Introduction. Torsional deformities are increasingly recognized as an additional factor in young patients with hip pain resulting from pincer- and cam-deformities. For example decreased femoral torsion can worsen an anterior Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) conflict while an increased torsion can be beneficial with the same configuration. It is unknown how often torsional deformities are present in young patients presenting with hip pain that are eligible for joint preserving surgery. We questioned (1) what is the prevalence of a pathological femoral torsion in hips with FAI or hip dysplasia? (2) which hip disorders are associated with an abnormal torsion?. Methods. An IRB-approved retrospective study of 463 consecutive symptomatic FAI patients (538 hips) and a MRI or CT scan on which femoral torsion could be measured was performed (‘study group'). Out of 915 MRI we excluded 377 hips. The study group was divided into 11 groups: Dysplasia (< 22° LCE), retroversion, anteverted hips, overcoverage (LCE angle 36–39°), severe overcoverage (LCE>39°), cam (>50° alpha angle), mixed FAI, varus- (<125° CCD angle), valgus- (>139° CCD), Perthes-hips and hips with no obvious pathology. The ‘control group' of normal hips consisted of 35 patients (35 hips) without radiographic signs of osteoarthritis or hip pain wich was used for a previous study. Femoral antetorsion was measured according to Tönnis et al. as the angle between the axis of the femoral neck and the posterior axis of the femoral condyles. Normal femoral torsion was defined by Tönnis et al. as angles 10–25° while decreased resp. increased torsion was defined as <5° and >25°. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variances (ANOVA). Results. (1) Fifty-one percent of the patients of the study group presented with abnormal values for femoral torsion. Torsional deformities (<10° or >25°) were measured in 52% of all 538 hips eligible for joint preserving surgery. (2) Torsional deformities were present in 86% of Perthes hips, in 61 % of dysplastic hips, 52.3 % of hips with overcoverage, in 51% of mixed FAI, in 50% of varus hips, in 45% of valgus hips, in 45% of retroverted hips, in 47% of anteverted hips, in 43% of cam FAI, 35% of hips with severe overcoverage. No torsional deformity was present in the control group. Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) revealed significant differences (p<0.001) of torsion between normal hips (mean 17°) and hips with dysplasia (26°), valgus hips (27°), hips with no obvious pathology (30°) and Perthes hips (32°). Mean femoral torsion was in the normal range in the other groups. Conclusion. More than half of the patients wich are eligible for joint preserving surgery of the hip present with abnormal femoral torsion. In particular dysplastic-, valgus-, Perthes hips and hips with no obvious pathology had a significantly altered femoral torsion compared to normal hips. Femoral antetorsion should be measured in every patient eligible for hip-preserving surgery

With the growing number of individuals with asymptomatic cam-type deformities, elevated alpha angles alone do not always explain clinical signs of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Differences in additional anatomical parameters may affect hip joint mechanics, altering the pathomechanical process resulting in symptomatic FAI. The purpose was to examine the association between anatomical hip joint parameters and kinematics and kinetics variables, during level walking. Fifty participants (m = 46, f = 4; age = 34 ± 7 years; BMI = 26 ± 4 kg/m²) underwent CT imaging and were diagnosed as either: symptomatic (15), if they showed a cam deformity and clinical signs; asymptomatic (19), if they showed a cam deformity, but no clinical signs; or control (16), if they showed no cam deformity and no clinical signs. Each participant's CT data was measured for: axial and radial alpha angles, femoral head-neck offset, femoral neck-shaft angle, medial proximal femoral angle, femoral torsion, acetabular version, and centre-edge angle. Participants performed level walking trials, which were recorded using a ten-camera motion capture system (Vicon MX-13, Oxford, UK) and two force plates (Bertec FP4060–08, Columbus, OH, USA). Peak sagittal and frontal hip joint angles, range of motion, and moments were calculated using a custom programming script (MATLAB R2015b, Natick, MA, USA). A one-way, between groups ANOVA examined differences among kinematics and kinetics variables (α = 0.05), using statistics software (IBM SPSS v.23, Armonk, NY, USA); while a stepwise multiple regression analysis examined associations between anatomical parameters and kinematics and kinetics variables. No significant differences in kinematics were observed between groups. The symptomatic group demonstrated lower peak hip abduction moments (0.12 ± 0.08 Nm/kg) than the control group (0.22 ± 0.10 Nm/kg, p = 0.01). Sagittal hip range of motion showed a moderate, negative correlation with radial alpha angle (r = −0.33, p = 0.02), while peak hip abduction moment correlated with femoral neck-shaft angle (r = 0.36, p = 0.009) and negatively with femoral torsion (r = −0.36, p = 0.009). With peak hip abduction moment in the stepwise regression analysis, femoral torsion accounted for a variance of 13.3% (F(1, 48) = 7.38; p = 0.009), while together with femoral neck-shaft angle accounted for a total variance of 20.4% (R² change = 0.07, F(2, 47) = 6.01; p = 0.047). Although elevated radial alpha angles may have limited sagittal range of motion, the cam deformity parameters did not affect joint moments. Femoral neck-shaft angle and femoral torsion were significantly associated with peak hip abduction moment, suggesting that the insertion location of the abductor affects muscle's length and its resultant force vector. A varus neck angle, combined with severe femoral torsion, may ultimately influence muscle moment arms and hip mechanics in individuals with cam FAI

Arthroscopic hip procedures have increased dramatically over the last decade as equipment and techniques have improved. Patients who require hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement on occasion require surgery on the contralateral hip. Previous studies have found that younger age of presentation and lower Charlson comorbidity index have higher risk for requiring surgery on the contralateral hip but have not found correlation to anatomic variables. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the factors that predispose a patient to requiring subsequent hip arthroscopy on the contralateral hip. This is an IRB-approved, single surgeon retrospective cohort study from an academic, tertiary referral centre. A chart review was conducted on 310 primary hip arthroscopy procedures from 2009-2020. We identified 62 cases that went on to have a hip arthroscopy on the contralateral side. The bilateral hip arthroscopy cohort was compared to unilateral cohort for sex, age, BMI, pre-op alpha angle and centre edge angle measured on AP pelvis XRay, femoral torsion, traction time, skin to skin time, Tonnis grade, intra-op labral or chondral defect. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. Of the 62 patients that required contralateral hip arthroscopy, the average age was 32.7 compared with 37.8 in the unilateral cohort (p = 0.01) and BMI was lower in the bilateral cohort (26.2) compared to the unilateral cohort (27.6) (p=0.04). The average alpha angle was 76.3. 0. in the bilateral compared to 66. 0. in the unilateral cohort (p = 0.01). Skin to skin time was longer in cases in which a contralateral surgery was performed (106.3 mins vs 86.4 mins) (p=0.01). Interestingly, 50 male patients required contralateral hip arthroscopy compared to 12 female patients (p=0.01). No other variables were statistically significant. In conclusion, this study does re-enforce existing literature by stating that younger patients are more likely to require contralateral hip arthroscopy. This may be due to the fact that these patients require increased range of motion from the hip joint to perform activities such as sports where as older patients may not need the same amount of range of motion to perform their activities. Significantly higher alpha angles were noted in patients requiring contralateral hip arthroscopy, which has not been shown in previous literature. This helps to explain that larger CAM deformities will likely require contralateral hip arthroscopy because these patients likely impinge more during simple activities of daily living. Contralateral hip arthroscopy is also more common in male patients who typically have a larger CAM deformity. In summary, this study will help to risk stratify patients who will likely require contralateral hip arthroscopy and should be a discussion point during pre-operative counseling. That offering early subsequent or simultaneous hip arthroscopy in young male patients with large CAMs should be offered when symptoms are mild

Introduction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the discrepancies of rotational profiles of whole limb between operated and non-operated limb following unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. We conducted an analysis the CT data from 32 patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty using measured resection technique, which femoral component was always implanted with external rotation to posterocondylar axis from July 2009 to April 2013. Using these CT scan, rotational profiles of total limb such as femoral torsion angle (femoral neck anteversion angle; FTA), tibial torsion angle (TTA), knee joint rotation angle (KJRA) and total limb rotation (TLR) were measured. Results. There were significant discrepancies of FTA and KJRA between operated and non-operated limb following unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mean difference of operated and non-operated side for FTA and KJRA were −6.51 ± 11.88º (p=0.0041) and −6.83 ± 5.04º (p < 0.001) respectively. However, there were no significant discrepancies of TLR, TTA. TTA and TLR showed strong correlation (r= 0.7309). Conclusion. FTA showed significant side to side discrepancy, TTA and TLR showed no significant discrepancy between operated- and non-operated limbs in patients undergone unilateral TKA. These results are due to the compensation effect of KJRA. However, excessive external rotation of femoral component beyond the compensation effect of prosthetic knee joint can lead to total limb rotational discrepancy in patient undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty

Background. A careful consideration of change of the rotational profiles of total limb after unilateral total knee arthroplasty is necessary. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the discrepancies of rotational profiles of total limb between operated and non-operated limb following unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis the CT data from 32 patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty using measured resection technique, which femur implant was applied at an external rotation of 3° relative to the posterior condylar axis from July 2009 to April 2013 in our hospital. Using these CT studies, rotational profiles of total limb such as femoral torsion angle (femoral neck anteversion angle; FTA), tibial torsion angle (TTA), neck-malleolar angle (NMA), knee joint rotation angle (rotational mismatch; KJRA) and total limb rotation (TLR) were measured. Results. There were significant discrepancies of FTA and KJRA between operated and non-operated limb following unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mean difference of operated and non-operated side for FTA and KJRA were −6.5 ± 11.9° (p=0.004) and −6.8 ± 5.0° (p < 0.001) respectively. However, there were no significant discrepancies of TLR, TTA and NMA. Conclusion. With comparison with non-operated side, although FTA is significantly decreased in operated limb than non-operated limb following total knee arthroplasty, there were no significant discrepancies of NMA and TLR, because of the compensatory effect of KJRA. However, excessive external rotation of femur implant can affect adversely on rotational profiles of total limb. Further long term studies will be required to evaluate the change of the rotational profiles following unilateral total knee arthroplasty

Introduction. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images are used for the preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however, these two-dimensional (2D) measurements are affected easily by limb position and scanning direction relative to three-dimensional (3D) bone model analyses. The purpose of our study was to compare these measurements to evaluate the factors affecting the difference. Patients and Methods. A total of 75 osteoarthritis knees before primary TKA were assessed. The full-length weight-bearing anteroposterior radiograph and CT slices were used for the 2D measurement. Three-dimensional measurement used 3D bone model reconstructed from the CT data and the coordinate system as the previous reports (Figure 1). We measured FVA (femoral valgus angle), CRA (the angle between the posterior condylar line <PC-L> and the clinical epicondylar axis <CEA>), and SRA (the angle between the PC-L and the surgical epicondylar axis <SEA>). Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and the differences between the 2D and the 3D measurements (Differences) were evaluated. In addition, we evaluated whether preoperative factors (preoperative extension angle, HKA, BMI and CT scanning direction) affected the differences between the 3D and the 2D measurements. Computer simulation was used to examine the influences of CT scanning direction. Results. The ICC and the mean values with 2D and 3D measurements were shown in Table 1. The mean Differences were 0.2 ± 1.2° in FVA, 0.7 ± 2.1° in CRA and 0.7 ± 1.8° in SRA. Nine percentage in CRA and 13% in SRA had over 3 degrees of the Differences. There were no significant correlations between these factors and the Difference, however, the 3D simulation showed a significant difference of CRA between the scanning direction in varus/valgus and the neutral condition (varus: p<0.001, valgus: p<0.001) (Figure 2). Discussion. From our study, the 3D measurements were highly reliable. In the 2D measurements, the rotational measurements showed less interobserver reliability because of the difficulty of picking the same CT plane and the same position of femoral bony landmarks between observers. The mean Differences were small, however, the range was large and almost10% of our cases were over 3 degrees which can induce the malalignment of the component in spite of the precise bone cutting. Particularly, smaller values of the CRA and SRA with the 2D measurement have a risk of internal-rotated position of the femoral component. Preoperative osteoarthritis knees have flexion contractures, valgus, and femoral torsion. The 3D measurements are useful to avoid the different evaluation from the CT scanning situation

Rotational positioning of the femoral component during the realisation of a total knee arthroplasty is an important part of the surgical technique and remains a topic of discussion in the literature. The challenge of this positioning is important because it determines the anatomical result and its effect on the flexion gap and clinical outcome mainly through its impact on patellofemoral alignment. The intraoperative identification of the axis transepicondylar visually or by navigation is not reliable or reproducible. The empirical setting to 3 ° of external rotation, the procedure used to cut or dependent or independent is not adapted to the individual variability of knee surgery. Indeed, the angle formed by the posterior condylar axis and trans-epicondylar axis is subject to large individual variations. The authors propose a novel technique, using the navigation of the trochlea to determine the rotation of the femoral component. The principle is to consider the rotation of the femoral implant as “ideal” when it makes a perfect superposition of the prosthetic trochlea with the native bony trochlea on patellofemoral view at 60° when planning the femur. The bottom of the prosthetic trochlea is well aligned with the trochlea groove, identified during the trochlear morphing, itself perpendicular to the trans-epicondylar axis. The authors hope to encourage centering patellofemoral joint prosthesis, thus favoring the original kinematics of the extensor apparatus. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate firstly, that the navigation of the trochlea is a reliable and reproducible method to adjust the rotation of the femoral component relative to the trans-epicondylar axis taken as reference and the other, the rotation control by this method is not done at the expense of the balance gap in flexion. It is a bi-centric study prospective, nonrandomised, including continuously recruited 145 patients in two French centers. All patients were included in the year 2010 and have all been revised three months and one year of surgery. The average age of patients was 71 years [53, 88]. It was made no selection of patients who have all been included consecutively in the study and in the two centres. In all cases, the rotation of the femoral component was determined by intraoperative navigation of the trochlea. The authors compared the alpha angle (angular divergence between the plane and the posterior bicondylar plane and trans-epicondylar axis) obtained by this method and that calculated on a pre-or postoperative scan. The authors also measured the space between femur and tibia internal and external side in flexion (90°) to assess the impact on the balance in flexion. There is excellent agreement between the results obtained by the method of CT scan and the trochlear navigation technique. In addition, this technique allows us to achieve a quadrilateral space gap in flexion. The authors found large individual variation in the distal femoral epiphyseal torsion (angle alpha). They demonstrate that the navigation of the trochlea is a reliable and reproducible method to adjust the rotation of the femoral component relative to the trans-epicondylar axis taken as reference and provides, concomitantly, a quadrilateral space gap in flexion

Rotational positioning of the femoral component during the realisation of a total knee arthroplasty is an important part of the surgical technique and remains a topic of discussion in the literature. The challenge of this positioning is important because it determines the anatomical result and its effect on the flexion gap and clinical outcome mainly through its impact on patellofemoral alignment. The intraoperative identification of the axis transepicondylar visually or by navigation is not reliable or reproducible. The empirical setting to 3 ° of external rotation, the procedure used to cut or dependent or independent is not adapted to the individual variability of knee surgery. Indeed, the angle formed by the posterior condylar axis and trans-epicondylar axis is subject to large individual variations. The authors propose a novel technique, using the navigation of the trochlea to determine the rotation of the femoral component. The principle is to consider the rotation of the femoral implant as “ideal” when it makes a perfect superposition of the prosthetic trochlea with the native bony trochlea on patellofemoral view at 60 ° when planning the femur. The bottom of the prosthetic trochlea is well aligned with the trochlea groove, identified during the trochlear morphing, itself perpendicular to the trans-epicondylar axis. The authors hope to encourage centering patellofemoral joint prosthesis, thus favouring the original kinematics of the extensor apparatus. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate firstly, that the navigation of the trochlea is a reliable and reproducible method to adjust the rotation of the femoral component relative to the trans-epicondylar axis taken as reference and the other, the rotation control by this method is not done at the expense of the balance gap in flexion. It is a bi-centric study prospective, nonrandomised, including continuously recruited 145 patients in two French centres. All patients were included in the year 2010 and have all been revised three months and one year of surgery. The average age of patients was 71 years [53, 88]. It was made no selection of patients who have all been included consecutively in the study and in the two centres. In all cases, the rotation of the femoral component was determined by intraoperative navigation of the trochlea. The authors compared the alpha angle (angular divergence between the plane and the posterior bicondylar plane and trans-epicondylar axis) obtained by this method and that calculated on a pre-or postoperative scan. The authors also measured the space between femur and tibia internal and external side in flexion (90°) to assess the impact on the balance in flexion. There is excellent agreement between the results obtained by the method of CT scan and the trochlear navigation technique. In addition, this technique allows to achieve a quadrilateral space gap in flexion. The authors found large individual variation in the distal femoral epiphyseal torsion (angle alpha). They demonstrate that the navigation of the trochlea is a reliable and reproducible method to adjust the rotation of the femoral component relative to the trans-epicondylar axis taken as reference and provides, concomitantly, a quadrilateral space gap in flexion