Intro: Total knee replacement (TKR) manufacturers offer the option of high flexion tibial tray inserts. The polyethylene is narrower posteriorly than the standard insert and comes with the theoretical risk of reduced longevity due to thinner implant. This trial studied both the intra-operative and post-operative difference in knee flexion. Method: 100 consecutive patients undergoing posterior stabilized Genesis II TKR with Brainlab navigation were studied. The flexion of each knee was assessed per-operatively using the Brainlab navigation system for both the high flex and standard tibial insert trials. Patients were then randomized to receive either a high flex or standard definitive implant and the knee flexion measured clinically with a goniometer six months post op. Results: Intra-operatively the high flexion insert trial flexed more than the standard flex option by 3.2 degrees. Clinically at six months post op there was no difference in knee flexion between the two groups. Conclusion: There is no clinical difference in knee flex-ion at six months post-op in patients with a high flex or standard tibial insert. However, we believe that in certain technical circumstances the high flex option is a valuable option for the surgeon to have available

Modifications in the design of knee replacements have been proposed in order to maximise flexion. We performed a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome, including maximum knee flexion, in patients receiving either a standard or a high flexion version of the NexGen legacy posterior stabilised total knee replacement. A total of 56 patients, half of whom received each design, were assessed pre-operatively and at one year after operation using knee scores and analysis of range of movement using electrogoniometry. For both implant designs there was a significant improvement in the function component of the knee scores (p < 0.001) and the maximum range of flexion when walking on the level, ascending and descending a slope or stairs (all p < 0.001), squatting (p = 0.020) and stepping into a bath (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference in outcome, including the maximum knee flexion, between patients receiving the standard and high flexion designs of this implant

The objective of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in weight-bearing, deep knee bending motion. Fifteen patients implanted with the Legacy Posterior Stabilized Flex (8; mobile bearing and 7; fixed bearing), 18 patients with Scorpio NRG, and 8 patients with PFC sigma RP-F were examined during a deep knee bending motion using fluoroscopy. Femorotibial motion was determined using a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional registration technique, which used computer-assisted design models to reproduce the position of metallic implants from single-view fluoroscopic images. The average flex-ion ranges of motion between the metallic implants were 120° with Legacy Flex, 125° with NRG and 121° with RP-F. The average rotation of the femoral component was 11° external rotation (ER) with Legacy Flex, 12° with NRG and 11° with RP-F. The mean kinematic pathways were early rollback, lateral pivot with ER, and bicondylar rollback with Legacy Flex, medial pivot with ER and bicondylar rollback with NRG and central pivot with ER and bicondylar rollback with RP-F. The in vivo kinematics was different due to the prosthesis designs to obtain weight-bearing deep knee bending motion.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is toevaluate the clinical and radiologic results after high flexiontotal knee arthroplasty, Lospa^®(Corentec Inc.) with 10mm cutting of posterior femoral condyle and LPS-Flex^®(Zimmer Inc.) with 12.5mm cutting of posterior femoral condyle.(Fig. 1)

This prospective randomised controlled double-blind trial compared two types of PFC Sigma total knee replacement (TKR), differing in three design features aimed at improving flexion. The outcome of a standard fixed-bearing posterior cruciate ligament-preserving design (FB-S) was compared with that of a high-flexion rotating-platform posterior-stabilised design (RP-F) at one year after TKR.

The study group of 77 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee comprised 37 men and 40 women, with a mean age of 69 years (44.9 to 84.9). The patients were randomly allocated either to the FB-S or the RP-F group and assessed pre-operatively and at one year post-operatively. The mean post-operative non-weight-bearing flexion was 107° (95% confidence interval (CI) 104° to 110°)) for the FB-S group and 113° (95% CI 109° to 117°) for the RP-F group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.032). However, weight-bearing range of movement during both level walking and ascending a slope as measured during flexible electrogoniometry was a mean of 4° lower in the RP-F group than in the FB-S group, with 58° (95% CI 56° to 60°) versus 54° (95% CI 51° to 57°) for level walking (p = 0.019) and 56° (95% CI 54° to 58°) versus 52° (95% CI 48° to 56°) for ascending a slope (p = 0.044). Further, the mean post-operative pain score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was significantly higher in the RP-F group (2.5 (95% CI 1.5 to 3.5) versus 4.2 (95% CI 2.9 to 5.5), p = 0.043).

Although the RP-F group achieved higher non-weight-bearing knee flexion, patients in this group did not use this during activities of daily living and reported more pain one year after surgery.

Aims. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has become a popular method of treating knee localized osteoarthritis (OA). Additionally, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is essential to maintaining the physiological kinematics and functions of the knee joint. Considering these factors, the purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects on PCL-deficient knees in medial UKA. Methods. Computational simulations of five subject-specific models were performed for intact and PCL-deficient UKA with tibial slopes. Anteroposterior (AP) kinematics and contact stresses of the patellofemoral (PF) joint and the articular cartilage were evaluated under the deep-knee-bend condition. Results. As compared to intact UKA, there was no significant difference in AP translation in PCL-deficient UKA with a low flexion angle, but AP translation significantly increased in the PCL-deficient UKA with high flexion angles. Additionally, the increased AP translation became decreased as the posterior tibial slope increased. The contact stress in the PF joint and the articular cartilage significantly increased in the PCL-deficient UKA, as compared to the intact UKA. Additionally, the increased posterior tibial slope resulted in a significant decrease in the contact stress on PF joint but significantly increased the contact stresses on the articular cartilage. Conclusion. Our results showed that the posterior stability for low flexion activities in PCL-deficient UKA remained unaffected; however, the posterior stability for high flexion activities was affected. This indicates that a functional PCL is required to ensure normal stability in UKA. Additionally, posterior stability and PF joint may reduce the overall risk of progressive OA by increasing the posterior tibial slope. However, the excessive posterior tibial slope must be avoided. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(9):593–600

Aims. Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses are designed to restore near normal kinematics including high flexion. Kneeling is a high flexion, kinematically demanding activity after TKA. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by six-degrees-of-freedom in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomized clinical trial compared kneeling kinematics in three TKA designs. Methods. In total, 68 patients were randomized to either a posterior stabilized (PS-FB), cruciate-retaining (CR-FB), or rotating platform (CR-RP) design. Of these patients, 64 completed a minimum one year follow-up. Patients completed full-flexion kneeling while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Kinematics were calculated by registering the 3D implant models onto 2D-dynamic fluoroscopic images and exported for analysis. Results. CR-FB designs had significantly lower maximal flexion (mean 116° (SD 2.1°)) compared to CR-RP (123° (SD 1.6°)) and PS-FB (125° (SD 2.1°)). The PS-FB design displayed a more posteriorly positioned femur throughout flexion. Furthermore, the CR-RP femur was more externally rotated throughout kneeling. Finally, individual patient kinematics showed high degrees of variability within all designs. Conclusion. The increased maximal flexion found in the PS-FB and CR-RP designs were likely achieved in different ways. The PS-FB design uses a cam-post to hold the femur more posteriorly preventing posterior impingement. The external rotation within the CR-RP design was surprising and hasn’t previously been reported. It is likely due to the polyethylene bearing being decoupled from flexion. The findings of this study provide insights into the function of different knee arthroplasty designs in the context during deep kneeling and provide clinicians with a more kinematically informed choice for implant selection and may allow improved management of patients' functional expectations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):105–112

Abstract. Objectives. Little is known about the impact of cartilage defects on knee joint biomechanics. This investigation aimed to determine the gait characteristics of patients with symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Methods. Gait analyses were performed at the Regional North-West Joint Preservation Centre. Anthropometric measurements were obtained, then 16 retroreflective markers representing the Plug-in-Gait biomechanical model were placed on pre-defined anatomical landmarks. Participants walked for two minutes at a self-selected speed on a treadmill on a level surface, then for 2 minutes downhill. A 15-camera motion-capture system recorded the data. Knee kinematics were exported into Matlab to calculate the average kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters per patient across 20 gait cycles. Depending on the normality of the data, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon ranked tests were performed to compare both knees (α = 0.05). Results. 20 patients participated; one of whom has bilateral cartilage defects. All 20 data sets were analysed for level walking; 18 were analysed for downhill walking. On a level surface, patients walked at an average speed of 3.1±0.8km/h with a cadence of 65.5±15.3 steps/minute. Patients also exhibited equal step lengths (0.470±0.072m vs 0.471±0.070m: p=0.806). Downhill, the average walking speed was 2.85±0.5km/h with a cadence of 78.8±23.1 steps/minute and step lengths were comparable (0.416±0.09m vs 0.420±0.079m: p=0.498). During level walking, maximum flexion achieved during swing did not differ between knees (54.3±8.6° vs 55.5±11.0°:p=0.549). Neither did maximal extension achieved at heel strike (3.1±5.7° vs 5.4±4.7°:p=0.135). On average, both knees remained in adduction throughout the gait cycle, with the degree of adduction greater in flexion in the operative knee. However, differences in maximal adduction were not significant (22.4±12.4° vs 18.7±11.0°:p=0.307). Maximal internal-external rotation patterns were comparable in stance (0.9±7.7° vs 3.5±9.8°: p=0.322) and swing (7.7±10.9° vs 9.8±8.3°:p=0.384). During downhill walking, maximum flexion also did not differ between operative and contralateral knees (55.38±10.6° vs 55.12±11.5°:p=0.862), nor did maximum extension at heel strike (1.32±6.5° vs 2.73±4.5°:p=0.292). No significant difference was found between maximum adduction of both knees (15.87±11.0° vs 16.78±12.0°:p=0.767). In stance, differences in maximum internal-external rotation between knees were not significant (5.39±10.7° vs 6.10±11.8°:p=0.836), nor were they significant in swing (7.69±13.3° vs 7.54±8.81°:p=0.963). Conclusions. Knee kinematics during level and downhill walking were symmetrical in patients with a cartilage defect of the knee, but an increased adduction during flexion in the operative knee may lead to pathological loading across the medial compartment of the knee during high flexion activities. Future work will investigate this further and compare the data to a healthy young population. We will also objectively assess the functional outcome of this joint preservation surgery to monitor its success. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) using components designed to increase the range of flexion is not fully understood. The short- to mid-term risk of aseptic revision in high flexion TKR was evaluated. The endpoint of the study was aseptic revision and the following variables were investigated: implant design (high flexion vs non-high flexion), the thickness of the tibial insert (≤ 14 mm vs > 14 mm), cruciate ligament (posterior stabilised (PS) vs cruciate retaining), mobility (fixed vs rotating), and the manufacturer (Zimmer, Smith & Nephew and DePuy). Covariates included patient, implant, surgeon and hospital factors. Marginal Cox proportional hazard models were used. In a cohort of 64 000 TKRs, high flexion components were used in 8035 (12.5%). The high flexion knees with tibial liners of thickness > 14 mm had a density of revision of 1.45/100 years of observation, compared with 0.37/100 in non-high flexion TKR with liners ≤ 14 mm thick. Relative to a standard fixed PS TKR, the NexGen (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) Gender Specific Female high flexion fixed PS TKR had an increased risk of revision (hazard ratio (HR) 2.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48 to 3.50)), an effect that was magnified when a thicker tibial insert was used (HR 8.10 (95% CI 4.41 to 14.89)). Surgeons should be cautious when choosing high flexion TKRs, particularly when thicker tibial liners might be required. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:217–23

Femoro-acetabular impingement involves a deformity of the hip joint and is associated with hip osteoarthritis. Although 15% of the asymptomatic population exhibits a deformity, it is not clear who will develop symptoms. Current diagnostic imaging measures have either low specificity or low sensitivity and do not consider the dynamic nature of impingement during daily activities. The goal of this study is to determine stresses in the cartilage, subchondral bone and labrum of normal and impinging hips during activities such as walking and sitting down. Quantitative CT scans were obtained of a healthy Control and a participant with a symptomatic femoral cam deformity (‘Bump’). 3D models of the hip were created from automatic segmentation of CT scans. Cartilage layers were added so the articular surface was the mid-line of the joint. Finite element meshes were generated in each region. Bone elastic modulus was assigned element-by-element, calculated from CT intensity converted to bone mineral density using a calibration phantom. Cartilage was modelled as poroelastic, E=0.467 MPa, v=0.167, and permeability 3×10. -16. m. 4. /N s. The pelvis was fixed while rotations and contact forces from Bergmann et al. (2001) were applied to the femur over one load cycle for walking and sitting in a chair. All analyses were performed in FEBio. High shear stresses were seen near the acetabular cartilage-labrum junction in the Bump model, up to 0.12 MPa for walking and were much higher than in the Control. Patient-specific modelling can be used to assess contact and tissue stresses during different activities to better understand the risk of degeneration in individuals, especially for activities that involve high hip flexion. The high stresses at the cartilage labrum interface could explain so-called bucket-handle tears of the labrum

Aims. Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with a flat tibial plateau has not performed well in the lateral compartment, leading to a high rate of dislocation. For this reason, the Domed Lateral UKA with a biconcave bearing was developed. However, medial and lateral tibial plateaus have asymmetric anatomical geometries, with a slightly dished medial and a convex lateral plateau. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the extent at which the normal knee kinematics were restored with different tibial insert designs using computational simulation. Methods. We developed three different tibial inserts having flat, conforming, and anatomy-mimetic superior surfaces, whereas the inferior surface in all was designed to be concave to prevent dislocation. Kinematics from four male subjects and one female subject were compared under deep knee bend activity. Results. The conforming design showed significantly different kinematics in femoral rollback and internal rotation compared to that of the intact knee. The flat design showed significantly different kinematics in femoral rotation during high flexion. The anatomy-mimetic design preserved normal knee kinematics in femoral rollback and internal rotation. Conclusion. The anatomy-mimetic design in lateral mobile UKA demonstrated restoration of normal knee kinematics. Such design may allow achievement of the long sought normal knee characteristics post-lateral mobile UKA. However, further in vivo and clinical studies are required to determine whether this design can truly achieve a more normal feeling of the knee and improved patient satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):421–428

‘High flexion’ polyethylene tibial tray inserts are available from total knee replacement (TKR) manufacturers. There is currently no published data available that examines how much extra knee flexion these new implants give or if there are any wear consequences for the change in design. The high flexion inserts are narrower posteriorly than standard inserts and have chamfers anteriorly and on the post in cruciate sacrificing designs. This prospective randomised controlled trial of 100 patients undergoing posterior stabilised TKR compared knee flexion, measured intra-operatively by a computer navigation system, of the standard and high flexion trial inserts in the same knee. Patients were then randomised to receive either a standard or ‘high flexion’ definitive component and the stability assessed. The post-operative knee flexion of all patients was measured at six months. High flexion inserts did not give significantly more knee flexion than standard inserts either per-operatively at the trial insert stage, or at six months post-op and resulted in marginally more anterior draw. The average per-operative difference in flexion between standard and high flex inserts measured in the same knee was 3.2° (range -4-18°) The average knee flexion at 6 months post op was 106° for both groups. The average change in knee flexion comparing pre and post op was 2.3° for the high flex group and 0.6° for the standard insert group. Laboratory Tek scan contact pressure analysis at the surface of the standard and high flexion designs was not significantly different, but the thinner polyethylene of the high flexion design raises questions about wear characteristics. High flexion polyethylene inserts are probably not justified in terms of improved knee flexion, but may be a useful option in certain technical circumstances during TKR such as patella baja or if the patella impinges on the post in deep flexion

Abstract. Objectives. Impingement in total hip replacements (THRs), including bone-on-bone impingement, can lead to complications such as dislocation and loosening. The aim of this study was to investigate how the location of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) affected the range of motion before impingement. Methods. A cohort of 25 CT scans (50 hips) were assessed and nine hips were selected with a range of AIIS locations relative to the hip joint centre. The selected CT Scans were converted to solid models (ScanIP) and THR components (DePuy Synthes) were virtually implanted (Solidworks). Flexion angles of 100⁰, 110⁰, and 120⁰ were applied to the femur, each followed by internal rotation to the point of impingement. The lateral, superior and anterior extent of the AIIS from the Centre of Rotation (CoR) of the hip was measured and its effect on the range of motion was recorded. Results. There was found to be a significant (p<0.05) inverse relationship between the ROM of the THR and the lateral measure of the AIIS. Of the three measures, the lateral AIIS measure showed the strongest relationship with ROM to impingement (R=0.73) with the anterior and superior measures resulting in R values of 0.41 and 0.56 respectively. For every millimetre lateral the AIIS location, there was typically a loss of 1.2° of range of motion. With increasing lateralisation, the AIIS was positioned more directly over the femur, thereby reducing the ROM in the THR during high flexion positions. No soft tissue was included in the models which would have affected the ROM. Conclusions. The results from this study have shown that the lateral measure of the AIIS could be a predictor for bone-on-bone impingement. To build confidence, wider study of AIIS location variation is needed, as well as analysis under impingement prone activities of daily living. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Aim. There has been a significant reduction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures recorded in Australia. This follows several national joint registry studies documenting high UKA revision rates when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the recent introduction of robotically assisted UKA procedures, it is hoped that outcomes improve. This study examines the cumulative revision rate of UKA procedures implanted with a newly introduced robotic system and compares the results to one of the best performing non-robotically assisted UKA prostheses, as well as all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures. Methods. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR) for all UKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA) between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Procedures using the Restoris MCK UKA prosthesis implanted using the Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted System were compared to non-robotically assisted Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System (ZUK) UKA, a commonly used UKA with previously reported good outcomes and to all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship. Results. There was no difference in the rate of revision when the Mako-assisted Restoris UKA was compared to the ZUK UKA (zero to nine months: HR 1.14 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.83; p = 0.596) vs nine months and over: HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; p = 0.058)). The Mako-assisted Restoris had a significantly lower overall revision rate compared to the other types of non-robotically assisted procedures (HR 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.79); p < 0.001) at three years. Revision for aseptic loosening was lower for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to all other non-robotically assisted UKA (entire period: HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.65); p = 0.001), but not the ZUK prosthesis. However, revision for infection was significantly higher for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to the two comparator groups (ZUK: entire period: HR 2.91 (95% CI 1.22 to 6.98; p = 0.016); other non-robotically assisted UKA: zero to three months: HR 5.57 (95% CI 2.17 to 14.31; p < 0.001)). Conclusion. This study reports comparable short-term survivorship for the Mako robotically assisted UKA compared to the ZUK UKA and improved survivorship compared to all other non-robotic UKA. These results justify the continued use and investigation of this procedure. However, the higher rate of early revision for infection for robotically assisted UKA requires further investigation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):319–328

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) deformities are a potential precursor to hip osteoarthritis and an important contributor to non-arthritic hip pain. Some hips with FAI deformities develop symptoms of pain in the hip and groin that are primarily position related. The reason for pain generation in these hips is unclear. Understanding potential impingement mechanisms in FAI hips will help us understand pain generation. Impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim has been proposed as a pathomechanism in FAI hips. This proposed pathomechanism has not been quantified with direct measurements in physiological postures. Research question: Is femoroacetabular clearance different in symptomatic FAI hips compared to asymptomatic FAI and control hips in sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (FADIR) and squatting postures?. We recruited 33 participants: 9 with symptomatic FAI, 13 with asymptomatic FAI, and 11 controls from the Investigation of Mobility, Physical Activity, and Knowledge Translation in Hip Pain (IMAKT-HIP) cohort. We scanned each participant's study hip in sitting FADIR and squatting postures using an upright open MRI scanner (MROpen, Paramed, Genoa, Italy). We quantified femoroacetabular clearance in sitting FADIR and squatting using beta angle measurements which have been shown to be a reliable surrogate for acetabular rim pressures. We chose sitting FADIR and squatting because they represent, respectively, passive and active maneuvers that involve high flexion combined with internal/external rotation and adduction/abduction, which are thought to provoke impingement. In the squatting posture, the symptomatic FAI group had a significantly smaller minimum beta angle (−4.6º±15.2º) than the asymptomatic FAI (12.5º ±13.2º) (P= 0.018) and control groups (19.8º ±8.6º) (P=0.001). In the sitting FADIR posture, both symptomatic and asymptomatic FAI groups had significantly smaller beta angles (−9.3º ±14º [P=0.010] and −3.9º ±9.7º [P=0.028], respectively) than the control group (5.7º ±5.7º). Our results show loss of clearance between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim (negative beta angle) occurred in symptomatic FAI hips in sitting FADIR and squatting. We did not observe loss of clearance in the asymptomatic FAI group for squatting, while we did observe loss of clearance for this group in sitting FADIR. These differences may be due to accommodation mechanisms in the active, squatting posture that are not present in the passive, sitting FADIR posture. Our results support the hypothesis that impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim is a pathomechanism in FAI hips leading to pain generation

Introduction. High flexion knee arthroplasties have been designed to allow up to 155 degrees flexion and enable high flexion activities such as kneeling and squatting. To date randomised controlled trials have shown no difference in range of movement (ROM) between high flexion and standard designs. Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in functional outcome and ROM between the standard and high flexion design of the PFC Sigma TKA system. Methods. 84 patients with the diagnosis of osteoarthritis undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were randomised to receive either a PFC Sigma or PFC Sigma RP-F total knee arthroplasty. ROM, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, Patella score and SF-12v2 were assessed independently before and at one year after surgery. Patients were blinded to the implant they received. Results. 42 patients in each group were included in this study and underwent surgery. 77 patients (92%) completed their one-year follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative scores between groups. At one year there was a statistically significant difference in ROM between the groups with a mean of 105 degrees in the PFC Sigma and 114 degrees in the PFC Sigma RP-F group (p=0.01). There was also a statistically significant difference in flexion with 106 degrees and 115 degrees respectively (p=0.007). The difference in improvement in ROM and flexion was also statistically significant between the groups (p=0.009 and p=0.008). There was no statistically significant difference in any of the functional outcome scores. Conclusions. This is the first randomised controlled trial to show a statistically significant difference in ROM and flexion between a standard and a high flexion design TKA. Further follow-up will be carried out to determine if these differences persist over time and to evaluate the long-term survival of the different designs

Aims. Cam and pincer morphologies are potential precursors to hip osteoarthritis and important contributors to non-arthritic hip pain. However, only some hips with these pathomorphologies develop symptoms and joint degeneration, and it is not clear why. Anterior impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim in positions of hip flexion combined with rotation is a proposed pathomechanism in these hips, but this has not been studied in active postures. Our aim was to assess the anterior impingement pathomechanism in both active and passive postures with high hip flexion that are thought to provoke impingement. Methods. We recruited nine participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and with pain, 13 participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and without pain, and 11 controls from a population-based cohort. We scanned hips in active squatting and passive sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation using open MRI and quantified anterior femoroacetabular clearance using the β angle. Results. In squatting, we found significantly decreased anterior femoroacetabular clearance in painful hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean -11.3° (SD 19.2°)) compared to pain-free hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean 8.5° (SD 14.6°); p = 0.022) and controls (mean 18.6° (SD 8.5°); p < 0.001). In sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation, we found significantly decreased anterior clearance in both painful (mean -15.2° (SD 15.3°); p = 0.002) and painfree hips (mean -4.7° (SD 13°); p = 0.010) with cam and/pincer morphologies compared to the controls (mean 7.1° (SD 5.9°)). Conclusion. Our results support the anterior femoroacetabular impingement pathomechanism in hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies and highlight the effect of posture on this pathomechanism. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):988–996

Increasingly, high flexion components have been touted by the industrial manufacturers of them as the implants of choice for routine total knee replacement (TKR). An acceptable flexion arc is obtainable in most patients through various intra-operative techniques; however, the importance of obtaining high flexion—which we define as greater than 120 degrees—is unclear. In our pilot study, a review was undertaken involving 60 of the senior authors patients who attained greater than 120 degrees of flexion after receiving an implant said to be high flexion based on the presence of both a rotating platform as well as a conforming cam-and-post third condylar space. Despite the achievement of both high flexion and impressive patient satisfaction, no functional benefits were observed—an observation that is supported in the current literature. We will explore possible reasons for this discord and note that most patients did not express the desire to regularly perform high flexion activities such as kneeling, squatting and stooping on a daily basis. Our results and evaluation of the literature lead us to question the importance placed upon the achievement of the maximum possible post-operative flexion arc as well as the importance placed in the ability to perform high flexion activities. This, in turn, calls into question the validity of many of the currently accepted outcomes measures used to post-operatively evaluate total knee replacements

Introduction. Total-knee-arthroplasty (TKA) is used to restore knee function and is a well-established treatment of osteoarthritis. Along with the widely used fixed bearing TKA design, some surgeons opt to use mobile bearing designs. The mobile-bearing TKA is believed to allow for more freedom in placement of the tibial plate, greater range of motion in internal-external (IE) rotation and greater constraint through the articular surface. This current study evaluates 1) the kinematics of a high constraint three condyle mobile bearing TKA, 2) the insert rotation relative to the tibia, and 3) compares them with the intact knee joint kinematics during laxity tests and activities-of-daily-living (lunge, level walking, stairs down). We hypothesize that 1) in contrast to the intact state the anterior-posterior (AP) stability of the implanted joint increases when increasing compression level while 2) maintaining the IE mobility, and that 3) the high constraint does not prevent differential femorotibial rollback during lunge. Methods. Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric knee joints with a mean donor age of 64.5 (±2.4) years and BMI of 23.3 (±7.3) were tested on a robot (KR140, KUKA) in two different states: 1) intact, 2) after implantation of a three condyle mobile bearing TKA. The tibia plateau and the insert of each tested specimen were equipped with a sensor to measure the insert rotation during testing. Laxity tests were done at extension and under flexion (15°, 30°, 45°, 60° 90°, 120°) by applying subsequent forces in AP and medial-lateral (ML) of ±100N and moments in IE and varus-valgus (VV) rotation (6Nm/4Nm, 12 Nm/-). Testing was performed under low (44N) and weight bearing compression (500N). Loading during the lunge, level walking and stairs descent activity was based on in-vivo data. Resulting data was averaged and compared with the kinematics of the intact knee. Results. Increasing the joint compression resulted in a 90% reduced AP laxity (increased stability) for the implanted case while the intact knee laxity stayed similar. In high compression the implanted IE mobility was reduced by 45% for low and mid flexion angles and by 20% for high flexion angles, while the intact knee IE mobility was reduced by 30% at low and mid flexion and 20% at high flexion. The trend of the rollback behaviour was similar for the implanted and intact joints and showed higher lateral than medial rollback (Figure 3 A). The average insert-rotation was highest during level walking (+ 5° to −2.5°) and lowest during lunge (−3.5° to 2.5° over flexion). Conclusion. The established hypotheses were supported by the above listed results. Increasing the joint compression in the mobile bearing design stabilized the knee in the AP direction and maintained the IE mobility similar to the intact knee. This can be directly related to the design of the TKA articular surface, which has a high impact on constraint as soon as the joint is loaded. However, the high constraint of the TKA did not prevent differential rollback

High flexion designs are intended to provide a greater range of knee flexion and possibly improve flexion in stiff knees. This study assessed the effects of two implant designs. A posterior stabilised high flexion mobile bearing (MB) design vs a cruciate retaining standard fixed bearing (FB) design. The aim of this study was to assess whether implant design has an effect on the functional outcome one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Ninety patients with knee osteoarthritis on the waiting list for unilateral TKA were recruited and randomly allocated to either the MB or FB group. Patients were assessed between one and four weeks before, and one year after TKA. Primary outcome was knee flexion during high flexion activities of daily living such as stair ascending and descending and squatting as measured using gait analysis. Knee flexion in long sitting using a manual goniometer and the WOMAC were also recorded. Two sample t-tests were used to investigate statistical differences between the two groups pre- and postoperatively. Results. Average age was 69 years. Thirty-three received the MB design and 39 the FB design. Age, gender balance and pre-operative flexion (112 and 113 degrees in the FB and MB groups respectively) were the same in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in post-operative knee flexion during functional activities. Knee flexion in sitting and the stiffness and function components of the WOMAC were also similar between the two groups (p>0.05). However, post-operatively the WOMAC pain component was slightly higher in the MB group (4.2 vs 2.4 points, p<0.05). Conclusion. In our patient group with a mean pre-operative flexion of 112.7 degrees, the high flexion mobile bearing design did not improve knee flexion during high flexion functional activities of daily living