation occurred and external fixation was removed with success after 2 months. Clinical outcome at 2 years showed a good functional outcome, and painless walking with only one crutch and limited limping. Discussion. This is a challenging case in which the comorbidity of immunosuppression, poor compliance of the patient and multiple hip revision surgery, started a very long sequence of complications and led to poor clinical results for years. Although the use of modularity aids reaching good stability and function in this kind of revision surgery, only a good control of general conditions of the patient and a multidisciplinary approach to correct patient's lifestyle has brought to stability and “up to now” endurance for this THA implant

Introduction:. Severe bone loss creates a challenge for fixation in femoral revision. The goal of the study was to assess reproducibility of fixation and clinical outcomes of femoral revision with bone loss using a modular, fluted, tapered distally fixing stem. Methods:. 92 consecutive patients (96 hips) underwent hip revision surgery using the same design of a modular, fluted, tapered titanium stem between 1998 and 2005. Fourteen patients with 16 hips died before a 2-year follow-up. Eighty hips were followed for an average of 11.3 years (range of 8 to 13.5 years). Bone loss was classified as per Paprosky's classification, osseointegration assessed according to a modified system of Engh et al, and Harris Hip Score was used to document pain and function. Serial radiographs were reviewed by an independent observer to assess subsidence, osseointegration and bony reconstitution. Results:. The average patient age was 68 years at the time of surgery (range 40 to 91). 80% hips had at least Paprosky type 3A proximal bone loss and 41% had an associated proximal femoral ostoetomy. Pre-operative Harris Hip scores (HHS) averaged 50.368 (range 22 to 72.775) and improved to an average HHS of 87.432 (range 63.450 to 99.825) at last follow-up. The HHS improved an average of 37.103 points (range 13.750 to 58.950). Radiographically, osseointegration was evident in all hips. No hips had measurable migration beyond 5 mm. 61%) hips had evidence of bone reconstitution and 27% demonstrated diaphyseal stress shielding. One well-fixed distal stem was revised for stem fracture, and two proximal segments were revised for recurrent dislocation. Conclusion:. Reproducible fixation and clinical improvement were consistently achieved with this stem design in the setting of femoral bone loss

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to report the results of the first 1000 cases hip arthroplasty using the Bencox. ®. hip stem, the first hip prosthesis developed and manufactured in Korea. Material & Method. This study reviewed 1000 cases retrospectively who underwent arthroplasty using Bencox. ®. hip system. The Bencox. ®. hip stem is the first hip prosthesis developed and manufactured in Korea. This stem have a double-tapered, wedge shape figure with a rectangular-shaped cross-section and specially designed neck shape, which is design to achieve normal stress pattern of the proximal femur and to increase initial stability and to increase range of motion. Surface is treated with MAO (Micro Arc Oxidation) coating. From the first arthroplasty with this system in September 2006, sequentially 1000 arthroplasties were performed by single surgeon until the July 2014. This material included 439 men and 561 female. Average age of patients was 65 year old. Follow up period was average 72.1 month (minimum 34 months to maximum 120 months). 1000 cases consisted of 569 hips in patients with femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture or subtrochanteric fracture (fracture group), 155 hips in osteoarthritis, 192 hips in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (arthritis group), 84 hips in revision surgery (revision group). Revision cases consisted of 58 hips with aseptic loosening and 26 hips with loosening due to infection sequelae. They were underwent hip arthroplasty using a Bencox. ®. hip stem in combination with Bencox. ®. bipolar cup and Bencox. ®. acetabular cup. Patients in the fracture group usually underwent bipolar hip arthroplasty, and those in the arthritis group and revision group underwent total hip arthroplasty. They were reviewed by medical records, clinically and radiologically. Results. During the follow-up period, there were no cases of revision of the femoral stem. Radiographically, there were no cases of radiolucent line except very proximal part of the stem endosteal bone ongrowth was found in most cases. Postoperative complications such as stem loosening, infection, dislocation, and ceramic breakage were not noted. But periprosthetic fracture was encountered in 7 hips due to slip down. They were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate and cables. There were no cases of failure of these treatments. Conclusion. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of hip arthroplasty using the Bencox. ®. hip system showed excellent outcomes with average 72.1 month follow-up in 1000 case

Significant hip osteoarthritis has been reported in 8–28% of patients with Down Syndrome. The prolonged life expectancy of these patients has allowed many of them to become disabled by their hip arthritis with the need for hip replacement. We have been able to perform a multi-center study evaluating total hip replacement in patients with Down Syndrome. Twenty patients (25 hips) with Down Syndrome underwent primary THA at a mean age of 35 years old with a mean 105-month follow-up. Cementless acetabular fixation with screws were used in all cases and all but one femoral component was cementless. Constrained liners were used in 8 cases to enhance stability. Five hips required revision surgery: two femoral components (one for periprosthetic fracture and one for aseptic loosening), two acetabular components (one for recurrent dislocation and one for wear with metallosis), and one hip required a two-stage revision for infection. Other than the hip revised for loosening, no other hip had radiographic evidence of loosening. The mean Harris Hip score improved from 42 points pre-operatively to 83 points at final follow-up. THA is a reliable surgical intervention in patients with Down Syndrome and symptomatic coxarthrosis. These patients and their families have been tremendously satisfied with this procedure. Strategies to prevent dislocation post THA are appropriate and need continued evaluation

It is unusual, if not unique, for three major research papers concerned with the management of the fractured neck of femur (FNOF) to be published in a short period of time, each describing large prospective randomized clinical trials. These studies were conducted in up to 17 countries worldwide, involving up to 80 surgical centers and include large numbers of patients (up to 2,900) with FNOF. Each article investigated common clinical dilemmas; the first paper comparing total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for FNOF, the second as to whether ‘fast track’ care offers improved clinical outcomes and the third, compares sliding hip with multiple cancellous hip screws. Each paper has been deemed of sufficient quality and importance to warrant publication in The Lancet or the New England Journal of Medicine. Although ‘premier’ journals, they only occationally contain orthopaedic studies and thus may not be routinely read by the busy orthopaedic/surgical clinician of any grade. It is therefore our intention with this present article to accurately summarize and combine the results of all three papers, presenting, in our opinion, the most important clinically relevant facts.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:198–202.

Introduction. In order to reduce polyethylene wear and incidence of osteolysis, and improve the long-term durability of total hip arthroplasty (THA), highly cross-linked polyethylene was introduced for clinical use in substitution for conventional polyethylene. We performed 35 cementless THAs between December 2000 and February 2002, and cross-linked polyethylene was used in these surgeries. The purpose of this study is to research linear wear rate of these hips, and to find the risk factor for high wear rate. Patients and Methods. 32 hips (26 patients) among the 35 could be evaluated at more than 10 years postoperatively. One hip required reoperations due to infection at 8 years postoperatively, and two were lost to followup in less than 10 years. There were 2 males and 24 females, and the observation period was 11.4 years in average (range 10?13 years). The age at the time of operation was 49.4 years in average (range 24?67 years), and body mass index was 22.4 in average (15?34). We used AHFIX total hip prostheses (KYOCERA Medical Corporation) for both acetabular and femoral replacement, and 22 mm Zirconia head was used in all cases. The median cup diameter was 46 mm (range 42?50). Osteolysis and loosening of the implant was evaluated on the anteroposterior radiograph of the hip. Using software for wear measurement (Hip Analysis Suite), linear wear rate and cup inclination angle were measured. Correlation between linear wear rate and age, BMI, cup inclination angle, and cup diameter was investigated using correlation coefficient. Results. Osteolysis and loosening were not found in any cases on the final radiograph. Cup inclination angle was 44.7±4.6 degree, and linear wear rate was 0.034±0.019 mm/y in average. No statistical correlation was found between linear wear rate and age, BMI, cup inclination angle, and cup diameter. Discussion. Long-term clinical performance of cross-linked polyethylene is rarely reported, although it is considered to have excellent wear resistance, and reduces the risk of osteolysis and loosening. Linear wear rate in this series was relatively low, and osteolysis and loosening were not observed. It was demonstrated that cross-linked polyethylene had excellent wear resistance when used in combination with 22 mm zirconia head, and observed for more than 10 years

Modulus femoral prosthesis is a modular cementless femoral system which consists of 5 degree tapered conical stem made of a titanium alloy with 8 fins of 1mm and modular neck. Modular neck enables to control any ideal stem anteversion as a surgeon prefers. This system is considered to be useful in severe hip deformity, for example developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). In this study, clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Modulus femoral prosthesis were evaluated at a mean of 3.6 (2–6) years postoperatively. We assessed the results of 193 primary total hip arthroplasty using a Modulus femoral prosthesis in 169 patients (15 males, 154 females) undergoing surgery between September 2007 and December 2011. The mean age at the time of surgery was 65.6 (31–86) years old. The diagnoses were osteoarthritis (OA) in 178 hips (including 167 hips of DDH), rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC) in 6 hips, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 6 hips, osteonecrosis in 2 hips, and subchondral insufficiency fracture in one hip. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip scores and complications. Radiographic assessments were including stem alignment, bone on-growth, cortical hypertrophy, stress shielding and stem subsidence. 43.8 points of the preoperative mean JOA score was significantly improved to 93.1 points postoperatively. In one case intraoperative femoral fracture was occurred. One dislocation had occurred and thigh pain was observed in one hip. No revision surgery was required. In 192 hips of 193 hips (99.5%), stem was implanted in neutral position (within ±2 degrees). Bone on-growth was observed in all cases (94.3% in zone 3; 73.1% in zone 5; 30.6% in zone 2; 22.3% in zone 6). Cortical hypertrophy was observed in 66 hips (34.2%) at zone 3 and 5. Reduction of bone density due to stress shielding was observed (1. st. degree was 58.5%; 2. nd. degree was 29.5%; 3. rd. degree was 11.9%; 4. th. degree was 0%). In 22 cases (11.4%), more than 2mm of stem subsidence was observed, however the subsidence was stopped within 6 months in all cases. Modulus femoral prosthesis showed good clinical results and radiographic findings up to 6 years postoperatively

Significant hip osteoarthritis has been reported in 8–28% of patients with Down Syndrome. The prolonged life expectancy of these patients has allowed many of them to become disabled by their hip arthritis with the need for hip replacement. We have been able to perform a multi-center study evaluating total hip replacement in patients with Down Syndrome. Twenty patients (25 hips) with Down Syndrome underwent primary THA at a mean age of 35 years old with a mean 105 month follow-up. Cementless acetabular fixation with screws were used in all cases and all but one femoral component was cementless. Constrained liners were used in 8 cases to enhance stability. Five hips required revision surgery: two femoral components (one for periprosthetic fracture and one for aseptic loosening), two acetabular components (one for recurrent dislocation and one for wear with metallosis), and one hip required a two-stage revision for infection. Other than the hip revised for loosening, no other hip had radiographic evidence of loosening. The mean Harris Hip score improved from 42 points preoperatively to 83 points at final follow-up. THA is a reliable surgical intervention in patients with Down Syndrome and symptomatic coxarthrosis. These patients and their families have been tremendously satisfied with this procedure

Introduction. Bi-Metric® cementless primary stem is tapered, rounded conical shaped and coated with plasma spray porous to one-third from the proximal. Fixation is achieved by a press-fit insertion in the Metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. From 1986 until now, nearly 700 Bi-Metric® stems have been implanted at our hospital. The purpose of this study was to present the clinical and radiological findings including a survival analysis of a consecutive Bi-Metric® stems series followed for over 10 years. Materials and methods. 112 primary cementless THAs in 96 patients using the Bi-Metric® femoral tapered stem were available for clinical and radiological evaluation with a minimum follow-up of ten years. Malloy-Head 4-fined acetabular cup was used in all hips. Follow-up was at a mean of 13 years. We applied THA in 84 patients for osteoarthritis, in 6 avascular necrosis for the femoral head and in 6 for rheumatoid arthritis. The mean age of the patients was 59.5 years. Clinically, pain ROM walking and ADL were evaluated according to the Japanese association hip (JOA) score, and complications and survivorship were investigated. Radiographic results were described according to the 7 femoral Gruen zones. Stem fixation in accordance with the method of Engh at al, cancellous condensation, reactive line, osteolysis, stem subsidence, and bone atrophy with stress shielding were examined. Wear was measured according to the method described by Livermore et al., and the effect of the wear on osteolysis was investigated. Results. The mean JOA score at follow-up was 93.5 points. No early loosening and no fracture of the implant were found. Tow hips underwent revision surgery, one for a late deep infection, and another one for recurrent dislocation. The overall survival was 98.2% at 13 years. Survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an endpoint was 100%. No subsidence was seen in follow-up period. The mean Engh score for fixation was 9.3 and for stability was 16.8. Focal osteolysis was noted in 20.6% of the hips. In most cases, they were located proximally in zones 1 and 7. The appearance of osteolysis was correlated with PE linear wear. Discussion. The results for mid- to long-term survival with this femoral component are encouraging. However focal osteolysis attributed to PE wear was seen in one-fifth of the hips and there is a concerned risk that progressing osteolysis causes the loosening in the future. We believe that if the PE wear is reduced, further longevity of this stem will be realized

Purpose. Despite the increasing interest and subsequent published literature on hip resurfacing arthroplasty, little is known about the prevalence of its complications and in particular the less common modes of failure. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and to analyse the reasons for it. Method. From a multi-surgeon series (141 surgeons) of 5000 Bimingham hip resurfacings we have analysed the modes, prevalence, gender differences and times to failure of any hip requiring revision surgery. Results. To date 182 hips have been revised (3.6%). The most common cause for revision was a fracture of the neck of the femur (54 hips, prevalence 1.1%), followed by loosening of the acetabular component (32 hips, 0.6%), collapse of the femoral head/avascular necrosis (30 hips, 0.6%), loosening of the femoral component (19 hips, 0.4%), infection (17 hips, 0.3%), pain with aseptic lymphocytic vascular and associated lesions (ALVAL)/metallosis (15 hips, 0.3%), loosening of both components (5 hips, 0.1%) dislocation (5 hips, 0.1%) and malposition of the acetabular component (3 hips, 0.1%). In two cases the cause of failure was unknown. Comparing men with women, we found the prevalence of revision to be significantly higher in women (women = 5.7%; men = 2.6%. p<0.001). When analysing the individual modes of failure we found women to have significantly more revisions for loosening of the acetabular component, dislocation, infection and pain/ALVAL/metallosis (p<0.001, p=0.004, p=0.008, p=0.01 respectively). The mean time to failure was 2.9 years (0.003 to 11.0) for all causes, with revisions for fracture of the neck of the femur occurring earlier than other causes (mean 1.5 years, 0.02 to 11.0). There was a significantly shorter time to failure in men (mean 2.1 years, 0.4 to 8.7) compared with women (mean 3.6 years, 0.003 to 11.0) (p<0.001). Conclusion. Hip resurfacing has its own unique set of complications, including fracture of the neck of the femur. It is important to understand the prevalence of complications as well as the risk factors in order to appropriately select patients and adequately inform them prior to hip resurfacing arthroplasty