The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge acquired from completing online case-based e-learning modules. A secondary objective was to identify how students use these independent resources and gauge their level of support for this novel instructional strategy. Fourth year medical students were randomized to either a module or control group. Both groups received the standard musculoskeletal medical school curriculum, while the students in the module group were also given access to case-based online modules created to illustrate and teach important orthopaedic concepts related to unique clinical presentations. The first module depicted an athlete with an acute knee dislocation while the second module portrayed a patient with hip pain secondary to femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). All participating students completed a knowledge quiz designed to evaluate the material presented in the module topics, as well as general musculoskeletal concepts taught in the standard curriculum. Following the quiz, the students were invited to share their thoughts on the learning process in a focus- group setting, as well as an individual survey. Demographic data was also collected to gauge student's exposure to and interest in orthopaedics, emergency medicine, anatomy and any prior relevant experience outside of medicine. Twenty-five fourth year medical students participated in the study with 12 randomized to the module group and 13 to the control group. The regression revealed students in the module group did on average 18.5 and 31.4 percentage points better on the knee and hip quizzes respectively, compared to the control group, which were both significant with a p-value < 0.01. Additionally, students who had completed an orthopaedics elective did 20 percentage points better than those who had not, while there was no significant improvement in students who had just completed their core orthopaedics rotation. The feedback collected from the survey and small group discussion was positive with students wishing more modules were available prior to musculoskeletal clinical skills sessions and their orthopaedics rotations. Medical students given access to online case-based e-learning modules enjoyed the innovative teaching strategy and performed significantly better on knowledge quizzes than their classmates who only received the standard musculoskeletal curriculum

Since its creation, labral repair has become the preferred method among surgeons for the arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears resulting in pain and dysfunction for patients. Labral reconstruction is performed mainly in revision hip arthroscopy but can be used in the primary setting when the labrum cannot be repaired or is calcified. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival between primary labral repair and labral reconstruction with survival defined as no further surgery (revision or total hip replacement). Patients who underwent labral repair or reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018 in the primary setting were included in the study. Patients were included if they had primary hip arthroscopy with the senior author for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), involving either labral reconstruction or labral repair, and were within the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of surgery. Exclusion criteria included confounding injuries (Leggs Calves Perthes, avascular necrosis, femoral head fracture, etc.), history of unilateral or bilateral hip surgeries, or Tönnis grades of 2 or 3 at the time of surgery. Labral repairs were performed when adequate tissue was available for repair and labral reconstruction was performed when tissue was absent, ossified or torn beyond repair. A total of 501 labral repairs and 114 labral reconstructions performed in the primary setting were included in the study. Labral reconstruction patients were older (37±10) compared to labral repair (34±11).(p=0.021). Second surgeries were required in 19/114 (17%) of labral reconstruction and 40/501(8%) [odds ratio: 2.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.2] (p=0.008). Revision hip arthroscopy were required in 6/114(5%) labral reconstructions and 33/501(6.5%) labral repair (p=0.496). Total hip replacement was required in 13/114 labral reconstructions and 7/501 labral repairs [odds ratio:9.1 95%CI 3.5 to 23] (p=< 0.01). The mean survival for the labral repair group was 10.2 years (95%CI:10 to 10.5) and 11.9 years (98%CI:10.9 to 12.8) in the labral reconstruction group. Conversion to total hip was required more often following primary labral reconstruction. Revision hip arthroscopy rates were similar between groups as was the mean survival, with both over 10 years. Similar survival was seen in labral repair and reconstruction when strict patient selection criteria are followed

As the field of hip arthroscopy continues to develop, functional measures and testing become increasingly important in patient selection, managing patient expectations prior to surgery, and physical readiness for return to athletic participation. The Hip Sport Test (HST) was developed to assess strength, coordination, agility, and range of motion prior to and following hip arthroscopy as a functional assessment. However, the relationship between HST and hip strength, range of motion, and hip-specific patient reported outcome (PRO) measures have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the HST scores and measurements of hip strength and range of motion prior to undergoing hip arthroscopy. Between September 2009 and January 2017, patients aged 18-40 who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement with available pre-operative HST, dynamometry, range of motion, and functional scores (mHHS, WOMAC, HOS-SSS) were identified. Patients were excluded if they were 40 years old, had a Tegner activity score < 7, or did not have HST and dynamometry evaluations within one week of each other. Muscle strength scores were compared between affected and unaffected side to establish a percent difference with a positive score indicating a weaker affected limb and a negative score indicating a stronger affected limb. Correlations were made between HST and strength testing, range of motion, and PROs. A total of 350 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 26.9 ± 6.5 years, with 34% females and 36% professional athletes. Total and component HST scores were significantly associated with measure of strength most strongly for flexion (rs = −0.20, p < 0 .001), extension (rs = −0.24, p<.001) and external rotation (rs = −0.20, p < 0 .001). Lateral and diagonal agility, components of HST, were also significantly associated with muscle strength imbalances between internal rotation versus external rotation (rs = −0.18, p=0.01) and flexion versus extension (rs = 0.12, p=0.03). In terms of range of motion, a significant correlation was detected between HST and internal rotation (rs = −0.19, p < 0 .001). Both the total and component HST scores were positively correlated with pre-operative mHHS, WOMAC, and HOS-SSS (p<.001 for all rs). The Hip Sport Test correlates with strength, range of motion, and PROs in the preoperative setting of hip arthroscopy. This test alone and in combination with other diagnostic examinations can provide valuable information about initial hip function and patient prognosis

Arthroscopic hip procedures have increased dramatically over the last decade as equipment and techniques have improved. Patients who require hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement on occasion require surgery on the contralateral hip. Previous studies have found that younger age of presentation and lower Charlson comorbidity index have higher risk for requiring surgery on the contralateral hip but have not found correlation to anatomic variables. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the factors that predispose a patient to requiring subsequent hip arthroscopy on the contralateral hip. This is an IRB-approved, single surgeon retrospective cohort study from an academic, tertiary referral centre. A chart review was conducted on 310 primary hip arthroscopy procedures from 2009-2020. We identified 62 cases that went on to have a hip arthroscopy on the contralateral side. The bilateral hip arthroscopy cohort was compared to unilateral cohort for sex, age, BMI, pre-op alpha angle and centre edge angle measured on AP pelvis XRay, femoral torsion, traction time, skin to skin time, Tonnis grade, intra-op labral or chondral defect. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. Of the 62 patients that required contralateral hip arthroscopy, the average age was 32.7 compared with 37.8 in the unilateral cohort (p = 0.01) and BMI was lower in the bilateral cohort (26.2) compared to the unilateral cohort (27.6) (p=0.04). The average alpha angle was 76.3. 0. in the bilateral compared to 66. 0. in the unilateral cohort (p = 0.01). Skin to skin time was longer in cases in which a contralateral surgery was performed (106.3 mins vs 86.4 mins) (p=0.01). Interestingly, 50 male patients required contralateral hip arthroscopy compared to 12 female patients (p=0.01). No other variables were statistically significant. In conclusion, this study does re-enforce existing literature by stating that younger patients are more likely to require contralateral hip arthroscopy. This may be due to the fact that these patients require increased range of motion from the hip joint to perform activities such as sports where as older patients may not need the same amount of range of motion to perform their activities. Significantly higher alpha angles were noted in patients requiring contralateral hip arthroscopy, which has not been shown in previous literature. This helps to explain that larger CAM deformities will likely require contralateral hip arthroscopy because these patients likely impinge more during simple activities of daily living. Contralateral hip arthroscopy is also more common in male patients who typically have a larger CAM deformity. In summary, this study will help to risk stratify patients who will likely require contralateral hip arthroscopy and should be a discussion point during pre-operative counseling. That offering early subsequent or simultaneous hip arthroscopy in young male patients with large CAMs should be offered when symptoms are mild

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) – enlarged, aspherical femoral head deformity (cam-type) or retroversion/overcoverage of the acetabulum (pincer-type) – is a leading cause for early hip osteoarthritis. Although anteverting/reverse periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to address FAI aims to preserve the native hip and restore joint function, it is still unclear how it affects joint mobility and stability. This in vitro cadaveric study examined the effects of surgical anteverting PAO on range of motion and capsular mechanics in hips with acetabular retroversion. Twelve cadaveric hips (n = 12, m:f = 9:3; age = 41 ± 9 years; BMI = 23 ± 4 kg/m2) were included in this study. Each hip was CT imaged and indicated acetabular retroversion (i.e., crossover sign, posterior wall sign, ischial wall sign, retroversion index > 20%, axial plane acetabular version < 15°); and showed no other abnormalities on CT data. Each hip was denuded to the bone-and-capsule and mounted onto a 6-DOF robot tester (TX90, Stäubli), equipped with a universal force-torque sensor (Omega85, ATI). The robot positioned each hip in five sagittal angles: Extension, Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, Flexion 60°, Flexion 90°; and performed hip internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions to 5 Nm in each position. After the intact stage was tested, each hip underwent an anteverting PAO, anteverting the acetabulum and securing the fragment with long bone screws. The capsular ligaments were preserved during the surgery and each hip was retested postoperatively in the robot. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed that the acetabular fragment was properly positioned with adequate version and head coverage. Paired sample t-tests compared the differences in range of motion before and after PAO (CI = 95%; SPSS v.24, IBM). Preoperatively, the intact hips with acetabular retroversion demonstrated constrained internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions. The PAO reoriented the acetabular fragment and medialized the hip joint centre, which tightened the iliofemoral ligament and slackenend the pubofemoral ligament. Postoperatively, internal rotation increased in the deep hip flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆IR = +7°, p = 0.001) and Flexion 90° (∆IR = +8°, p = 0.001); while also demonstrating marginal decreases in external rotation in all positions. In addition, adduction increased in the deep flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆ADD = +11°, p = 0.002) and Flexion 90° (∆ADD = +12°, p = 0.001); but also showed marginal increases in abduction in all positions. The anteverting PAO restored anterosuperior acetabular clearance and increased internal rotation (28–33%) and adduction motions (29–31%) in deep hip flexion. Restricted movements and positive impingement tests typically experienced in these positions with acetabular retroversion are associated with clinical symptoms of FAI (i.e., FADIR). However, PAO altered capsular tensions by further tightening the anterolateral hip capsule which resulted in a limited external rotation and a stiffer and tighter hip. Capsular tightness may still be secondary to acetabular retroversion, thus capsular management may be warranted for larger corrections or rotational osteotomies. In efforts to optimize surgical management and clinical outcomes, anteverting PAO is a viable option to address FAI due to acetabular retroversion or overcoverage

In the young and highly active population of military patients, femoroacetabular impingement can be a source of serious disability as well as a threat to their career. This morbidity can be treated with hip arthroscopy with debridement of cam lesion, and excision or repair of a corresponding labral tear. We report on the long term outcomes (>1 year) of 26 military cases who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, in a single surgeon's series. Twenty two patients (four bilateral cases) underwent hip arthroscopy as a day case procedure during the period February 2013 to October 2014. Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS) were obtained from patients pre-operatively, at two months, four months and at least one year post-operatively. There was a significant improvement in NAHS at two months (75.6)(p<0.05), four months (85.1)(p<0.001) and one year (84.8)(p<0.001), compared to pre-operative NAHS (65.8). There was no significant change in NAHS beyond four months. Only three out of the 22 patients were medically discharged secondary to persistent hip symptoms. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement is an effective, viable procedure for military patients. Mobility, pain and function is significantly improved after surgery. This improvement is sustained in the long term up to and beyond one year

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a condition of the hip where there is a mismatch of the femoral head and hip acetabulum. This mismatch creates abnormal contact between the bones and causes hip pain which can lead to damage, and eventually osteoarthritis of the hip. The diagnosis and treatment of FAI has become one of the most popular clinical scenarios in orthopaedic surgery, with hip arthroscopy procedures increasing exponentially over the past five years. Surgical intervention usually involves correcting the existing deformities by reshaping the ball and socket (“osteoplasty” or “rim trimming”) so that they fit together more easily while repairing any other existing soft tissue damage in the hip joint (e.g. labral repair). Although correction of the misshaped bony anatomy and associated intra-articular soft tissue damage of the hip is thought to appease impingement and improve pain and function, the current evidence is based on small, observational, and low quality studies. A lack of definitive evidence regarding the efficacy of osteochondroplasty in treating FAI fueled the design and execution of the FIRST randomized controlled trial (RCT). FIRST evaluated the impact of surgical correction of the hip impingement morphology with arthroscopic osteochondroplasty versus arthroscopic lavage on pain, function, and quality of life in adults aged 18–50 years diagnosed with non-arthritic FAI at one year. FIRST was a large definitive RCT (NCT01623843) enrolling patients with FAI requiring surgical intervention across 11 international clinical sites. Participants were randomized to either arthroscopic osteochondroplasty (shaving of bone) or lavage (washing the joint of painful inflammation debris). The primary outcome was patient-reported pain within one year of the initial surgery measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included function, health utility, and health-related quality of life using several general and hip-centric health questionnaires. An independent, blinded adjudication committee evaluated the quality of surgery, re-operations, and other patient complications. Patients and data analysts were blinded to the treatment groups. Two-hundred and twenty participants were enrolled into the FIRST trial over a six-year period (pilot phase: N=50, from 2012–2013 and definitive phase: N=170, from 2015–2018) at 11 clinical sites in Canada, Finland, and Denmark. The FIRST results will be released at the ISAKOS annual meeting as follows. The absolute difference in rate of pain reduction between groups was XX (95% CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean differences of the Short-Form 12 (SF-12, MCS and PCS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) between groups are XX (95% CI: YY-YY, p=X)…, respectively. Reoperations occurred in XX of 220 (X%) patients over the one-year follow up period (OR:XX, 95% CI: YY-YY, p=X) and the patients treated with arthroscopic osteochondroplasty conferred the following risk of reoperation within one-year compared to arthroscopic lavage (RR:XX, 95% CI: YY-YY, p=X). This RCT represents major international efforts to definitively identify the optimal treatment strategy for FAI. The results of this trial will change practice, being used to prevent chronic hip pain and loss of function caused by hip osteoarthritis

Over the past fifteen years hip preservation surgery has rapidly evolved. Improved understanding of the pathomechanics and associated intra-articular degeneration of both hip instability and femoroacetabular impingement have led to improved surgical indications, refined surgical techniques and more effective joint preservation surgical procedures. The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was initially introduced by Ganz and colleagues and has become the preferred treatment in North America for pre-arthritic, symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. Both hip arthroscopy and safe surgical dislocation of the hip have been popularised for the treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement disorders. Hip arthroscopy is effective for focal and\or accessible impingement lesions while the surgical dislocation approach is reserved for nonfocal disease patterns as seen in complex FAI, and residual Perthes and SCFE deformities. Femoroacetabular impingement from major acetabular retroversion can be managed with the PAO if there is coexistent posterosuperior acetabular insufficiency. Short- to mid-term results of these procedures are generally good to excellent for most patients and the complication rates associated with these procedures are very acceptable. Long-term outcomes are best known for the PAO. Several recent studies have documented survivorship rates of 65–90% at 10–20-year follow-up. Certain factors are associated with long-term success including minimal pre-operative radiographic OA, early symptoms, accurate acetabular correction, and younger age. These data strongly suggest that the PAO can defer THA to an older age for most patients while completely avoiding arthroplasty may only be possible in select patients with excellent congruency, no secondary OA and an ideal surgical correction

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) deformities are a potential precursor to hip osteoarthritis and an important contributor to non-arthritic hip pain. Some hips with FAI deformities develop symptoms of pain in the hip and groin that are primarily position related. The reason for pain generation in these hips is unclear. Understanding potential impingement mechanisms in FAI hips will help us understand pain generation. Impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim has been proposed as a pathomechanism in FAI hips. This proposed pathomechanism has not been quantified with direct measurements in physiological postures. Research question: Is femoroacetabular clearance different in symptomatic FAI hips compared to asymptomatic FAI and control hips in sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (FADIR) and squatting postures?. We recruited 33 participants: 9 with symptomatic FAI, 13 with asymptomatic FAI, and 11 controls from the Investigation of Mobility, Physical Activity, and Knowledge Translation in Hip Pain (IMAKT-HIP) cohort. We scanned each participant's study hip in sitting FADIR and squatting postures using an upright open MRI scanner (MROpen, Paramed, Genoa, Italy). We quantified femoroacetabular clearance in sitting FADIR and squatting using beta angle measurements which have been shown to be a reliable surrogate for acetabular rim pressures. We chose sitting FADIR and squatting because they represent, respectively, passive and active maneuvers that involve high flexion combined with internal/external rotation and adduction/abduction, which are thought to provoke impingement. In the squatting posture, the symptomatic FAI group had a significantly smaller minimum beta angle (−4.6º±15.2º) than the asymptomatic FAI (12.5º ±13.2º) (P= 0.018) and control groups (19.8º ±8.6º) (P=0.001). In the sitting FADIR posture, both symptomatic and asymptomatic FAI groups had significantly smaller beta angles (−9.3º ±14º [P=0.010] and −3.9º ±9.7º [P=0.028], respectively) than the control group (5.7º ±5.7º). Our results show loss of clearance between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim (negative beta angle) occurred in symptomatic FAI hips in sitting FADIR and squatting. We did not observe loss of clearance in the asymptomatic FAI group for squatting, while we did observe loss of clearance for this group in sitting FADIR. These differences may be due to accommodation mechanisms in the active, squatting posture that are not present in the passive, sitting FADIR posture. Our results support the hypothesis that impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim is a pathomechanism in FAI hips leading to pain generation

Surgical treatment options for Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) includes both surgical dislocation and hip arthroscopy techniques. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the survivorship of arthroscopies (scope) and surgical dislocations (SD) at minimum 5-year follow-up. The secondary aim was to describe differences in functional outcomes between the 2 groups. This was a retrospective, single surgeon, consecutive, case-series from a large tertiary care centre. We evaluated all surgeries that were performed between 2005 and 2011. Our institutional database was queried for any patient undergoing surgery for FAI (pincer (n=23), cam (n=306), or mixed (n=103) types). Patients with childhood pathologies i.e. Legg Calve Perthes and slipped capital femoral epiphysis were excluded. This resulted in 221 hips (169 males, 52 females) who underwent either SD (94, 42.5%) or scope (127, 57.5%). A manual chart review was completed to identify patients who sustained a complication, underwent revision surgery or progressed to a total hip arthroplasty (THA). In addition, we reviewed prospectively collected patient reported outcome measure (PROMs) using (SF12, HOOS, and UCLA). Survivorship outcome was described for the whole cohort and compared between the 2 surgical groups. PROMs between groups were compared using The Mann-Whitney U test and the survival between groups was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier Analysis and the Log-Rank Mantel Cox test. All analyses were performed in SPSS (IBM, v. 26.0). The cohort included 110 SDs and 320 arthroscopies. The mean age of the whole cohort was 34±10; patients in the SD group (32±9) were younger compared to the arthroscopy group (39±10) (p<0.0001). There were 16 post-operative complications (similar between groups) and 77 re-operations (more common in the SD group (n=49) due to symptomatic metal work (n=34)). The overall 10-year survival was 91±3%. Survivorship was superior in the arthroscopy group at both 5- (96% (95%CI: 93 – 100)) and 8- years 94% (95%CI: 90 – 99%) compared to the SD Group (5-yr: 90% (95%CI: 83 – 98); 8-yr: 84% (95%CI:75 – 93)) (p=0.003) (Figure 1). On average HOOS improved from 54±19 to 68±22 and WOMAC from 65±22 to 75±22. The improvement in PROMs were similar between the 2 groups. We report very good long-term joint preservation for the treatment of FAI, which is similar to those reported in hip dysplasia. In addition, we report satisfactory improvement in function following such treatment. The differences reported in joint survival likely reflect selection biases from the treating surgeon; more complex cases and those associated with more complex anatomy were more likely to have been offered a SD in order to address the pathology with greater ease and hence the inferior joint preservation identified in this group. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

To determine the effect that preoperative use of 3D printed models has on the outcomes for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery. Ninety patients that underwent FAI surgeries by the same surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were age- and sex-matched for two groups - those who had pre-operative 3D printed hip models (n=45) and those with conventional planning using X-rays and/or CT scan (n=45) were identified. Radiographic parameters on pre- and post-operative radiographs that include the alpha angle (45 Dunn view), center edge angle (CEA) (weight bearing AP pelvis), and head-neck offset ratio (cross-table lateral) were obtained. Clinical outcomes were assessed by analyzing iHOT and HOS scores pre- and post-operatively. Ninety patients (3D printed group 45, Conventional group 45) with a mean age of 36 years were evaluated. Mean follow-up time was 28 months. For all of the radiological variables (CEA and alpha angle), there was a significant improvement seen for both groups (p=0.001). However, the 3D printed group showed significantly better resection of bone to a normal alpha angle (< 5 5) than did the Conventional group. Additionally, head-neck offset was significantly better in the 3D printed group (p=0.001). Statistically significant improvements were seen in both groups on the HOS and iHOT-33 (p=0.001). Planning FAI surgery using 3D hip models helps in achieving better resection, especially in CAM-type FAI

Previous authors have suggested that the analgesic effects of intra-articular morphine may be beneficial. Clonidine has been found to potentiate the analgesic effect of morphine. Following knee arthroscopy, morphine has demonstrated equivocal effect in comparison to bupivicaine for analgesia while circumventing the issue of chondrotoxicity. There have been no studies evaluating the effect of intra-articular morphine following hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular morphine in combination with clonidine on pain and narcotic consumption following hip arthroscopy surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. A retrospective review was performed on 43 patients that underwent hip arthroscopy between September 2014 and May 2015 at our institution for femoroacetabular impingement. All patients received preoperative Celebrex and Tylenol per our anesthesia protocol, and 22 patients received an additional intra-articular injection of 10 mg morphine and 100 mcg of clonidine at the conclusion of the procedure. Narcotic consumption, duration of anesthesia recovery, and perioperative pain scores were compared between the two groups. We found that patients who received intra-articular morphine and clonidine used significantly less opioid analgesic in the PACU, with 23 mEq of morphine equivalents required in the intra-articular morphine and clonidine group compared to 40 mEq of opiod equivalents in the non-injection group (p=0.0259). There were no statistically significant differences in time spent in recovery prior to discharge or in VAS pain scores recorded immediately post-operatively and at one hour following surgery. In conclusion, we found that an intraoperative intra-articular injection of morphine and clonidine significantly reduced the amount of narcotic requirement following hip arthroscopy. We do believe that there may be significant benefits to this, including less systemic effects from overall narcotic usage in the perioperative period. Our study demonstrated a beneficial effect of intra-articular morphine that may help with overall pain improvement, less narcotic consumption, and improved patient satisfaction following outpatient hip arthroscopy. This study provides the foundation for future research currently being conducted in a randomised-control setting

Malreduction of the syndesmosis is a poor prognosticator following ankle fracture and has been documented in as many as 52% of patients following fracture fixation. The current standard for assessment of reduction of the syndesmosis is bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan of the ankle. Multiple radiographic parameters are utilized to define malreduction, however, there has been limited investigation into the accuracy of these measurements to differentiate malreduction from inherent anatomical asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of positive malreduction standards within the syndesmosis of native, uninjured ankles. Bilateral lower extremity CT scans including ankles were screened. Studies were excluded if the patient was skeletally immature, had pathology below the knee or if they had congenital neuromuscular syndromes. The resulting cohort consisted of 207 patients. The indication for bilateral CT scan was femoral acetabular impingement in 110 patients (53%), rotation assessment following arthroplasty in 32 patients (15%), rotation assessment following femoral fracture in 30 patients (14%), rotational assessment for patellar instability in 30 patients (14%) and five miscellaneous indications (2%). Fifty patients were reviewed by three observers independently and to determine inter-observer reliability. A single observer repeated the measurements within the same cohort four weeks later to evaluate intra-observer reliability. Three observers then measured the anterior syndesmotic distance, posterior syndesmotic distance, central syndesmotic distance, fibular rotation and sagittal fibular translation at 1cm from the distal tibial articular surface. Overall side to side variability between the left and right ankle were assessed. Previously studied malreduction standards were evaluated. These included: anterior to posterior syndesmotic distance > 2mm, central syndesmotic difference > 1.5mm, average syndesmotic distance > 2mm, fibular rotational difference > 10o and sagittal translational difference > 2mm. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was good to excellent for anterior, posterior and central syndesmotic distance, and fibular rotation measurements. Sagittal fibular translation had an ICC of 0.583, and thus was only of fair reliability. Side to side comparison revealed statistically significant difference in only anterior syndesmotic difference (p=0.038). A difference of anterior to posterior syndesmotic distance of greater than 2mm was observed in 43 patients (20.2%). Thirty eight patients (17.8%) had a central syndesmotic difference of greater than 1.5mm. A fibular rotational difference of greater than 10o was observed in 49 patients (23%). The average difference between the anterior and posterior syndesmosis was greater than 2mm in 17 patients (8.2%). Nine patients (4.2%) had sagittal translation of greater than 2mm. Eighty one patients (39%) demonstrated at least one parameter beyond previously set standards for malreduction. Only one parameters was anomalous in 54 patients (26%), 18 patients (8%) had two positive parameters, while eight patients (4%) had three. One patient was asymmetrical in all measured parameters. In this study there was no statistically significant asymmetry between ankles. However, 39% of native syndesmoses would be classified as malreduced on CT scan using previously studied malreduction limits. Current radiographic parameters are not sufficient to differentiate mild inherent anatomical asymmetry from malreduction of the syndesmosis

Introduction. Acetabular retroversion is an accepted cause of Pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. There is increasing evidence that acetabular retroversion is rather a rotational abnormality of the pelvis than an overgrowth of the acetabular wall or even a dysplasia of the posterior wall. Initially, patients with a retroverted acetabulum were treated with an open rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation (SHD) based on the early understanding of the pathomorphology. Theoretically, the reduction of the anterior wall can decrease the already small joint contact area in retroverted hips to a critical size. Based on the most recent literature, anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) seems to be the more appropriate surgical treatment. With this technique, the anterior impingement conflict can be treated efficiently without compromising the joint contact area. However, it is unknown whether this theoretical advantage in turn results in better mid term results of treatment. Objectives. We asked if anteverting PAO results in better clinical and radiographical mid term results compared to rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation. Methods. We performed a retrospective comparative study based on 257 hips (221 patients) with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Acetabular retroversion was defined by a cross-over sign, a posterior wall sign, and a positive ischial spine sign. We then formed two matched groups consisting of 73 hips undergoing open acetabular rim trimming and 54 hips with an anteverting periacetabular osteotomy. Patients with incomplete radiographic documentation, previous surgery, and hip dysplasia (LCE < 20°) were excluded. Some patients were excluded due to a matching process (Fig. 1). Patients were generally followed clinically and radiographically after two, five and ten years. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the following endpoints: a low clinical score, radiographic progression of osteoarthritis, and/or the conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The Log Rank Score was used to compare the two survivorship curves. Results. Patients undergoing anteverting PAO for acetabular retroversion had a significantly increased survivorship (82%, 95% confidence interval, 72–91%) at seven years in comparison to open surgical rim trimming (63%, 95%CI, 49–76%, p<0.0001). The two survivorship curves are comparable for the first four years with a substantial drop for the rim trimming group after year five (Fig. 2). Conclusion. This study proofs for the first time that the theoretical advantages of anteverting periacetabular osteotomy in hips with symptomatic acetabular retroversion results in an increased survivorship at mid term follow-up in comparison to open rim trimming. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Surgical management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) aims to preserve the native hip, restore joint function, and delay the onset of osteoarthritis. However, it is unclear how surgery affects joint mechanics and hip joint stability. The aim was to examine the contributions of each surgical stage (i.e., intact cam hip, capsulotomy, cam resection, capsular repair) towards hip joint centre of rotation and microinstability. Twelve fresh, frozen cadaveric hips (n = 12 males, age = 44 ± 9 years, BMI = 23 ± 3 kg/m2) were skeletonized to the capsule and included in this study. All hips indicated cam morphology on CT data (axial α = 63 ± 6°, radial α = 74 ± 4°) and were mounted onto a six-DOF industrial robot (TX90, Stäubli). The robot positioned each hip in four sagittal angles: 1) Extension, 2) Neutral 0°, 3) Flexion 30°, and 4) Flexion 90°, and performed internal and external hip rotations until a 5-Nm torque was reached in each direction, while recording the hip joint centre's neutral path of translation. After the (i) intact hip was tested, each hip underwent a series of surgical stages and was retested after each stage: (ii) T-capsulotomy (incised lateral iliofemoral capsular ligament), (iii) cam resection (removed morphology), and (iv) capsular repair (sutured portal incisions). Eccentricity of the hip joint centre was quantified by the microinstability index (MI = difference in rotational foci / femoral head radius). Repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc paired t-tests compared the within-subject differences in hip joint centre and microinstability index, between the testing stages (CI = 95%, SPSS v.24, IBM). At the Extension and Neutral positions, the hip joint centre rotated concentrically after each surgical stage. At Flexion 30°, the hip joint centre shifted inferolaterally during external rotation after capsulotomy (p = 0.009), while at Flexion 90°, the hip joint centre further shifted inferolaterally during external rotation (p = 0.005) and slightly medially during internal rotation after cam resection, compared to the intact stages. Consequently, microinstability increased after the capsulotomy at Flexion 30° (MI = +0.05, p = 0.003) and substantially after cam resection at Flexion 90° (MI = +0.07, p = 0.007). Capsular repair was able to slightly restrain the rotational centre and decrease microinstability at the Flexion 30° and 90° positions (MI = −0.03 and −0.04, respectively). Hip microinstability occurred at higher amplitudes of flexion, with the cam resection providing more intracapsular volume and further lateralizing the hip joint during external rotation. Removing the cam deformity and impingement with the chondrolabral junction also medialized the hip during internal rotation, which can restore more favourable joint loading mechanics and stability. These findings support the pathomechanics of cam FAI and suggest that iatrogenic microinstability may be due to excessive motions, prior to post-operative restoration of static (capsular) and dynamic (muscle) stability. In efforts to limit microinstability, proper nonsurgical management and rehabilitation are essential, while activities that involve larger amplitudes of hip flexion and external rotation should be avoided immediately after surgery

The literature indicates that femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients do not return to the level of controls (CTRL) following surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare hip biomechanics during stair climbing tasks in FAI patients before and two years after undergoing corrective surgery against healthy controls (CTRL). A total of 27 participants were included in this study. All participants underwent CT imaging at the local hospital, followed by three-dimensional motion analysis done at the human motion biomechanics laboratory at the local university. Participants who presented a cam deformity >50.5° in the oblique-axial or >60° in the radial planes, respectively, and who had a positive impingement test were placed in the FAI group (n=11, age=34.1±7.4 years, BMI=25.4±2.7 kg/m2). The remaining participants had no cam deformity and negative impingement test and were placed in the CTRL group (n=16, age=33.2±6.4 years, BMI=26.3±3.2 kg/m2). The CTRL group completed the biomechanics protocol once, whereas the FAI group completed the protocol twice, once prior to undergoing corrective surgery for the cam FAI, and the second time at approximately two years following surgery. At the human motion biomechanics laboratory, participants were outfitted with 45 retroreflective markers placed according to the UOMAM marker set. Participants completed five trials of stairs task on a three step instrumented stair case to measure ground reaction forces while 10 Vicon MX-13 cameras recorded the marker trajectories. Data was processed using Nexus software and divided into stair ascent and stair descent tasks. The trials were imported into custom written MatLab software to extract peak pelvis and hip kinematics and hip kinetic variables. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine significant (p < 0.05) differences between the groups. No significant differences occurred during the stair descent task between any of the groups. During the stair ascent task, the CTRL group had significantly greater peak hip flexion angle (Pre-Op=58±7.1°, Post-Op=58.1±6.6°, CTRL=64.1±5.1°) and sagittal hip range of motion (ROM) (Pre-Op=56.7±6.7°, Post-Op=56.3±5.5°, CTRL=61.7±4.2°) than both the pre- and post-operative groups. Pre-operatively, the FAI group had significantly less peak hip adduction angle (Pre-Op=2±4.5°, Post-Op=3.4±4.4°, CTRL=5.5±3.7°) and hip frontal ROM (Pre-Op=9.9±3.4°, Post-Op=11.9±5.4°, CTRL=13.4±2.5°) compared to the CTRL group. No significant differences occurred in the kinetic variables. Our findings are in line with the Rylander and colleagues (2013) who also found that hip sagittal ROM did not improve following corrective surgery. Their study included a mix of cam and pincer-type FAI, and had a mean follow-up of approximately one year. Our cohort included only cam FAI and they had a mean follow-up of approximately two years, indicating with the extra year, the patients still did not show sagittal hip kinematics improvement. In the frontal plane, there was no significant difference between the post-op and the CTRL, indicating that the postoperative FAI reached the level of the CTRLs. This is in line with recent work that indicates a more medialized hip contact force vector following surgery, suggesting better hip stabilization

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. The earlier PAO series show 20 year survivorship of 81% and 65% in Tonnis Grade 0 and 1 hips. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-operatively whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Background. Rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) is an effective treatment option for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. However, excessive lateral and anterior correction during the periacetabular osteotomy may lead to femoroacetabular impingement. We used preoperative planning software for total hip arthroplasty to perform femoroacetabular impingement simulations before and after rotational acetabular osteotomies. Methods. We evaluated 11 hips in 11 patients with available computed tomography taken before and after RAO. All cases were female and mean age at the time of surgery was 35.9 years. All cases were early stage osteoarthritis without obvious osteophytes or joint space narrowing. Radiographic analysis included the center-edge (CE) angle, Sharp's acetabular angle, the acetabular roof angle, the acetabular head index (AHI), cross-over sign, and posterior wall sign. Acetabular anteversion was measured at every 5 mm slice level in the femoral head using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography. Impingement simulations were performed using the preoperative planning software ZedHip (LEXI, Tokyo, Japan). In brief, we created a three-dimensional model. The range of motion which causes bone-to-bone impingement was evaluated in flexion (flex), abduction (abd), external rotation in flex 0°, and internal rotation in flex 90°. The lesions caused by impingement were evaluated. Results. In the radiographic measurements, the CE angle, Sharp's angle, acetabular roof angle, and AHI all indicated improved postoperative acetabular coverage. The cross-over sign was recognized pre- and postoperatively in each case. Acetabular retroversion appeared in one case before RAO and in three cases after RAO. Preoperatively, there was a tendency to reduce the acetabular anteverison angle in the hips from distal levels to proximal. In contrast, there was no postoperative difference in the acetabular anteversion angle at any level. In our simulation study, bone-to-bone impingement occurred in flex (preoperative/postoperative, 137°/114°), abd (73°/54°), external rotation in flex 0°(34°/43°), and internal rotation in flex 90°(70°/36°). Impingement occurred within internal rotation 45°in flexion 90°in two preoperative and eight postoperative cases. The impingement lesions were anterosuperior of the acetabulum in all cases. Discussion. It is easy to make and assess an impingement simulation using preoperative planning software, and our data suggest the simulation was helpful in a clinical setting, though there were some remaining problems such as approximation of the femoral head center and differences in femur movement between the simulation and reality. In the postoperative simulation there was a tendency to reduce the range of motion in flex, abd, and internal rotation in flex 90°. There was a correlation between acetabular anteversion angle and flex. Since impingement occurred within internal rotation 45°in flexion 90°in eight postoperative simulations, we consider there is a strong potential for an increase in femoroacetabular impingement after RAO

Introduction. Several reports demonstrated the overcoverage of the anterior acetabulum. Anterior CE angle over 46°may be a probable risk factor for pincer FAI syndrome after a rotational acetabular osteotomy. In addition, a highly anteverted femoral neck, reported as a risk factor for posterior impingement, has been found in DDH patients. These findings indicate proper acetabular reorientation is essential to avoid anterior or posterior impingement after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between acetabular three-dimensional (3D) alignment reorientation and clinical range of motion (ROM) after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Methods. A total of 53 patients who underwent curved PAO (CPO) for DDH from January 2014 to April 2017 were selected. Three (5.7%) of them were lost to follow-up. Therefore, the data from 58 hips, contributed by 50 patients (44 women and 6 men), were included in the analysis. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans from the pelvis to the knee joint were performed and transferred to a 3D template software (Zed Hip; Lexi, Tokyo, Japan). The pelvic plane axis was defined according to the functional pelvic plane. The pre- and postoperative lateral and anterior 3D center-edge (CE) angles were measured on the coronal and sagittal views through the center of the femoral head. The pre- and postoperative 3D center-edge (CE) angles and femoral anteversion were measured and compared with clinical outcomes, including postoperative ROM. Results. The radiographical outcomes of our study are demonstrated in Figure 1. The mean values of pre- and postoperative lateral CE angles were 12.6º±8.7 and 30.2º±9.7, respectively (p<0.001), and mean pre- and postoperative anterior CE angles were 42.4º±15.3 and 63.9º±12.1, respectively (p<0.001). Both CE angles were significantly improved. The correlation between pre- and postoperative acetabular coverage and postoperative ROM was evaluated. Postoperative abduction and internal rotation ROM were significantly associated with postoperative lateral CE angles (abduction; p < 0.001, internal rotation; p = 0.028); flexion and internal rotation ROM was significantly associated with postoperative anterior CE angles (flexion; p < 0.001, internal rotation; p = 0.028). Femoral anteversion was negatively correlated with postoperative abduction (p = 0.017) and external rotation (p = 0.047) ROM (Table 1). Postoperative abduction ROM was strongly positively correlated with femoral anteversion, whereas postoperative external rotation was strongly negatively correlated (Table 2). The total anteversion was strongly correlated with pre- or postoperative ROMs during flexion and internal rotation ROM (Table 2). Conclusion. Postoperativeanterior acetabular coverage may affect internal rotation ROM more than the lateral coverage. Therefore, the direction of acetabular reorientation should be carefully determined according to 3D alignment during PAO. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Preoperative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctible problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis