Background. Evidence from recent trials has supported the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection for pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no randomized controlled trial has compared the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection with that of other regimens for simultaneous bilateral TKA. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which patients scheduled for simultaneous bilateral TKA were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. In the periarticular analgesic injection group, the injection contained 7.5 mg/ml ropivacaine 40 ml, 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate 1.0 ml, 1.0 mg/ml epinephrine 0.6 ml, methylprednisolone 80 mg, and ketoprofen 50 mg. These agents were mixed with normal saline to a combined volume of 120 ml. The 60 ml of the cocktail was injected into each knee. In the epidural analgesia group, the catheter was placed at the L2–3 or L3–4 level, and connected to an infusion pump delivering continuous infusion (flow rate: 4 ml/h) of 100 ml of 2 mg/ml ropivacaine plus 1.0 ml of 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate. Surgery was managed under spinal anaesthesia. Surgical techniques and postoperative medication protocols were identical in both groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain at rest, quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the score on a visual analogue scale. Results. Seventy-one patients with 142 knees were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. The flow chart presented in Figure 1 outlines the trial. The periarticular analgesic injection group had a significantly lower AUC at 4–24 hour compared with the epidural analgesia group (174.9 ± 181.5 versus 360.4 ± 360.6; p = 0.0073), while no difference in the AUC was noted at 24–72 hour (1388.1 ± 727.2 versus 1467.3 ± 810.1; p = 0.67). The consumption of diclofenac sodium suppositories as rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group on the night of surgery (0.16 ± 0.4 versus 0.70 ± 0.9; p = 0.0013). The incidence of nausea on the night of surgery and postoperative day 1 and that of pruritus were significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group (7.4 % versus 45.5 %; p = 0.0031, 7.4 % versus 54.5 %; P = 0.0003, and 0 % versus 15.2 %; p = 0.014, respectively). Conclusions. Compared with epidural analgesia, periarticular analgesic injection following simultaneous bilateral TKA was associated with better postoperative pain relief and decreased opioid-related side-effects. Periarticular analgesic injection is preferable to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief after simultaneous bilateral TKA

Background. Continuous epidural anesthesia or femoral nerve block has decreased postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty to some extent. Although the established efficacy of these pain relief method, some adverse events such as hematoma or muscle weakness are still problematic. Intraoperative local infiltration of analgesia (LIA) has accepted as a promising pain control method after total knee arthroplasty. The safety and efficacy of LIA has been reported, although there are still limited evidence about the effect of LIA on quadriceps function and recovery of range of motion in early post-operative phase. The purpose of this study is to compare the quadriceps function and range of motion after TKA between the LIA with continuous epidural anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia alone. Methods. Thirty patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA were included in this study. Patients who took anticoagulants were treated continuous epidural anesthesia alone (n=11) and the other patients were treated with LIA with continuous epidural anesthesia (n=19). A single surgeon at our department performed all surgeries. Surgical procedure and rehabilitation process was identical between two groups. Before the implantation, analgesic drugs consisting of 20 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine and 6.6 mg of dexamethasone were injected into the peri-articular tissues. In each group, fentanyl continuous epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was also used during 48-h post-operative period. Knee flexion and extension angle were evaluated before surgery, post-op day 3, 7, 10 and 14. The quadriceps function was evaluated by quadriceps peak torque at 30° and 60° flexion using VIODEX. The peak torque was recorded preoperatively, day 14 and 3 month after surgery. The difference between two groups was analyzed by Mann Whitney U-test using Prism 6, a statistical software. Results. LIA group showed better postoperative flexion angle until day 7 (Fig. 1). Then the discrepancy became smaller and came to the same degree at day14. The peak torque at 30° and 60° flex is higher in LIA group compared to epidural anesthesia alone. The LIA group showed less peak torque decrease at 2 weeks after surgery than epidural anesthesia alone group (Fig. 2, 3). No adverse events such as were observed in each group. Discussion. This paper demonstrated that LIA in addition to the continuous epidural anesthesia after TKA provides better quadriceps function and early recovery in knee range of motion. In this study we also used continuous epidural anesthesia, thus this study can not evaluate the stand alone LIA effects on quadriceps function and range of motion recovery. Furthermore the patients were not randomly assigned in this study, this might be another limitation of this study. In conclusion, LIA provide better quadriceps function and early recovery of range of motion in addition to the pain relief. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Epidural steroid injection is an established treatment modality for intervertebral disc prolapse. It is a low-risk alternative to surgical intervention in some patients for whom noninvasive treatment has failed. Caudal epidural steroid injection is one of the most widely used methods for pain relief. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of same dose in different volume of caudal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. Material/Methods. Prospective study was conducted during 2007 to 2009. 100 Patients were randomized in to two groups, of which 50 % (group A) received 4 ml of steroid with isotonic saline and remaining 50 % (group B) received 12 ml. Injection was given in prone position through a 22-G needle in to the epidural space through the sacral hiatus. The average follow-up was 18 months. Outcomes scores included the SF-36, Oswestry disability index and pain VAS and were recorded in the pre and post injection periods. Results. In group A, 18 patients had significant pain relief and 32 had no relief during the early period. Whereas in group B, 22 had significant pain relief and 28 had no relief. The quality of pain relief of 50% or greater was considered as significant. Follow up after 1 year does not show much difference. Group B had significant decrease in symptoms in the initial post injection period (P<0.05). Conclusions. The volume of steroid solution in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease is significant in the early post injection period only

Background. There are no published studies investigating predictive values of psychological distress on effectiveness of epidural injection. Aims. To evaluate response to epidural injection (EI) in patients with chronic lower back pain (CLBP) with and without psychological distress. Methods. 96 patients with CLBP were recruited to this prospective cohort study. They had preoperative level of distress measured using Modified Zung Index (MZI) and Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ); pain with Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ); back related disability with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Fluoroscopic caudal EI comprising 80 mg methylprednisolone and 8 mg of lignocaine was performed. Scores were repeated at 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Successful outcome was Minimal Clinically Important Change (MCIC) in any given measure. Results. There were 62.5% not-distressed patients, 3.1% somatising, 15.6% depressed and 18.8% with mixed distress. Preoperative VAS was 82.4, MPQ 18.2 and ODI 51.6. Distress was associated with worse MPQ and ODI. Average VAS and MPQ improved significantly at 6 and 26 weeks. Mean change of ODI was significant but less than MCIC. Average magnitude of change of VAS and ODI did not differ between distressed and not-distressed. MPQ improved significantly more in the distressed. MZI was significant predictor of VAS-MCIC at 6 weeks while MZI and MSPQ at 6 months. None could predict this outcome independently. MSPQ was the only individual predictor of MPQ-MCIC at any time; MSPQ≥8 could predict MPQ-MCIC with 53%-sensitivity and 78%-specificity. MZI was significant predictor of ODI-MCIC but not individually.88% patients were satisfied with the treatment at 6 weeks and 63% at 6 months (significantly higher rate if somatising). Conclusions. Early psychological screen was correlated with outcome following epidural injection in CLBP and capable of predicting some response to treatment. Minimal, short-lived improvement of distress was not related to post-treatment CLBP measures

The aim of our study was to assess the outcome of caudal epidural injection for patients with low back pain in relation to fatty infiltration of spinal muscle. This is a prospective study. The spinal muscles were graded on sagittal section T1 MRI at the lower border of lumber 4 vertebra from 3 to 12 depending on the severity of fatty infiltration. The outcome of the intervention was assessed by improvement in pre and post intervention oswestry disability index score as well as visual analog pain score. Patients with significant fatty changes don't respond well to the caudal epidural injection

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with high intraoperative and postoperative blood loss. Antifibrinolytic drugs have been used to minimize the potential risks of bleeding and blood transfusion. Studies on the effect of tranexamic acid on decreasing blood loss in THA have revealed interesting results, but most have focused on cemented THA. Yet its benefits in THA, especially in cementless THA, have not been proved. We conducted a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study on 64 patients who were candidates for cementless THA under epidural anesthesia between 2006 and 2008. Patients were randomly assigned into study and control groups. Patients in both groups were well matched regarding preoperative characteristics. Five minutes preoperatively 32 patients of the study and control groups received 15 mg/kg tranexamic acid or normal saline intravenously respectively. Our findings showed a significantly smaller decrease in 6- and 24-hour postoperative hemoglobin levels, less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, and less need for allogenic blood transfusion in the tranexamic acid group. Our results also revealed a higher mean of 6- and 24-hour hematocrit level and shorter hospital stay in the tranexamic acid group compared to the control group, which were not statistically meaningful. In our study no thromboembolic event was seen; except 1 patient in the control group. Our study showed that administering tranexamic acid before the start of cementless THA under epidural anesthesia can reduce intraoperative and postoperative bleeding as well as need for blood transfusion

The optimal management of patients with the diagnosis of a spinal epidural abscess (SEA) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with spontaneous SEA and to correlate presentation and treatment with clinical and neurological outcome. A retrospective review of the medical records and radiology of patients with a diagnosis of SEA, treated between September 2003 and December 2010, at a tertiary referral hospital was performed. A total of 46 patients were identified including 27 males and 19 females. Mean age was 61 years (range, 30 – 86 years). At presentation, all patients had axial pain and 67% had a neurological deficit, out of which one third had paraplegia or quadriplegia. 32% patients were febrile. Diabetes was the most common risk factor (30%) followed by malignancy (17%), intravenous drug use (6%) and alcoholism (2%). Organisms were cultured in 44 patients with Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus most common (68%), followed by Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (14%). The epidural abscess was located in the lumbar spine in 24 patients, thoracic spine in 11 patients and cervical spine in 11 patients. 61% of patients had a concurrent source of septic focus on presentation, including psoas abscess (24%), facet joint septic arthritis (15%), pneumonia (11%), infective endocarditis (7%) and urosepsis (4%). 26% of patients were treated non-operatively, with computed tomography-guided aspiration and/or intravenous antibiotics based on cultures, whereas 74% underwent surgical decompression with or without fusion in combination with antibiotics. The mean inpatient hospital stay was 42 days (range, 2 – 742 days) and 34% of patients required an average of 40 days of Intensive Care Unit admission. At time discharge from hospital, of the patients managed nonoperatively, 33% had improved neurological function, 17% had worsened neurological function, 17% died and data was unavailable in 33%. Of the patients treated with surgery, 74% had improved neurological function, 6% remained unchanged, 6% had worsened neurologic function, 6% died and data was unavailable in 9% at time of discharge. SEA remains a severe condition associated with multiple septic foci and significant morbidity. Surgical decompression combined with antibiotics is associated with superior neurologic recovery compared with non-operative management, however a significant proportion of patients still deteriorate or die. Early diagnosis and management may prevent or reduce permanent neurologic deficit

Aim. In our Bone Infection Unit, epidural anaesthesia and sedation (EA+Sed) is the technique of choice for complex orthoplastic surgery involving lower limb free tissue transfer (LLFTT) (1) as it avoids complications of prolonged general anaesthesia (GA). Following our initial reports of successful use of audio-visual distraction (AVD) as an adjunct to regional anaesthesia we wished to evaluate the AVD effect on the patients’ experience during long duration, complex orthoplastic surgery for chronic osteomyelitis under EA+Sed. Method. Our AVD equipment consists of a WiFi connected tablet and noise reducing head phones, providing access to downloaded music, films and the internet. Patients are also allowed to use their own equipment. All patients were fully informed about AVD and EA+Sed as a choice of anaesthesia. EA was established in the anaesthetic room and continued perioperatively. Sedation with propofol was titrated to the patients’ requirements to ensure comfort during surgery. All patients were followed up postoperatively with a structured questionnaire. Results. Ten patients underwent LLFTT surgery for chronic bone infection under EA+Sed+AVD (picture). Mean duration of surgery was 550 min (480 −600 min). Patients used the AVD to listen to music, watch movies, play internet games and use e-mail and social media. All 10 patients were very satisfied, and 9 reported feeling comfortable or very comfortable intraoperatively. All rated their experience better than previous GAs, with quicker general recovery. All patients would recommend this technique to others. Conclusions. Our case series of patients undergoing prolonged surgery for osteomyelitis under EA+Sed has shown very positive impact of AVD on patients’ experience and confirmed our earlier encouraging observations. This clinical service improvement deserves further evaluation and funding

This study was designed to compare length of hospital stay, and 30-day major and minor complications between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with general anesthesia, to those undergoing TKA with spinal or epidural anesthesia with or without regional nerve blocks. Patients 18 years and older undergoing TKA between the years of 2005 and 2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Patient demographics, anesthesia type, length of operation and hospital stay, as well as 30-day major and minor complications were collected from the database. Patients with “primary anesthesia technique” codes for either spinal or epidural anesthesia along with “other anesthesia technique” codes for regional anesthesia were assumed to have been given a regional nerve block. Chi square tests, and analysis of variance were utilized to evaluate unadjusted differences in demographics and outcomes between anesthesia types. Multivariable regression was utilized to compare outcomes (length of stay and complications) between anesthesia types, while adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class, comorbidities, sex, steroid/immunosuppressant use, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, length of operation and smoking status. A total of 214,665 TKA patients were identified (average age 67 ± 10 years). Of these, 257 (0.12%) underwent epidural anesthesia with a nerve block (EB), while 2,318 (1.08%) underwent epidural anesthesia with no block (E), 14,468 (1.08%) underwent spinal anesthesia with a block (SB), and 85,243 (39.7%) underwent spinal anesthesia with no block (S), and 112,377 (52.4%) underwent general anesthesia (G). The unadjusted length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the E group (3.67 ± 5 days) compared to the G group (3.1 ± 3.9 days), while the unadjusted LOS was significantly shorter in the EB group (2.6 ± 1.2), and both SB and S groups (2.6 ± 3 and 2.9 ± 3, respectively), compared to the G group p < 0 .001. Following covariable adjustment, anesthesia type remained an independent predictor of length of stay. Compared to the G group, patients in the E group stayed 0.56 days longer (95% Confidence interval [95%CI] 0.42 – 0.71 days), while patients in the SB were discharged 0.28 days (95%CI 0.21 – 0.35 days) earlier, and those in the S group were discharged 0.06 days earlier (95%CI 0.02–0.09), (p < 0 .0001). While the unadjusted rates of major complications were not significantly different between groups, the unadjusted rates of minor complications were higher in the E, EB, and G groups compared to the S and SB groups. Following covariable adjustment, there were no differences between groups in the risk of minor complications. In conclusion, these data indicate that anesthesia type following TKA is associated with length of hospital stay, but not with 30-day complications. After adjusting for relevant covariables, patients who received epidural anesthesia without a nerve block for TKA were discharged later, while patients who received spinal anesthesia, both with and without a nerve block for TKA were discharged earlier, compared to patients who received general anesthesia for TKA

Background:. The reported prevalence of sciatica ranges from 1.2% to 43%. Epidural injections are the most commonly performed interventions for sciatica. Setting:. A provincial based spinal unit. Objective:. To evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar epidural injections with local anaesthetic and steroids, in patients with sciatica secondary to disc herniation in providing effective pain relief. Methods:. A retrospective chart review of 25 patients given an epidural with local anaesthetic mixed with non-particulate betamethasone. Patient outcomes were measured at baseline and 6 weeks with the Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI). Observations of gender, sex, co-morbities and medication intake were made. Decrease of 50% in the Oswestry scores were considered significant. Results:. Significant pain relief was seen at 6 weeks in 80% of patients and medication intake was decreased. Limitations:. The study limitations include the lack of a placebo group and the fact that this is a preliminary report of the 25 patients. Conclusion:. Overall, 80% of patients with sciatica benefited from lumbar epidural injections

To investigate clinical outcome scores in surgically treated patients with either spontaneous or postoperative pyogenic spondylodiscitis after 3, 12 and 24 month. 70 consecutive patients (mean age 64y; male n=33 female n=27) underwent surgical treatment due to pyogenic spondylodiscitis with or without epidural abscess at our department from 2011 to 2013. We performed either microsurgical debridement or debridement in combination with ventral support employing dorsally instrumented spondylodesis followed by bracing and antibiotic therapy up to 12 weeks. European life quality score (EQ-5D), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) were recorded 3, 12 and 24 month after surgery. Length of hospital stay (LOS) was 25,3 days. The Mean time to presentation at our spine center and diagnosis was 3,8 weeks. Distribution of inflammation was lumbar in 66 (94%) and thoracic in 4 (6%) patients. Thirtyfour patients (49%) had isolated spondylodiscitis (SD). Epidural abscess (ED) was found in 26 patients (37%). Ten patients (14%) showed a combination of SD and ED. SD or ED were predominantly found after previous surgery at the same or contiguous level 38 (54%). Nine patients (13%) suffered from ED or SD after previous lumbar epidural steroid injections (LESI). Spontaneous idiopathic inflammation was found only in 13 cases (19%). Standardized follow-up (FU) protocol was scheduled at 3, 12, and 24 month. FU rate was 60%. Healing of the inflammation was the rule. In our study cumulative EQ-5D increased from 0.47 to 0,80. ODI decreased from 41.1 to 24.3 and VAS concerning back pain decreased from 58.4 to 22.6 VAS according sciatica decreased from 46.8 to 20.5. Due to an increasing number of spine surgeries and spinal interventions as well as the increasing age and morbidity of patients, spinal surgeons have to deal more often with the diagnosis pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Standardized conservative or radical surgical treatment strategies in order to achieve good results according to patients life quality are gaining more importance

Objective. We have been using continuous epidural block and local infiltration cocktail for the pain management after TKA since 2005, and good pain control has been acquired with this method. During the past few years we have changed our protocol of postoperative pain management. We have stopped the administration of Loxoprofen starting next morning of the operation, instead Celecoxib was given starting before the operation. We have started mixing steroid to the intraoperative local infiltration cocktail to reduce acute pain as well as swelling. We also have stopped using suction drain, and delayed the timing of CPM start from day 2 to day 3. Methods. This is case control study, and 78 cases of unilateral TKA were investigated for the study. All cases were anesthetized with continuous epidural block with intravenous dosage of phentanyl and propofol. Compositions of local infiltration cocktail are 40ml 0.75% Ropivacaine, 60ml saline, 0.5ml epinephrin. Group1 (n=40) used this cocktail independently, and Group2 (n=38) used this cocktail with addition of 40mg of triamcinolone(Fig.1). Local infiltration cocktail was used during operation, which was injected to the whole joint capsule. In group1 Loxoprofen was given starting next morning, in group 2 Celecoxib was given starting at 7am on the day of operation. In group1 suction tube was left for 2 days, where as in group2 no suction tube was used postoperatively, and continuous epidural block catheter was removed on postoperative day 2 in both groups. CPM was started at postoperative day 2 in group 1 and postoperative day 3 in group 2. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to analyze the pain. Circumferences of knee and thigh, as well as ROM of knee joint were measured periodically. Results. Preoperative demographics showed no statistical difference between two groups(Fig. 2). Group 2 showed significantly less pain at 6am next morning postoperatively (Fig.3&4). Group 2 showed significantly lower NRS on motion at postoperative day1, 3, 5 and 7 (Fig.5). Group 2 also showed significantly less swellings of knees and thighs at postoperative day 7 (Fig.6). The ROM of the knee joints at postoperative day 7, 14 and 21 were better in group2(Fig.7). Discussions. Our new method of multimodal pain control is effective. It significantly decreased the pain at 6am next morning postoperatively, which is due to preoperative administration of Celecoxib. The pain on motion during 1 st week was significantly decreased which is probably due to the addition of steroid to the cocktail. Suction drain was not needed, if you use steroid in the cocktail and delay the timing to start CPM. The swelling was significantly reduced by steroid injection and delay in ROM exercise. As a result better ROM at postoperative day 7,14 and 21 were obtained. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Stiffness after TKR is a frustrating complication that has many possible causes. Though the definition of stiffness has changed over the years, most would agree that flexion > 75 degrees and a 15-degree lack of extension constitutes stiffness. This presentation will focus upon the potential causes of a stiff TKR, intra-operative tips, the post-operative evaluation and management, and the results of revision for a stiff TKR. The management of this potentially unsatisfying situation begins pre-operatively with guidance of the patient's expectations; it is well-known that pre-operative stiffness is strongly correlated with post-operative lack of motion. At the time of surgery, osteophytes must be removed and the components properly sised and aligned and rotated. Soft-tissue balancing must be attained in both the flexion/extension and varus/valgus planes. One must avoid overstuffing the tibio-femoral and/or patello-femoral compartments with an inadequate bone resection. Despite these surgical measures and adequate pain control and rehabilitation, certain patients will continue to frustrate our best efforts. These patients likely have a biological predisposition for formation of scar tissue. Other potential causes for the stiff TKR include complex regional pain syndrome or joint infection. Close followup of a patient's progress is crucial for the success in return of ROM. Should motion plateau early in the recovery phase, the patient should be evaluated for manipulation under anesthesia. At our institution, most manipulations are performed within 3 months post-operative under an epidural anesthetic; patients will stay overnight for continuous epidural pain relief and immediate aggressive PT. The results of re-operations for a stiff TKR are variable due to the multiple etiologies. A clear cause of stiffness such as component malposition, malrotation or overstuffing of the joint has a greater chance of regaining motion than arthrofibrosis without a clear cause. Although surgical treatment with open arthrolysis, isolated component or complete revision can be used to improve TKR motion, results have been variable and additional procedures are often necessary

Bilateral one stage total knee replacement (TKR) has a number of advantages. There is one operative procedure and anesthetic and overall recovery time is significantly reduced. It is a more cost-effective procedure in that acute hospital stay is less and although rehabilitation time is greater in the short term, overall it is less. Additionally, if there is a bilateral flexion contracture present there is an inevitable loss of extension if a single knee is operated upon as this knee will assume the position of the unoperated knee. Patients greatly prefer having both knees corrected at one operative setting rather than having to have the inconvenience and pain associated with a second operative procedure at three to six months after the first one. There are potential disadvantages to a one stage procedure. One concern has been that there is more peri-operative morbidity associated with one stage bilateral total knee replacement. In a review of 501 patients undergoing bilateral one stage total knee replacement at the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) there were no peri-operative deaths, myocardial infarctions or cerebrovascular accidents. There were arrhythmias present in 5% of patients. Fat emboli were present in 3% and 2 patients (0.4%) had pulmonary emboli. The average transfusion requirement was 2.6 units and allogeneic blood was required in 42%. There were 2 deep infections, 3 hematomas and 5 patients with delayed wound healing There was an increased incidence of major complications in patients with ASA classification 3 and with increasing age over 70 years. New data indicates peri-operative administration of hydrocortisone may mitigate lung injury as demonstrated by reduction in cytokine and desmosine levels in a randomised trial. There was also a trend toward less need for narcotic medication and better range of motion in the steroid treated group. Patient selection is important and all patients are screened pre-operatively by an internist and anesthesiologist. In over 3000 bilateral TKRs at HSS infection rate and mortality were lower than in the unilateral total knee replacement patients. Much of this is due to patient selection criteria. All patients underwent the procedure with epidural anesthesia with post-operative epidural PCA for 48 hours. All patients are discharged on warfarin and spend the operative night in the recovery room. The procedure has acceptable morbidity and great advantage in properly selected patients

Fluoroscopic guidance is common in interventional pain procedures. In spine surgery, injections are used for differential diagnosis and determination of indication for surgical treatment as well. Fluoroscopy ensures correct needle placement and accurate delivery of the drug. Also, exact documentation of the intervention performed is possible. However, besides the patient, interventional pain physicians, surgeons and other medical staff are chronically exposed to low dose scatter radiation. The long-term adverse consequences of low dose radiation exposure to the medical staff are still unclear. Especially in university hospital settings, where education of trainees is performed, fluoroscopy time and total radiation exposure are significantly higher than in private practice settings. It remains a challenge for university hospitals to reduce the fluoroscopic time while maintaining the quality of education. Multiple approaches have been made to reduce radiation exposure in fluoroscopy, including the wide spread use of pulsed fluoroscopy, or rarely used techniques like laser guided needle placement systems. The Zero-Dose-C-Arm-Navigation (ZDCAN) allows an optimal positioning of the c-arm without exposure to radiation. For training purposes, relevant anatomical structures can be highlighted for each interventional procedure, so injection needles can be best positioned next to the target area. The Zero-Dose-C-Arm-Navigation (ZDCAN) module was developed to display a radiation free preview of the expected fluoroscopic image of the spine. Using an optical tracking system and a registered 3D-spine model, the expected x-ray image is displayed in real-time as a projection of the model. Additionally, selected anatomical structures including nerve roots, facet joints, vertebral discs and the epidural space, can be displayed. A seamless integration of the ZDCAN in a c-arm system already used in clinical practice for years could be achieved. For easy use, a tool was developed allowing the admission and use of regular single-use syringes and spinal needles. Accordingly, these can be used as pointers in the sterile area, a sterilization of the whole tool after every single injection is not required. We evaluated the efficiency and accuracy of this procedure compared to conventional fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. In sawbones of the lumbar spine, facet joint injections (N = 50), perineural injections (N = 46) and epidural injections (N = 20) were performed. Highlighting the target area in the radiation free preview model, an optimal positioning of the c-arm could be achieved even by unskilled medical staff. The desired anatomical structures could be identified easily in the x-rays taken, as they were displayed in the 3D model aside. As already seen evaluating a previous version of the ZDCAN module for the lower limb, the total number of x-ray images taken could be reduced significantly. Compared to the conventional group, the number of x-ray images required for facet joint injections could be reduced from 12.5 (±1.1) to 5.7 (±1.1), from 5.4 (±1.8) to 3.8 (±1.3) for perineural injections and from 4.1 (±0.9) to 2.1 (±0.3) for epidural injections. Total radiation time was reduced accordingly. Likewise, the mean time needed for the interventional procedure could be reduced from 168.3 s (±19.1) to 131.4 s (±16.8) for facet joint injections, was unchanged from 97.7 s (±26.0) to 104.7 s (±31.0) for perineural injections and from 60 s (±14.9) to 52 s (±7.1) for epidural injections. The ZDCAN is a powerful tool advancing conventional fluoroscopy to another level. Using the radiation free preview model, the c-arm can easily be positioned to show the desired area. The accentuated display of the target structures in the preview model makes the introduction to fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures easier. This feature might reduce the learning curve to achieve better clinical results with lower radiation dose exposure. Thus, the ZDCAN can be a tool to improve education in university hospital settings for physicians as well as for medical staff while reducing radiation dose exposure in general use

Aim. Spinal infections with and without aSCI represent a severe disease with a high lethality rate of up to 17%. The current treatment recommendations include an antimicrobial therapy and if necessary in combination with operative procedures. Aims of this study are the analysis of risk factors and treatment concepts and to compare the outcome of patients suffering a spinal infection with and without an aSCI. Method. Monocentric prospective case study from 2013 – 2015. Patients were examined using a diagnostic algorithm (CT-thorax/abdomen, MRI total-spine, blood cultures, dental chart, echocardiogram). A calculated antimicrobial therapy was initially administered and later changed according to the antibiotic resistance. Additional operative procedures were performed with respect to the clinical and radiological findings. Results. 68 patients (age 69.8 ± 13.7 years) were included. A Charlson-Comorbidity-Index of 3.9 ± 2.5 was calculated. An spinal infection with aSCI was associated with a significantly higher number of infected spinal segments (p=0.013). A longer duration of antibiotic treatment (statistically non-significant) and a higher operation rate was shown with aSCI. Also the inpatient and intensive-care unit treatment duration was significantly longer with aSCI. The number of treatment-associated complications and the lethality were equal in both groups. The age (odds-ratio 1.1 per one year increase; p=0.02) and the appearance of an epidural empyema (odds-ratio 7.9; p=0.04) have been identified as independent lethality factors. Conclusions. Patients with spinal infections are multimorbid and have multiple infectious origins, which warrant further diagnostic investigations. Treatment associated complications, lethality rates and clinical outcome of spinal infection with and without aSCI are comparable in a specialized unit. Lethality risk factors are age and presence of an epidural empyema. In subsequent studies the antibiotic treatment duration and the long-term follow up will be evaluated

Introduction. Urinary catheterisation can cause bacteraemia and therefore may be associated with a risk of infection in hip and knee arthroplasty. However postoperative urinary retention can be distressing for the patient. This study investigates the factors that might predict the need for postoperative catheterisation in order to help develop a protocol to decide who should be electively catheterised. Methods. A prospective blinded study of 128 consecutive patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty was carried out. No patient underwent perioperative catheterisation. Data obtained included sex, age, joint (hip or knee replacement), prostate score (IPSS), previous urinary retention, comorbidities and residual bladder volume after attempted complete voiding measured using an ultrasound bladder scanner. The type of anaesthesia and the requirement for urinary catheterisation postoperatively were recorded. Predictive risk factors were identified using binary logistic regression, and expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. The mean age was 69.5 years (SD 8.9). There were 56 males and 72 females. 38 patients (30%) required postoperative catheterisation. Logistic regression identified the following predictive risk factors: bladder scan volume per ml increase (OR 1.006; CI 1.000–1.012); male sex (OR 5.51; CI 2.01–15.16); previous catheter (OR 4.26; CI 1.53–11.82); spinal/epidural/combined spinal epidural (CSE) anaesthesia (OR 6.78; CI 1.75–26.32); moderate IPSS score (OR 5.15; CI 1.73–15.37); severe IPSS score (OR 3.53; CI 0.605–20.54). The specificity of our model is 91%, the positive predictor value 71% and negative predictor value 82%. Discussion. Post-voiding bladder scan volume (1ml increase = 0.6% increased risk), male sex, history of retention, medium or high IPSS score and an epidural, spinal or CSE anaesthetic are independent risk factors that can be used preoperatively to predict the likelihood of postoperative retention

Bilateral one stage total knee replacement has a number of advantages. There is one operative procedure and anesthetic and overall recovery time is significantly reduced. It is a more cost effective procedure in that acute hospital stay is less and although rehabilitation time is greater in the short term overall it is less. Additionally if there is a bilateral flexion contracture present there is an inevitable loss of extension if a single knee is operated upon as this knee will assume the position of the unoperated knee. Patients greatly prefer having both knees corrected at one operative setting rather than having to have the inconvenience and pain associated with a second operative procedure at three to six months after the first one. There are potential disadvantages to a one stage procedure. One concern has been that there is more peri-operative morbidity associated with one stage bilateral total knee replacement. In a review of 501 patients undergoing bilateral one stage total knee replacement at the Hospital for Special Surgery there were no peri-operative deaths, myocardial infarctions or cerebrovascular accidents. There were arrhythmias present in 5% of patients. Fat emboli were present in 3% and 2 patients (0.4%) had pulmonary emboli. The average transfusion requirement was 2.6 units and allogeneic blood was required in 42%. There were 2 deep infections, 3 hematomas and 5 patients with delayed wound healing. There was an increased incidence of major complications in patients with ASA classification 3 and with increasing age over 70 years. New data indicates peri-operative administration of hydrocortisone my mitigate lung injury as demonstrated by reduction in cytokine and desmosine levels in a randomised trial. There was also a trend toward less need for narcotic medication and better range of motion in the steroid treated group. Patient selection is important and all patients are screened pre-operatively by an internist and anesthesiologist. In over 3000 bilateral TKR at HSS infection rate and mortality were lower than in the unilateral total knee replacement patients. Much of this has is due to patient selection criteria. All patients underwent the procedure with epidural anesthesia with post-operative epidural PCA for 48 hours. All patients are discharged on warfarin and spend the operative night in the recovery room. The procedure has acceptable morbidity and great advantage in properly selected patients

Increased operative time has been previously identified as a risk factor for complications following total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of surgical time on 30-day complications following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine if there were specific time intervals associated with worse outcomes. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was utilized to identify patients ≥18 years who underwent TKA between 2005 and 2016 using procedural codes. Patients with surgical durations >240 minutes were excluded. Patient demographics, operation length, and 30-day major and minor complication rates were captured. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if the rate of complications differed depending on length of operation, while adjusting for age, sex, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class, functional status, smoking status, comorbidities, anesthesia type, and Body Mass Index (BMI). Multivariable linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of duration of surgery. A total of 213,921 TKA patients (average age 67 ± 10 years) were identified from the database. Within 30-days of the index procedure, 3,321 (1.55%) experienced a major complication, and 6,144 (2.86%) experienced a minor complication. Mean surgical duration was 92 minutes (range 20 – 240). Underweight, or overweight/obese BMI, male sex, hypertension, cancer, dependent functional status, epidural anaesthesia, and ASA class III and IV were determined to be independent predictors of prolonged operation length, while COPD, current smoking, spinal anesthesia, and older age predicted lower operation times. Operation lengths ≥ 90 minutes significantly increased the risk of both major and minor complications (P>0.01). Specifically, the rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), unplanned reintubation, surgical site infection (SSI), sepsis, and wound disruption were higher for patients whose operations lasted ≥ 90 minutes (p 0.05). With respect to specific complications, following covariate adjustment, operation lengths ≥ 90 minutes increased the risk of DVT, deep and superficial incisional SSI, and wound disruption, while operation lengths ≥ 120 minutes increased the risk of deep, non-incisional SSI, and sepsis (P < 0 .01). Surgical times of ≥90 minutes independently increase the 30-day risk of DVT, infection, and wound disruption following TKA after controlling for other variables that influence operation length. This study confirms the importance of surgical duration on early outcomes following TKA

Peri-articular injections (PAI) have become an important component in many multimodal pain protocols after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Liposomal bupivacaine has emerged as a highly marketed and touted ingredient for PAI. However, the true efficacy of this material, particularly compared with less expensive PAI “cocktails” such as traditional bupivacaine or ropivacaine, has not been proven to date. Ropivacaine is considered a long-active local analgesic and in combination with epinephrine, ketorolac and clonidine has been shown to be a very effective PAI in a multimodal pain program. Liposomal bupivacaine has been similarly touted as a long-acting PAI. Initial reports provided support for liposomal bupivacaine PAI's providing similar pain relief as epidurals or femoral nerve blocks. The authors of these studies tout comparable pain control with decreased length of stay attributable to avoiding the side effects of epidurals and regional blocks. However, the ultimate clinical issue relates to how liposomal bupivacaine PAI's compares to traditional PAI cocktail ingredients such as bupivacaine and ropivacaine, which also avoid deleterious effects of regional analgesia, and at a much cheaper price point. Fortunately the highest quality research to date, which includes randomised prospective trials and retrospective controlled cohort studies, have reported consistent results. In a retrospective cohort study comparing a traditional ropivacaine and epinephrine versus liposomal bupivacaine PAI demonstrated no difference between the two groups in inpatient pain scores when used in a comprehensive multimodal pain control program. Further, two prospective randomised trials reported no difference in liposomal bupivacaine PAI compared to a traditional PAI of either bupivacaine or ropivacaine, epinephrine, ketorolac and clonidine. Finally, there have been some authors who contend the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine PAI's is entirely dependent on a meticulous injection technique, however, comparative studies against traditional PAI ingredients with this recommended technique do not exist. In summary, the existing data supports that liposomal bupivacaine is an effective PAI that can be used to provide comparable pain relief to that achieved by regional blocks. However, liposomal bupivacaine has not been shown to provide superior pain relief when compared to traditional ropivacaine or bupivacaine PAI's in multimodal pain protocols after TKA. Further, liposomal bupivacaine is prohibitively priced at approximately six times that of ropivacaine-based PAI cocktails. Therefore, the “game changer” is likely the implementation of peri-articular injections as an essential component of multimodal pain control programs and NOT liposomal bupivacaine