Introduction. Closed avulsion of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus (FDP) from distal phalanx most commonly affects the ring finger when an extensive force is applied to a finger in active flexion. Whilst it is undoubtably reasonable to provide treatment for those who present with symptoms, there may be a cohort of people who sustain an avulsion without noticing. This study aims to quantify the effect of ring finger FDP avulsion on overall grip strength to determine the functional effect of a missed injury. Method. Right handed volunteers, with no abnormality on examination were included (N= 42). Proximal muscle group action was excluded. Grip strength was tested using a Jamar dynamometer with and without splinting of the ring finger to block flexion at the DIPJ and repeated six times alternately to mitigate the effects of fatigue. Results. Most subjects showed a small (0.3–3kg) change in their average grip strength with the splint (N= 29). Some showed a dramatic change in their grip strength (6–11.4) (N=6) others showed no change or slight improvement with the splint (−3–0) (N=7). Data were not normally distributed (kolmogorov-smirnov p=0.023). A wilcoxon signed rank test showed a statistically significant difference in performance with, compared to without, the splint, mean 2.34kg reduction (−3.3 − 11.4) (p <0.0005. Discussion. Horton et al have examined the quadriga effect and shown that the individual strength of other digits is reduced when one FDP is isolated. This implies overall grip strength should be reduced; our data supports this assertion. However despite splinting, the majority of subjects were still within the normal range of power for age. Larger scale studies are required to assess the functional effect of repair vs conservative management

Aims. There has been an increasing use of early operative fixation for scaphoid fractures, despite uncertain evidence. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate up-to-date evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing the effectiveness of the operative and nonoperative treatment of undisplaced and minimally displaced (≤ 2 mm displacement) scaphoid fractures. Methods. A systematic review of seven databases was performed from the dates of their inception until the end of March 2021 to identify eligible RCTs. Reference lists of the included studies were screened. No language restrictions were applied. The primary outcome was the patient-reported outcome measure of wrist function at 12 months after injury. A meta-analysis was performed for function, pain, range of motion, grip strength, and union. Complications were reported narratively. Results. Seven RCTs were included. There was no significant difference in function between the groups at 12 months (Hedges’ g 0.15 (95% confidence interval -0.02 to 0.32); p = 0.082). The complication rate was higher in the operative group and involved more serious complications. Conclusion. We found no difference in functional outcome at 12 months for fractures of the waist of the scaphoid with ≤ 2 mm displacement treated operatively or nonoperatively. The complication rate was higher with operative treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):953–962

Aims. Following cast removal for nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures, rehabilitation facilitated by advice leaflet and advice video were compared to a course of face-to-face therapy. Methods. Adults with an isolated, nonoperatively treated distal radius fracture were included at six weeks post-cast removal. Participants were randomized to delivery of rehabilitation interventions in one of three ways: an advice leaflet; an advice video; or face-to-face therapy session(s). The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at six weeks post intervention and secondary outcome measures included DASH at one year, DASH work subscale, grip strength, and range of motion at six weeks and one year. Results. A total of 116 (97%) of 120 enrolled participants commenced treatment. Of those, 21 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 30 participants in the advice leaflet, 32 in the advice video, and 33 face-to-face therapy arms, respectively at six weeks of follow-up. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the DASH at six weeks (advice leaflet vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.69; advice video vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.56; advice leaflet vs advice video, p = 0.37; advice leaflet vs advice video vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.63). At six weeks, there were no differences in any secondary outcome measures except for the DASH work subscale, where face-to-face therapy conferred benefit over advice leaflet (p = 0.01). Conclusion. Following cast removal for nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures, offering an advice leaflet or advice video for rehabilitation gives equivalent patient-reported outcomes to a course of face-to-face therapy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1033–1039

Aims. To compare operative and nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged over 65 years. Methods. A total of 100 patients were randomized in this non-inferiority trial, comparing cast immobilization with operation with a volar locking plate. Patients with displaced AO/OTA A and C fractures were eligible if one of the following were found after initial closed reduction: 1) dorsal angulation > 10°; 2) ulnar variance > 3 mm; or 3) intra-articular step-off > 2 mm. Primary outcome measure was the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) after 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), EuroQol-5 dimensions 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), range of motion (ROM), grip strength, “satisfaction with wrist function” (score 0 to 10), and complications. Results. In all, 89 women and 11 men were included. Mean age was 74 years (65 to 91). Nonoperative treatment was non-inferior to operation with a five-point difference in median QuickDASH after 12 months (p = 0.206). After three and six months QuickDASH favoured the operative group (p = 0.010 and 0.030). Median values for PRWHE were 19 (interquartile range (IRQ) 10 to 32) in the operative group versus ten (IQR 1 to 31) in the nonoperative group at three months (p = 0.064), nine (IQR 2 to 20) versus five (IQR 0 to 13) (p = 0.020) at six months, and two (IQR 0 to 12) versus zero (IQR 0 to 8) (p = 0.019) after 12 months. Range of motion was similar between the groups. The EQ-5D-5L index score was better (mean difference 0.07) in the operative group at three and 12 months (p = 0.008 and 0.020). The complication rate was similar (p = 0.220). The operated patients were more satisfied with wrist function (median 8 (IQR 6 to 9) vs 6 (IQR 5 to 7) at three months, p = 0.002; 9 (IQR 7 to 9) vs 8 (IQR 6 to 8) at six months, p = 0.002; and 10 (IQR 8 to 10) vs 8 (IQR 7 to 9) at 12 months, p < 0.001). Conclusion. Nonoperative treatment was non-inferior to operative treatment based on QuickDASH after one year. Patients in the operative group had a faster recovery and were more satisfied with wrist function. Results from previous trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in the elderly vary between favouring the operative group and showing similar results between the treatments. This randomized trial suggests that most elderly patients may be treated nonoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):247–255

Objectives. To investigate the differences of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of complex AO Type C distal radius fractures between two different models of a single implant type. Methods. A total of 136 patients who received either a 2.4 mm (n = 61) or 3.5 mm (n = 75) distal radius locking compression plate (LCP DR) using a volar approach were followed over two years. The main outcome measurements included motion, grip strength, pain, and the scores of Gartland and Werley, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Differences between the treatment groups were evaluated using regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test with significance based on the Bonferroni corrected p-value of < 0.003. Results. The groups were similar with respect to baseline and injury characteristics as well as general surgical details. The risk of experiencing a complication after ORIF with a LCP DR 2.4 mm was 18% (n = 11) compared with 11% (n = 8) after receiving a LCP DR 3.5 mm (p = 0.45). Wrist function was also similar between the cohorts based on the mean ranges of movement (all p > 0.052) and grip strength measurements relative to the contralateral healthy side (p = 0.583). In addition, DASH and SF-36 component scores as well as pain were not significantly different between the treatment groups throughout the two-year period (all p ≥ 0.005). No patient from either treatment group had a step-off > 2 mm. Conclusions. Differences in plate design do not influence the overall final outcome of fracture fixation using LCP.

This is a retrospective study of six children with ununited scaphoid fractures treated conservatively. Their mean age was 12.8 years (9.7 to 16.3). Five had no early treatment. Radiological signs of nonunion were found at a mean of 4.6 months (3 to 7) after injury. Treatment consisted of cast immobilisation until clinical and radiological union. The mean clinical and radiological follow-up was for 67 months (17 to 90). We assessed the symptoms, the range of movement of the wrist and the grip strength to calculate the Modified Mayo Wrist score. The fracture united in all patients after a mean period of immobilisation of 5.3 months (3 to 7). Five patients were pain free; one had mild pain. All returned to regular activities, and had a range of movement and grip strength within 25% of normal, resulting in an excellent Modified Mayo Wrist score. Prolonged treatment with cast immobilisation resulted in union of the fracture and an excellent Modified Wrist Score in all patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subjective and objective functional outcome after osteosynthesis of the forearm bone fractures with plates and screws (ORIF) or elastic nailing (CRIF). We evaluated 55 patients (45 men and 10 women) who underwent internal fixation of both forearm bones with CRIF or ORIF, concerning the range of motion of the forearm, wrist and elbow (pronation, supination, flexion and extension), grip strength and a validated outcome measure (DASH score). The mean duration of follow-up was 3 years, and standardized radiographs of the forearm were evaluated. The mean age was 41.6. We used the Student's t test to compare means and chi-square test to compare proportions. The mean (confidence interval 95%) of the DASH scale was 29.6 (22.6 to 36.5), significantly higher (p<0.001) than the normative value in the U.S. (10.1). There was a statistically significant reduction of forearm supination (86.4 vs. 64.6, p<0.001) and grip strength (0.63 vs. 0.48, p<0.001) in relation to the opposite member; grip strength decrease correlated with worse subjective outcome (p<0.02). There were no significant differences between groups undergoing ORIF or CRIF. The risk of nonunion and reintervention was not different between groups (p=0214). Forearm bones fractures are associated with high rates of consolidation and satisfactory mobility of the forearm since we obtain an anatomic reduction of the fracture, as is most easily achieved by plate fixation. However, elastic nailing is a less invasive technique that allows restoring function more quickly with less pain and no increased risk of complications. Given the scant scientific evidence currently available we will require a more comprehensive study to compare the anatomical and functional outcome after ORIF and CRIF

The best surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis remains uncertain. Recently radiofrequency microtenotomy (RFMT) has been proposed as a suitable surgical treatment. We aim to compare open release with RFMT and present the results of our randomised controlled trial. Patients with symptoms of tennis elbow for at least 6 months who had failed to respond to conservative management were included in the trial. They were randomised to open release or RFMT. Outcome measures included grip strength, pain and DASH scores. 41 patients were randomised, 23 to RFMT and 18 to open release, 2 patients withdrew from the study. Our results show that both treatments give a significant benefit at all time points for DASH and pain scores, but only open release gives a significant improvement in grip strength. Comparing the two treatments the only significant difference is the open group have better pain scores at 6 weeks, but this is not seen at later follow up. In conclusion both groups have shown benefit from the treatments, but one is not shown to be clearly superior

Introduction. The role of in-situ decompression in patients with severe ulnar nerve compression is still controversial. The authors present a prospective study on the results of in-situ decompression in this selected group of patients treated through a mini open incision (4cms) and complete decompression by appropriate patient positioning. Material/Methods. Thirty patients (20 Male/10 Female) with severe degree of nerve compression, confirmed clinically by Dellon's classification and by abnormal Nerve Conduction Study, underwent simple in-situ decompression under general anaesthesia as a day-case procedure. Through a 4cms incision and by moving the elbow the nerve is fully visualised and decompressed. Outcome was measured prospectively at three months and one year using Modified Bishop's score, grip strengths and two point discrimination (2PD). Results/Statistics. The average age of patients were 58.3 (26–87) and dominant hand was involved in 13 patients. Patients showed improvement greater at 1year than at 3 months. There was statistically significant improvement in power (p-0.01) and pinch grip strength (p-0.001) at one year after surgery. According to Modified Bishop's scoring, 24 patients (80%) had good to excellent results at one year follow-up. Of the eight patients with fair results at three months four improved and two detiorated, leading to a total of four poor results (13.3%) at one year follow-up. The 2PD identified the patients with poor or good results according to the Modified Bishop score at three months follow-up. Conclusions. Our results show that the minimally invasive in-situ decompression is technically simple, safe and gives good results in patients with severe nerve compression. The Modified Bishop score and 2PD were more reliable in assessing these patients at follow-up

We reviewed 13 patients with a complex fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of a finger and one patient with a complex fracture-dislocation of the interphalangeal joint of thumb. We had treated these injuries using a pins and rubbers traction system which had been modified to avoid friction of the pins against the bone during mobilisation of the joint in order to minimise the risk of osteolysis. A Michigan hand outcome questionnaire was used for subjective assessment. The active range of movement (AROM) of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints and the grip strength were used for objective assessment. The mean follow-up was 34 months (12 to 49). The mean normalised Michigan hand outcome score was 84. The mean AROM of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 85° and that of the distal interphalangeal joint 48°. The mean grip strength was 92% of the uninvolved hand. Twelve patients have returned to their original occupations. There has been no radiological osteolysis or clinical osteomyelitis. This modified traction system has given acceptable results with a low rate of complications. It is light, cheap, effective and easy to apply

A total of 179 adult patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius was randomised to receive indirect percutaneous reduction and external fixation (n = 88) or open reduction and internal fixation (n = 91). Patients were followed up for two years. During the first year the upper limb musculoskeletal function assessment score, the SF-36 bodily pain sub-scale score, the overall Jebsen score, pinch strength and grip strength improved significantly in all patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the radiological restoration of anatomical features or the range of movement between the groups. During the period of two years, patients who underwent indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation had a more rapid return of function and a better functional outcome than those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, provided that the intra-articular step and gap deformity were minimised

Introduction. Several clinical and radiological studies have confirmed the benefits of using Volar Locking Plates (VLPs) to treat unstable distal radius fractures. The “theoretical” advantage of VLPs compared to standard plate fixation is that VLPs, through their design, intrinsically provide angular stability for most fracture configurations including comminuted fractures and, quite possibly, osteoporotic fractures. However few studies have compared the clinical results of patients of different ages who have been treated using VLPs. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of VLP fixation of displaced distal radius in younger (<59 yrs) and older (>60yrs) patients. Patients & Methods. We reviewed 78 consecutive patients who had undergone ORIF of their displaced distal radial fractures using a VLP. All patients were reviewed at predetermined time points by an independent observer and the findings at 6 months are presented. In addition to documenting the standard demographics for each patient and classifying the fractures using the OTA/AO system, wrist function was assessed using Range of Movement (ROM), Grip strength (GS), the Modified Gartland & Werley score (MGWS), the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Quick DASH scores, and overall scores of wrist Pain and Function using Visual Analogue Scores (VAS). Results. 43 patients were under 60 years of age and 35 patients were 60 years or over. The proportion of extra-articular to intra-articular fractures were similar for both age groups. There was little difference in terms of patient perception of Pain and Function, or ROM, MGWS (7.2 versus 6.9), PRWE (24 versus 23.6) and quick DASH scores (17.3 versus 19.1) between the two groups at 6 months. The younger group did have significantly better grip strength, but when compared as a percentage of the uninjured wrist, the results were also similar (83% vs 80%). Conclusions. VLPs are a suitable option for fixing distal radial fractures in older patients (>60yrs) and the clinical results appear to be just as good as they are in younger patients

We performed a prospective, randomised study on 57 patients older than 60 years of age with unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius to compare the outcome of immobilisation in a cast alone with that using supplementary, percutaneous pinning. Patients treated by percutaneous wires had a statistically significant improvement in dorsal angulation (mean 7°), radial length (mean 3 mm) and radial inclination (mean 3 mm) at one year. However, there was no significant difference in functional outcome in terms of pain, range of movement, grip strength, activities of daily living and the SF-36 score except for an improved range of movement in ulnar deviation in the percutaneous wire group. One patient developed a pin-track infection which required removal of the wires at two weeks. We conclude that percutaneous pinning of unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius provides only a marginal improvement in the radiological parameters compared with immobilisation in a cast alone. This does not correlate with an improved functional outcome in a low-demand, elderly population

Introduction. Lesions of the upper extremities, and especially of the hands, are the most common form of occupational injury in the agricultural and industrial sectors [1]. When the grip strength and the way of its development are relevant, it would be very useful to be able to rely on an instrumental procedure, in support of the clinical examination, for both clinical and legal purposes. The possibility of differentiating between healthy subjects and patients affected by disabilities of the upper extremities, using parameters based on force-time curves for handgrip tests, was investigated with the aim to obtain objective and comprehensive outcome, useful to support the clinical evaluation. Materials and Methods. The reference group consisted of 151 subjects examined for occupational trauma of the upper limbs, all with a dominant right arm, who had suffered an occupational injury. The 74% of the injuries affected the hand. A further 648 healthy people were enrolled as the control group. Grip strength was measured with an electronic dynamometer. The signals acquired with the dynamometer were subdivided into 5 characteristic phases [2]: first reaction, explosive contraction, isometric contraction, release and relaxation. The maximum force, the ratio between the maximum force exerted by the two arms and an index related to the explosive muscle power and the ability to maintain maximum voluntary contraction were calculated. Percentage variations of each parameter, as compared to a threshold value, were taken into account and an overall value (T) was calculated, representing the sum of these variations. Result and Discussion. This acquisition system was shown to be reliable and easy to use, and the test could be administered simply and fairly rapidly. The findings in the control group were comparable to those reported in the literature [3–4]. A negative value of T invariably identified a subject with a disability. By associating assessment of T with those of the specific indexes, other subjects with a clinical disability were identified. The use of the parameters we describe makes it possible not only to assess the maximum force of the handgrip but also how it is exerted and maintained, thus providing a more reliable method of differentiating between normal function and impairment and what it is more obtaining an objective and comprehensive outcome, which sensitivity is useful to support clinical evaluation. The proposed functional tests could offer the clinician a possible diagnostic aid, providing a method that can describe the motor skill on the basis of objective parameters. In view of its good sensitivity (0.99%) and specificity (0.84%), relatively rapid execution and the low cost of the tools, it could be usefully adopted in the clinical setting

This multicentre prospective clinical trial aimed to determine whether early administration of alendronate (ALN) delays fracture healing after surgical treatment of fractures of the distal radius. The study population comprised 80 patients (four men and 76 women) with a mean age of 70 years (52 to 86) with acute fragility fractures of the distal radius requiring open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate and screws. Two groups of 40 patients each were randomly allocated either to receive once weekly oral ALN administration (35 mg) within a few days after surgery and continued for six months, or oral ALN administration delayed until four months after surgery. Postero-anterior and lateral radiographs of the affected wrist were taken monthly for six months after surgery. No differences between groups was observed with regard to gender (p = 1.0), age (p = 0.916), fracture classification (p = 0.274) or bone mineral density measured at the spine (p = 0.714). The radiographs were assessed by three independent assessors. There were no significant differences in the mean time to complete cortical bridging observed between the ALN group (3.5 months (. se. 0.16)) and the no-ALN group (3.1 months (. se. 0.15)) (p = 0.068). All the fractures healed in the both groups by the last follow-up. Improvement of the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, grip strength, wrist range of movement, and tenderness over the fracture site did not differ between the groups over the six-month period. Based on our results, early administration of ALN after surgery for distal radius fracture did not appear to delay fracture healing times either radiologically or clinically. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1544–50

Fractures of the distal radius occurring in young adults are treated increasingly by open surgical techniques, partly because of concern that failure to restore the alignment of the fracture accurately may cause symptomatic post-traumatic osteoarthritis in future years. We reviewed 106 adults who had sustained a fracture of the distal radius between 1960 and 1968 and who were below the age of 40 years at the time of injury. We carried out a clinical and radiological assessment at a mean follow-up of 38 years (33 to 42). No patient had required a salvage procedure. While there was radiological evidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis after an intra-articular fracture in 68% of patients (27 of 40), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores were not different from population norms, and function, as assessed by the Patient Evaluation Measure, was impaired by less than 10%. Ordinal logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship between narrowing of the joint space and extra-articular malunion (dorsal angulation and radial shortening) as well as intra-articular injury. Multivariate analysis revealed that grip strength had fallen to 89% of that of the uninjured side in the presence of dorsal malunion, but no measure of extra-articular malunion was significantly related to either the Patient Evaluation Measure or DASH scores. While anatomical reduction is the principal aim of treatment, imperfect reduction of these fractures may not result in symptomatic arthritis in the long term, and this should be considered when counselling patients on the risks and benefits of the many treatment options available

The Essex-Lopresti injury is rare. It consists of fracture of the head of the radius, rupture of the interosseous membrane and disruption of the distal radioulnar joint. The injury is often missed because attention is directed towards the fracture of the head of the radius. We present a series of 12 patients with a mean age of 44.9 years (26 to 54), 11 of whom were treated surgically at a mean of 4.6 months (1 to 16) after injury and the other after 18 years. They were followed up for a mean of 29.2 months (2 to 69). Ten patients had additional injuries to the forearm or wrist, which made diagnosis more difficult. Replacement of the head of the radius was carried out in ten patients and the Sauve-Kapandji procedure in three. Patients were assessed using standard outcome scores. The mean post-operative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 55 (37 to 83), the mean Morrey Elbow Performance score was 72.2 (39 to 92) and the mean Mayo wrist score was 61.3 (35 to 80). The mean grip strength was 68.5% (39.6% to 91.3%) of the unaffected wrist. Most of the patients (10 of 12) were satisfied with their operation and in 11 the pain was relieved. When treating the chronic Essex-Lopresti injury, we recommend accurate realignment of the radius and ulna and replacement of the head of the radius. If this fails a Sauve-Kapandji procedure to arthrodese the distal radioulnar joint should be undertaken to stabilise the forearm while maintaining mobility

Background. The usefulness of arthroscopic reduction for the intra-articular fracture of the distal radius has been reported, although it is technically difficult. Hypothesis. Our hypothesis is that the reduction using the external fixator is useful as equivalent to the arthroscopic reduction for the intra-articular fracture of the distal radius fracture in the fixation with the volar locking plate. Materials & Methods. The surgery was performed in both methods randomly for 40 patients; average age 64(24 to 92) years, 11 male, 29 female. Image evaluations were performed at 24 weeks after surgery. Ulnar variance, Radial inclination, Volar tilt in the X-ray image, and gap and step in the computed tomogram were evaluated. Clinical evaluation was performed at 6, 12, 24 weeks after surgery. Objective evaluations were ranges of motion and grip strength. Subjective evaluations were disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH). Results. The results of image and objective evaluation had no significant difference between the two groups. DASH in arthroscopic group was significantly inferior at 24 weeks because of minor complications. Discussion & Conclusion. The external fixator and the arthroscopy are equally valuable in reduction of articular surface

Introduction. Lack of standardization of outcome measurement has hampered an evidence-based approach to clinical practice and research. We report on the progress on establishing a minimal set of core domains for outcome measurement in distal radius fracture. Materials and methods. Participants included an expert panel of orthopaedic surgeons, outcome researchers, patients, physiotherapists, industry representatives involved in distal radius research and partners in regulatory affairs. Decisions were made by review of evidence and theory and establishing group consensus. Results. There was consensus that clinical research studies should include a proof of concept outcome that would directly assess the presumed direct benefit of the intervention. We identified a need for additional outcome measures for research including measures that provide more detail on pain and function; or that address supplemental concepts important to that study. Measures of fracture healing/alignment, grip strength, joint motion were recognized as commonly utilized secondary outcomes. Discussion and Conclusion. Our approach provides preliminary steps in establishing core domains that have content relevant to patient goals (i.e. pain and function) and the providers’ treatment goals (i.e. strength, range of motion, function). The panel recommendations provide flexibility in establishing customized data collection for specific indications; but offer some core consistency

The previous bioabsorbable plates have had several issues with regard to clinical usage for fractures. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the clinical results of novel bioabsorbable plates made of hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide and titanium plates for metacarpal fractures and to compare mechanical properties of them in a fracture model. The subjects were 33 metacarpal diaphyseal fractures of 27 consecutive patients treated with bioabsorbable plates. The mean age was 35.8 (17–78), 22 male and 5 female was included. The mean follow up period was 7.4months (2–14). All cases achieved bone union, and there were no complication especially for aseptic swelling etc. Furthermore, we compared the mechanical properties of bioabsorbable and titanium plates. There were no significant differences in 6 month postoperative clinical results including total range of active motion and % of the contralateral grip strength between patients receiving bioabsorbable and titanium plates. The bending strength and stiffness of one-third tubular bioabsorbable plate constructs were comparable with those of titanium plates for 1.5mm screws, and those of semi-tubular bioabsorbable plates were comparable with those of titanium plates for 2.0mm screws. The torsional strength of semi-tubular bioabsorbable plates was significantly greater than that of titanium plates for 2.0mm screws