Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

FEMORAL COMPONENT SIZE SELECTION AFFECTS NOT ONLY FLEXION GAP BUT ALSO EXTENSION GAP AFTER FEMORAL COMPONENT PLACEMENT IN POSTERIOR-STABILISED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), 27th Annual Congress. PART 3.



Abstract

Introduction

Appropriate osteotomy alignment and soft tissue balance are essential for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The management of soft tissue balance still remains difficult and it is left much to the surgeon's subjective feel and experience.

We developed an offset type tensor system for TKA. This device enables objective soft tissue balance measurement with more physiological joint conditions with femoral trial component in place and patello-femoral (PF) joint reduced. We have reported femoral component placement decreased extension gap.

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the influence of femoral component size selection on the decrease of extension gap in posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA.

Material & Method

120 varus type osteoarthritic knees implanted with PS TKAs (NexGen LPS flex: Zimmer) were subjected to this study. All TKAs were performed using measured resection technique with anterior reference.

The femoral component size was evaluated intra-operatively using conventional femoral sizing jig. The selected femoral component size was expressed by the antero-posterior (AP) size increase (mm) comparing to that of original femoral condyles. Gap measurements were performed using a newly developed offset type tensor device applying 40lbs (178N) of joint distraction force. Firstly, conventional osteotomy gaps (mm) were measured at extension and flexion. Secondary, component gaps (mm) after femoral trial placement with PF joint reduced were evaluated at 0° and 90° of knee flexion.

To compare conventional osteotomy gaps and component gaps, estimated extension and flexion gaps were calculated by subtracting the femoral component thickness at extension (9mm) and flexion (11mm) from conventional osteotomy gaps respectively. The decrease of gap at extension and flexion were calculated with estimated gaps subtracted by component gaps. The simple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of selected femoral component size on the decrease of gap after femoral component placement.

Results

The mean extension and flexion conventional osteotomy gaps were 25.7 and 28.2 mm, and estimated gaps were 16.7, 17.2 mm respectively. The component gaps were 11.1, 16.9 mm at 0° and 90° of knee flexion respectively. Extension joint gap was significantly decreased as much as 5.6mm after femoral component placement, but flexion gap showed no significant differences. Selected femoral component size showed a positive correlation to the decrease of gap after femoral component placement (Fig 1).

Discussion & Conclusion

This result indicates that AP femoral component size variation affects not only flexion gap but also extension gap in PS TKA. With the larger femoral component size selected, the more protrusion of posterior condyles would increase the more tension on the posterior structures and resulted in the more decrease of joint gap after femoral component placement at full extension. This mechanism might play a physiological role on the prevention of knee hyper-extension, and would be affected by flexion contracture.

Accordingly, we conclude that the surgeon should aware of the effect of femoral component placement on the gap control, and femoral component size selection affects not only flexion gap but also extension gap after femoral component placement in PS TKA.


Email: