Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Full Access

Introduction. Missile injuries are very serious injuries particularly in the cervical region. They are classified into high and low missile injuries when it involves the cervical spine. In modern guerrilla warfare, one must be aware of ballistic pathology with bullets as well as from explosives. In particular, improvised explosive devices commonly known as IED's play a new and important pathophysiology whether they are suicided vests or roadside bombs. They usually produce severe or lethal injuries and serious neurovascular deficit is frequent. We present the details of 40 patients with local experience on how to handle serious penetrating cervical missile injuries. Methods. All cases were collected from the record of Basrah University Hospital, Iraq. Healthy military gentlemen with ages ranging between 20–35 years were included. Results. 11 patients had bullet injuries and 29patients had fragments of shell injuries. The sites of injuries were 9: C2–C3, 12: C5–C6, 12: C4–C5 and 7: C7-T1. Bullet entrance was anterior in 23 patients, posterior in 7 patients and lateral in 10 patients. The cervical vertebrae were injured in 37 patients at body or lamina level while in 3 patients it was only neural tissue injuries. Missiles were retained in 13 patients. All injuries showed some degree of neurological deficit with quadriplegia in 26 patients. 9 patients presented with very serious injuries. No relation was found between the size of the missile and the extent of damage. Outcome of treatment in all patients was poor. Conclusion. Gunshot wounds only account for approximately one third of penetrating missile injuries in patients who survive and are well enough to receive medical treatment. 62% of patients' cohort were from explosive devices, consistent with data from 2010, where 58% of fatalities were from IED's occurring in foreign soldiers in Afghanistan. We discuss the importance of general supportive measures, generous wound excision, removal of the retained missiles and heavy cover of antibiotics


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 8 | Pages 920 - 927
1 Aug 2023
Stanley AL Jones TJ Dasic D Kakarla S Kolli S Shanbhag S McCarthy MJH

Aims

Traumatic central cord syndrome (CCS) typically follows a hyperextension injury and results in motor impairment affecting the upper limbs more than the lower, with occasional sensory impairment and urinary retention. Current evidence on mortality and long-term outcomes is limited. The primary aim of this study was to assess the five-year mortality of CCS, and to determine any difference in mortality between management groups or age.

Methods

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a traumatic CCS between January 2012 and December 2017 in Wales were identified. Patient demographics and data about injury, management, and outcome were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to assess mortality and between-group differences.