Restoration of joint line in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important for kinematics of knee and ligamentous balance. Especially in revision TKA, it may be difficult to identify the joint line. The aim of this study is to define the relationship between epicondyles and articular surface using CT based three-dimensional digital templating sofware $“Athena” (Soft Cube, Osaka, Japan). 137 knees with osteoarthritis, all caces were grade 2 or lower in Kellgren-Lawrence index, were investigated. Perpendicular lines were dropped from the prominences of the medial and lateral femoral epicondyles to the most distal points of articular surfaces and distances of the lines were measured on the axial and coronal planes. The femoral width was measured as the distance between medial and lateral epicondyles. Each of the distance described above was converted to a ratio by dividing by the femoral width. On the axial plane, the average distance from epicondyles to the posterior articular surfaces were 29.4±2.2mm on the medial side and 21.2±2.3mm on the lateral side. The average of the femoral width was 75.2±4.1mm. On coronal plane, the average distance from epicondyles to the distal articular surfaces were 25.2±2.8mm on the medial side and 21.4±2.5mm on the lateral side. The ratio for the distance from epicondyles to the distal and posterior joint line compared to femoral width was 0.39±0.02, 0.28±0.03, 0.33±0.03 and 0.28±0.03. The distance from epicondyles to the distal and posterior joint line correlates with the femoral width of the distal femur. This information can be useful in determining appropriate joint line

The posterior compartments of the knee are currently accessed arthroscopically through anterior, posteromedial or posterolateral portals. A direct posterior portal to access the posterior compartments has been overlooked due to a perceived high-risk of injury to the popliteal neurovascular structures. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and accessibility of a direct posterior portal into the knee. This cross-sectional study comprised a sample of 95 formalin-embalmed cadaveric knees and 9 fresh-frozen knees. Cannulas were inserted into the knees, 16mm from the vertical plane between the medial epicondyle of the femur and medial condyle of the tibia and 8 and 14mm (females and males respectively) from the vertical plane connecting the lateral femoral epicondyle and lateral tibial condyle. Landmarks were identified in full extension and cannula insertion was completed with the formalin-embalmed knees in full extension and the fresh-frozen in 90-degree flexion. Posterior aspects of the knees were dissected from superficial to deep, to assess potential damage caused by cannula insertion. Incidence of neurovascular damage was 9.6% (n=10); 0.96% medial cannula and 8.7% lateral cannula. The medial cannula damaged one small saphenous vein (SSV) in a male specimen. The lateral cannula damaged one SSV, 7 common fibular nerves (CFN) and both CFN and lateral cutaneous sural nerve in one specimen. All incidences of damage occurred in formalin-embalmed knees. The posterior horns of the menisci were accessible in all specimens. A medial-lying direct posterior portal into the knee is safe in 99% of occurrences. The lateral-lying direct posterior portal is of high risk to the CFN

A primary goal of revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (rTKA) is restoration of the Joint Line (JL) and Posterior Condylar Offsets (PCO). The presence of a native contralateral joint allows JL and PCO to be inferred in a way that could account for patient-specific anatomical variations more accurately than current techniques. This study assesses bilateral distal femoral symmetry in the context of defining targets for restoration of JL and PCO in rTKA. 566 pre-operative CTs for bilateral TKAs were segmented and landmarked by two engineers. Landmarks were taken on both femurs at the medial and lateral epicondyles, distal and posterior condyles and hip and femoral centres. These landmarks were used to calculate the distal and posterior offsets on the medial and lateral sides (MDO, MPO, LDO, LPO respectively), the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), TEA to PCA angle (TEAtoPCA) and anatomic to mechanical axis angle (AAtoMA). Mean bilateral differences in these measures were calculated and cases were categorised according to the amount of asymmetry. The database analysed included 54.9% (311) females with a mean population age of 68.8 (±7.8) years. The mean bilateral difference for each measure was: LDFA 1.4° (±1.0), TEAtoPCA 1.3° (±0.9), AAtoMA 0.5° (±0.5), MDO 1.4mm (±1.1), MPO 1.0mm (±0.8). The categorisation of asymmetry for each measure was: LDFA had 39.9% of cases with <1° bilateral difference and 92.4% with <3° bilateral difference, TEAtoPCA had 45.8% <1° and 96.6% <3°, AAtoMA had 85.7% <1° and 99.8% <3°, MDO had 46.2% <1mm and 90.3% <3mm, MPO had 57.0% <1mm and 97.9% <3mm. This study presents evidence supporting bilateral distal femoral symmetry. Using the contralateral anatomy to obtain estimates for JL and PCO in rTKA may result in improvements in intraoperative accuracy compared to current techniques and a more patient specific solution to operative planning

Introduction. Several studies have described the relationship between the joint line and bony landmarks around the knee. However, high inter-patient variation makes these absolute values difficult in use. This study was set up to validate the previously described distances and ratios on calibrated full limb standing X-rays and to investigate the accuracy and reliability of these ratios as a tool for joint line reconstruction. Methods:. One hundred calibrated full-leg standing radiographs obtained from healthy volunteers were reviewed (fig 1). Distances from the medial epicondyle, the lateral epicondyle, the adductor tubercle, the fibular head and the proximal center of the knee (CJD) to the virtual prosthetic joint line were determined (fig 3). This prosthetic joint line was created by introducing a virtual distal femoral cutting block with a valgus angle of 6° on the full-leg radiographs. The adductor ratio was defined as the distance from adductor tubercle to the joint line divided by the femoral width. The correlation with the femoral width, the CJD and the limb alignment was analysed using linear regression analysis. The accuracy and reliability of the use of the ratio of the distance of the adductor tubercle, the medial epicondyle and the CJD relative to the femoral width to reconstruct the joint line was calculated. Results:. The average distance to the joint line from the medial epicondyle, the lateral epicondyle, the adductor tubercle and the fibular head was 28 mm (SD 2.97), 27 mm (SD 2.67), 44 mm (SD 4,27) and 15 mm (SD 3.69) respectively. The distance from the adductor tubercle (R = 0,82) and the CJD (R = 0,96) to the joint line showed a strong and significant linear correlation with the femoral width. The medial epicondyle, the lateral epicondyle and the fibular head showed less strong correlations. There was no significant correlation with the limb alignment. The adductor ratio was found to be 0.52 (SD 0.027) with only small inter-individual variation. The use of the adductor ratio reconstructed the joint line within 4 mm of its original level in 92% of the cases. Discussion. The absolute distances and ratios for determining joint line position as previously described, were confirmed on calibrated full-limb standing radiographs. Recently, the adductor tubercle has been described as a reliable landmark for determining joint line position. As a rule of thumb, the femoral width as measured on the preoperative radiograph or intra-operative, is divided by 2. Intra-operative, the distance from the adductor tubercle to the distal cutting block that has been inserted with a 6° distal cutting angle, is adjusted to equal the calculated value. Fixation of the cutting block at this level will automatically reconstruct the joint line at its original level (fig 2). Modern instrumentation techniques will allow you to immediately select the appropriate size distal femoral augment to reconstruct this joint level. Conclusion. The adductor ratio was found to be the most useful and accurate tool to restore the joint line to its original level in revision TKA

Incorrect registration during computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CA-TKA) leads to malposition of implants. Our aim was to evaluate the tolerable error in anatomic landmark registration. We incorrectly registered the femoral epicondyles, femoral and tibial centers, as well as the malleoli and documented the change in angulation or rotation. We found that the distal femoral epicondyles were the most difficult anatomic landmarks to register. The other bony landmarks were more forgiving. Identification of the distal femoral epicondyles has a high inter- and intra-observer variability. Our observation that there is less than 2 mm of safe zone in the anterior or posterior direction during registration of the medial and lateral epicondyles may explain the inability of CA-TKA to improve upon the outcomes of conventional TKA

Introduction. Component position and overall limb alignment following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to influence device survivorship and clinical outcomes. However current methods for measuring post-operative alignment through 2D radiographs and CTs may be prone to inaccuracies due to variations in patient positioning, and certain anatomical configurations such as rotation and flexion contractures. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new vector based method for overall limb alignment and component position measurements using CT. The technique utilizes a new mathematical model to calculate prosthesis alignment from the coordinates of anatomical landmarks. The hypothesis is that the proposed technique demonstrated good accuracy to surgical plan, as well as low intra and inter-observer variability. Methods. This study received institutional review board approval. A total of 30 patients who underwent robotic assisted TKA (RATKA) at four different sites between March 2017 and January 2018 were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, non-randomized clinical study. CT scans were performed prior to and 4–6 weeks post-operatively. Each subject was positioned headfirst supine with the legs in a neutral position and the knees at full extension. Three separate CT scans were performed at the anatomical location of the hip, knee, and ankle joint. Hip, knee, and ankle images were viewed in 3D software and the following vertices were generated using anatomical landmarks: Hip Center (HC), Medial Epicondyle Sulcus (MES), Lateral Epicondyle (LE), Femur Center (FC), Tibia Center (TC), Medial Malleolus (MM), Lateral Malleolus (LM), Femur Component Superior (FCS), Femur Component Inferior (FCI), Coronal Femoral Lateral (CFL), Coronal Femoral Medial (CFM), Coronal Tibia Lateral (CTL), and Coronal Tibia Medial (CTM). Limb alignment and component positions were calculated from these vertices using a new mathematical model. The measurements were compared to the surgeons’ operative plan and component targeted positions for accuracy analysis. Two analysts performed the same measurements separately for inter-observer variability analysis. One of the two analysts repeated the measurements at least 30 days apart to assess intra-observer variability. Correlation analysis was performed on the intra-observer analysis, while Bland Altman analysis was performed on the inter-observer analysis. Results. Average measurement errors of overall limb alignments, femoral and tibial component position were less than 1 degree. Bland Altman plots for inter-observer analysis demonstrate great reproducibility in limb and component alignment measurements between surgeons with no bias. Correlation plots for intra-observer analysis demonstrate low variability with slopes ranging between 0.86 to 1.00 and R value greater than 0.88. Discussion. The proposed method demonstrated good accuracy to plan and low intra- and inter observer variability. This technique may be considered for assessing component position accuracy with post-operative CTs. Further studies are needed to investigate the robustness of the method in a larger cohort. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Summary. There is tremendous variability amongst surgeons' ability to reference anatomic landmarks. This may suggest the necessity of other objective methods in determining femoral alignment and rotation. Introduction. Despite the durability of total knee arthroplasty, there is much room for improvement with regards to functional outcome and patient satisfaction. One important factor contributing to poor outcomes after TKA is malrotation of the femoral component. It has been postulated that this is due to failure of surgeons to correctly reference bony landmarks, principally the femoral epicondyles, however, this is unproven. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of joint surgeons and trainees in identifying anatomic landmarks for positioning the femoral component and to determine the effect of prior training and experience. Methods. 23 surgeons (17 attending surgeons, 6 trainees) participated in this study. Using custom-made computer software, each surgeon interactively defined the epicondylar axis (EA), the anterior-posterior axis (AP) of the distal cut (Whiteside's Line) on 3D computer models of 10 normal femora reconstructed from CT scans. Each surgeon then aligned a standard distal cutting guide on the resected distal surface of each femoral model. A standardized procedure was employed to determine the true location of the epicondyles, the direction of Whiteside's Line and the orientation of the cutting guide. Each participant was surveyed to ascertain their extent of formal training in joint arthroplasty, their annual volume of TKA cases, and whether they routinely aligned their TKAs using Whiteside's and the transepicondylar axis. The difference between the ideal and surgeon-selected parameters were calculated and correlated with data describing each surgeon's training and experience. Results. Landmark selection and guide placement was highly variable between surgeons. Overall, surgeons placed Whiteside's line in 1.83°± 7.01° of internal rotation vs. the calculated axes. Additionally, surgeons placed the transepicondylar axis in 1.40°± 3.72° of internal rotation vs. the calculated axes. On average, the guide was placed in 1.44°± 2.59° of additional internal rotation in comparison to the selected transepicondylar axis. Surgeons who routinely utilized the transepicondylar axis intraoperatively placed the guide significantly closer to the selected transepicondylar axis than those who did not (0.74°± 1.28° vs. 1.85°± 3.05°, p=.0024). Surprisingly, fellowship training, years of training, and volume of cases per year had no statistical effect the outcome of placement. Conclusion. This study suggests that there is tremendous variability amongst surgeons' ability to accurately reference the femoral epicondyles, Whiteside's line, and the transepicondylar axis. Our results also indicate that surgeons are not able to identify Whiteside's line with sufficient reliability for it to be a dependable indicator of correct component alignment in TKA. Our data also support the use of other methods to reliably determine correct rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty

Introduction. A femoral rotational alignment is one of the essential factors, affecting the postoperative knee balance and patellofemoral tracking in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To obtain an adequate alignment, the femoral component must be implanted parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA). We have developed “a superimposable Computed Tomography (CT) scan-based template”, in which the SEA is drawn on a distal femoral cross section of the CT image at the assumed bone resection level, to determine the precise SEA. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the rotational alignment of the femoral component positioned with the superimposed template in TKA. Patients and methods. Twenty-six consecutive TKA patients, including 4 females with bilateral TKAs were enrolled. To prepare a template, all knees received CT scans with a 2.5 mm slice thickness preoperatively. Serial three slices of the CT images, in which the medial epicondyle and/or lateral epicondyle were visible, were selected. Then, these images were merged into a single image onto which the SEA was drawn. Thereafter, another serial two CT images, which were taken at approximately 9 mm proximal from the femoral condyles, were also selected, and the earlier drawn SEA was traced onto each of these pictures. These pictures with the SEA were then printed out onto transparent sheets to be used as potential “templates” (Fig. 1-a). In the TKA, the distal femur was resected with the modified measured resection technique. Then, one template, whichever of the two potential templates, was closer to the actual shape, was selected and its SEA was duplicated onto the distal femoral surface (Fig. 1-b). Following that, the distal femur was resected parallel to this SEA. The rotational alignment of the femoral component was evaluated with CT scan postoperatively. For convention, an external rotation of the femoral component from the SEA was given a positive numerical value, and an internal rotation was given a negative numerical value. Results. The subjects were 4 knees in 4 males and 26 knees in 22 females. A mean age (for 30 knees) at the operation was 76.7 ± 6.1 years (range from 66.4 to 88.3). The posterior condylar angle was −0.27 ± 1.43, and the outlier, more than 3 degrees, was 1 case. Discussion. Conventionally, the SEA is palpated intraoperatively, however, the sulcus of the medial condyle sometimes cannot be identified precisely in osteoarthritic degeneration at the medial condyle. Also, the SEA is determined from the posterior condylar axis (PCA) by calculating the posterior condylar angle, which is between the SEA and the PCA, with the measurements from the preoperative CT scan. However, the residual cartilage thickness is not considered in this method, and thus, the SEA is possible to be inaccurate. The simple technology of our template allowed us to determine the SEA directly on the femoral surface, without any influence from bone degeneration. The femoral components could be implanted accurately, and therefore, the superimposed template was considered to improve TKA outcomes with the accurate SEA

Introduction:. Distal humerus fractures as well as elbow fracture dislocation are often accompanied by soft tissue damage that warrants early fixation with an external fixator. The distal humerus is a hazardous area for placement of an external fixator due to the close proximity of the radial nerve to the humerus in this area. No known safe zone has been identified on the lateral border of the humerus to avoid radial nerve damage. The aim of this study was to record the incidence of radial nerve damage by placing two 4 mm pins into the humerus and to note the relation of the nerve to the pins. Methods:. Two 4 mm pins used to fix an external fixator were drilled into the lateral border of the humerus at points 100 mm and 70 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle of both arms of 39 cadavers. The 30 mm interval between the pins is the interval between the pins in a pinblock of a commonly-used external fixator. The arms were dissected by medical students and the incidence of radial nerve damage was recorded. Statistical analysis was done using a Fischer's exact test to identify the incidence of nerve damage relative to pin insertion. The number of damaged nerves was compared to the number of non-damaged nerves. A design based Chi Square test was carried out to test left and right arms. The proportions of interest were estimated along a 95% confidence interval. Results:. The radial nerve was hit (damaged) by 56.4% of the proximal and 20.5% of the distal pins. The radial nerve ran posterior to the proximal pin in 2.57% of arms and 0% to the distal pin. Conclusion:. Although no clear safe zone could be established, pins should be placed closer than 100 mm from the lateral epicondyle and as posterior on the humerus as possible to minimize the risk for radial nerve damage. Keywords: Radial nerve, external fixation, humerus fractures

Purpose. To validate accuracy of transepicondylar axis as a reference for femoral component rotation in primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods. A prospective study done from dec 2010 to dec 2011 at tertiary centre. 80 knees were included (43 females and 21 males). All surgeries were carried out by one senior arthroplasty surgeon. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included and all revision cases were excluded. Intraoperative assessment of TEA was done by palpating most prominent point on lateral epicondyle and sulcus on medial epicondyle and passing a k wire through it. Confirmation is done under image intensifier C arm with epicondylar view. Postoperative TEA was assessed by taking CT scan, measuring condylar twist angle and posterior condylar angle. Also correlation of femoral component rotation with postoperative anterior knee pain was assessed. Results. The mean PCA was around 4° with TEA as reference and only 10% patients required an additional lateral release of which 2% patient had preop patellar maltracking. No postoperative patellar maltracking was seen. Anterior knee pain was present in 8% patients. No postop infection is noted. Alignment ranging from 3° to 9° external rotation. Conclusion. TEA is most accurate reference for femoral component rotation even in severely deformed arthritic knees. Key words – Transepicondylar axis, total knee arthroplasty, femoral component rotation,

Purpose:. To compare accuracy of transepicondylar axis as a reference for femoral component rotation in primary navigated versus non navigated total knee arthroplasty in severely deformed knees. Methods:. A prospective study done from dec 2009 to dec 2011 at tertiary centre. 180 knees were included (124 females and 56 males). All cases were randomly allocated into 2 groups: navigated and non navigated. All surgeries were carried out by two senior arthroplasty surgeons. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included and all revision cases were excluded. Intraoperative assessment of TEA was done by palpating most prominent point on lateral epicondyle and sulcus on medial epicondyle and passing a k wire through it. Confirmation is done under image intensifier C arm with epicondylar view in Non navigated knees. Postoperative TEA was assessed by taking CT scan, measuring condylar twist angle and posterior condylar angle (PCA). Results:. The mean PCA was around 4° with TEA as reference in Navigated and 6° in Non navigated knees and only 7% patients required an additional lateral release of which 2% patient had preop patellar maltracking. No postoperative patellar maltracking was seen. Anterior knee pain was present in 10% patients. No postop infection is noted. Alignment ranging from 4° to 8° external rotation. Conclusion:. Navigation is most accurate measure for TEA as reference, as compared to non navigated TKA, which can lead to excessive external rotation especially in severely deformed knees

Surgeon-performed periarticular injection and anesthesiologist-performed femoral nerve or adductor canal block with local anesthetic have been used in multimodal pain management for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Anesthesiologist-performed adductor canal blocks are costly, time consuming, and may be unreliable. We investigated the feasibility of a surgeon-performed saphenous nerve (“adductor-canal”) block from within the knee joint. A retrospective analysis of 94 thigh-knee MRI studies was performed to determine the relationship between the width of the distal femur at the epicondylar axis and the proximal location of the saphenous nerve after its exit from the adductor canal and separation from the superficial femoral artery. After obtaining these data, TKA resections and trial component implantation were performed, using a medial parapatellar approach, in 11 fresh cadaveric lower extremity specimens. Using a blunt tip 1.5cm needle, we injected 10 ml each of two different colored solutions at two different intra-articular medial injection locations, and after 30 minutes, dissected the femoral and saphenous nerve and femoral artery from the hip to the knee to determine the location of the injections. Based upon the MRI analysis, the saphenous nerve was located (and had exited the adductor canal) at a mean of 1.5 times the epicondylar width in females, and mean 1.3 times the epicondylar width in males, proximal to the medial epicondyle. After placement of TKA trial components and injection, the proximal injection site solution bathed the saphenous nerve in 8 of 11 specimens. The proximal blunt needle and solution was adjacent, but did not puncture, the femoral artery and vein in only one specimen. This study suggests that a surgeon-performed injection of the saphenous nerve from within the knee is a feasible procedure. This technique may be a useful alternative to ultrasound guided block. A trial comparing surgeon and anesthesiologist-performed nerve block should be considered to determine the clinical efficacy of this procedure. Our anecdotal use of this intra-articular injection over the past year has been favorable. Newer, extended release anesthetic agents should be investigated with this technique

Introduction. The Walch Type B2 glenoid has the hallmark features of posteroinferior glenoid erosion, retroversion, and posterior humeral head subluxation. Although our understanding of the pathoanatomy of bone loss and its evolution in Type B's has improved, the etiology remains unclear. Furthermore, the morphology of the humerus in Walch B types has not been studied. The purpose of this imaging based anthropometric study was to examine the humeral torsion in Walch Type B2 shoulders. We hypothesized that there would be a compensatory decrease in humeral retroversion in Walch B2 glenoids. Methods. Three-dimensional models of the full length humerus were generated from computed tomography data of normal cadaveric (n = 59) and Walch Type B shoulders (n = 59). An anatomical coordinate system referencing the medial and lateral epicondyles was created for each model. A simulated humeral head osteotomy plane was created and used to determine humeral version relative to the epicondylar axis and the head-neck angle. Measurements were repeated by two experienced fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons to determine inter-rater reliability. Glenoid parameters (version, inclination and 2D critical shoulder angle) and posterior humeral head subluxation were calculated in the Type B group to determine the pathologic glenohumeral relationship. Two-way ANOVAs compared group and sex within humeral version and head-neck angle, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) with a 2-way random effects model and absolute agreement were used for inter-rater reliability. Results. There were statistically significant differences in humeral version between normal and Type B shoulders (p < .001) and between males and females within the normal group (p = .043). Normal shoulders had a humeral retroversion of 36±12°, while the Walch Type B group had a humeral retroversion of 14±9° relative to the epicondylar axis. For head-neck angle, there were no significant differences between sexes (p = .854), or between normal and Type B shoulders when grouped by sex (p = .433). In the Type B group, the mean glenoid version was 22±7°, glenoid inclination was 8±6°, 2D critical shoulder angle was 30±5° and humeral head subluxation was 80±9%. Inter-rater reliability showed fair agreement between the two experienced observers for head-neck angle (ICC = .562; 95% CI: -.28 to .809) and excellent agreement for humeral version (ICC = .962;.913 to .983). Although only fair agreement was found between observers in head-neck angle ICC, the difference in mean angle was only 2°. Discussion. Although much time and effort has been spent understanding and managing Type B2 glenoids, little attention has been paid to investigating associated humeral contributions to the Type B shoulder. Our results indicate that the humeral retroversion in Type B shoulders is significantly lower than in normals. These findings have several implications, including, helping to understanding the etiology of the B2, the unknown effects of arbitrarily selecting higher version angles for the humeral component, and the unknown effects of altered version on glenohumeral joint stability, loading and implant survivorship post-arthroplasty. Our results also raise an important question, whether it is best to reconstruct Type B humeral component version to pathologic version or to non-pathologic population means

It is unusual to require the use of a total knee implant with more constraint than a posterior-stabilised post in primary knee arthroplasty. The most common indication is a knee with a severe deformity, usually fixed valgus with an incompetent medial collateral ligament, and an inability to correctly balance the knee in both flexion and extension. The pre-operative deformity is usually greater than 15–20 degrees fixed valgus and may be associated with a severe flexion contracture. This is usually seen in an elderly female patient with advanced osteoarthritis. Those pre-operative diagnoses more likely to require a constrained design include advanced rheumatoid arthritis, true neuropathic joint, and the “Charcot-like” joint due to bone loss or crystalline arthritis. Rarely, patients with periarticular knee Paget's disease of bone may require more constraint following correction of a severe deformity through the knee joint. Beware those patients with a staple or screw at the medial epicondyle or those with severe heterotopic ossification at the medial joint line, as this may signify a serious prior injury to the medial collateral ligament. Finally, there is a possibility of inadvertent division of the medial collateral ligament intra-operatively. Although this situation may be treated with suture repair and bracing, my choice is to switch to more constraint and early unbraced motion. There are over 20 designs of varus-valgus constrained components, with a variety of tibial post designs with specific rotary and angular biomechanics, and many have the option of adding modular stems. Our experience with constrained, non-linked designs has been favorable with both the use of nonmodular and modular stem extensions. Longer-term survival analysis has shown a 96% survival at 10 years with these constrained components. However, the older designs frequently required a lateral retinacular release for proper patella tracking, and there were patella complications (fracture and osteonecrosis) in 16%. With a more modern design, over the past 12 years, the need for a lateral retinacular release and patella complications have been notably decreased. Varus-valgus constrained components have a small but important role in primary total knee arthroplasty for patients with severe deformity or an incompetent medial collateral ligament

Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in total knee arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP axis (Whiteside's Line) or epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2- to 3-degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments. The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, posterolateral corner/arcuate complex, posterior capsule, LCL, and popliteus tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general, pie crust release of the IT band is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the posterolateral corner / arcuate and posterior capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle, if necessary. Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant

Both gap balancing and measured resection for TKA will work and these techniques are often combined in TKA. The only difference is really the workflow. The essential difference in gap balancing is that you determine femoral component rotation by cutting the distal femur and the proximal tibia, and then using a spacer to determine femoral rotation. I prefer measured resection because I am, for most cases, a cruciate retaining surgeon. It is not ideal to determine femoral rotation based upon a gap balancing if you retain the cruciate. It is also important to maintain the joint line, especially in cruciate retention, in order to reproduce more normal kinematics and balance the knee throughout the range of flexion and extension. It is my opinion that the soft tissue balancing is easier to do with measured resection and the workflow is easier. The sequence of cuts and soft tissue balance is different if one is a gap balancing surgeon. This is more conducive for people who are cruciate substituters, but more difficult in a varus cruciate retaining knee. In that situation, if you determine femoral rotation by gap balancing with the tibia before you have cleared the posterior medial osteophytes in the varus knee, and remove the last bit of meniscus, you could artificially over rotate the femoral component causing posteromedial laxity. The major difference is that cutting the posterior cruciate will open the flexion space and allow the surgeon easier access to the posteromedial corner of the knee before the posterior femoral cut is made. It is also important to remember that in most cases cruciate substitution surgeons will make the flexion space 2 mm smaller than the extension space to compensate for the flexion space opening when the posterior cruciate is cut. The extensor mechanism plays an important role in flexion balance and should only be tested once the patella is prepared and the patella is back in the trochlear groove. I prefer gap balancing in most revision knees as I am virtually always substituting for the posterior cruciate in that case. My technique for measured resection is to assess the character of the knee prior to surgery. Is it varus? Is it valgus? Does it hyperextend? Does it have a flexion contracture? Would the knee be considered tight or loose? I cut the distal femur first, based upon measured resection. I use anatomic landmarks to determine femoral rotation. My most consistent landmark is the transtrochlear line, which is not always from the top of the notch to the bottom of the trochlea. I will use the medial epicondyle and the posterior reference in a varus knee, but not in a valgus knee. The tibial cut, also by measured resection, is easier once the femur has been prepared. The patellar cut is also a measured resection. Having done a preliminary soft tissue balance based upon the deformity, I will then use trial components to finish the soft tissue balance. In summary, both techniques can be used successfully in a cruciate substituting knee, but measured resection, in my opinion, is preferable especially in varus arthritis when the posterior cruciate is retained

Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in total knee arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP Axis (Whiteside's Line) or Epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2- to 3-degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments. The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, Posterolateral Corner/Arcuate Complex, Posterior Capsule, LCL, and Popliteus Tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general Pie Crust release of the ITB is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the Posterolateral Corner/Arcuate Complex and Posterior Capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle, if necessary. Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant

A prospective study was done to assess the outcome of MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability using quadriceps graft. MPFL reconstruction was done using superficial strip of quadriceps by an anteromedial incision and attached close to medial epicondyle of femur. There were 15 knees in thirteen patients with a mean age of 23.4 years. All patients had MPFL reconstruction and 5 had tibial tuberosity transfers. With a mean follow-up of 39.4 (12–57) months, the mean pre-op Kujala scores improved from 47.8 to 87.2. The mean Lysholm scores improved from 54.2 to 86.8. None of the patients had patella re-dislocations. MPFL reconstruction with quadriceps graft appears to be effective producing good results in patients with patellar instability

Restoration of the joint line of the knee during primary and revision total knee arthroplasty is one of many critical steps that directly influence patient outcomes. Fifty MRI scans of normal atraumatic knees were analyzed to determine a quantitative relationship between the joint line of the knee and the bony landmarks of the knee joint: femoral epicondyles, metaphyseal flare of the femur, tibial tubercle, and proximal tibio-femoral joint. We describe the relationship of these six anatomic landmarks about the knee in a gender and size independent manner. This description supports a simple three-step algorithm allowing orthopaedic surgeons to calculate, instead of estimate, the location of the joint line of the knee

Background. Humeral version is the twist angle of the humeral head relative to the distal humerus. Pre-operatively, it is most commonly measured referencing the transepicondylar axis, although various techniques are described in literature (Matsumura et al. 2014, Edelson 1999, Boileau et al., 2008). Accurate estimation of the version angle is important for humeral head osteotomy in preparation for shoulder arthroplasty, as deviations from native version can result in prosthesis malalignment. Most humeral head osteotomy guides instruct the surgeon to reference the ulnar axis with the elbow flexed at 90°. Average version values have been reported at 17.6° relative to the transepicondylar axis and 28.8° relative to the ulnar axis (Hernigou, Duparc, and Hernigou 2014), although it is highly variable and has been reported to range from 10° to 55° (Pearl and Volk 1999). These studies used 2D CT images; however, 2D has been shown to be unreliable for many glenohumeral measurements (Terrier 2015, Jacxsens 2015, Budge 2011). Three-dimensional (3D) modeling is now widely available and may improve the accuracy of version measurements. This study evaluated the effects of sex and measurement system on 3D version measurements made using the transepicondylar and ulnar axis methods, and additionally a flexion-extension axis commonly used in biomechanics. Methods. Computed tomography (CT) scans of 51 cadaveric shoulders (26 male, 25 female; 32 left) were converted to 3D models using medical imaging software. The ulna was reduced to 90° flexion to replicate the arm position during intra-operative version measurement. Geometry was extracted to determine landmarks and co-ordinate systems for the humeral long axis, epicondylar axis, flexion-extension axis (centered through the capitellum and trochlear groove), and ulnar long axis. An anatomic humeral head cut plane was placed at the head-neck junction of all shoulders by a fellowship trained shoulder surgeon. Retroversion was measured with custom Matlab code that analysed the humeral head cut plane relative to a reference system based on the long axis of the humerus and each elbow axis. Effects of measurement systems were analyzed using separate 1-way RM ANOVAs for males and females. Sex differences were analyzed using unpaired t-tests for each measurement system. Results. Changing the measurement reference significantly affected version (p<0.001). The ulnar axis method consistently resulted in higher measured version than either flexion-extension axis (males 9±1°, females 14±1°, p<0.001) or epicondylar axis (males 8±1°, females 12±1°, p<0.001). See Figure 1. Version in males (38±11°) was 7° greater than females (31±12°) when referencing the flexion-extension axis (p=0.048). Conclusion. Different measurement systems produce different values of version. This is important for humeral osteotomies; if version is assessed using the epicondyles pre-operatively and subsequently by the ulna intra-operatively, then the osteotomy will be approximately 10° over-retroverted. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).