Introduction. Despite being from different manufacturers, Exeter stem and Ogee cup are commonly used together as cemented ‘cross breed’ combination in United Kingdom. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of this combination. Materials and methods. The ten years outcome of 131 primary hip replacements using an Exeter stem and an Ogee cup combination were studied retrospectively from clinical audit data and radiographs. Results. The Harris Hip score (HHS) improved significantly from 46 pre-surgery to 88 post-surgery. This had a gradual decrease to 81 over ten years. This effect was associated with a decrease in function score but a sustained pain score. Radiologically, five cups were loose and two stems had failed. One stem had migrated and another had progressive endosteolysis. There were two recurrent dislocations, of which one was revised to a bipolar socket. The ten year survival of the combination implant was 99% (CI 97 to 100) with revision as an end point. The same with impending failure as end point was 93% (CI 87 to 99). Conclusion. It might be preferable to have a multi-centric prospective study to demonstrate the performance of this commonly done combination implant at various settings. In the meantime it is concluded that the Exeter stem-Ogee cup combination arthroplasty has acceptable outcomes at ten years

The Exeter stem is a polished cemented stem that has been associated with an excellent survivorship. However, this wedge shaped stem has also been associated with a relative higher risk for a peri-periprosthetic fracture due to the wedge-shaped configuration that can lead to a Vancouver type B2 fracture when the stem is being driven downwards inside the femoral canal by a traumatic blast. Traditionally, these fractures should be treated with a revision stem because the stem has become loosened in the fractured cement mantle. We present a case series of 5 cases where our treatment algorithm was to first let the non-displaced fracture to consolidate by 6 weeks of limited weight bearing as tolerated in order to conduct a second stage in-cement revision. This would simplify the revision procedure dramatically. However, all patients are currently pain free and do not require revision surgery although they are being monitored very closely. We conclude that non-displaced Vancouver type B2 fractures can be approached by a 2 stage treatment algorithm where the initial step is to let the fracture consolidate with limited weight bearing

Implant choice was changed from cemented Thompson to Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) for treatment of displaced intra-capsular neck of femur fractures in University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, United Kingdom (a major trauma center), following the NICE guidelines that advised about the use of a proven femoral stem design rather than Austin Moore or Thompson stems for hemiarthroplasties. The aim of our study was to compare the results of Thompson versus ETS hemiarthroplasty in Aintree. We initially compared 100 Thompson hemiarthroplasties that were performed before the start of ETS use, with 100 ETS hemiarthroplasties. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of patients' demographics (age, sex and ASA grade), intra-operative difficulties/complications, post op medical complications, blood transfusion, in-patient stay and dislocations. The operative time was statistically significantly longer in the ETS group (p= .0067). Worryingly, the 30 days mortality in ETS group was more than three times higher in ETS group (5 in Thompson group versus 16 in ETS group. P= .011). To corroborate our above findings we studied 100 more consecutive patients that had ETS hemiarthroplasty. The results of this group showed 30 day mortality of 8 percent. However the operative time was again significantly longer (p= .003) and there was 18 percent conversion to bipolar hemiarthropalsty. Moreover there was statistically significant increased rate of deep infection (7%, p = .03) and blood transfusion (27%, p = .007). This we feel may be due to longer and more surgically demanding operative technique including pressurised cementation in some patients with significant medical comorbidities. Our results raise the question whether ETS hemiarthoplasty implant is a good implant choice for neck of femur fracture patients. Randomised control trials are needed to prove that ETS implant is any better than Thompson hemiarthroplasty implants in this group of patients

We reviewed 142 consecutive primary hip arthroplasties using the Exeter Universal femoral stem implanted between 1988 and 1993 into 123 patients. 74 patients with 88 hips survived to 10 years or more and were reviewed with a mean 12 years 8 months. There was no loss to follow-up and the fate of all stems is known. Our stem revision rate for aseptic loosening and osteolysis was 1.1% (1 stem); stem revision for any cause was 2.2% (2 stems); and re-operation for any cause was 21.6% (19 hips), all but 2 of which were due to cup failure. All but one stem subsided within the cement mantle to an average of 1.5mm at final follow-up (0 to 8mm). One stem was revised for deep infection and one was revised for excessive periarticular osteolysis. One further stem had subsided excessively (8mm) and demonstrated lucent lines at the stem-cement and cement-bone interfaces. This was classified as a radiological failure and is awaiting revision. 28% of stems had cement mantle defects, which were associated with increased subsidence (p=0.01), but were not associated with endosteal lysis or stem failure. Periarticular osteolysis was significantly related with the degree of polyethylene wear (p<0.001), which was in turn associated with younger age patients (p=0.01) and males (p<0.001). The Exeter metal backed cups were a catastrophic failure with 34% revised (11 cups) for loosening. The Harris Galante cups failed with excessive wear and osteolysis, with failure to revision of 18%. Only 1 cemented Elite cup was revised for loosening and osteolysis (4%). The Exeter Universal stem implanted outside the originator centre has excellent medium term results

We report the outcome of 320 primary Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA) with minimum 10-year follow-up (range 10–17 years, mean 12.6 years), performed by a single surgeon in Tauranga New Zealand, with the Exeter Contemporary Flanged all-polyethylene cup and Exeter femoral stem via a posterior approach. The aim of the study is to compare the results with the published results from the design centre and create a baseline cohort for further outcomes research in this centre. All patients were prospectively followed at 6 weeks, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, (and 15 years when available). Of 333 cases that matched the inclusion criteria, 13 procedures in 12 patents were excluded because of concomitant bone grafting and/or supplementary cage fixation, leaving 320 primary THA procedures in 280 patients, including 26 bilateral procedures in 13 patients. Mean follow-up of the surviving cases was 12.6 (range 5.0-17.1) years. There were 12 revisions – 2 for fracture, 5 for instability, 1 for impingement pain and 4 for infection. There were no revisions for aseptic cup loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100% at 15.0 years (with minimum 40 cases remaining at risk). All-cause acetabular revision in 12 cases result in a Kaplan-Meier survival of 95.9% (95% CI: 93.5 to 98.3%). Cemented THA with the Exeter Contemporary Flanged cup and the Exeter stem is a durable combination with results that can be replicated outside of the design centre. The Exeter Contemporary Flanged cup has excellent survivorship at 15 years when used with the Exeter stem. Cemented THA with well-proven components should be considered the benchmark against which newer designs and materials should be compared

The clinical results of the cemented Exeter stem in primary hip surgery have been excellent. The Exeter ‘philosophy’ has also been extended into the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures with ‘cemented bipolars’ and the Exeter Trauma Stem (Howmedica). We have identified an increase in the number of periprosthetic fractures that we see around the Exeter stem. We have also identified a particular group of patients with comminuted fractures around ‘well fixed’ Exeter stems after primary hip surgery that present a particular difficult clinical problem. Prior to fracture, the stems are not loose, the cement mantle remains sound and bone quality surrounding the reconstruction is good, i.e. classifying it as a Vancouver B1. However the comminuted nature of the fracture makes reduction and fixation with traditional methods difficult. Therefore in these particular circumstances it is often better to manage these as B2 or even B3 fractures, with distal bypass and uncemented reconstruction. Over an eleven-year period since 1999, 185 patients have been admitted to Nottingham University Hospitals with a periprosthetic femoral fracture around a hip replacement. These patients were identified from a prospective database of all trauma patients admitted to the institution. Of these patients we have identified a cohort of 21 patients (11%) with a periprosthetic fracture around an Exeter polished stem. Hospital notes were independently reviewed and data retrieved. Outcome data was collected with end points of fracture union, re-revision surgery and death. Data was also collected on immediate and long term post-operative complications. The mean age was 76 years at time of fracture, and 52% were male. The mean duration between primary index surgery and fracture was 18 months (median 11 months). 15 patients were classified as Vancouver B1, and six as B2 fractures. Of the B1 fractures, 14 underwent fixation and one was treated non-operatively. Of the B2 fractures, four were revised, one was revised and fixed using a plate, and one was fixed using a double-plating technique. Prior to fracture, none of the implants were deemed loose although one patient was under review of a stress fracture which subsequently displaced. One patient died prior to fracture union. All the other patients subsequently went onto unite at a mean of 4 months. There were no deep infections, non- or malunions. No patient underwent further surgery. Dislocation occurred in one patient and a superficial wound infection occurred in one patient which responded to antibiotic treatment. Three other patients have subsequently died at seven, twelve and fifty-three months post fracture due to unrelated causes. In our series of patients, in addition to the more standard fracture patterns, we have identified a very much more comminuted fracture. Indeed, we have described the appearance as if the tapered stem behaves like an axe, splitting the proximal femur as a consequence of a direct axial load. As a consequence of the injury, the cement mantle itself is severely disrupted. There is significant comminution and soft tissue stripping, calling into question the viability of the residual fragments. Treatment of this type of fracture using a combination of plates, screws and cables is unlikely to provide a sufficiently sound reconstruction. In our experience we believe these fractures around previously ‘well fixed’ Exeter stems should be treated as B2/B3 injuries

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different. In the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The author's personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The author's current indication for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is an extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems, unfortunately, may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however, it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

Introduction:. In an attempt to reduce stress shielding in the proximal femur multiple new shorter stem design have become available. We investigated the load to fracture of a new polished tapered cemented short stem in comparison to the conventional polished tapered Exeter stem. Method:. A total of forty-two stems, twenty-one short stems and twenty-one conventional stems both with three different offsets were cemented in a composite sawbone model and loaded to fracture. Results:. study showed that femurs will break at a significantly lower load to failure with a shorter compared to conventional length Exeter stem. Conclusion:. This Both standard and short stem design are safe to use as the torque to failure is 7–10 times as much as the torques seen in activities of daily living

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different, in the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The authors' personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The authors' current indications for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is a extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems unfortunately may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons' armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

Purpose. We describe an update of our experience with the implantation of the first 325 Exeter Universal hips. The fate of every implant is known. Methods and results. The first 325 Exeter Universal stems (309 patients) were inserted between March 1988 and February 1990. The procedures were undertaken by surgeons of widely differing experience. Clinical and radiological review was performed at a mean of 15.7 years. At last review 185 patients had died (191 hips). 103 hips remain in situ. Survivorship at 17 years with revision for femoral component aseptic loosening was 100% (95% CI 97 to 100), with revision for acetabular component aseptic loosening was 90.4% (95% CI 83.1 to 94.7) and with any re-operation as the endpoint was 81.1% (95% CI 72.5 to 89.7). 12 patients (12 hips) were not able to attend for review due to infirmity or emigration, and scores were obtained by phone (x-rays were obtained in 4 patients). Mean D'Aubigné and Postel scores (Charnley modification) at review were 5.4 for pain and 4.8 for function. The mean Oxford score was 21.6 +/− 9.8 and the mean Harris score 71.7 +/− 19.7. On radiological review there were no femoral component failures. Three sockets (2.9%) were loose as demonstrated by migration or change in orientation (two patients were asymptomatic) and 5 sockets (4.9%) had radiolucent lines in all 3 zones but no migration. There are two patients awaiting socket revision. Conclusion. The high rate of clinical and radiological success of the Exeter Universal stem seen at 12 years is sustained at 17 years. Further cup failures have occurred but overall survivorship remains good. With the favourable long-term behaviour of the original Exeter stem, we feel optimistic that good function of the Universal stem will continue through the third decade

Introduction. The Exeter cemented polished tapered stem design was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1970's. [i] Design and cement visco-elastic properties define clinical results [ii]; a recent study by Carrington et al. reported the Exeter stem has 100% survivorship at 7 years. [iii] Exeter stems with offsets 37.5–56 mm have length 150 mm (shoulder to tip). Shorter stems, lengths 95–125 mm, exist in offsets 30–35.5 mm. The Australian National Joint Replacement Registry recently published that at 7 years the shorter stems are performing as well as longer stems on the registry [iv]. Clinical observation indicates in some cases of shorter, narrower femora that fully seating a 150 mm stem's rasp in the canal can be difficult, which may affect procedural efficiency. This study investigates the comparative risk of rasp distal contact for the Exeter 150 mm stem or a 125 mm stem. Materials and Methods. Rasps for 37.5, 44, 50 mm offset, No.1, 150 mm length stems (Exeter, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah NJ) were compared with shortened length models using SOMA™ (Stryker Orthopaedics Modeling and Analytics technology). 637 patients' CT scanned femora were filtered for appropriate offset and size by measuring femoral-head to femoral-axis distance and midsection cancellous bone width (AP view). These femora were analyzed for distal contact (rasp to cortices) for 150 mm and 125 mm models (Figure 1). The widths of the rasp's distal tip and the cancellous bone boundary were compared to assess contact for each femur in the AP and ML views; the rasp was aligned along an ideal axis and flexed in order to pass through the femoral neck (ML view only). Results. The sample size of appropriate patients totaled 238 femora. In the AP view, the rasp exhibited contact in 43 cases for a 150 mm stem but in 0 cases for a 125 mm stem; 95% of bones with contact were Champagne Fluted. In the ML view, rasp distal contact occurred in 52 femora for a 150 mm stem and in 1 femur for a 125 mm stem (Table 1). The difference was significant in both views with p < 0.001. Discussion. This study shows that a shortened stem design's rasp avoids distal contact. Shorter stem rasps resolved all cases where there was a risk of contact with a 150 mm rasp and reduced the likelihood of contact (one case compared to 52), AP and ML views respectively. These results indicate that shorter stems may address patients with champagne-fluted and/or excessively bowed femora, commonly found in the Asian population[v]. Contact avoidance may improve rasp seating height (AP view) and alignment with the femoral axis (ML view), thereby increasing procedural efficiency and producing an optimal cement mantle distally.[vi] The data shows that a total 29% of appropriate model patients would benefit from a shorter stem. Shorter cemented stems may effectively address the global population's needs in THR

Introduction. The use of bone cement as a fixation agent has ensured the long-term functionality of THA implants . 1. However, some studies have shown the undesirable effect of wear of stem-cement interface, due to the release of metals and polymeric debris lead to implant failure . 2,3. Debris is generated by the micromotion together with a severely corrosive medium present in the crevice of stem-cement interface . 3,4. FEA studies showed that micromotion can affect osseointegration and fretting wear . 5,6. The aim of this research is to investigate if the micromotions measures from in silico analysis of the stem-cement correlate with the fretting-corrosion damage observed on in vitro testing. Methods. The in vitro fretting-corrosion testing was made with positioning and loading based on ISO 7206-4 and ISO 7206-6. It was used Exeter stems embedded in bone cement (PMMA) and immersed in a saline solution (9.0 g/L of NaCl). A fatigue testing system (Instron 8872, USA) was used to conduct the test, applying a sinusoidal cyclic load at 5.0 Hz. The tests were finished after 10 million cycles and images of stem surfaces were taken with a photographic camera (Canon EOS Rebel T6i, Japan) and a stereoscope (Leica M165C, Germany). For the computational analysis, the same testing configurations were modeled on software ANSYS. The analysis was performed using linear isotropic elasticity for both stem (E=193GPa; ⱱ=0.27; σ. y. =400MPa) and PMMA cement (E=2.7GPa; ⱱ=0.35; σ. u. =76MPa). 7,8. . A second-order tetrahedral element was used to mesh all components with a size of 0.5 mm in the stem-cement contact area, increasing until 1.0 mm outside from them. A frictional contact (µ=0.25) with an augmented Lagrange formulation was used. The third cycle of loading was evaluated and a variation of sliding distance less than 10% was set as convergence criteria. The micromotion was measured as the sliding distance on the stem-cement interface. Results and Discussion. The in silico analysis showed the presence of areas almost without micromotion in the proximal lateral and distal medial regions. In these regions, there is no evidence of fretting-corrosion after the in vitro testing. The lack of micromotion is caused by the debonding due to testing configurations and implant design. The absence of contact doesn't allow wear by abrasion or third body, avoiding the fretting-corrosion damage. For the regions distal lateral and proximal medial, it is possible to observe fretting-corrosion due to micromotions, which is supported by the in silico analysis results. The region proximal medial had the highest micromotion on computational analysis and the fretting-corrosion was more severe on laboratory testing, reinforcing the relevance of micromotion in the fretting-corrosion damage on the stem-cement interface. Conclusion. The results indicate a correlation of micromotion calculated by in silico analysis and fretting-corrosion damage observed on in vitro testing. The developed FEA model may be a useful tool to predict the fretting-corrosion damage on the THA implants on pre-clinical testing. Additional efforts are needed to apply this tool on bone-implant systems to predict fretting-corrosion damage observed in vivo. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. The release of metallic debris can promote many adverse tissue reactions, as metallosis, necrosis, pseudotumors and osteolysis . 1–3. This debris is mainly generated by the fretting-corrosion mechanism due to the geometric difference in the head-stem interface . 4. Retrieval and in silico analysis showed the roughness of the stem-head interface appears to play an important role in the volume of material lost and THA failure . 5–7. The technical standard ISO 7206-2 recommends the measurement of average roughness (Ra) and max height of the profile (Rz) to control the quality of the surface finish of articulating surfaces on THA implants. However, despite the importance of the trunnion roughness, there is no specific requirement for this variable on the referred technical standard. The present study carried out a surface finish analysis of the trunnion of hip stems from five distinct manufacturers. Methods. Four stems (n = 4) from five (5) distinct manufacturers (A, B, C, D, and E) were used to evaluate the roughness of the trunnion. All the stems are similar to the classical Exeter stem design, with a 12/14 taper and a polished body surface. The roughness of trunnions was evaluated according to ISO 4287 and ISO 13565-2. The total assessment length was 4.8 mm with 0.8 mm cut-off. The first and last 8.33% of assessment length were not considered. The measurements of all samples were made in a rugosimeter with 2 µm feeler ITP (Völklingen, Germany), the velocity of 0.5 mm.s. -1. , and a force of 1.5 mN. The calibration was made at 20 ºC and relative humidity at 50%. The Kruskal Wallis with post hoc Nemenyi test was used to evaluate the difference of Ra among the manufacturers. The confidence level was set at 5%. Results and Discussion. The analysis of surface finish revealed different roughness among the manufactures (p < 0.005), with Ra between 0.061 µm to 3.184 µm and Rz varying of 0.41 µm to 12.69 µm. The manufacturers A and E had a Ra (2.587±0.050 µm and 3.146±0.031µm) of the trunnion similar to founded by Panagiotidou et al (2013). Within such range, the trunnion has shown a high presence of pit . 8. The manufacturer C, on the other hand, had the best surface finish of the trunnion (Ra = 0.069±0.010 µm and Rz = 0.505 ± 0.076 µm). This more smooth surface might increase the taper strength, reduce the shear stress and the susceptibility to the fretting-corrosion damage . 4,8. . Conclusion. The results were worrying because there is great variability of roughness among the manufacturers with the occurrence of trunnions with roughness too high. Nevertheless, the ISO technical standard does not recommend any procedure or minimum parameters acceptable for the surface finish of the trunnion. The revision of ISO 7206-2 would guarantee better control of trunnion roughness to reduce the amount of metallic debris and increase the safety of THA implants. Additional research is needed to determine a target value for this variable. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Purpose. It is generally accepted that the cement mantle surrounding the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) should be complete without any defects, and of at least 2 mm in thickness. Radiographic evaluation is the basis for assessment of the cement mantle. The adequacy of radiographic interpretation is subject to debate. Poor interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of radiographic cement mantle assessment has been reported. In this study, 3D template software was used that allow anatomical measurements and analysis of three-dimensional digital femura geometry based on CT scans. The purpose of this study is to analyze the three-dimensional cement mantle thickness of cemented hip stem. Materials and Methods. 52 hips that underwent THA with Exeter stem (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) were enrolled in this study. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. There were 49 hips in 49 women and 3 hips in 3 men. The average age at surgery was 73 years (range, 60–88 years). The etiology of the hip lesions were osteoarthrosis in 49, rheumatoid arthritis in 3, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 1. For preoperative and postoperative evaluation, a CT scan of the pelvis and knee joint was obtained and was transferred to 3D template software (Zed hip, Lexi, Tokyo, Japan). We evaluated the alignment for stem anteversion/valgus/anterior tilt angles and the contact of the cortical bone with the cement mantle was evaluated. Results. Concerning the alignment of the stems, variability was observed in the anteversion; however, the stems were inserted in an almost neutral position in varus-valgus and extension-flexion. The 3D contact of the stems with a cement mantle of 2 mm added with the cortical bone was evaluated, and it could be broadly classified into three patterns: cases in which the cortical bone was not reamed in the range of 2 mm from the stem, those in which the distal medial part was partially reamed, and cases in which the distal anterior and medial parts of the cortical bone were reamed in a relatively wide range. In this study, there were 17 patients with no reaming, 32 patients with partial reaming, and 3 patients with a relatively large range of reaming. Discussion and Conclusion. Oversizing of the stem associated with incomplete cement mantles has been suggested to account for early femoral component loosening. In this study, 3 patients whose cortical bone was reamed in a relatively wide range and who had a risk of partial thinning of the cement mantle as a result were observed. The effect of reaming of the cortical bone on the clinical results is still unknown; however, a careful follow-up in the future may be required

(Case) 79-year-old woman. Past history, in 1989, right femur valgus osteotomy. in 1991, THA at left side. Follow-up thereafter. Hyaluronic acid injection for both knee osteoarthritis. (Clinical course)Her right hip pain getting worse and crawling indoors from the beginning of July 2013. We did right hybrid THA at August 2013(posterior approach, TridentHA cup, Exeter stem, Biolox Forte femoral head 28mm). But immediately, she dislocated twice than the third day after surgery because she became a delirium. It has been left by nurse for about 6 hours because of the midnight after the second dislocation. Next morning, check the dislocation limb position, closed reduction wasdone under intravenous anesthesia. As a result of waking up from the anesthesia, and complained of paralysis and violent pain in the right leg backward. A right lower extremity nerve findings, there is pain in the lower leg after surface about the calf, there was no apparent perception analgesia. Toe movement is weak, but the G-toe planter anddorsiflexion possible about M2, and neurological symptoms to relieved by flexion(above 70 degrees) of the right hip joint. Therefore, we thought that she suffered anterior dislocation of the sciatic nerve by the stem neck (retraction), judged to closed reduction was impossible, open reduction surgery was performed after waitingat hip flex position. But paralysis is gradually worsened during waiting surgery, toes movement had become impossible to operating room admission. Sciatic nerve is caught in front of the stem neck as expected, operative findings were able to finally reduction after removing the femoral head after dislocation. Anteversion of the cup was changed to 25 degrees from 15 degrees, and changed to 32mm diameter metal head and polyethylene liner. And we needed Intensive Care Unit(ICU) management after surgery for prevent recurrence of dislocation. Fitted with a hip brace for her, has not been re-dislocation. The sciatic nerve palsy improved in three months after the operation, the patient became able to walk without a cane. (Summary) We experienced a rare case suffered anterior dislocation of the sciatic nerve by the stem neck, and she had a good result after open reduction surgery

Background. We occasionally come across cortical atrophy of the femur with cemented collarless polished triple-taper stem, a short time after the operation. This study aimed to estimate the radiographs of cemented collarless polished triple-taper stem taken at three, six, twelve, and twenty-four months after the initial operation. Methods. Between May 2009 and April 2011, 97 consecutive patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty using a SC-stem or C-stem implant. During the 24 month follow-up, radiographic examination was performed on a total of 95 patients (98 hips). Out of those 95 patients, 52 hips had total hip arthroplasty, 45 had osteoarthritis, 5 had idiopathic osteonecrosis, there were two 2 other cases and 46 hips had hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The cementing grade was estimated on the postoperative radiographs. The 24 month postoperative radiographs were analyzed for changes in stem subsidence, cortical atrophy and cortical hypertrophy. According to the Gruen zone, cortical atrophy and cortical hypertrophy were classified on the femoral side. We defined no cortical atrophy as grade 0, cortical atrophy less than 1 mm as grade 1, more than 1 mm and less than 2 mm as grade 2, and more than 2 mm as grade 3. We defined Grade 1 as 1 point, Grade 2 as 2 points, and Grade 3 as 3 points. The points in every zone were calculated, and the average per zone was determined. Result. The mean points of the cortical atrophy adjacent to the stem was 1.19 in THA, and 1.58 in BHA in zone II, 0.98 in THA, and 1.15 in BHA in zone III, 0.34 in THA, and 0.6 in BHA in zone V, and 0.63 in THA, and 0.93 in BHA in zone VI. Statistical significance was found between the two groups (THA and BHA). Stem subsidence slightly increased with time. During the following 2 years there was not a single case with over 1.5mm of stem subsidence. The average stem subsidence after 24 months was 0.72 in THA, and 0.78 in BHA. Cortical hypertrophy was only demonstrated in 5 cases. Discussion. Cortical atrophy was recognized more in the femoral neck fracture group than in the THA group, and cortical atrophy was recognized in zone 2 and zone 3 more frequently than in zone 5 and zone 6. According to the finite element analysis of the SC-stem, more stress is received on the medial aspect of the stem during weight bearing, so it is suspected that more cortical atrophy on the lateral aspect is associated with stem design. These findings are compatible with the cortical hypertrophy reported with Exeter stem in zone 5. Conclusion. Cortical atrophy (cancellizaton) was recognized in 70% of THA group, and in 80% of BHA group, 2 years after the operation. Cortical atrophy in most cases was recognized in Gruen Zones 2 & 3 (P<0.01). Cortical atrophy was found more severely and more frequently in the femoral neck fracture group than the THA group (P<0.01)

Summary. A laboratory based study investigating fracture forces and implant subsidence rates in embalmed human femurs undergoing impaction grafting. Methods. Human femurs were harvested from cadavers for destructive impaction testing. An initial group of femurs underwent destructive impaction testing, using the impaction grafting technique as described by Gie et al, modified, allowing increasing, controlled impaction forces to be applied until femoral fracture occurred. A second group of embalmed human femurs underwent impaction bone grafting at constant force, with varied impaction frequencies. An Exeter stem was cemented into the neo-medullary canals. These constructs underwent subsidence testing simulating the first 2 months post-operative weight-bearing. Results. In a group of 17 femurs, none fractured below a 0.5kN impaction force. 82% of the femurs fractured at or above 1.6kN of applied force. No massive implant subsidence occurred in the second group of 8 femurs, all undergoing femoral impaction grafting at 1.6kN. There was no correlation between implant subsidence and frequency of impaction. Average subsidence was 3.2mm. Conclusions. It is possible to calculate a force below which no fracture occurs in the embalmed human femur undergoing impaction grafting. Increasing impaction frequency, at constant force, doesn't decrease rates of implant subsidence

Background and purpose. The two most common complications of femoral impaction bone grafting are femoral fracture and massive implant subsidence. We investigated fracture forces and implant subsidence rates in embalmed human femurs undergoing impaction grafting. The study consisted of two arms, the first examining the force at which femoral fracture occurs in the embalmed human femur, and the second examining whether significant graft implant/subsidence occurs following impaction at a set force at two different impaction frequencies. Methods. Using a standardized impaction grafting technique with modifications, an initial group of 17 femurs underwent complete destructive impaction testing, allowing sequentially increased, controlled impaction forces to be applied until femoral fracture occurred. A second group of 8 femurs underwent impaction bone grafting at constant force, at an impaction frequency of 1 Hz or 10 Hz. An Exeter stem was cemented into the neomedullary canals. These constructs underwent subsidence testing simulating the first 2 months of postoperative weight bearing. Results. No femur fractured below an impaction force of 0.5 kN. 15/17 of the femurs fractured at or above 1.6 kN of applied force. In the second group of 8 femurs, all of which underwent femoral impaction grafting at 1.6 kN, there was no correlation between implant subsidence and frequency of impaction. Average subsidence was 3.2 (1–9) mm. Interpretation. It is possible to calculate a force below which no fracture occurs in the embalmed human femur undergoing impaction grafting. Higher impaction frequency at constant force did not reduce rates of implant subsidence in this experiment

The cement in cement technique for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has shown good results in selected cases. However, results of its use in the revision of hemiarthroplasty to THA has not been previously reported. Between May 1994 and May 2007 28 (20 Thompson's and 8 Exeter bipolar) hip hemiarthroplasties were revised to THA in 28 patients using the cement in cement technique. All had an Exeter stem inserted at the time of revision. Clinical and operative data were collected prospectively. Clinical evaluation was by the Charnley, Harris and Oxford. Hip scores and radiographs were analysed post-operatively and at latest follow up. The mean age at time of hemiarthroplasty revision was 80 (35 to 93) years. The reason for revision was acetabular erosion in 12 (43%), recurrent dislocation in eight (29%), aseptic stem loosening in four (14%), periprosthetic fracture in two (7%) and infection in a further two (7%) patients. No patient has been lost to follow up. Three patients died within three months of surgery. The mean follow up of the remainder was 50 (16 to 119) months. Survivorship with revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100%. Three cases (11%) have since undergone further revision, one for recurrent dislocation, one for infection, and one for periprosthetic fracture. The cement in cement technique can be successfully applied to revision of hip hemiarthroplasty to THA. It has a number of advantages in this elderly population including minimising bone loss, blood loss and operative time

Femoral impaction grafting with cancellous bone and cement is an important technique in reconstituting deficient bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. We report the medium to long term results of 75 consecutive patients using a collarless, polished, tapered femoral stem with an average age of 68 (±11.4) years and a mean follow up of 10.5 (±2.4) years (range 6.3 to 14.1 years). The median Endoklinik pre-operative bone defect score was 3 (IQR: 2–3) with a median subsidence at 1 year of 2mm (IQR: 1–3mm). At the most recent follow-up (mean 10.5±2.4 years), the median Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 80.6 (IQR: 67.6–88.9) and median subsidence 2mm (IQR: 1–4mm). Ten-year survivorship with any further femoral operation as an endpoint was 92%. Four prostheses required further revision. Subsidence of the Exeter stem continued, albeit at a slower rate after the first year and was related to the Endoklinik pre-operative bone loss (p=0.037). The degree of subsidence at 1 year was a strong predictor of long term subsidence (p<0.001). Neither subsidence nor bone stock were related to long term outcome (HHS). There was a correlation between previous revision surgery and a poor Harris Hip Score (p=0.028) and those who had undergone previous revision surgery for infection had a higher risk of complications (p=0.048). The good long term results of this technique commend its use in revision hip arthroplasty for patients with poor femoral bone stock