Introduction. Accurate component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves post-operative stability and reduces wear and aseptic loosening. Methods for achieving accurate stem placement have not been as extensively studied as cup placement. Objectives. The purpose of this study is to determine how consistently femoral stem version can be corrected to an ideal of 15 +/− 5 degrees using robotic guidance. Furthermore, the study aims to identify other factors related to approach and patient demographics, which may influence the degree of correction obtained. Methods. 175 consecutive patients who underwent MAKO robotic guidance THA were included in the study with a mean age of 57.9 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 30.41kg/m2. 48% of the population was male and 74% of the procedures were performed through an anterior approach. The absolute difference between 15 degrees of anteversion and native femoral version as well as 15 degrees of anteversion and femoral stem version was calculated for each patient. A smaller absolute value post-operatively reflects a closer femoral stem version to a target of 15 degrees. Results. The mean native femoral version was 6.39+/−9.14 degrees. The mean stem version was 9.23+/−8.57 degrees. With respect to achieving a target version of 15 degrees the mean absolute difference between native version and 15 degrees was 10.46+/−6.94 degrees and mean absolute difference between the stem version and 15 degrees was 8.37+/−6.03 degrees. This difference was statistically significant. 69% of patients were able to have their native femoral version corrected to a target of 15 degrees. Conclusions. Robotic guidance in THA was effective in correcting native femoral version towards a target of 15 degrees. This is can be achieved using both the anterior and posterior approach and is not affected by BMI

Introduction

Appropriate femoral stem anteversion is an important factor in maintaining stability and maximizing the performance of the bearing after total hip replacement (THR). The anteversion of the native femoral neck has been shown to have a significant effect on the final anteversion of the stem, particularly with a uncemented femoral component. The aim of this study was to quantify the variation in native femoral neck anteversion in a population of patients requiring total hip replacement.

Introduction

Appropriate prosthetic alignment is an important factor in maintaining stability and maximising the performance of the bearing after total hip replacement (THR). With a cementless component, the anteversion of the native femur has been shown to influence the anteversion of the prosthetic stem. However, the extent to which anteversion of a cementless stem can be adjusted from the native anteversion has seldom been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between native and stem anteversion with two different cementless stem designs.

Combined anteversion angle of acetabular component and femeral neck is an important factor for total hip arthroplasty (THA) as it may affect impingement and dislocation. Previous studies have collected data mainly from direct measurements of bone morphology or manual measurements from 2D or 3D radiolographic images. The purpose of this study was to electronically measure the version angles in native acetabulum and femur in matured normal Caucasion population using a novel virtual bone database and analysis environment named SOMA™.

221 CT scans from a skeletally mature, normal Caucasian population with an age range of 30–95 years old. The population included 135 males and 86 females. CT data was converted to virtual bones with cortical and cancellous boundaries using custom CT analytical sofware. (SOMA™ V.3.2) Auxillary reference frames were constructed and measurements were performed within the SOMA™ design environment. Acetabular Anteversion (AA) angle as defined by Murray¹ was measured. The acetabular rim plane was constructed by selecting 3 bony land marks from pubis, ilium and ischium. A vector through acetabular center point and normal to the rim plane defined the plane for the AA measurement. The AA was defined as the angle of this plane relative to the frontal (Coronal) plane of the pelvis. The Femoral Neck Anteversion (FNA) angle was measured from the neck axis plane to the frontal (Coronal) plane as defined by the posterior condyles. The neck axis plane was constructed to pass through femoral neck axis perpendicular to the transverse plane. The combined anteversion angle was computed as the summation of acetabular and femoral anteversion angles. Student's t tests were performed to compare gender difference with an assumed 95% confidence level.

The mean AA angle for total population was 25.8°, SD=7.95°. The mean AA for male was 24.8°, SD=5.93° and for female was 27.3°, SD=7.14°. P=0.009.

The mean FNA angle for total population was 14.3°, SD=6.52°. The mean FNA for male was 13.5°, SD=7.97° and for female was 15.5°, SD=7.80°. P=0.058.

The mean combined anteversion angle for total population was 40.1°, SD=10.76°. The mean combined anteversion angle for male was 38.3° SD=10.39 ° and for female was 42.8° SD=10.83 °. P=.0002. The plot of AA as a function of FNA shows weak correlation for both male and female. (Figure 1) The frequency distribution is shown in Figure 2.

The results showed the both AA, FNA and combined anteversion angles were significantly smaller in male population than that in female population. The FNA angle of the cementless femoral stem can be smaller than with the natural femur, therefore a higher AA or higher posterior build up may be required for the acetabular component for optimal function of a THA.

Introduction. Osteogenesis imperfect (OI) is a geno- and phenotypically heterogeneous group of congenital collagen disorders characterized by fragility and microfractures resulting in long bone deformities. OI can lead to progressive femoral coxa vara from bone and muscular imbalance and continuous microfracture about the proximal femur. If left untreated, patients develop Trendelenburg gait, leg length discrepancy, further stress fracture and acute fracture at the apex of the deformity, impingement and hip joint degeneration. In the OI patient, femoral coxa vara cannot be treated in isolation and consideration must be given to protecting the whole bone with the primary goal of verticalization and improved biomechanical stability to allow early loading, safe standing, re-orientation of the physis and avoidance of untreated sequelae. Implant constructs should therefore be designed to accommodate and protect the whole bone. The normal paediatric femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) ranges from 135 to 145 degrees. In OI the progressive pathomechanical changes result in FNSA of significantly less than 120 degrees and decreased Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angles (HEA). Proximal femoral valgus osteotomy is considered the standard surgical treatment for coxa vara and multiple surgical techniques have been described, each with their associated complications. In this paper we present the novel technique of controlling femoral version and coronal alignment using a tubular plate and long bone protection with the use of teleoscoping rods. Methodology. After the decision to operate had been made, a CT scan of the femur was performed. A 1:1 scale 3D printed model (AXIAL3D, Belfast, UK) was made from the CT scan to allow for accurate implant templating and osteotomy planning. In all cases a subtrochanteric osteotomy was performed and fixed using a pre-bent 3.5 mm 1/3 tubular plate. The plate was bent to allow one end to be inserted into the proximal femur to act as a blade. A channel into the femoral neck was opened using a flat osteotome. The plate was then tapped into the femoral neck to the predetermined position. The final position needed to allow one of the plate holes to accommodate the growing rod. This had to be determined pre operatively using the 3D printed model and the implants. The femoral canal was reamed, and the growing rod was placed in the femur, passing through the hole in the plate to create a construct that could effectively protect both the femoral neck and the full length of the shaft. The distal part of the plate was then fixed to the shaft using eccentric screws around the nail to complete the construct. Results. Three children ages 5,8 and 13 underwent the procedure. Five coxa vara femurs have undergone this technique with follow-up out to 62 months (41–85 months) from surgery. Improvements in the femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) were av. 18. o. (10–38. o. ) with pre-op coxa vara FNSA av. 99. o. (range 87–114. o. ) and final FNSA 117. o. (105–125. o. ). Hilgenreiner's epiphyseal angle was improved by av. 29. o. (2–58. o. ). However only one hip was restored to <25. o. In the initial technique employed for 3 hips, the plates were left short in the neck to avoid damaging the physis. This resulted in 2 of 3 hips fracturing through the femoral neck above the plate at approximately 1 year. There were revisions of the 3 hips to longer plates to prevent intra-capsular stress riser. All osteotomies united and both intracapsular fractures healed. No further fractures have occurred within the protected femurs and no other repeat operations have been required. Conclusions. Surgical correction of the OI coxa vara hip is complex. Bone mineral density, multiplanar deformity, a desire to maintain physeal growth and protection of the whole bone all play a role in the surgeon's decision making process. Following modifications, this technique demonstrates a novel method in planning and control of multiplanar proximal femoral deformity, resulting in restoration of the FNSA to a more appropriate anatomical alignment, preventing long bone fracture and improved femoral verticalization in the medium term follow-up

Instability is the most common reason for revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Since THA requires arthrotomy of the hip and replacement with a femoral head that is smaller than the normal hip, instability following THA is always a potential concern. Many factors contribute to the development of instability after THA including: restoration of normal anatomy, implant design, component position, surgical approach and technique, and numerous patient related factors. Recently, the role of spinal mobility and deformity has been shown to have a significant effect on risk of dislocation after THA. The long held guidelines for component positioning or so called “safe zone” described by Lewinnek have also been questioned since most dislocations have been shown to occur in patients whose components are positioned within this “safe” range. In the early post-operative period, dislocation can occur prior to capsular and soft tissue healing if the patient exceeds their peri-operative range of motion limits. Closed reduction and abduction bracing for 6 weeks may allow for soft tissue healing and stabilization of the hip. It is important to try and identify the mechanism of dislocation since this can affect the technique of closed reduction, how the patient is braced following reduction and what may need to be addressed at the time of revision if dislocation recurs. Closed reduction and bracing may be effective in patients who have a previously well-functioning, stable THA who suffer a traumatic dislocation after the peri-operative period. Despite successful closed reduction, recurrent dislocation occurs in many patients and can be secondary to inadequate soft tissue healing, patient noncompliance or problems related to component positioning. Patients who incur more than 2 dislocations should be considered for revision surgery. Prior to revision surgery, an appropriate radiographic evaluation of the hip should be performed to identify any potential mechanical/kinematic issues that need to be addressed at the time of revision. Typically this involves plain radiographs, including a cross table lateral of the involved hip to assess acetabular version, but may also involve cross-sectional imaging to assess femoral version. Patients with soft tissue pseudotumors frequently have significant soft tissue deficiencies that are not amenable to component repositioning alone and require use of constrained or dual mobility components. In general, “limited revisions” consisting of modular head and liner exchange with insertion of a lipped liner and larger, longer femoral head rarely correct the problem of recurrent instability, since component malposition that frequently contributes to the instability is not addressed. Similarly, insertion of a constrained liner in a malpositioned cup is associated with a high rate of implant failure and recurrent dislocation since impingement contributing to the instability is not addressed. In patients who fail closed management and have a history of recurrent instability, we have found the treatment paradigm described by Wera, et al. to be very helpful in the management of the unstable THA. Several studies have shown that tripolar type constrained liners appear to perform considerably better than locking ring type constrained liners. As a result, dual mobility implants are becoming more widely utilised in patients with abductor and other soft tissue deficiencies, hip instability of uncertain etiology and patients with increased risk factors for instability undergoing primary THA. Early results with dual mobility components have been shown to have a low rate of failure in high instability risk revision THAs. These devices do have several unique potential complications and their use should be limited to patients with significantly increased risk of dislocation and instability

Background. Despite the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA), there are still challenges including restoration of leg length, offset, and femoral version. The Tsolution One combines preoperative planning with an active robotic system to assist in femoral canal preparation during a THA. Purpose of Study. To demonstrate the use of an active robotic system in femoral implant placement and determine the accuracy of femoral implant position. This was evaluated in a cadaveric study. Study Design and Methods. Four THA's were performed in fresh frozen cadaveric hips with assistance of the TSolution One System for preparation of the femoral canal. CT scans of the hip were used as input for TPLAN preoperative planning software to position the implants in three-dimensions (3D). The intraoperative process includes exposure of the joint using a posterolateral approach, fixation of the femur relative to the TCAT system, and registration of the femur. TCAT then actively milled the femoral canal in each of the cases after which Depuy Trilock implants were inserted by the surgeon. Only the femoral stem implants were considered in this study. Postoperative CT was used to compare actual implant position with preoperatively planned implant position in 3D. The translations between the centroids of the implant positions were compared. Findings of Study. All femoral stems were successfully implanted with no complications. Implant position very closely matched the preoperative plan. Compared to the preoperative plan, the mean (± SD) positions of the centroid of the implant were off by 0.6 (±0.6) mm in the medial-lateral direction, 0.8 (±0.3) mm in the anterior-posterior direction, and 2.0 (±1.3) mm in the superior-inferior direction. No intraoperative fractures occurred. A sample of the preoperative planned position (left) and actual postoperative position (right) as seen on TPLAN can be seen in Figure 1. An example of the final 3D implant position in blue as compared to the preoperative implant position in red can be seen in Figure 2. Conclusions. Overall, the post-operative stems positions were superior compared to the preoperative plan and it is believed that this is likely a result of not impacting the stems enough during the procedure. The medial-lateral and anterior-posterior stem positions were within 1 mm of what was planned. Active robotics can successfully be used to improve accuracy, precision, and reproducibility when considering final implant position in THA. These improvements can reduce unwanted human error and reduce complications. Further in vivo study is planned to demonstrate the clinical benefits of such improved precision

Over the past several decades, cementless femoral fixation for primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) has become more common in North America. It is estimated that nearly 90% of all primary THAs completed in the United States are cementless. In the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry, the use of cementless fixation has increased from 51.3% in 2003 to 63.3% in 2015. During the same time period, cemented fixation declined from 13.9% to 3.7%, but hybrid fixation was relatively stable at about 33%. This is likely related to the fact that multiple institutional and national registries have shown a higher rate of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures with the use of cementless femoral components in certain patient populations. Those risk factors include patients greater than 65 years of age, female patients, and those with significant osteoporosis and Dorr C canals. However, it is important to note that not all cementless femoral components are similar. In fact, there is great variation in not only the geometry of cementless femoral components, but also in the type and extent of the biologic ingrowth surfaces. Each design has unique advantages and disadvantages. While some cementless femoral components are indicated for the general population, some are more specific and tailored to complex primary THAs (such as developmental dysplasia of the hip or post-traumatic arthritis with intra-operative concern for femoral version and thus hip stability) or revision procedures where distal fixation is needed (such as those with periprosthetic fractures or lack of proximal metaphyseal bony support). In 2000, Berry first described the evolution of cementless femoral components based upon distinct geometries that govern where fixation is obtained. This was modified in 2011 by Khanuja et al. to include six general types of cementless femoral components based upon shape. These include the following: Type 1: Single wedge; Type 2: Double edge with metaphyseal filling; Type 3: Tapered - A: Tapered round, B: Tapered spline/cone, C: Tapered rectangle; Type 4: Cylindrical fully coated; Type 5: Modular; Type 6: Anatomic. Type 1, 2, and 6 cementless femoral components obtain fixation in the metaphysis, whereas Type 3 stems obtain fixation in the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Type 4 stems obtain fixation in the diaphysis. Type 5 stems can obtain fixation in either the metaphysis or the diaphysis. Within each type of stem, specific implant designs have had excellent long-term survivorship, while other specific implant designs have had higher than expected failure rates. Type 1 stems have the most published reports, and most contemporary reports indicate a stem survivorship greater than 95% at 15–20 years. Similar findings have been documented with specific implants from other types of stems when appropriate indications and surgical technique are utilised. Of note, one class of stems that has shown early failures due to adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) is that of dual-modular necks. On the other hand, modular fluted tapered stems continue to produce excellent long-term data in complex primary THAs, as well as difficult revision THAs

Introduction. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an important variable for short and long term durability of any hip implant. This novel method utilises internal and external bony landmarks, and the transverse acetabular ligament for positioning the acetabular component. Methods. The cup is placed parallel and superior to the transverse ligament and inside the anterior wall notch of the true acetabulum, and then adjusted for femoral version and pelvic tilt, fixed obliquity, and transverse rotational deformity based on weight bearing pre-operative radiographs. Seventy consecutive THRs (68 patients) were performed using the above technique. The cup radiographic and functional anteversion and abduction angle were measured on post-operative weight bearing pelvic radiographs using EBRA software. Results. The mean follow-up was 8.1 ± 2.4 months (4.3 – 11.8 months). There were no dislocations. The mean anteversion and abduction angle was 41.8 degrees ± 4.6 degrees and 18.5 degrees ± 4.4 degrees, respectively. In 3 hips, the radiographic abduction angle was slightly outside the safe zone of Lewinnek as measured based on the inter-teardrop line. However, when using a weight bearing AP pelvis radiograph to measure functional abduction angle using a horizontal line as a reference, they were all within the normal range. Discussion and Conclusion. The proposed technique utilises intra- and extra-articular bony landmarks, allows for adjustment for lumbosacral angle, abnormal femoral anteversion, and excessive acetabular version. The proposed technique is a reproducible and accurate method for cup placement with posterior exposure

With the increasing use of 3D medical imaging, it is possible to analyze 3D patient anatomy to extract features, trends and population specific shape information. This is applied to the development of ‘standard implants’ targeted to specific population groups. INTRODUCTION. Human beings are diverse in their physical makeup while implants are often designed based on some key measurements taken from the literature or a limited sampling of patient data. The different implant sizes are often scaled versions of the ‘average’ implant, although in reality, the shape of anatomy changes as a function of the size of patient. The implant designs are often developed based on a certain demographic and ethnicity and then, simply applied to others, which can result in poor design fitment [1]. Today, with the increasing use of 3D medical imaging (e.g. CT or MRI), it is possible to analyze 3D patient anatomy to extract features, trends and population specific shape information. This can be applied to the development of new ‘standard implants’ targeted to a specific population group [2]. PATIENTS & METHODS. Our population analysis was performed by creating a Statistical Shape Model (SSM) [3] of the dataset. In this study, 40 full Chinese cadaver femurs and 100 full Caucasian cadaver femurs were segmented from CT scans using Mimics®. Two different SSMs, specific to each population, were built using in-house software tools. These SSMs were validated using leave-one-out experiments, and then analyzed and compared in order to enhance the two population shape differences. RESULTS. An SSM is typically represented by an average model and a few independent modes of variation that capture most of the inherent variations in the data. Based on these main modes of variations, the shape features, e.g. length, thickness, curvature neck angle and femoral version, presenting largest variations were determined, and correlations between these features were calculated. Figure 1 represents the Caucasian and Chinese average models, and shows that while the length of these two models was significantly different, the AP and ML dimensions were similar, indicating a difference of morphology (other than a scaling) between the two populations. Figure 2 represents the first mode of variation that illustrates the variation of Chinese femur shape with size. As an example, the neck angle increases of 26° with an increase of 139 mm in femur length, indicative of the effect of changes in loading conditions on geometry as a function of size. CONCLUSION. The advantage of using more advanced statistical analyses is that the 3D data are probed in an unbiased fashion, allowing the most important parameters of variation to be determined. These analyses are thus particularly effective to compare different populations, to evaluate how well existing implant designs fit specific populations, and to highlight the design parameters that need to be adapted for good fitment of specific populations