Aims

Several different designs of hemiarthroplasty are used to treat intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur, with large variations in costs. No clinical benefit of modular over monoblock designs has been reported in the literature. Long-term data are lacking. The aim of this study was to report the ten-year implant survival of commonly used designs of hemiarthroplasty.

A modular hemiarthroplasty has a Metal-on-Metal (MoM) taper-trunnion junction, which may lead to increased wear and Adverse-Reaction-to-Metal-Debris (ARMD). To-date no wear related issues have been described in the elderly and less active that receives a hemiarthroplasty. This study aims to determine in vivo wear (i.e. serum metal ion levels) in hip hemiarthroplasty, and identify factors associated with increased wear.

This is a prospective, IRB approved, single-centre, cohort study of patients that received an uncemented, modular hemiarthroplasty of proven design for the treatment of hip fracture between 2013–2015. All, alive, patients at 12-months post-implantation with AMTS≥6 were invited to participate. Of the 125 eligible patients, 50 accepted the invitation and were reviewed, including clinical/radiological assessment, metal-ion ([Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co)]) measurement and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Acetabular erosion was graded (0–3: normal-protrusio). Metal ion levels were considered high if ≥7ppb.

The mean OHS was 37 (SD: 10). No acetabular erosion was detected in 21, whilst the remaining had either grade-1 (n=21) or grade-2 (n=8). The median Cr and Co levels were 2.9 (SD:9) and 2.2 (SD:4) respectively. There were 8 cases (16%) with high ion levels. To-date only 2 of them has an ARMD lesion, and none have been revised. Patients with metal ion levels had similar pre-fall mobility, taper- and head- size and OHS to those with low metal ion levels (p=0.2–0.7) However, all hips with high metal ion levels had evidence of acetabular erosion (≥1).

Modular Hip hemiarthroplasties and their taper-trunnion junction are not immune to high wear and ARMD despite being implanted in a less active cohort. Acetabular erosion should alert clinicians, as it is associated with 20× increased-risk of taper wear, presumably due to the increased transmitted torque. Whether the use of modular hemiarthroplasties should remain is debatable.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Hip Hemiarthroplasties (HA) are successful, cost-effective procedures that improve quality of life. Dislocation is a well recognised complication with a significant health and economic burden. We aim to establish the current management practices across the United Kingdom (UK) for Prosthetic Hip Dislocations (PHD). Our definition of a PHD includes; THA, HA and revision THA. This national study builds on our regional pilot study and records one of the largest datasets of Prosthetic Hip Dislocation management within the UK. A trainee-led collaborative; the North West Orthopaedic Research Collaborative (NWORC). Conducted a retrospective audit, registered as Quality Improvement (QI) projects, collected data from 38 hospital trusts across the UK. Data was collected on patient-related factors, inpatient management, and outpatient follow up of each PHD episode between January and July 2019. Primary outcome measured definitive management, in the form of revision surgery or the consideration for this through a referral pathway. A total of 673 (THA 504, Revision THA 141, HA 28) patients were included with a total of 740 dislocation episodes. Mean age was 75.6 years with female to male ratio 2:1. The majority of PHDs were a result of a low energy mechanism (98.7%) and presented over 6 months post index procedure (80.5%). Over half (53.8%) attended with a first or second time dislocation. Only 29.9% patients received onward revision referral; whereas 70.1% followed diverse management patterns, including local non-arthroplasty and primary arthroplasty surgeon follow-ups. Revision THAs had higher rates of referral for revision (p<0.001) compared to primary THA and HA dislocations. A high number of PHDs present across the UK, with under a third receiving definitive management plans. This variation increases the economical burden to the National Health Service, highlighting the need for national guidance to manage these complex patients

Total Hip Replacements (THR) and Hip Hemiarthroplasties (HA) are both successful and common orthopaedic procedures. Dislocation is a well-recognised complication carrying significant morbidity and, in some cases, increased mortality risks. We define prosthetic hip dislocations (PHDs) to include both THRs and HAs. Prosthetic Hip Dislocations (PHDs) are a common acute admission yet there are no published guidelines or consensus on management following reduction. A retrospective audit was undertaken by the North West Orthopaedic Research Collaborative (NWORC) between January 2019 and July 2019. A questionnaire was used to capture the management of each dislocation episode presenting to 11 Hospital trusts. The study was registered as a Quality Improvement (QI) project at each site. Data regarding the surgical management physiotherapy input, ongoing care and further management plans were recorded. A total of 183 patients with 229 dislocations were submitted for initial analysis (171 THRs, 10 HAs, 2 PFRs). Female to male ratio was 2:1 with mean age of 76.7 years. Average time to first dislocation was 8.1 years. 61.1% were first or second time dislocators and 38.9% presented with 3 or more dislocations. Initial reductions were predominantly attempted in theatre (96.5%, n=221) with only 3.5% (n=8) attempted in the emergency department. In theatre 89% (n=201) were reduced closed. There was no plan for revision surgery in 70.6% cases with no difference seen between patients with >=3 dislocations and <=2 dislocations. Of the patients with a revision plan, 71% of these were performed or planned locally. The high number of patients with 3 or more dislocations and the lack of plans for definitive interventions in the majority of cases highlights the significant variation in the management of this complex group of patients. This variation in the quality of care increases the burden on the National Health Service through repeat hospital episodes. We aim to roll out this study nationally to assess regional variations and ultimately make the case for national guidance on the management of prosthetic hip dislocations

Aims

We investigated patient characteristics and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral component revision and/or osteosynthesis.

Surgical interventions consisting of internal fixation (IF) or total hip replacement (THR) are required to restore patient mobility after hip fractures. Conventionally, this decision was based solely upon the degree of fracture displacement. However, in the last ten years, there has been a move to incorporate patient characteristics into the decision making process. Research demonstrating that joint replacement renders superior functional results when compared with IF, in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures, has swayed the pendulum in favour of THR. However, a high risk of dislocation has always been the concern. Fortunately, there are newer technologies and alternative surgical approaches that can help reduce the risk of dislocation. The authors propose an algorithm for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: if minimally displaced, in the absence of hip joint arthritis, IF should be performed; if arthritis is present, or the fracture is displaced, then THR is preferred.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):43–7.