[Introduction]. As an essential concept in TKA, preparing equalized rectangular extension and flexion gaps is recognized as desirable to ensure proper knee kinematics. However, in the ways that was recommended by an implant manufacturer, the adjustments are so difficult, and for inexperienced doctor, we don't have an ideal technique for an additional cutting up and ligament balancing. Then, the New method (Precut method) was introduced in order to enable an ideal adjustments. [Method]. Sixty eights patients with osteoarthritis of the knee received TKAs using Precut method. This method is the following. At first, proximal tibia was resected 10 mm by standard cutting device. And then, femoral posterior condyle was resected 4 mm lesser than cutting line by measured resection technique (Precut method). In the next, using the spacer block 1 mm unit and the Precut trial implant (8 mm; distal femur 4 mm; posterior condyle), we investigated the bone gap and the component gap (put the Precut trial on the distal femur). Finally, we calculated the amount of the final cutting value based on the component gap. The survey item measured the bone gap at extension and flexion, the component gap at extension and flexion after putting the Precut trial on. Then we compared the gap difference with and without the Precut trial. [Result]. Our results showed that the extension gap with the Precut trial was smaller than the predicted value with the Precut trial (mean: 8.66 mm/8.18 mm), the flexion gap with the Precut trial was larger than the predicted value with the Precut trial (mean: 13.2 mm/14.1 mm). The extension gap had reduced by 0.48 mm and the flexion gap enlarged by 0.3 mm. [Discussion]. In TKA, it is difficult to make extension gap and flexion gap equal. Therefore, after putting the final implant, we experienced the case s such as could not stretch fully in extension, such as had instability in flexion. However, in this method, we will earn the ideal stability in postoperative condition. It is because that after putting the Precut trial, we measured implant gap at extension and flexion, and then decided the final osteotomy value to eliminate the gap difference. [Conclusion]. As we measured extension gap and flexion gap in condition which put the Precut trial on, before the final osteotomy, we can make an equal gap at extension and flexion. We think a useful procedure for the stability after TKA

Introduction. Although gap balancing technique has been reported to be beneficial for the intra-operative soft tissue balancing in posterior-stabilized (PS)-TKA, excessive release of medial structures for achieving perfect ligament balance would be more likely to result in medial instability, which would deteriorate post-operative clinical results. We have modified conventional gap balancing technique and devised a new surgical concept; named as “medial gap technique” aiming at medial stability with permitting lateral looseness, as physiologically observed in normal knee. Objective. We compared intra-operative soft tissue balance between medial gap technique (MGT) and measured resection technique (MRT) in PS-TKAs. Materials and Methods. The subjects were 210 female patients with varus type osteoarthritic knees, underwent primary PS TKA. The surgical techniques were MGT in 96 patients and MRT in 114 patients. The extension gap was made in the same manners in both groups with medial releases limited until the spacer block could be easily inserted. The residual lateral laxity was permitted. In the MGT group, before posterior femoral osteotomies, varus angles (°) and center gaps (mm) at extension and flexion were measured using an offset type tensor with applying 40 lbs. (177.9N) of joint distraction force. The level and external rotation angle of posterior femoral osteotomies were determined based on the difference of center gaps and varus angles between extension and flexion respectively. Intra-operative joint gap kinematics was measured with femoral trial in place and patello-femoral joint reduced. We measured varus angle and component gap at 8 different knee flexion angles from 0° to 135°. From these component gaps and varus angles, we calculated a medial and lateral compartment gaps (MCG and LCG) by using a trigonometric function. Also we calculated the increase of both compartment gaps from those at full extension, named as joint gap loosening (mm). Both compartment gaps and joint gap loosening were compared between 2 groups using unpaired t-test, and the difference between MCG and LCG in each group were compared using paired t- test (p<0.05). Results. The mean MCGs showed significantly smaller value than LCGs at all flexion angles in both groups (Fig.1). Both medial and lateral joint gap loosening were significantly smaller in MGT group than MRT group from mid-flexion to deep flexion (Fig. 2, 3). Discussion. We have reported the joint distraction force affected varus imbalance due to the stiffness difference between medial and lateral structures. This might be a reason why gap technique was performed less quantitatively and with higher risk of medial instability. In MGT, we allowed persistent lateral looseness and applied the difference in varus angle between extension and flexion to the external rotation angle of femoral component. Results showed no medial looseness were observed in MGT like in MRT. The less joint gap loosening with knee flexion were achieved by MGT because the advantage of conventional gap balancing was also incorporated. We found “medial gap technique” was effective for quantitative soft tissue balancing with more stable joint gap kinematics and no medial looseness

Introduction. Appropriate osteotomy alignment and soft tissue balance are essential for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The management of soft tissue balance still remains difficult and it is left much to the surgeon's subjective feel and experience. We developed an offset type tensor system for TKA. This device enables objective soft tissue balance measurement with more physiological joint conditions with femoral trial component in place and patello-femoral (PF) joint reduced. We have reported femoral component placement decreased extension gap. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of femoral component size selection on the decrease of extension gap in posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. Material & Method. 120 varus type osteoarthritic knees implanted with PS TKAs (NexGen LPS flex: Zimmer) were subjected to this study. All TKAs were performed using measured resection technique with anterior reference. The femoral component size was evaluated intra-operatively using conventional femoral sizing jig. The selected femoral component size was expressed by the antero-posterior (AP) size increase (mm) comparing to that of original femoral condyles. Gap measurements were performed using a newly developed offset type tensor device applying 40lbs (178N) of joint distraction force. Firstly, conventional osteotomy gaps (mm) were measured at extension and flexion. Secondary, component gaps (mm) after femoral trial placement with PF joint reduced were evaluated at 0° and 90° of knee flexion. To compare conventional osteotomy gaps and component gaps, estimated extension and flexion gaps were calculated by subtracting the femoral component thickness at extension (9mm) and flexion (11mm) from conventional osteotomy gaps respectively. The decrease of gap at extension and flexion were calculated with estimated gaps subtracted by component gaps. The simple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of selected femoral component size on the decrease of gap after femoral component placement. Results. The mean extension and flexion conventional osteotomy gaps were 25.7 and 28.2 mm, and estimated gaps were 16.7, 17.2 mm respectively. The component gaps were 11.1, 16.9 mm at 0° and 90° of knee flexion respectively. Extension joint gap was significantly decreased as much as 5.6mm after femoral component placement, but flexion gap showed no significant differences. Selected femoral component size showed a positive correlation to the decrease of gap after femoral component placement (Fig 1). Discussion & Conclusion. This result indicates that AP femoral component size variation affects not only flexion gap but also extension gap in PS TKA. With the larger femoral component size selected, the more protrusion of posterior condyles would increase the more tension on the posterior structures and resulted in the more decrease of joint gap after femoral component placement at full extension. This mechanism might play a physiological role on the prevention of knee hyper-extension, and would be affected by flexion contracture. Accordingly, we conclude that the surgeon should aware of the effect of femoral component placement on the gap control, and femoral component size selection affects not only flexion gap but also extension gap after femoral component placement in PS TKA

Introduction. Patient specific surgical guide (PSSG) is a relatively new technique for accurate total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and there are many reports supporting PSSG can reduce the rate of outlier in the coronal plane. We began to use PSSG provided by Biomet (Signature®) and have reported the same results. Before using Signature, we performed TKA by modified gap technique (parallel cut technique) to get the well balanced flexion gap. Signature is the one of the measured resection technique using the anatomical landmarks as reference points on the images of CT or MR taken before surgery. We usually measure the center gap width and gap balance during operation with the special device “knee balancer”(Fig. 1) that can be used on patella reposition. After cutting all of the bone with Signature, gap balance in the extension position was very good but the gap balance was shown slight lateral opening in the 90 degrees flexion position. So we have changed the surgical procedure. We use Signature for cutting only distal femur and proximal tibia to get extension gap and apply the modified gap technique to decide the rotation of the femoral component (Signature with modified gap technique). The purpose of this study is to compare the gap balance between the two techniques. Materials & Methods. From November, 2012 through March, 2014, 50 CR type TKA (Vanguard Knee®, Biomet) in osteoarthritis patients were performed using Signature. 25 TKA were performed using only Signature (group S) and other 25 TKA were done using Signature with modified gap technique (group SG). After all osteotomies of femur and tibia were completed, applying femoral trial, center gap width and gap balance (plus means lateral opening angle) were measured using knee balancer with respect to 30 degrees of the knee flexion angle from zero to 120 degrees (Fig. 2). Results. From knee flexion angle 0 to 120 degrees, gap width was 10.8, 11.9, 11.3, 11, 2 10.8mm in group S, 11.9, 12.6, 11.9, 12.0, 11.8mm in group SG, the range of the gap width was small, 1.1mm and 0.8mm. Gap balance was 0.4, 0.6, 1.0, 2.6, 3.6 degrees in group S and 0.1, 0.1, 0.5, 0.6, 2.6 degrees in group SG. Discussion. With both techniques, Signature and Signature with gap technique, center gap width stayed constant. When it comes to gap balance, in Signature with gap technique group, gap balance were good and constant in knee flexion angle from zero to 90 degrees. But in Signature group, the more flexion angle increased, the more lateral opening angle enlarged. So Signature with gap technique is better than only Signature to get good gap balances during knee movement

Introduction. Infected big gap non-union of femur and tibia are difficult to treatment because of infection, bone loss, shortening, poor sift tissue over and deformity. Step by step management and definitive treatment by Ilizarov fixator was achieved in our cases. Materials and Methods. A long defect which is more than 10cm in femur and tibia because of infection and gap, tumor resection, traumatic loss, which is very difficult to treat by conventional method and that's why we treated that type defect by Tibialization of fibula with Ilizarov technique. Management of infected big gap non-union of the femur include debridement and bone transport by Ilizarov technique by using Ilizarov fixator we can correct deformities, regenerate new bone without bone grafting, correct LLD and patient can weight bear during the course of treatment. We retrospectively reviewed records of 246 consecutive patients who underwent distraction osteogenesis using Ilizarov compression-distraction device for infected big gap INU of femur and tibia from 2000 to 2020. Results. All healed with the application of Ilizarov fixator, 5 needed reapplications of Ilizarov to achieve 100% union. 210 were excellent, 25 good and 6 were fair by ASAMI criteria. Mean Ilizarov duration was 366 days (130–250). Mean 8.2 cm length was achieved in the regenerate. Conclusions. A well plan step by step Ilizarov technique to cover infected gap non-union of femur and tibia is an excellent method in challenging cases. Excellent results cannot be achieved with conventional methods but can be easily achieved with Ilizarov technique within 1–2 years

INTRODUCTION. Mechanical alignment in TKA introduces significant anatomic modifications for many individuals, which may result in unequal medial-lateral or flexion-extension bone resections. The objective of this study was to calculate bone resection thicknesses and resulting gap sizes, simulating a measured resection mechanical alignment technique for TKA. METHODS. Measured resection mechanical alignment bone resections were simulated on 1000 consecutive lower limb CT-Scans from patients undergoing TKA. Bone resections were simulated to reproduce the following measured resection mechanical alignment surgical technique. The distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts were perpendicular to the mechanical axis, setting the resection depth at 8mm from the most distal femoral condyle and from the most proximal tibial plateau (Figure 1). If the resection of the contralateral side was <0mm, the resection level was increased such that the minimum resection was 0mm. An 8mm resection thickness was based on an implant size of 10mm (bone +2mm of cartilage). Femoral rotation was aligned with either the trans-epicondylar axis or with 3 degrees of external rotation to the posterior condyles. After simulation of the bone cuts, media-lateral gap difference and flexion-extension gaps difference were calculated. The gap sizes were calculated as the sum of the femoral and tibial bone resections, with a target bone resection of 16mm (+ cartilage corresponding to the implant thickness). RESULTS. For both the varus and valgus knees, the created gaps in the medial and lateral compartments were reduced in the vast majority of cases (<16mm). The insufficient lateral condyle resection distalises the lateral joint surface by a mean of 2.1mm for the varus and 4.4mm for the valgus knees. The insufficient medial tibial plateau resection proximalises the medial joint surface by 3.3mm for the varus and 1.2mm for the valgus knees. Medio-lateral gap imbalances in the extension space of more than 2mm) occurred in 25% of varus and 54% of valgus knees and significant imbalances of more than 5mm were present in up to 8% of varus and 19% of valgus knees. Higher medio-lateral gap imbalances in the flexion space were created with trans epicondylar axis versus 3 degrees to the posterior condyles (p<0.001). Using trans epicondylar axis, only 49% of varus and 18% of valgus knees had less than 3mm of imbalance in both media-lateral and flexion-extension gaps together. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. A systematic use of the tested measured resection mechanical alignment technique for TKA leads to many cases with medio-lateral or flexion-extension gap asymmetries. Some medio-lateral imbalances may not be correctable surgically and may results in TKA instability. Other versions of the mechanical alignment technique or other alignment methods that better reproduce knee anatomies should be explored. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Background. There are few reports including natural course of initial gap in total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of initial gap in the PSL type shells and its natural course. Methods. Total of 386 THAs with Trident or TriAD PSL shells were performed between January 2000 and December 2014. Exclusion criteria were shells with screw fixations (n=189), previous pelvic osteotomy (n=15) and less than 3 years’ follow-up (n=11). Finally, our study included 171 hips. Average age was 56.8 (17∼83) years at THA and average follow-up time was 8.3 (3∼16.3) years; 112 (66%) were women; and 120 hips (70.2%) had osteoarthrosis. As radiographic evaluation, we checked presence or absence of initial gap, maximum size of it, gap filling and cup stability. The presence of initial gap was defined as gap present on post-operative anteroposterior X-ray measuring 1mm or greater. Gap filling was defined as confirmed trabecular formation between the cup and acetabular floor without cup migration. And we determined the time to gap filling. As clinical evaluation, we retrospectively checked Harris Hip Score (HHS) at pre-operative and final follow-up period, and presence of shell revision. Furthermore, we compared clinical results with or without initial gap. Results. Initial gap was confirmed at 85 hips (49.7%) and mean maximum size was 2.1 (1∼6.3) mm. Mean gap filling occurred at 2.5 (± 1.4) years and there was no unstable cup. Comparing clinical results with or without initial gap, pre-operative HHS was not significantly associated with initial gap (57.8 and 56.3, respectively, p=0.41). HHS at final follow-up period was also not significantly associated with initial gap (88.4 and 87.5, respectively, p=0.49). There was no shell revision with or without initial gap. Discussion. Initial gap of hemispherical type shell is reported that its incidence is 16∼38% and initial gap is not associated with clinical outcome. Our results show that PSL type shell occurs initial gap more frequently than hemispherical type shells. Conclusion. Initial gap of PSL type shell was confirmed at 85 hips (49.7%) and mean gap filling occurred at 2.5 years. Initial gap did not affect shell revision and clinical outcome

INTRODUCTION. The results of modified gap balancing and measured resection technique have been still controversial. We compared PS-type TKAs for osteoarthritis performed using the modified gap technique and the measured resection to determine if either technique provides superior clinical results. METHODS. The modified gap technique was used in 85 knees, and the measured technique using preoperative CT was used in 70 knees. To compare intra-operative soft tissue balance, bone gap and component gap were measured using original two paddle tensor (20,30,40lb) at 0 degree extension and 90 degrees flexion. To assess the post-operative patella congruency and soft tissue balance, we measured patella tilt, condylar twist angle (CTA) and condylar lift-off angle (LOA) in radiographs. Finally, we evaluated postoperative clinical result (1–5 years) KOOS. Statistical analysis was used by StatView. RESULTS. (1). Component gaps in flexion at measured techniques were bigger than at gap techniques. Lateral flexion-extension gap and lateral-medial balance at 30lb or 40lb in the measured technique were statistically bigger than the gap technique. (2). There were no statistical correlations with patella tilt, CTA and LOA in both techniques. There were no significant differences between each of the two techniques. (3). KOOS of ‘pain during going up or down stairs’ for the measured technique were statistically worse than for the gap technique. DISCUSSION. Intra-operative lateral gap and flexion balance using measured technique were bigger than gap technique, but there were no statistical differences in post-operative LOA and PF congruency in radiographs. Post-operative pain on stairs might be affected by the differences in intra-operative gap and balance between the two techniques with the balanced ligament technique showing more positive results

Background. Adjusting the joint gap length to be equal in both extension and flexion is an important issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Tight flexion gaps occur sometimes, particularly with the cruciate-retaining (CR) type of TKA, and it impede knee flexion. In posterior stabilizing (PS) TKA, because sacrificing the PCL increases the flexion gap, the issue of gap balancing with PS-TKA is usually focused on decreasing the enlarged flexion gap to be equal to the extension gap. It is generally known that posterior tibial slope would affect the flexion gap, however, the extent to which changes in the tibial slope angle directly affect the flexion gap remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the influence of tibial slope changes on the flexion gap in CR- or PS-TKA. Methods. The flexion gap was measured using a tensor device with the femoral trail component in 20 cases each of CR- and PS-TKA. A wedge plate with a 5° inclination was placed on the tibial cut surface by switching its front–back direction to increase or decrease the tibial slope by 5°. The flexion gap in changing the tibial slope was compared to that of the neutral slope measured with a flat plate that had the same thickness of the wedge plate center. Results. When the tibial slope decreased or increased by 5°, the flexion gap decreased or increased by 1.9 ± 0.6 mm or 1.8 ± 0.4 mm, respectively, with CR-TKA and 1.2 ± 0.4 mm or 1.1 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, with PS-TKA. Conclusions. The influence of changing the tibial slope by 5° on the flexion gap was approximately 2 mm with CR-TKA and 1 mm with PS-TKA. Clinical relevance. This information is useful to consider the effect of manipulating the tibial slope on the flexion gap when performing CR- or PS-TKA

INTRODUCTION. The extension and flexion gaps are affected by different factors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Flexion but not extension gap measurements are influenced by posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) preservation or resection and patella reduction or eversion and thigh weight. If the flexion gap is measured with the thigh placed on the tibia, the measurement results must include the thigh weight; nevertheless, there is no detailed report regarding the thigh weight influence on the flexion gap. In this study, we investigated how thigh weight affected flexion gap measurement. METHODS. Four knees of whole-body fresh-frozen cadavers (Mongolian race) were investigated. The femur and tibia were dissected with a standard measured resection technique. After the femoral component was set, the flexion gap was measured with a knee balancer. The distraction force of 20, 30, and 40 pounds were loaded at the joint level. For each measurement, the influences of the patella reduced or everted (PR or PE) and the PCL preserved or resected (CR or PS) were estimated. The flexion gap was measured five times in four different categories (CR/PR, CR/PE, PS/PR, PS/PE) and the thigh weight was reduced by weights (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 kg) using a string and pulley system. During measurement, the femur was just placed on the tibia, and the knee flexion angle was maintained at 90 degrees with a goniometer. After all measurements, the lower limbs were resected, and the thighs were weighed with a scale. Steel-Dwasstest (non-parametric multiple comparison test) were performed for statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS. Flexion gap measurement results show over 10 mm difference between the maximum gap (PS/PE, 40 lbs, 3 kg weight reduction) and the minimum gap (CR/PR, 20 lbs distraction, no weight reduction) in this study. When a 0.5 kg weight reduction was applied, there were no significant flexion gap increases compared to no weight reduction situation in almost all categories except for “CR/PR and 40 lbs distraction”. According to the increase of the weight reduction, the flexion gap became larger in all categories. When a 3 kg weight reduction was applied, there were significant flexion gap increases compared to no weight reduction situation in all categories (Table 1-3). The mean thigh weight was 2.3 kg (2.0–2.6 kg). DISCUSSION. The flexion gap is usually measured with the thigh placed on the tibia in TKA, and the measurement results are considered to include the influence of the thigh weight even though this has not been discussed in the literature. From our results, the influence of the thigh weight reduction on the flexion gap was different according to heaviness of the reduction weight. When the reduction weight was over the thigh weight, flexion gap increase relative to the flexion gap without weight reduction was significant in all categories nevertheless different situations of the PCL, patella position, and joint distraction forces. To estimate adequate flexion gap and avoid post-operative flexion gap looseness, the thigh weight should be reduced when the flexion gap is measured

Inverse Kinematic Alignment (iKA) and Gap Balancing (GB) aim to achieve a balanced TKA via component alignment. However, iKA aims to recreate the native joint line versus resecting the tibia perpendicular to the mechanical axis. This study aims to compare how two alignment methods impact 1) gap balance and laxity throughout flexion and 2) the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK). Two surgeons performed 75 robotic assisted iKA TKA's using a cruciate retaining implant. An anatomic tibial resection restored the native joint line. A digital joint tensioner measured laxity throughout flexion prior to femoral resection. Femoral component position was adjusted using predictive planning to optimize balance. After femoral resection, final joint laxity was collected. Planned GB (pGB) was simulated for all cases posthoc using a neutral tibial resection and adjusting femoral position to optimize balance. Differences in ML balance, laxity, and CPAK were compared between planned iKA (piKA) and pGB. ML balance and laxity were also compared between piKA and final (fiKA). piKA and pGB had similar ML balance and laxity, with mean differences <0.4mm. piKA more closely replicated native MPTA (Native=86.9±2.8°, piKA=87.8±1.8°, pGB=90±0°) and native LDFA (Native=87.5±2.7°, piKA=88.9±3°, pGB=90.8±3.5°). piKA planned for a more native CPAK distribution, with the most common types being II (22.7%), I (20%), III (18.7%), IV (18.7%) and V (18.7%). Most pGB knees were type V (28.4%), VII (37.8%), and III (16.2). fiKA and piKA had similar ML balance and laxity, however fiKA was more variable in midflexion and flexion (p<0.01). Although ML balance and laxity were similar between piKA and pGB, piKA better restored native joint line and CPAK type. The bulk of pGB knees were moved into types V, VII, and III due to the neutral tibial cut. Surgeons should be cognizant of how these differing alignment strategies affect knee phenotype

Mechanical alignment (MA) techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may introduce significant anatomic modifications, as it is known that few patients have neutral femoral, tibial or overall lower limb mechanical axes. A total of 1000 knee CT-Scans were analyzed from a database of patients undergoing TKA. MA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated. Femoral rotation was aligned with either the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA) or with 3° of external rotation to the posterior condyles (PC). Medial-lateral (DML) and flexion-extension (DFE) gap differences were calculated. Extension space ML imbalances (3mm) occurred in 25% of varus and 54% of valgus knees and significant imbalances (5mm) were present in up to 8% of varus and 19% of valgus knees. For the flexion space DML, higher imbalance rates were created by the TEA technique (p < 0 .001). In valgus knees, TEA resulted in a DML in flexion of 5 mm in 42%, compared to 7% for PC. In varus knees both techniques performed better. When all the differences between DML and DFE are considered together, using TEA there were 18% of valgus knees and 49% of varus knees with < 3 mm imbalances throughout, and using PC 32% of valgus knees and 64% of varus knees. Significant anatomic modifications with related ML or FE gap imbalances are created using MA for TKA. Using MA techniques, PC creates less imbalances than TEA. Some of these imbalances may not be correctable by the surgeon and may explain post-operative TKA instability. Current imaging technology could predict preoperatively these intrinsic imitations of MA. Other alignment techniques that better reproduce knee anatomies should be explored

In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), extension gap commonly decreases after inserting the trial components. As most of UKA technique incorporates the fixture of implants using bone cement, it is likely that the gap decreases further when inserting the actual implants. We performed a new additional procedure that enables a precise adjustment of the extension gap. Thirty-two patients who had undergone UKA (ZIMMER Unicompartmental High-Flex Knee System, Zimmer®, Warsaw) using the spacer block technique at our hospital in 2013 were reviewed. Ten cases had difficulties in achieving full extension after the trial implants were inserted, and hence, a new procedure of longitudinal incision between the medial collateral ligament and the posterior capsule was performed. This additional method created a mean increase of 3mm of the extension gap, and facilitated the knee to extend completely. There were no cases that had an increase in the flexion gap. Previously, a tibial osteotomy was added in such cases, but this had a risk of increasing not just the extension gap but also the flexion gap. This method is a valid technique for precise adjustments, and could also be applied to patients with severe flexion contracture to treat by UKA

Backgrounds. It is well accepted that gap balancing is one of the important step for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In order to evaluate gap balancing during operation, many tension devises have been used and developed. However, during operation, proper load to be applied, ideal gap amount, appropriate angle formed between femoral component and tibial cut surface are not clearly defined. Understanding the relationship between applied load and gap pattern will provide important information. The purpose of this study is to precisely analyze gap amount and inclination in extension and flexion using digital analyzer during TKA and characterize gap pattern. Methods. We analyzed 39 knees in 39 cases that underwent TKA with Scorpio NRG PS knee prosthesis operated by modified gap balancing technique. A customized digital knee balancer was manufactured applying load cell, angle sensor, and gap sensor in the selected part within offset seesaw type balancer (Fig 1). It can measure three values (gap, angle and force) at the same time and automatically record the values. After bone cut for femur, tibia, and patella, femoral component trial was inserted to the femur. Then gap length and inclination angle between femoral condyle surface and tibial cut surface was analyzed in extension and at 90 degrees knee flexion with gradually increasing opening torque. Inclination was expressed by positive degrees when lateral side opened. Serial data was recorded automatically and analyzed. Results. In extension, average gap between femoral implant and tibial cut surface increased gradually from 7.3mm to 13.6mm with increasing load from 10 lbs. to 75 lbs. During this load increase, average inclination changed from 0.2 degrees to 0.7degrees. In flexion, average gap between femoral implant and tibial cut surface increased gradually from 7.4mm to 15.9mm with increasing load from 10 lbs. to 75 lbs. During this increase, average inclination change was from 0 to 3.5 degrees (Fig 2). Lateral opening was observed over 25lbs and this opening angle increased gradually thereafter. When the identical load is applied, average gap difference between extension and flexion was 0.1 to 2.38mm. Linear relationship between extension gap and flexion gap was obtained when each applied load was identical (Fig 3). Discussions. In this study, we have reported gap patterns using digital knee analyzer in vivo for the first time. This digital analyzer provides gap length, angle and applied force between tibia and femur with accuracy. We conclude that in extension lateral laxity is not affected even with increasing load up to 75lbs. On the other hand, in flexion, lateral laxity became remarkable with load increase and can cause more gap increase in flexion compared in extension. In determining the rotational alignment using modified gap technique, this tendency has to be kept in mind. Conclusions. Digital knee balancer provided precise gap pattern in TKA with femoral component in place. Gap length in extension and flexion has linear relationship Lateral laxity in flexion need to be analyzed carefully in TKA

Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty helps in accurate and reproducible implant positioning, bony alignment, and soft-tissue balancing which are important for the success of the procedure. In TKR, there are two surgical techniques one is measured resection in which bony landmarks are used to guide the bone cuts and the other is gap balancing which equal collateral ligament tension in flexion and extension is done before and as a guide to final bone cuts. Both these procedures have their own advantages and disadvantages. We retrospectively collected the data of 128 consecutive patients who underwent computer-assisted primary TKA using either a gap-balancing technique or measured resection technique. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon using computer navigation system available during a period between June 2016 to October 2016. Inclusion criteria were all patients requiring a primary TKA, male or female patients, and who have given informed consent for participation in the study. All patients requiring revision surgery of a previous implanted TKA or affected by active infection or malignancy, who presented hip ankylosis or arthrodesis, neurological deficit or bone loss or necessity of more constrained implants were excluded from the study. Two groups measured resection and gap balancing was randomly selected. At 1-year follow-up, patients were assessed by a single orthopaedic registrar blinded to the type of surgery using the Knee Society score (KSS) and functional Knee Society score (FKSS). Outcomes of the 2 groups were compared using the paired t test. All the obtained data were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.5 statistical software (SPSS Inc. Chicago). Inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired t-test were used and statistical significance was set at P = 0.05. In the measured resection group, the mean FKSS increased from 48.8769 (SD, 2.3576), to 88.5692 (SD, 2.7178) respectively. In the gap balancing group, the respective scores increased from 48.9333 (SD, 3.6577) to 89.2133(SD, 7.377). Preoperative and Postoperative increases in the respective scores were slightly better with the gap balancing technique; the respective p values were 0.8493 and 0.1045. The primary goal of TKA is restoration of mechanical axis and soft-tissue balance. Improper restoration leads to poor functional outcome and premature prosthesis loosening. Computer navigation enables precise femoral and tibial cuts and controlled soft-tissue release. Well balanced and well aligned knee is important for good results. Mechanical alignment and soft-tissue balance are interlinked and corrected by soft tissue releases and precise proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. The 2 common techniques used are measured resection and gap balancing techniques. In our study, knee scores of the 2 groups at 1-year follow-up were compared, as most of the improvement occurs within one year, with very little subsequent improvement. Some surgeons favour gap balancing technique, as it provides more consistent soft-tissue tension in TKA

Mechanical alignment (MA) techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) introduces significant anatomic modifications and secondary ligament imbalances. A restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol was proposed to minimise these issues and improve TKA clinical results. A total of 1000 knee CT-Scans were analyzed from a database of patients undergoing TKA. rKA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated. rKA is defined by the following criteria: Independent tibial and femoral cuts within ± 5° of the bone neutral mechanical axis and, a resulting HKA within ± 3° of neutral. Medial-lateral (ΔML) and flexion-extension (ΔFE) gap differences were calculated and compared with MA results. With the MA technique, femoral rotation was aligned with either the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA) or with 3° of external rotation to the posterior condyles (PC). Extension space ML imbalances (>/=3mm) occurred in 33% of TKA with MA technique versus 8% of the knees with rKA (p /=5mm) were present in up to 11% of MA knees versus 1% rKA (p < 0 .001). Using the MA technique, for the flexion space ΔML, higher imbalance rates were created by the TEA technique (p < 0 .001). rKA again performed better than both MA techniques using TEA of 3 degrees PC techniques (p < 0 .001). When all the differences between ΔML and ΔFE are considered together: using TEA there were 40.8% of the knees with < 3 mm imbalances throughout, using PC this was 55.3% and using rKA it was 91.5% of the knees (p < 0 .001). Significantly less anatomic modifications with related ML or FE gap imbalances are created using rKA versus MA for TKA. Using rKA may help the surgeon to balance a TKA, whilst keeping the alignment within a safe range

Gap balancing technique aims to achieve equal and symmetric gap at full extension and in flexion; however, little is known about the connection between the native and the replaced knee gaps. In this study, a novel robotic assisted ligament tensioning tool was used to measure the pre- and post- operative gaps to better understand their relationship when aiming for balance gaps in flexion and extension. The accuracy of a prediction algorithm for the post-operative gaps based on the native gap and implant alignment was evaluated in this study. The medial and lateral gap were smallest at full extension. The native gaps increase with flexion until 30 degrees where they plateaued for the remaining flexion range. The native lateral gap was larger than the medial gap throughout the flexion range. Planning for equal gaps at extension and flexion resulted with tightest gaps at these angle; however, the gaps in mid-flexion were 3–4 mm larger. Good agreement was observed between the post-operative results and the predicted gas from the software algorithm. The results showed that the native gaps are neither symmetric nor equal. In addition, aiming for equal gaps reduces the variation at these angles but could result in mid- flexion laxity. Advanced robotics-assisted instrumentation can aid in evaluation of soft-tissue and help in surgical planning of TKA. This allows the surgeon to achieve the targeted outcome as well as record the final implant tension to correlate with clinical outcomes

Aims. The aims of this prospective study were to determine the effect of osteophyte excision on deformity correction and soft- tissue gap balance in varus knees undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods. Limb deformity in coronal (varus) and sagittal (flexion) planes, medial and lateral gap distances in maximum knee extension and 90° knee flexion and maximum knee flexion were recorded before and after excision of medial femoral and tibial osteophytes using computer navigation in 164 patients who underwent 221 computer-assisted, cemented, cruciate- substituting TKAs. Results. Mean varus and flexion deformities of 4.5°±3° (0.5° to 30° varus) and 4.9°±5.9° (−15° hyperextension to 30° flexion) reduced significantly (p<0.0001) to mean varus deformity of 1°±2.3° and mean flexion deformity of 2.7°±4.2° after excision of medial femoral and tibial osteophytes. The mean medio-lateral (ML) soft-tissue gap difference in maximum knee extension and 90°knee flexion of 2.7±3.6mm and 0.7±2.6mm reduced significantly (p<0.0001) to mean ML soft-tissue gap difference of 0.7±2.5mm in maximum knee extension and 0.1±1.9mm in 90°knee flexion. The mean maximum knee flexion (122.8°±8.4°) increased significantly to mean maximum knee flexion of (125°±8°). Conclusion. Excision of medial femoral and tibial osteophytes during TKA in varus knees significantly improves varus and flexion deformities, mediolateral soft-tissue gap imbalance in maximum extension and in 90°knee flexion and maximum knee flexion. Clinical Relevance. Excision of medial femoral and tibial osteophytes can be a useful, initial step towards achieving deformity correction and gap balance without having to resort to soft-tissue release during TKA in varus knees

Flexion instability is a well-defined, though often difficult to diagnose, type of TKA instability. It may also complicate posterior stabilised arthroplasties. It is one of three modes of tibial-femoral instability along with: 1. Varus-valgus or coronal plane instability and 2. Instability in the plane of motion that results from either fixed flexion contracture and buckling or recurvatum and collapse. The issues for correction of coronal instability are generally alignment and either ligamentous balance or constraint. For plane of motion instability it is full extension without hyperextension and restoration of extensor mechanism power. The issues for flexion instability are basically balanced flexion and extension gaps. The diagnosis of flexion instability is made by history and physical examination. These patients, with a more spacious or lax flexion gap, initially do extremely well following surgery, achieving flexion rapidly and comfortably. They progress within months however, to a condition of chronic swelling and tenderness of peri-articular soft tissue, recurrent effusion and a feeling of unease up and down the stairs, as well as getting up out of a chair: anything that stresses the knee in the flexed position. The diagnosis is confirmed by clinical examination. In gross cases, the patient sitting on the edge of the exam table with the legs dangling and flexed at 90 degrees will first of all close the flexion gap, bringing the tibial component into contact with the posterior femoral condyles when they contract the quadriceps muscle. This vertical motion that precedes extension can be observed. Similarly, if the patient is supine, with the knee flexed to 90 degrees, the examiner may grasp the ankle and with a hand under the thigh, distract the flexion gap and then allow it to close. The travel and the clunk can be appreciated. The standard ‘posterior drawer’ test that is appropriate for the non-arthroplasty knee will only be useful for relatively non-constrained, cruciate dependent prostheses. It will not be useful for flexion instability in the posterior stabilised prosthesis. It is useful to perform this distraction maneuver in flexion, during the arthroplasty with trial components in place to confirm that the arthroplasty is stable in flexion. The common maneuver to assess the flexion gap, of internally and externally rotating the femur to detect medial lateral instability in flexion seems to be less accurate. The patients at greatest risk for this complication are those presenting for arthroplasty with a fixed flexion contracture. If a measured resection technique is employed without consideration of correcting the tighter extension gap, when a (relatively thinner) poly insert is selected to achieve full extension, it will not be thick enough to stabilise the larger/normal flexion gap. Flexion instability should not be confused with so-called “mid-flexion” instability, which is a poorly defined and much more subtle, clinical entity that has been described in case reports of revision surgery and the cadaver laboratory. Although more conforming articular polyethylene inserts may resolve this problem, even if revision is performed to a more constrained component, the essence of the solution is revision arthroplasty to balance the flexion and extension gaps

Both gap balancing and measured resection for TKA will work and these techniques are often combined in TKA. The only difference is really the workflow. The essential difference in gap balancing is that you determine femoral component rotation by cutting the distal femur and the proximal tibia, and then using a spacer to determine femoral rotation. I prefer measured resection because I am, for most cases, a cruciate retaining surgeon. It is not ideal to determine femoral rotation based upon a gap balancing if you retain the cruciate. It is also important to maintain the joint line, especially in cruciate retention, in order to reproduce more normal kinematics and balance the knee throughout the range of flexion and extension. It is my opinion that the soft tissue balancing is easier to do with measured resection and the workflow is easier. The sequence of cuts and soft tissue balance is different if one is a gap balancing surgeon. This is more conducive for people who are cruciate substituters, but more difficult in a varus cruciate retaining knee. In that situation, if you determine femoral rotation by gap balancing with the tibia before you have cleared the posterior medial osteophytes in the varus knee, and remove the last bit of meniscus, you could artificially over rotate the femoral component causing posteromedial laxity. The major difference is that cutting the posterior cruciate will open the flexion space and allow the surgeon easier access to the posteromedial corner of the knee before the posterior femoral cut is made. It is also important to remember that in most cases cruciate substitution surgeons will make the flexion space 2 mm smaller than the extension space to compensate for the flexion space opening when the posterior cruciate is cut. The extensor mechanism plays an important role in flexion balance and should only be tested once the patella is prepared and the patella is back in the trochlear groove. I prefer gap balancing in most revision knees as I am virtually always substituting for the posterior cruciate in that case. My technique for measured resection is to assess the character of the knee prior to surgery. Is it varus? Is it valgus? Does it hyperextend? Does it have a flexion contracture? Would the knee be considered tight or loose? I cut the distal femur first, based upon measured resection. I use anatomic landmarks to determine femoral rotation. My most consistent landmark is the transtrochlear line, which is not always from the top of the notch to the bottom of the trochlea. I will use the medial epicondyle and the posterior reference in a varus knee, but not in a valgus knee. The tibial cut, also by measured resection, is easier once the femur has been prepared. The patellar cut is also a measured resection. Having done a preliminary soft tissue balance based upon the deformity, I will then use trial components to finish the soft tissue balance. In summary, both techniques can be used successfully in a cruciate substituting knee, but measured resection, in my opinion, is preferable especially in varus arthritis when the posterior cruciate is retained