Background:. Closed femoral shortening (CFS) is a recognised procedure for managing leg length discrepancy (LLD). Method:. We report twenty-nine consecutive patients with LLD who underwent CFS using an intramedullary saw and nail. Mean age was 29.2 years (16.1–65.8). The primary outcome was accuracy of correction. Secondary outcomes were complications, union, ASAMI score and re-operation, alongside Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), using EQ5D-5L and GROC. Results:. Mean pre-operative limb length discrepancy was 3.4 cm (1.5–6.5). Mean planned and achieved shortening was 2.9 cm (1.7–5.0). Mean follow-up was 2.0 years (0.2–8.4). Minimal access surgery was possible in all cases but careful technique is essential. All patients achieved a correction within 5mm of the planned shortening (range 0–5mm). 28 patients (97%) achieved uncomplicated union. One patient had a non-union requiring exchange nailing and subsequent compression plating. 13 patients had nail removal at a mean of 1.7 years and 3 had locking screw removal. Patients had an overall positive experience with 81% reporting high PROM scores. Discussion:. This technique offered accurate limb length correction with few complications. Patients rehabilitated well with good functional outcomes. Conclusion;. CFS with an intramedullary saw is a well-tolerated and effective technique when managing LLD up to 5cm

The Covid-19 pandemic restricted access to elective arthroplasty theatres. Consequently, there was a staggering rise in waiting times for patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA). Concomitantly, rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDOA) incidence also increased. Two cohorts of patients were reviewed: patients undergoing primary THA, pre-pandemic (December 2017-December 2018) and patients with RDOA (ascertained by dual consultant review of pre-operative radiographs) undergoing THA after the pandemic started (March 2020 – March 2022). There were 236 primary THA cases in the pre-pandemic cohort. Out of the 632 primary THA cases post-pandemic, 186 cases (29%) had RDOA. Within this RDOA cohort, the pre-operative mean OHS, EQ5D3L and EQVAS (12.7, 10.5 and 57.6 respectively) were all poorer than in the pre-pandemic population (18.3, 9.4 and 66.7 respectively) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the RDOA and pre-pandemic cohort in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) at 12 months, perhaps due to their ceiling effect. Within the RDOA cohort, 7 cases required acetabular augments, 1 of which also required femoral shortening. The rate of intra-operative fracture, dislocation, infection, return to theatre, and revision were 2.2%, 2.7%, 4.3%, 3.8% and 2.2% respectively, greater than those reported in the literature. No fractures nor dislocations occurred in robot assisted arthroplasties. With ever increasing waiting lists, RDOA prevalence will continue to rise. Increased surgical challenges and potential use of additional implants generated by its presence excludes these patients from waiting list initiative pathways, potentiating the complexity of the operative procedure. Going forwards, the economic burden and training implications must be considered

Femoral lengthening has been associated with narrowing of the joint space at the hip. We have studied the joint space before lengthening in 20 patients with a short femur due to a femoral-shaft fracture (15) or distal femoral epiphyseal injury (5). Their mean age at injury was 16 years (3 to 27) and the mean shortening was 5.4 cm (1.1 to 14). We found that the hip joint space of the shortened femur was significantly narrower (p < 0.001) than that on the normal side, with a mean narrowing ratio of 15.5% (−5 to +43). The narrowing ratio was directly related to the period spent non-weight-bearing (p < 0.001), but not to the amount of femoral shortening. We have shown that the joint space of the hip in patients with post-traumatic femoral shortening was narrowed even before femoral lengthening had been started

Introduction. The management of a significant bone defect following excision of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral non-union remains a challenge. Traditional bone transport techniques require prolonged use of an external fixator with associated complications. We present our clinical outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral shortening, stabilised with a deliberately long retrograde intramedullary nail, accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis to restore segment length utilising a temporary monolateral fixator. Method. 9 patients underwent the ‘rail and nail’ technique for the management of femoral non-union. Distraction osteogenesis was commenced on the 6. th. post-operative day. Proximal locking of the nail and removal of the external fixator was performed approximately one month after length had been restored. Full weight bearing and joint rehabilitation was encouraged throughout. Consolidation was defined by the appearance of 3 from 4 cortices of regenerate on radiographs. Results. 7 males and 2 females of adult age underwent treatment between 2009 and 2016. The mean lengthening was 6.6cm (3–10cm). The external fixator was removed at a mean 123 days (57–220), with an external fixation index of 20 days/cm. The regenerate healing index was 28 days/cm. There were no deep infections. Significant complications were seen in 4 patients including knee stiffness, a foot drop, delayed union of the non-union osteotomy (requiring exchange nailing and bone grafting) and revision nailing due to a prominent proximal tip. Conclusion. The combined over-sized intramedullary nail and external fixator enables compression of the femoral osteotomy, alignment of the bone and controlled lengthening. Once the length has been restored, removal of the external fixator and proximal locking of the nail reduces the risk of complications associated with the fixator and stabilises the femur with the maximum working length of the nail. This small retrospective study demonstrates encouraging results for this complex clinical scenario

Introduction. Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures (AO 31A2) continue to be a challenge, as non-locking implants have shown a considerable rate of loss of reduction. Intramedullary fixation has been recommended, although screw cut-out has been identified as problematic. This study was performed to ascertain whether treatments with the established proximal femoral nail (PFN) and the newer PFNA with blade design (proximal femoral nail antirotation) have advantages over the use of the Percutaneous Compression Plate (PCCP, developed by Gotfried). Methods. Cohort study. Between March 2003 and March 2008, 134 patients with unstable fractures were treated with a PCCP, (n=44, 78.3 yrs, ASA 2.8), a PFN (n=50, 77.2 yrs, ASA 2.8), or a PFNA (n=40, 75.8 yrs, ASA 2.6). The patients (31 PCCP, 33 PFN, 30 PFNA) were then reexamined clinically and radiologically after approximately 21 months. Results. The PCCP was found to require less implantation time than the PFN and the PFNA (60 vs. 80 vs. 84 min, p<0.001) and less radiation exposition time (PCCP 139 vs. PFN 283 vs. PFNA 188 seconds, p<0.001). The rate of reoperations due to wound infections and hematomas amounted to 2% for the PCCP, 4% for the PFN, and 5% for the PFNA (p=0.799). Due to mechanical complications, 9% of patients implanted with a PCCP, 13% of those implanted with a PFN, and 5% of those implanted with a PFNA had to be reoperated (p=0.353). The cut-out rate was 2% after implantation of the PCCP, 4% after the PFN, and 5% after implantation of the PFNA (p=0.799). In one case, the shaft was fractured intraoperatively (PFNA). The tip-apex distance for the lower femoral neck screw (PCCP 22mm vs. PFN 30mm vs. PFNA 30mm, p<0.001), stress-related varisation of the collodiaphyseal (CCD) angle (4° for all implants), impaction (PCCP 5mm vs. PFN 5mm vs. PFNA 6mm, p=0.662) and femoral shortening (PCCP 3mm vs. PFN 3mm vs. PFNA 4mm, p=0.876) were not determinants of the postoperative function. On the basis of their scores according to Merle d'Aubigné and Harris, there was no variation in the results of the follow-up examinations. Conclusions. The use of the PCCP for the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures presents a minimally invasive method of implantation, as well as a promising therapy option with regards to operation time, radiologic examination time, and rate of complications. Processes of impaction due to stress are seldom observed. No benefits could be established in an intramedullary treatment with the PFN or the PFNA; thus, it appears that the higher cost of these implants is avoidable

Aims

The management of a significant bony defect following excision of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral nonunion remains a challenge. We present the outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral shortening, stabilized with a long retrograde intramedullary nail, accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis with a temporary monolateral fixator.

The results of the treatment of 31 open femoral fractures (29 patients) with significant bone loss in a single trauma unit were reviewed. A protocol of early soft-tissue and bony debridement was followed by skeletal stabilisation using a locked intramedullary nail or a dynamic condylar plate for diaphyseal and metaphyseal fractures respectively. Soft-tissue closure was obtained within 48 hours then followed, if required, by elective bone grafting with or without exchange nailing.

The mean time to union was 51 weeks (20 to 156). The time to union and functional outcome were largely dependent upon the location and extent of the bone loss. It was achieved more rapidly in fractures with wedge defects than in those with segmental bone loss. Fractures with metaphyseal defects healed more rapidly than those of comparable size in the diaphysis. Complications were more common in fractures with greater bone loss, and included stiffness of the knee, malunion and limb-length discrepancy.

Based on our findings, we have produced an algorithm for the treatment of these injuries. We conclude that satisfactory results can be achieved in most femoral fractures with bone loss using initial debridement and skeletal stabilisation to maintain length, with further procedures as required.