Of 586 employed patients with a whiplash injury 40 (7%) did not return to work. The risk was increased by three times in heavy manual workers, two and a half times in patients with prior psychological symptoms and doubled for each increase of grade of disability. The length of time off work doubled in patients with a psychological history and trebled for each increase in grade of disability. The self-employed were half as likely to take time off work, but recovered significantly more slowly than employees.

Aims. Only a few studies have investigated the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with an idiopathic scoliosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the overall HRQoL and employment status of patients with an idiopathic scoliosis 40 years after diagnosis, to compare it with that of the normal population, and to identify possible predictors for a better long-term HRQoL. Methods. We reviewed the full medical records and radiological reports of patients referred to our hospital with a scoliosis of childhood between April 1972 and April 1982. Of 129 eligible patients with a juvenile or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 91 took part in the study (71%). They were evaluated with full-spine radiographs and HRQoL questionnaires and compared with normative data. We compared the HRQoL between observation (n = 27), bracing (n = 46), and surgical treatment (n = 18), and between thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves. Results. The mean time to follow-up was 40.8 years (SD 2.6) and the mean age of patients was 54.0 years (SD 2.7). Of the 91 patients, 86 were female (95%) and 51 had a main thoracic curve (53%). We found a significantly lower HRQoL measured on all the Scoliosis Research Society 22r instrument (SRS-22r) subdomains (p < 0.001) with the exception of mental health, than in an age-matched normal population. Incapacity to work was more prevalent in scoliosis patients (21%) than in the normal population (11%). The median SRS-22r subscore was 4.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 3.3 to 4.4) for TL/L curves and 4.1 (IQR 3.8 to 4.4) for thoracic curves (p = 0.300). We found a significantly lower self-image score for braced (median 3.6 (IQR 3.0 to 4.0)) and surgically treated patients (median 3.6 (IQR 3.2 to 4.3)) than for those treated by observation (median 4.0 (IQR 4.1 to 4.8); p = 0.010), but no statistically significant differences were found for the remaining subdomains. Conclusion. In this long-term follow-up study, we found a significantly decreased HRQoL and capacity to work in patients with an idiopathic scoliosis 40 years after diagnosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):166–171

Purposes and Background. Musculoskeletal disorders including as back and neck pain are leading causes of work disability. Effective interventions exist (i.e. functional restoration, multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation, workplace-based interventions, etc.), but it is difficult to select the optimal intervention for specific patients. The Work Assessment Triage Tool (WATT) is a clinical decision support tool developed using machine learning to help select interventions. The WATT algorithm categorizes patients based on individual, occupational, and clinical characteristics according to likelihood of successful return-to-work following rehabilitation. Internal validation showed acceptable classification accuracy, but WATT has not been tested beyond the original development sample. Our purpose was to externally validate the WATT. Methods and Results. A population-based cohort design was used, with administrative and clinical data extracted from a Canadian provincial compensation database. Data were available on workers being considered for rehabilitation between January 2013 and December 2016. Data was obtained on patient characteristics (ie. age, sex, education level), clinical factors (ie. diagnosis, part of body affected, pain and disability ratings), occupational factors (ie. occupation, employment status, modified work availability), type of rehabilitation program undertaken, and return-to-work outcomes (receipt of wage replacement benefits 30 days after assessment). Analysis included classification accuracy statistics of WATT recommendations for selecting interventions that lead to successful RTW outcomes. The sample included 5296 workers of which 33% had spinal conditions. Sensitivity of the WATT was 0.35 while specificity was 0.83. Overall accuracy was 73%. Conclusion. Accuracy of the WATT for selecting successful rehabilitation programs was modest. Algorithm revision and further validation is needed. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Funding was provided by the Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta

The purpose was to investigate back pain and disability and their relationship to vertebral changes in patients with untreated Scheuermann's. Overall, 136 patients who had attended the outpatient clinics between 1950 and 1990 for Scheuermann's were contacted, 49 of them (12 females, 37 males) responded. There was no difference in the baseline data between responders and non-responders. From radiographs, th-kyphosis, l-lordosis, and scoliosis were measured. The number of affected vertebrae and the degree of wedging were registered. Anthropometric data, occurrence of back pain, disability scores, and employment status were compared to a representative sample (n=3835) of the normal population. After mean follow-up of 37 (6.5;25.9-53.7) y, their average age was 58.8 (8.2;44.4.-79.3) y. Male patients were significantly taller than the control subjects. Female patients were on average 6 kg heavier (P=0.016) and their mean BMI was higher (23.9 kg/m. 2. vs 20.8 kg/m. 2. ,P=0.001) at age 20 than in the controls. Females had a greater mean kyphosis than males (51.7 vs. 43.2°, p=0.11). There was no correlation between the degree of thoracic kyphosis and disability. Scheuermann's patients had an increased risk for constant back pain (P=0.003), a 2.6-fold risk for disability because of back pain during the past 5 years (P=0.002), a 3.7-fold risk for back pain during the past 30 days (P<0.001), and a 2.3-fold risk for sciatic pain (P=0.005). They reported a poorer quality of life (p<0.001) and general health (p<0.001). There was no difference in working ability and employment status between patients and controls

Aims

People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial).

Purpose and Background:. To identify treatment effect modifiers within the STarT Back Trial which demonstrated prognostic stratified care was effective in comparison to standard care for patients with low back pain. Methods:. Secondary analysis of the STarT Back Trial using 688 patients with available 4-month follow-up data. Disability (baseline and 4 months) was assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) using continuous and dichotomized (>7) outcome scores. Potential treatment effect modifiers were evaluated with group x predictor interaction terms using linear and logistic regression models. Modifiers included: age, gender, education, socio-economic status (SES), employment status, work satisfaction, episode duration, general health (SF-12), number of pain medications, and treatment expectations. Results:. No significant treatment effect modifiers were identified using linear regression, however logistic regression analysis identified SES as a treatment modifier (interaction: OR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 0.98). Comparing those receiving stratified care versus best current care, the proportion of patients with poor 4 month outcome was similar for lower SES patients (35.4% vs. 37.2%), yet different for high SES patients (19.3% vs. 38.9%). No other treatment effect modifiers were identified; however exploratory analyses indicated trends for worse outcomes with increased age, patients taking ≥3 medications, those with lower education, and those with poor treatment expectations as potential treatment effect modifiers. Conclusion:. SES was identified as a treatment effect modifier in the STarT Back Trial with patients with lower SES not benefiting from stratified care. The explanations for this finding need further exploration

Background and purpose. To identify methods used to measure free living sedentary behaviour in people with back pain and review the validity and reliability of identified measures. Methods. Databases including CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, AMED, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus and the Sedentary Behaviour and Research Network website (. www.sedentarybehaviour.org. ) were searched for relevant published articles up to June 2014. Studies which measured sedentary behaviour in people with back pain were included. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Checklist was used to assess psychometric properties. Results. Six papers were identified; two of high methodological quality. The most common method of data collection was self-report, using activity diaries or questionnaires. Sedentary behaviour measured by accelerometry ranged from 6.7 to 10.7 hours per day whereas results from self-report measures ranged from 5 to 9.4 hours per day. According to the COSMIN checklist, the psychometric properties of the measurement instruments were rated fair to excellent. Conclusion. People with back pain spend a large proportion of their waking day participating in sedentary behaviour. Therefore valid and reliable sedentary behaviour measurements, such as those identified in this study, are essential for assessing the effectiveness of public health interventions and for future population monitoring. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Department for Employment and Learning

Purpose and background. To explore the cost-utility of implementing stratified care for low back pain (LBP) in general practice, compared with usual care, within patient risk subgroups (low, medium and high risk of persistent disabling pain determined by the STarT Back tool). Methods. Adopting a cost-utility framework alongside a prospective, sequential comparison of separate patient cohorts (922 patients in total) with six-month follow-up, the base case analysis estimated the incremental LBP-related healthcare cost per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) by risk subgroup. Uncertainty was explored with cost-utility planes and acceptability curves. Sensitivity analyses examined alternative approaches (a complete case analysis, the incorporation of non-LBP-related healthcare use and estimation of societal costs relating to work absence). Results. Stratified care was a dominant treatment strategy compared with usual care for patients at high risk, with mean healthcare cost savings of £124 and an incremental QALY estimate of 0.023. The likelihood that stratified care provides a cost-effective use of resources for patients at low and medium risk is no greater than 60% irrespective of a decision makers' willingness-to-pay for additional QALYs. Patients at medium and high risk of persistent disability in paid employment at six-month follow-up reported, on average, six fewer days of LBP-related work absence in the stratified care cohort compared with usual care (associated societal cost savings per employed patient of £736 and £652, respectively). Conclusions. At the observed level of adherence to screening tool recommendations for matched treatments, stratified care for LBP is cost-effective for patients at high risk of persistent disabling LBP. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: The Health Foundation

Background. 60% of back pain patients report pain radiation in the leg(s), which is associated with worse symptoms and poorer recovery. The majority are treated in primary care, but detailed information about them is scarce. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of patients with back and leg pain-seeking treatment in primary care. Methods. Adult patients consulting their GP with back and leg pain were invited to the study. Participants completed questionnaires including sociodemographic, physical and psychosocial measures. They also underwent standardised clinical assessments by physiotherapists, and received an MRI scan. Results. 609 patients participated with 67.5% reporting pain below the knee. 62.6% were female, sample mean (SD) age 50.2 (13.9). 367 (60.7%) were in paid employment with 39.7% reporting time off work. Mean disability (RMDQ) was 12.7 (5.7) and mean pain intensity was 5.6 (2.2) and 5.2 (2.4) for back and leg respectively. Mean sciatica bothersomeness index (SBI) score was 14.9 (5.1). 74.2% (452/609) were clinically diagnosed as having sciatica. Patients in the sciatica group reported significantly higher levels of leg pain and SBI scores, leg pain worse than back pain and pain below the knee. Neuropathic pain was more prevalent in patients with referred leg pain. Conclusion. This primary care cohort reported high levels of disability and pain. Three quarters were diagnosed with sciatica. Follow-up of this cohort will investigate the prognostic value of their baseline characteristics. This abstract summarises independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (Grant Reference Number RP-PG-0707-10131). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. K. Konstantinou is supported by a HEFCE/NIHR Senior Clinical Lectureship. KM Dunn is supported by the Wellcome Trust (083572)

Aims

To provide normative data that can assess spinal-related disability and the prevalence of back or leg pain among adults with no spinal conditions in the UK using validated questionnaires.

To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented. Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline. Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term

Purpose. To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Methods. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented. Results. Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term. Ethics - none, Interest –none

To examine the relationship between obesity (BMI> 30) and the incidence of peri-operative complications, outcome of surgery and return to work in patients undergoing elective less invasive posterior lumbar inter-body fusion of the lumbar spine for low back pain and leg pain (“LI-PLIF”). 15 patients with BMI> 30 who underwent (“LI-PLIF”) were identified by reviewing the clinical notes and the pre-operative admission sheet from April 2005- to March 2007. All had suffered chronic low back pain for a minimum of 2 years that had proven unresponsive to conservative treatment. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative evaluations for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), short-form 36 (SF-36), and visual analogue scores (VAS). Minimum follow-up was for 12 months. Blood loss was dependent on BMI, number of levels, and surgical time. Post operative complication was more in the morbidly obese group than the in the obese. 10 patients (66.6%) returned to their normal pre-operative employment within the 12 months of the index procedure. There was a significant improvement in the ODI and in the VAS for back pain. Length of hospital stay was a mean of 3.3 days. Although surgery is technically more demanding our experience with less invasive posterior inter-body fusion has shown less incidence of post operative complication, less intra-operative blood loss and short in-patient hospital stay. We conclude that a high BMI should not be a contraindication to surgery in patients with degenerative low back pain. Ethics approval: None: Audit Interest Statement None

Introduction. This study aims to evaluate the impact of associated psychological co-morbidities (Depression/Anxiety), smoking history, gender, work benefits and employment status on the clinical outcome following anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR). Materials and Methods. We included in our study 100 patients who underwent ACDR in our Spinal Unit (between May 2006 – May 2010). We used as clinical outcome measures: Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Bodily Pain (SF36-BP) component of the Short Form 36 questionnaire. Statistics were obtained using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Independent sample t-test for normally distributed data and Man-Whitney U test for non-parametric data were used. Statistical significance was designated at p < 0.05. Results. There were 48 males and 52 females. Average age at operation was 52.96 years (Range 38-80) for males and 49.79 years (Range 31-71) for females. Average duration of follow up was 14.4 months (Range 6-35). Out of 100 patients, 28 patients had a history of anxiety/depression, 19 patients were smokers, 47 were actively working and 23 were receiving work benefits. We found that gender, smoking status, associated co-morbidities, working and benefit status had no statistically significant contribution to clinical outcome measures in the follow up period. For example, in the sub-group of non-smokers versus smokers, there was no significant difference in NDI (p=0.78), VAS-AP (p=0.12), SF-BP (p= 0.83) and VAS-NP (p=0.08). Conclusion. We conclude that in our study there was no statistically significant contribution of the associated psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes following ACDR

Between 1986 and 1995, we treated with foraminal injection of local anaesthetic and steroids 30 patients with severe lumbar radiculopathy secondary to foraminal and extraforaminal disc herniation which had not resolved with rest and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. They were assessed prospectively using standardised forms as well as the Low Back Outcome Score, and were reviewed at an average of 3.4 years (1 to 10) after injection by an independent observer (BKW). Relief of symptoms was obtained in 27 immediately after injection. Three subsequently relapsed, requiring operation, and two were lost to long-term follow-up. Thus 22 of the 28 patients available for long-term follow-up had considerable and sustained relief from their symptoms. Before the onset of symptoms 17 were in employment and, after injection, 13 resumed work, all but two in the same job. The average score before injection was 25 out of a possible 75 points. At follow-up, the overall average score was 54, and in those who had obtained relief of symptoms it had improved to a mean of 61. Based on these findings we recommend foraminal injection of local anaesthetic and steroids as the primary treatment for patients with severe radiculopathy secondary to foraminal or extraforaminal herniation of a lumbar disc

Aims

Chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF).

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of repeat epidural steroid injections as a form of treatment for patients with insufficiently controlled or recurrent radicular pain due to a lumbar or cervical disc herniation.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical predictors of surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). We reviewed a consecutive series of 248 patients (71 women and 177 men) with CSM who had undergone surgery at our institution between January 2000 and October 2010. Their mean age was 59.0 years (16 to 86). Medical records, office notes, and operative reports were reviewed for data collection. Special attention was focused on pre-operative duration and severity as well as post-operative persistence of myelopathic symptoms. Disease severity was graded according to the Nurick classification.

Our multivariate logistic regression model indicated that Nurick grade 2 CSM patients have the highest chance of complete symptom resolution (p < 0.001) and improvement to normal gait (p = 0.004) following surgery. Patients who did not improve after surgery had longer duration of myelopathic symptoms than those who did improve post-operatively (17.85 months (1 to 101) vs 11.21 months (1 to 69); p = 0.002). More advanced Nurick grades were not associated with a longer duration of symptoms (p = 0.906).

Our data suggest that patients with Nurick grade 2 CSM are most likely to improve from surgery. The duration of myelopathic symptoms does not have an association with disease severity but is an independent prognostic indicator of surgical outcome.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:966–71.

We compared a group of 46 somatised patients with a control group of 41 non-somatised patients who had undergone elective surgery to the lumbar spine in an attempt to identify pre-operative factors which could predict the outcome. In a prospective single-centre study, the Distress and Risk Assessment method consisting of a modified somatic perception questionnaire and modified Zung depression index was used pre-operatively to identify somatised patients. The type and number of consultations were correlated with functional indicators of outcome, such as the Oswestry disability index and a visual analogue score for pain in the leg after follow-up for six and 12 months.

Similar improvements in the Oswestry disability index were found in the somatised and non-somatised groups. Somatised patients who had a good outcome on the Oswestry disability index had an increased number of orthopaedic consultations (50 of 83 patients (60%) vs 29 of 73 patients (39.7%); p = 0.16) and waited less time for their surgery (5.5 months) (sd 5.26) vs 10.1 months (sd 6.29); p = 0.026). No other identifiable factors were found. A shorter wait for surgery appeared to predict a good outcome. Early review by a spinal surgeon and a reduced waiting time to surgery appear to be of particular benefit to somatised patients.