Arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is a common procedure used for the treatment of end stage arthritis. We studied a cohort of patients who underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ Fusion for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Here we report the 10-year clinical outcomes, complication rate, requirement for further surgery and patient experience. All patients, who underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ Fusion for osteoarthritis from June 2008 until November 2011 were included. Demographics, clinical outcome data and subsequent procedures performed were collected from a departmental database (Bluespier). Patients were contacted and asked to complete the MOxFQ questionnaire and rate their satisfaction using pain, function and if they would undergo the surgery again. Mean follow up was 10.85 (range 9–12) years. A total of 161 patients (183 feet) underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ fusion during this time period. 156 of the feet showed a successful arthrodesis (85.2% fusion rate); 27 patients required revision surgery, 19 (10.4%) for a symptomatic non-union and 8 (4.4%) for mal-union. Those patients with co-morbidities (diabetes and gout) required revision earlier than those without (p<0.01). Average MOxFQ score was 16.6 (0–64) and 28 out of the 38 (73.6%) said they would have the operation again. Overall, the long-term results of the 1st MTPJ fusion had good outcomes with a successful fusion rate and minimal complications, both in line with the corresponding literature. In this series, fusion provided high patient satisfaction with the majority of patients opting to undergo fusion with the gift of hindsight

Arthritis of the mid-foot is a common presentation to the foot and ankle clinic, resulting from primary (idiopathic), post-traumatic, or inflammatory joint degeneration. Treatment in the initial stages is conservative, with midfoot fusion regarded as the operative treatment of choice; however there is a paucity of comparative and patient reported data regarding outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), were prospectively collected from October-2015 to March-2018. Diagnoses were confirmed with image guided injection and initial management was conservative. In total, 66 patients were managed conservatively and 40 treated with mid-foot fusion. MOxFQ (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire) and EQ-5D-3L (Euroqual) PROMS were collected pre-operatively, at 26 weeks and at 52 weeks. In the operatively managed group, the female:male ratio was 5.7:1, with a mean age of 61 (range 24–80), while in the conservatively managed group, the ratio was 2.1:1 with mean age 63 (range 29–86). In the surgically managed group, 88.2% of patients reported improvement in symptoms at 26 weeks and 88.9% at 52 weeks. This was greater than the conservatively managed group, in which 40.6% reported improvement at 26 weeks and 33.3% at 52 weeks. Mean MOxFQ improvement in the surgically managed group was +30.7 and +33.9 at 26 and 52 weeks respectively, and in the conservative group, +9.4 and +4.3, at 26 and 52 weeks. Similarly, favourable surgical outcomes were reported across all domains of EQ-5D-3L. This study has highlighted excellent early outcomes after surgical treatment and may represent promise for those patients for whom conservative management fails

Introduction. The degeneration of the adjacent segment in lumbar spine with spondylodesis is well known, though the exact incidence and the mechanism is not clear. Several implants with semi rigid or dynamic behavior are available to reduce the biomechanical loads and to prevent an adjacent segment disease (ASD). Randomized controlled trials are not published. We investigated the biomechanical influence of dynamic and semi rigid implants on the adjacent segment in cadaver lumbar spine with monosegmental fusion (MF). Materials and Methods. 14 fresh cadaver lumbar spines were prepared; capsules and ligaments were kept intact. Pure rotanional moments of ±7.5 Nm were applied with a Zwick 1456 universal testing machine without preload in lateral bending and flexion/extension. The intradiscal pressure (IDP) and the range of motion (ROM) were measured in the segments L2/3 and L3/4 in following situations: in the native spine, monosegmental fusion L4/5 (MF), MF with dynamic rod to L3/4 (Dynabolt), MF with interspinous implant L3/4 (Coflex), and semi rigid fusion with PEEK rod (CD Horizon Legacy) L3-L5. Results. Under flexion load all implants reduced the IDP of segment L2/L3, whereas the IDP in the segment L3/4 was increased using interspinous implants in comparison to the other groups. The IDP was reduced in extension in both segments for all semi rigid or dynamic implants. Compared under extension to the native spine the MF had no influence on the IDP of the adjacent disc. The rod instrumentation (Dynabolt, PEEK rod) lead to a decreased IDP in lateral bending tests. The ROM in L3 was reduced in all groups compared to the native spine. The dynamic and semi rigid stabilization in the segment L3/4 limited the ROM more than the MF. Discussion. The MF reduced the ROM in all directions, whereas the IDP of the adjacent segment remained unaffected. The support of the adjacent segment by semi rigid and dynamic implants decreased the IDP of both segments in extension mainly. This fact is an agreement with other studies. Compared to our data, no significant effect on the adjacent levels was observed. Interestingly, in our study, the IDP of the adjacent segment is unaffected by MF. The biomechanical influence in the view of an ASD could be comprehended, but is not completely clear. The fact of persistent IDP in the adjacent segment suggests that MF has a lower effect on the adjacent segment degeneration as presumed. Biomechanical studies with human cadaver lumbar spines are limited and depend on age and degenerative situation. The effect on supporting implants on adjacent segment disease in lumbar spine surgery has to be investigated in clinical long term studies

There is limited long term evidence to support instrumented fusion as an adjunct to decompression for foraminal stenosis in the presence of single level degenerative disc disease. We report the long term outcome of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Forty-four patients with single-level disc disease were randomly assigned to three groups (spinal decompression (Group 1), decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion (Group 2), or decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion plus transforaminal interbody fusion (Group 3). Spinal disability (Dallas, Roland Morris, and Lower Back Outcome Score [LBOS]), and quality of life (EuroQol (EQ) and short form (SF-) 36 questionnaires) were assessed before and at after surgery by independent researchers. At mean of 15 years follow up 33 (75%) patients were available for assessment. All groups observed a significant improvement in the EQ-5D at final follow up. Group 1 demonstrated significantly better functional outcome at final follow up according to the Dallas, Roland Morris, LBOS, and EQ-5D (3L and VAS) scores when compared to the other two groups (p<0.01). The SF-36 score demonstrated that group 1 had significantly better generic health scores compared to groups 2 and 3. Regression analysis was used to adjust for the differences in general health between the groups and demonstrated no significant difference between the groups in the spine specific scores: Dallas (p>0.15), Roland Morris (p>0.37), or the LBOS (p>0.32). Fusion in combination with decompression for the treatment of foraminal stenosis and single level degenerative disc disease offers no long term functional benefit over decompression in isolation

Between 1994 and 1999, we treated six patients with avascular necrosis of the talus by excision of the necrotic body of the talus and tibiocalcaneal fusion using an Ilizarov frame. This was combined with corticotomy and a lengthening procedure. Shortening was corrected in all patients except two, who were over 60 years of age. All patients had previous operations which had failed. All achieved solid bony fusion, with five out of six having either a good or an excellent result. We conclude that this is an effective reconstructive technique which gives a good functional result

Introduction. Significant access morbidity with intercostal neuralgia and post-thoracotomy pain syndrome was reported in case that an anterior approach for spondylodesis of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine was used. We describe our experience with thoracoscopical fusion from anterior as a less invasive approach. Patients. Between 02/2007 and 09/2008 in a series of 32 patients (18 male; mean age 43, 17–74yrs) with fractures of the thoracolumbar spine (level Th11: n = 2, level Th12: n = 12, level L1: n = 18; fracture types: A3.1.1: n = 15, A3.2.1: n = 11, A3.3.1: n = 3, B2.1: n = 1 and B2.3: n = 2) thoracoscopical fracture stabilization was performed. A less invasive approach with three portals without an assistant was used facilitated by a new retractor system. In 16 patients fracture stabilization from anterior was supported by an additional spondylodesis using an dorsal approach. For reconstruction of the anterior column a VLIFT-system (n = 19), a Synex- (n = 11) or a Harms-Cage (n = 2) in combination with a MACS-TL (n = 16) or a Arcofix-system (n = 2) were used. Results. Thoracoscopical fusion from anterior was performed about 8 days after the injury (1–73 days), monosegmental in 11 and bisegmental in 21 out of 32 cases. The mean overall operating time was 201min (range 105–380min). The mean overall blood loss was 780ml, in 3/32 patients blood transfusions were required. In one patient epidural bleeding and in another a screw cut-out of the MACS system of the first lumbar vertebral body occurred intraoperatively. Revision surgery was necessary due to failure of the hardware (n = 2) or occurrence of hematothorax (n = 1). In the further follow up period no wound healing disorders, failure of the implants nor intercostal neuralgia were noted. Discussion. The endoscopic view is two-dimensional and may disorientate the less experienced surgeon, and thus, prolong operation time. However, the use of a retractor system allowed for bimanual operation increasing the depth perception, provided an optimal illuminated, and permanent and stable operation field, and was economic as an assistant was not required. Conclusion. The presented technique is a high demanding approach for anterior fusion of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, however, with the potential to reduce the surgical access trauma to a minimum with an operation time comparable to open surgery. Patients might benefit from a shortened rehabilitation and a early reintegration into professional life

Purpose. In stabilisations of atlantoaxial instabilities it holds risks to injure the A. vertebralis as well as neurological structures. Furthermore the posterior approach of the upper part of the cervical spine requires a huge and traumatic preparation of the soft tissue. However the anterior transarticular C1-2 fusion (ATF) is less traumatic and offers almost the same strengh of the stabilisation. Methods. Since the 01/2007 22 multimorbid patients with atlanto-axial instabilities of different entities were treated via the ATF, were regular examined radiologicaly (x-ray/CT) and the procedure critically judged. Results. C1-2 fusions were performed in 22 patients (17f, 5m, Ø 81,67 years). Main symptoms was pain radiating in the upper cervical spine and the occiput, 2 Patients complaining radiating pain with paraesthesia. The average operation-time took 64,5 min. Leftside the screws of Ø 39,5mm (32–44mm), rightside of 36mm (32–44mm) were inserted in addiction to the point of access and the angle of insertion (mediolateral angle Ø 32,0°, ventrodorsal Ø17,6°). No introperative complications occured, one revision had to be done because of p.o. bleeding, one because of screw dislocation. Postoperative x-ray and CT control of the upper cervical spine showed 30/44 screws in 22 patients in correct position. 8 (18,2%) screws were too long, 3 (6,8%) screws were placed too anterior and 3 (6,8%) too medial. 8 additional positionated dens-screws were in correct position. After a clear learning curve both screws of the 6th patient were positoinated correct. Two aspects are important for success: Correct entry point and right insertion of the angle in the coronar and sagittal view. A low intraoperative blood loss, a non traumatic access as well as an immediate pain decrease have to be valued positively for this procedure. Conclusions. The gentle procedure of the ATF requires-despite of the huge experience in anterior surgery of dens fractures - a learning curve, because of the more proximate insertion point, the flat insertion angle and the closeness of the A. vertebralis. If these aspects are going to be noticed, failed screw positioning and excessive length as well as injuries of the A. vertebralis can be avoided

Lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection is critical to preventing complications following posterior spinal arthrodesis (PSA) for thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (TL/L AIS), but evidence guiding LIV selection is limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PSA using novel unilateral convex segmental pedicle screw instrumentation (UCS) in correcting TL/L AIS, to identify radiographic parameters correlating with distal extension of PSA, and to develop a predictive equation for distal fusion extension using these parameters. We reviewed data (demographic, clinical, radiographic, and SRS-22 questionnaires) preoperatively to 2-years' follow-up for TL/L AIS patients treated by PSA using UCS between 2006 to 2011. 53 patients were included and divided into 2 groups: Group-1 (n=36) patients had PSA between Cobb-to-Cobb levels; Group-2 (n=17) patients required distal fusion extension. A mean curve correction of 80% was achieved. Mean postoperative LIV angle, TL/L apical vertebra translation (AVT), and trunk shift were lower than previous studies. Six preoperative radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups and correlated with distal fusion extension: thoracic curve size, thoracolumbar curve size, LIVA, AVT, lumbar flexibility index, and Cobb angle on lumbar convex bending. Regression analysis optimised an equation (incorporating the first five parameters) which is 81% accurate in predicting Cobb-to-Cobb fusion or distal extension. SRS-22 scores were similar between groups. We conclude that TL/L AIS is effectively treated by PSA using UCS, six radiographic parameters correlate with distal fusion extension, and a predictive equation incorporating these parameters reliably informs LIV selection and the need for fusion extension beyond the caudal Cobb level

Background Context. Different minimally invasive approaches to the lumbar spine have been proposed but they can be associated with increased risk of complications, steep learning curve and longer operative time. Purpose. To report the complications associated with a minimally invasive technique of retroperitoneal anterolateral approach to the lumbar spine. Study design. Retrospective study of 179 patients who underwent anterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Methods. A total of 179 patients with previous posterior instrumented fusion undergoing OLIF were included. This muscle-splitting approach consists in anterolateral exposure through a 4 cm incision followed by placement of a PEEK cage filled with bone graft and/or substitute. Results. Patients were aged 54.110.6 years with BMI of 24.84.1 kg/m2. Length of follow-up was (0.90.7 years), including 17 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A left-sided approach was done in 174 patients. The procedure was performed at L1–2 in 4, L2–3 in 54, L3–4 in 120, L4–5 in 134 and L5-S1 in 6 patients. It was done at 1 level in 56, 2 levels in 107, and 3 levels in 16 patients. Operative time and blood loss were respectively 32.513.2 min and 57131 cc per level fused. There were 19 patients with single complication and one with two complications, including two patients with postoperative radiculopathy after L3–5 OLIF. There was no abdominal weakness or herniation. Conclusion. Minimally invasive OLIF can be performed easily and safely from L2 to L5, and at L1–2 and L5-S1 for selected cases. Up to 3 levels can be addressed through a “sliding window”. It is associated with minimal blood loss and short operative time. The risk of complications is similar to that reported for traditional anterior approaches, with the advantage of decreasing the risk of abdominal wall weakness or herniation

Gunshot injuries to the shoulder are rare and difficult to manage. We present a case series of seven patients who sustained a severe shoulder injury to the non-dominant side as a result of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. We describe the injury as ‘suicide shoulder’ caused by upward and outward movement of the gun barrel as the trigger is pulled. All patients were male, with a mean age of 32 years (21 to 48). All were treated at the time of injury with initial repeated debridement, and within four weeks either by hemiarthroplasty (four patients) or arthrodesis (three patients). The hemiarthroplasty failed in one patient after 20 years due to infection and an arthrodesis was attempted, which also failed due to infection. Overall follow-up was for a mean of 26 months (12 to 44). All four hemiarthroplasty implants were removed with no feasible reconstruction ultimately possible, resulting in a poor functional outcome and no return to work. In contrast, all three primary arthrodeses eventually united, with two patients requiring revision plating and grafting. These patients returned to work with a good functional outcome. We recommend arthrodesis rather than replacement as the treatment of choice for this challenging injury.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:820–4.

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis is a common procedure particularly for posttraumatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Two surgical approaches are commonly used: the medial and the dorsal approach. It is recognized that access to the lateral aspect of the talonavicular joint can be limited when using the medial approach and it is our experience that using the dorsal approach addresses this issue.

We performed an anatomical study using cadaver specimens, to compare the amount of articular surface that can be accessed, and therefore prepared for arthodesis, by each surgical approach. Medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint were performed on each of 11 cadaveric specimens (10 fresh frozen, 1 embalmed). Distraction of the joint was performed as used intraoperatively for preparation of articular surfaces during talonavicular arthrodesis. The accessible area of articular surface was marked for each of the two approaches using a previous reported technique3. Disarticulation was performed and the marked surface area was quantified using an immersion digital microscribe, allowing a three dimensional virtual model of the articular surfaces to be assessed.

The median percentage of accessible total talonavicular articular surface for the medial and dorsal approaches was 71% and 92% respectively. This difference was significant (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, p<0.001).

This study provides quantifiable measurements of the articular surface accessible by the medial and dorsal approaches to the talonavicular joint. These data support for the use of the dorsal approach for talonavicular arthrodesis.

Introduction

End-stage ankle osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition that results in functional limitations and a poor quality of life. Ankle arthrodesis (AAD) and total ankle replacement (TAR) are the major surgical treatment options for ankle arthritis. The purpose of the present study was to compare preoperative and postoperative participation in sports and recreational activities, assesses levels of habitual physical activity, functional outcome and satisfaction of patients who underwent eighter AAD or TAR.

Introduction. Osteochondral lesions (OCLs) of the talus are a challenging and increasingly recognized problem in chronic ankle pain. Many novel techniques exist to attempt to treat this challenging entity. Difficulties associated with treating OCLs include lesion location, size, chronicity, and problems associated with potential graft harvest sites. Matrix associated stem cell transplantation (MAST) is one such treatment described for larger lesions >15mm2 or failed alternative therapies. This cohort study describes a medium-term review of the outcomes of talar lesions treated with MAST. Methods. A review of all patients treated with MAST by a single surgeon was conducted. Preoperative radiographs, MRIs and FAOS outcome questionnaire scores were conducted. Intraoperative classification was undertaken to correlate with imaging. Postoperative outcomes included FAOS scores, return to sport, revision surgery/failure of treatment and progression to arthritis/fusion surgery. Results. 58 MAST procedures in 57 patients were identified in this cohort. The mean follow up was 5 years. There were 20 females and37males, with a mean age of 37 years (SD 9.1). 22 patients had lateral OCLS were and 35 patients had medial OCLs. Of this cohort 32patients had previous surgery and 25 had this procedure as a primary event. 15 patients had one failed previous surgery, 9 patients had two, four patients had three previous surgeries and three patients had four previous surgeries. 12 patients had corrective or realignment procedures at the time of surgery. In terms of complications 3 patients of this cohort went on to have an ankle fusion and two of these had medial malleolar metal work taken out prior to this, 5 patients had additional procedures for arthrofibrotic debridements, 1 patient had a repeat MAST procedure, 1 additional patients had removal of medial malleolar osteotomy screws for pain at the osteotomy site, there were 2 wound complications one related to the ankle and one related to pain at the iliac crest donor site. Conclusion. MAST has demonstrated positive results in lesions which prove challenging to treat, even in a “ failed microfracture” cohort. RCT still lacking in field of orthobiologics for MAST. Longer term follow up required to evaluate durability

To compare the long-term outcomes of fibular nailing and plate fixation for unstable ankle fractures in a cohort of patients under the age of 65 years. Patients from a previously conducted randomized control trial comparing fibular nailing and plate fixation were contacted at a minimum of 10 years post intervention at a single study centre. Short term data were collected prospectively and long-term data were collected retrospectively using an electronic patient record software. Ninety-nine patients from one trauma centre were included (48 fibular nails and 51 plate fixations). Groups were matched for gender (p = 0.579), age (p = 0.811), body mass index (BMI)(p = 0.925), smoking status (p = 0.209), alcohol status (p = 0.679) and injury type (p = 0.674). Radiographically at an average of 2 years post-injury, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for development of osteoarthritis (p = 0.851). Both groups had 1 tibio-talar fusion (2% of both groups) secondary to osteoarthritis with no statistically significant difference in overall re-operation rate between groups identified (p = 0.518,). Forty-five percent (n=42) of patients had so far returned patient reported outcome measures at a minimum of 10 years (Fibular nail n=19, plate fixation n=23). No significant difference was found between groups at 10 years for the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (p = 0.990), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (p = 0.288), Euroqol-5D Index (p = 0.828) and Euroqol-5D Visual Analogue Score (p = 0.769). The current study illustrates no difference between fibular nail fixation and plate fixation at a long-term follow up of 10 years in patients under 65 years old, although the study is currently under powered

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with trans-articular screws or dorsal plating is the standard surgical technique for displaced Lisfranc injuries. This aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous reduction and internal fixation (PRIF) of low energy Lisfranc injuries with a matched, control group of patients treated with ORIF. Over a seven-year period (2012–2019), 16 consecutive patients with a low energy Myerson B2-type injury were treated with PRIF. Patient demographics were recorded within a prospectively maintained database at the institution. This study sample was matched for age, sex and mechanism of injury to a control group of 16 patients with similar Myerson B2-type injuries treated with ORIF. Clinical outcome was compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). At a mean follow up of 43.0 months (95% CI 35.6 – 50.4), both the AOFAS and MOXFQ scores were significantly higher in the PRIF group compared to the control ORIF group (AOFAS 89.1vs 76.4, p=0.03; MOXFQ 10.0 vs 27.6, p=0.03). There were no immediate postoperative complications in either group. At final follow up, there was no radiological evidence of midfoot osteoarthritis in any patient in the PRIF group. Three patients in the ORIF group developed midfoot osteoarthritis, one of whom required midfoot fusion. PRIF is a technically simple, less invasive method of operative stabilisation of low energy Lisfranc injures which also appears to be associated with better mid-term clinical outcomes compared to ORIF

Aims

Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest.

Aims

The purpose of this study was to determine the weightbearing practice of operatively managed fragility fractures in the setting of publically funded health services in the UK and Ireland.

Objectives. The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. Methods. A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two available databases: Embase and PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. All articles that reported the clinical use of a DBM-product in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery were included. Results. The literature search resulted in 823 manuscripts of which 64 manuscripts met the final inclusion criteria. The included manuscripts consisted of four randomised controlled trials (level I), eight cohort studies (level III) and 49 case-series (level IV). No clinical studies were found for ten DBM products, and most DBM products were only used in combination with other grafting materials. DBM products were most extensively investigated in spinal surgery, showing limited level I evidence that supports the use Grafton DBM (Osteotech, Eatontown, New Jersey) as a bone graft extender in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DBM products are not thoroughly investigated in trauma surgery, showing mainly level IV evidence that supports the use of Allomatrix (Wright Medical, London, United Kingdom), DBX (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland), Grafton DBM, or OrthoBlast (Citagenix Laval, Canada) as bone graft extenders. Conclusions. The clinical level of evidence that supports the use of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery is limited and consists mainly of poor quality and retrospective case-series. More prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed to understand the clinical effect and impact of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: J. van der Stok, K. A. Hartholt, D. A. L. Schoenmakers, J. J. C. Arts. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systemati c review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:423–432. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1

Arthordesis of small joints of the foot is a commonly performed procedure in orthopaedics. A variety of fixation devices have been used for this purpose. Nickel-Titanium Memory compression staples for arthrodesis have been used in our institute since June 2003. We report the results of the procedure over a period of 7years involving 252 feet in 232 consecutive patients who underwent arthrodesis or an osteotomy fixation using compression staples. The patients were evaluated to determine the period of immobilization in cast and the time to radiographic joint fusion. The emphasis of this study was to validate the safety of the implant for fusion of small joints of the foot, as well as to determine whether there is a demonstrable trend in time to fusion and period of immobilization required. The average time to fusion was 7.2 weeks, the average period of immobilisation was 6.5 weeks. Successful union was achieved in 98% cases. We report the follow up results, finer technical aspects of the procedure and pitfalls to avoid whilst performing the fusions

Introduction. Debate remains which surgical technique should be used for ankle arthrodesis. Several open approaches have been described, as well as the arthroscopic method, using a variety of fixation devices. Both arthroscopic and open procedures have good results with union rates of 93–95%, 3% malunion rate and patient satisfaction of 70–90%, although some report complication rates as high as 40%. Aims. To identify union, complication and patient satisfaction rates with open ankle fusions (using the plane between EHL and tibialis anterior). Method. A retrospective review of all isolated primary fusions performed between 2005 and 2009. Patient records were reviewed and patients were recalled for clinical evaluation and AOFAS scoring. Follow up range was 7 months–8.3 years (mean 4 years). Results. 82 ankles were identified in 73 patients. Medical notes were reviewed for all patients. Fifty five patients were clinically reviewed (75% response rate), a further 3 contacted by telephone (79% response rate). Fifeteen were not contactable. Male 47: 35 female, age range at surgery 18–75 years (mean 56.1), left 37: 45 right, 8 were smokers. Causes leading to fusion were: Trauma 52 (63%), OA 17, Rh.A 7, CMT 3, CTEV 2, Talar AVN 1. All fusions were performed with 2 (78) or 3 (4) medial tibiotalar screws. Length of stay range: 1–12 days (mean 3.1). All patients were placed in plaster post operatively for a minimum 12 weeks. Time to union ranged from 8 to 39 weeks (mean 13.3) with a union rate of 100%. Major complications were 14.6%: 7 (8.5%) malalignment, 3 (3.7%) wound problems, 2 (2.4%) complex regional pain syndrome. There were no non unions, DVT, PE, stress fractures or deep infections. There were 2 (2.4%) delayed unions (> 6 months, both smokers), 6 (7%) asymptomatic superficial peroneal nerve injuries and one saphenous nerve injury. Four (4.8%) required screw removal. Subsequent fusions were performed in 7.3%, 4 subtalar, 1 triple and 1 chopart. The AOFAS range was 8–89 (mean 66). 79% were either ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ and 8% were ‘very disatisfied’ or ‘disatisfied’. Patients played a variety of sports including golf, squash, badmington and sky diving. Conclusion. These results show excellent union rates (100%) in part related to the strong no smoking policy and meticulous surgical technique. Two delayed unions (union at 39 and 31 weeks) were smokers. There were high satisfaction rates, however varus malalignment and persistent pain (particularly CRPS) resulted in dissatisfaction. Many patients remained highly active. These results exceed the current reported union rates and compare favourable with complications and patient satisfaction and we therefore advocate this technique