The rate of surgical site infection after elective foot and ankle surgery is higher than that after other elective orthopaedic procedures. Since December 2005, we have prospectively collected data on the rate of post-operative infection for 1737 patients who have undergone elective foot and ankle surgery. In March 2008, additional infection control policies, focused on surgical and environmental risk factors, were introduced in our department. We saw a 50% reduction in the rate of surgical site infection after the introduction of these measures. We are, however, aware that the observed decrease may not be entirely attributable to these measures alone given the number of factors that predispose to post-operative wound infection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:516–19

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown in elective foot and ankle surgery. In March 2010 we surveyed the current practice in VTE prophylaxis in elective foot and ankle surgery amongst members of the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS). The response rate was 53%. The total the number of elective foot and ankle operations performed by the surveyed group was 33,500 per annum. The perceived incidence of DVT, PE and fatal PE was 0.6%, 0.1% and 0.02%. In our study the number of patients needed to treat to prevent a single fatal PE is 10,000 although this figure is open to significant bias. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recently published guidelines on reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients. These guidelines cover all surgical inpatients and uses data extrapolated from other groups of patients. We question the applicability of these guidelines to patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. We consider that this data justifies the prospective study of the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery, without the use of chemical thromboprophylaxis

The incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is thought to be low following foot and ankle surgery, but the routine use of chemoprophylaxis remains controversial. This retrospective study assessed the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications following a consecutive series of 2654 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. A total of 1078 patients received 75 mg aspirin as routine thromboprophylaxis between 2003 and 2006 and 1576 patients received no form of chemical thromboprophylaxis between 2007 and 2010. The overall incidence of VTE was 0.42% (DVT, 0.27%; PE, 0.15%) with 27 patients lost to follow-up. If these were included to create a worst case scenario, the overall VTE rate was 1.43%. There was no apparent protective effect against VTE by using aspirin. We conclude that the incidence of VTE following foot and ankle surgery is very low and routine use of chemoprophylaxis does not appear necessary for patients who are not in the high risk group for VTE

Thromboembolic disease is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. There is increasing pressure for elective orthopaedic patients, including those undergoing foot and ankle surgery, to be prescribed chemical thromboprophylaxis post-operatively in order to reduce the risk of a thromboembolic event. The risks of chemical thromboprophylaxis in terms of increased bleeding, wound problems and HIT are well documented. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery with and without the use of aspirin. We audited a consecutive series of 1625 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery between 2003 and 2010. Between 2003 and 2006 inclusive, aspirin was used post operatively as chemical thromboprohylaxsis. Between 2007 and 2010, no chemical thromboprohylaxsis was used. The follow-up period for all patients was at least three months post-operatively. Most patients were reviewed at 3 months by the senior surgeon. Those who were reviewed less than 3 months (patients undergoing minor procedures) were contacted via telephone to confirm whether a thromboembolic event had been diagnosed. There was no loss to follow up. Of the 1625 patients, 555 patients received aspirin and 1070 patients received no chemical thromboprohylaxsis. 5 of 1625 (0.31%) patients developed a clinically significant thromboembolic event. 3 patients developed a DVT at an average time of 5 weeks post operatively. 2 patients developed non-fatal PE at an average time of 7 weeks post operatively. 3 of the 5 thromboembolic events occurred in the aspirin group (all DVT's) whereas 2 of the 5 (all PE) developed in the non aspirin group. The incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events is low in elective orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. We suggest that the benefit of chemical thromboprophylaxis does not outweigh its potential risks in foot and ankle surgery

Introduction:. The National institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for thromboprophylaxis following lower limb surgery and plastercast immobilisation recommend pharmacological prophylaxis be considered until the cast is removed. These guidelines have been extrapolated from data for hip and knee arthroplasty, and trauma studies. Recent studies have questioned the validity of these guidelines. At Portsmouth, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is prescribed for 14 days following surgery in high risk patients. The protocol predates the most recent NICE guidance. We set out to investigate whether this was a safe method of thromboprophylaxis following elective hindfoot surgery. Methods:. A retrospective audit of all patients undergoing hindfoot surgery between 01/01/10 and 31/12/12 was performed. All patients were immobilised in a POP backslab and prescribed 14 days of LMWH. All patients were reviewed at 2 weeks and converted to a full cast or boot. Immobilisation was continued for between 6 and 12 weeks. A list of all patients who had undergone investigation for deep vein thrombosis at Queen Alexandra hospital from 01/01/10 to 28/03/13 was obtained from the VTE investigation department. The two lists were cross referenced to identify any DVTs occurring following hindfoot surgery and plastercast immobilisation. Results:. During the 3 years, 197 major hindfoot operations were performed in 194 patients. Mean age was 53 years (range18-82) and 94 males with 100 females. Two patients had confirmed deep vein thromboses; 1 patient at 13 days post op while receiving LMWH prophylaxis. Conclusion:. Symptomatic VTE following elective hindfoot surgery and post operative plaster cast immobilisation in our hospital is rare. There are no randomised controlled trials to guide thromboprophylaxis regimes following hindfoot surgery. Based on our results, our protocol appears to be effective and safe

Introduction:. PREMS and PROMS are part of the national initiative of the DoH. They measure quality from patient perspective and also help patient choice. We present our pioneering experience of PROMS 2.0 which is a semi automated web based system to collect and analyse outcome data in real time. Materials and methods:. Data was prospectively collected from January 2013 to June 2014. Outcome measures included EQ-5D VAS, EQ-5D Health Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Patient Personal Experience (PPE-15) was collected postoperatively. A semi-automated e mail based system – Amplitude – was used. Results:. 345 patients consented to participate.147 patients (42.6%) and 168 pathways (47%) signed up for PROMs 2.0 programme. 40 (27%) did not complete either pre-op or post op questionnaire after signing up. 30 patients (20.4%) completed pre-op and at least one post op score. 99 patients (58.9%) completed PPE questionnaire. 83% of respondents had improved or unchanged EQ-5D VAS score, and EQ-5D Health Index. MOxFQ scores showed improvement in over 80% of responses. 88% responded favourably (YES) to PPE 15 questionnaire. Conclusion:. Our data shows an improvement in PROMS and a favourable PREMS in excess of 80% of our elective foot & ankle patients following surgery. Patient response was higher for PPE questionnaire compared to other PROMs outcomes. Methods to increase patient enrolment and to encourage higher participation are required. We feel patient education and simplification of PROMS 2.0 are the key

Introduction:. Patient reported outcome measures are becoming more popular in their use. Retrospective scoring is not yet a validated method of data collection but one that could greatly decrease the complexity of research projects. We aim to compare preoperative and retrospective scores in order to assess their correlation and accuracy. Methods:. 36 patients underwent elective foot and ankle surgery. All patients were scored preoperatively using the SF-12 and FFI. Patients then recorded both PROMs retrospectively at the three month follow up (av. 139 days). Results were then analyzed for statistical significance. Results:. 36 patients (av. age 54.6 years) completed both sets of questionnaires. There were 15 hindfoot and 21 forefoot procedures. Two patients (5.6%) recalled their identical preoperative SF12 score. No retrospective FFI scores were identical. The mean percentage difference between the two preoperative scores was; −0.9% (−5.8 to 4.0%, 95% CI) for SF12 and 40.7% (25.3 to 56.1%, 95% CI) for FFI. This retrospective accuracy was statistically significant (p< 0.001). When both scores were plotted against each other, the outcome measurements showed positive correlations (SF 12 p 0.31, FFI p 0.81). With both PROMs mean percentage differences combined, patients undergoing hindfoot procedures (13.5%; 5.8 to 21.3%, 95% CI) were more accurate with retrospective scoring than their forefoot counterparts (26.8%; 10.4 to 43.1%, 95% CI). This was not statistically significant. Conclusion:. Retrospective scoring appears to lack accuracy when compared to prospective methods. However, our data shows the SF12 is recalled more accurately than the FFI (p< 0.001) and to an average discrepancy of < 1% when compared to the original preoperative result. These results show patients tend to recall their symptoms at a worse level preoperatively than originally described, especially those with forefoot problems

Introduction. VTE is a possible complication of foot and ankle surgery, however there is an absence of agreement on contributing risk factors in the development of VTE. The primary outcome of this study was to analyse the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE following foot and ankle surgery and to determine which factors may increase the risk of VTE. Methods. This was a national, multi-centre prospective audit spanning a collection duration of 9 months (2022/2023). Primary outcomes included incidence of symptomatic VTE and VTE related mortality up to 90 days following foot and ankle surgery and Achilles tendon rupture, and analysis of risk factors. Results. In total 11,363 patients were available for analysis. 5,090 patients (44.79%) were elective procedures, 4,791 patients (42.16%) were trauma procedures (excluding Achilles ruptures), 398 patients (3.50%) were acute diabetic procedures, 277 patients (2.44%) were Achilles ruptures undergoing surgery and 807 patients (7.10%) were Achilles ruptures treated non-operatively. There were 99 cases of VTE within 90 days of admission across the whole group (Total incidence = 0.87%), with 3 cases of VTE related mortality (0.03%). On univariate analysis, increased age and ASA grade showedhigher odds of 90-day VTE, as did previous cancer, stroke, history of VTE, and type of foot and ankle procedure / injury (p<0.05). However, on multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors for 90-day VTE were found to be the type of foot and ankle procedure (Achilles tendon rupture = Odd's Ratio 11.62, operative to 14.41, non-operative) and ASA grade (grade III/IV = Odd's Ratio 3.64). Conclusion. The incidence of 90-day post procedure VTE in foot and ankle surgery in this national audit was low. Significant, independent risk factors associated with the development of 90-day symptomatic VTE were Achilles tendon rupture management and high ASA grade

Aims. Diabetic foot care is a significant burden on the NHS in England. We have conducted a nationwide survey to determine the current participation of orthopaedic surgeons in diabetic foot care in England. Methods. A questionnaire was sent to all 136 NHS trusts audited in the 2018 National Diabetic Foot Audit (NDFA). The questionnaire asked about the structure of diabetic foot care services. Results. Overall, 123 trusts responded, of which 117 admitted patients with diabetic foot disease and 113 had an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon. A total of 90 trusts (77%) stated that the admission involved medicine, with 53 (45%) of these admissions being exclusively under medicine, and 37 (32%) as joint admissions. Of the joint admissions, 16 (14%) were combined with vascular and 12(10%) with orthopaedic surgery. Admission is solely under vascular surgery in 12 trusts (10%) and orthopaedic surgery in 7 (6%). Diabetic foot abscesses were drained by orthopaedic surgeons in 61 trusts (52%) and vascular surgeons in 47 (40%). Conclusion. Orthopaedic surgeons make a significant contribution to both acute and elective diabetic foot care currently in the UK. This contribution is likely to increase with the movement of vascular surgery to a hub and spoke model, and measures should be put in place to increase the team based approach to the diabetic foot, for example with the introduction of a best practice tariff. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):618–622

We report an audit of 208 patients with a mean age of 39 years (16 to 65) attending the Orthopaedic Assessment Unit at the Wellington Hospital between January 2006 and December 2007 with an injury of the tendo Achillis requiring immobilisation in a cast. Information on assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, prophylactic measures and VTE events for all patients was obtained from the medical records. A VTE risk factor was documented in the records of three (1%) patients. One of the 208 patients received aspirin prophylaxis; none received low molecular weight heparin. In all, 13 patients (6.3%, 95% confidence interval 3.4 to 10.5) developed symptomatic VTE during immobilisation in a cast, including six with a distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), four with a proximal DVT, and three with a confirmed pulmonary embolus. This incidence of symptomatic VTE is similar to that reported following elective hip replacement. We propose that consideration is given to VTE prophylaxis during prolonged immobilisation of the lower limbs in a cast, to ensure that the same level of protection is provided as for patients undergoing elective hip replacement

1737 elective foot and ankle cases were prospectively audited from Dec 2005 to end June 2010. All cases were brought back to a specialist nurse dressing clinic between 10 and 17 days post op. Data was collected at the dressing clinic with a standardised proforma on the type of surgery, the state of the wound and any additional management required. Those patients with a pre-existing infection were excluded. Of the 1737 cases 201 (11.6%) had a minor wound problems such as excessive post op bleeding into the dressings, suture problems, early removal of K wires, delayed wound healing and minor infection. 42 patients required antibiotics (2.4%) 8 patients had a deep wound infection (0.5%) requiring intravenous antibiotics and or further surgery. There were 1185 forefoot procedures 36 of which developed an infection (3%), overall infections of the mid/hindfoot was 6 (1%). Practice has changed as a result of the audit (reviewed annually). We have changed our closure techniques (reducing suture problems). For the past 2 years all of our elective foot and ankle patients now go to an ultra clean ward (Joint Replacement Unit) and we have shown a reduction in infection rates by over 50% since. Our infection rate before the JRU was 3.3% with 0.7% deep infection rate (818 procedures) and after the introduction of the JRU our infection rate has ped to 1.6% superficial and 0.3% deep infection p<.001. This large series prospective study sets a benchmark for infection rates in elective foot and ankle surgery. It also highlights the benefit of a dedicated orthopaedic elective unit with rigorous infection control policy and the need to regularly review our results

Introduction:. Surgeons want to counsel their patients accurately about the risks of rare complications. This is difficult for venous thromboembolism (VTE), as most studies report rates of asymptomatic disease, which may not be clinically relevant. Generic guidelines promote chemoprophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery despite a relative dearth of evidence. We therefore calculated the rate of confirmed, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, after surgery or trauma to the foot or ankle, in our hospital. Methods:. In a retrospective cohort design, we scrutinised referrals for venous Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography pulmonary angiography, and found all confirmed deep vein thromboses (DVTs) or pulmonary embolisms (PEs) over an 18 month period from November 2010 to May 2012. These patients were cross-referenced with our orthopaedic database. All adult trauma admissions and fracture clinic attendances were retrieved and divided according to injury. We then identified all adult elective patients using Healthcare Resource Group code data. Results:. Out of 1763 elective foot and ankle procedures, there were five DVTs (incidence 0.28%) and no PEs. Out of 1970 patients with ankle fractures, seventeen (0.86%) sustained DVTs (thirteen conservatively, four operatively managed) and five PEs (0.25%). Of 147 patients with Achilles tendon rupture, three (2%) had a DVT and two (1.36%) a PE (p<0.05). Summing together all fractures of the foot, of 1775 patients, two (0.05%) had a DVT and there were no PEs. Conclusion:. Currently this group of patients does not routinely receive anticoagulants. The relatively low incidence of symptomatic VTE is reassuring and will help to inform surgeons when considering the risks and benefits of anticoagulation. However, Achilles rupture is confirmed as a higher risk injury, which therefore is more likely to benefit from either increased vigilance or anticoagulation. Large randomised trials measuring clinically relevant VTE (rather than asymptomatic DVT) are needed

Aims

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery during the global pandemic. Secondary objectives were to determine if there was a change in infection and complication profile with changes introduced in practice.

Aims

To assess the characteristic clinical features, management, and outcome of patients who present to orthopaedic surgeons with functional dystonia affecting the foot and ankle.

Aims

A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures.

Metatarsal fractures are extremely common injuries accounting for 10% of all fractures seen in our accident and emergency departments (3). The vast majority can be treated conservatively. There is no standardised treatment, but it is commahplace to immobilise the foot and ankle joint in a below-knee back-slab, full cast or functional brace for a period of up to 6 weeks, weight-bearing the patient as pain allows. This practice is time-consuming and expensive, not to mention debilitating, and carries a morbidity risk to the patient. We describe a simple, effective and cheap treatment method for metatarsal fracture management using the functional forefoot-offloading shoe (FOS). This is clinically proven to offload pressure on the metatarsals and is commonly used in both elective forefoot surgery and in diabetic patients. Between January and September 2009, we identified 57 patients attending our fracture clinic with new metatarsal fractures. 28 met our inclusion criteria. All patients reported a significant improvement in their pain. At Injury – mean 8.21 out of 10 (range 4-10). After FOS fitting - mean 2.92 out of 10 (range 0-6). The forefoot-offloading shoe is an excellent alternative to plaster casting or functional boot immobilisation, offering high patient satisfaction, an excellent outcome and a considerable cost-saving to the hospital trust

Introduction. Patients who present with atypical foot pain in a non specific sensory distribution may benefit from having nerve conduction studies (NCS). The aim of this study was to confirm whether NCS is a useful tool. Methods. Between July 2005 and March 2011, 78 patients had NCS to investigate foot pain. The management following NCS was compared with the initial management plan. Results. Complete data was available for 60 patients, of whom 31 were male. The mean age at presentation was 54.4 years (range 18–89.7). Eighteen patients had bilateral symptoms. The predominant symptom was pain in 47 patients. Aching, burning, throbbing, shooting, pins and needles, proximal/distal radiation, numbness, and paraesthesia were also described in 23 patients. Twenty patients had a history of trauma and five developed symptoms following elective lower limb surgery. Eight patients had a cavovarus foot. There were 22 normal results. The NCS diagnosed peripheral nerve (13)/nerve root (8) pathology, Charcot-Marie-Tooth (1), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (1), tarsal tunnel syndrome (3), and nonspecific neuropathy (12). Surgery was initially considered for 9 patients. Following a normal result, 4 out of 7 had surgery. One patient with an abnormal result proceeded to surgery. The NCS was abnormal in 70.1% (36/51) of patients who were for nonoperative management, 4 of whom proceeded to have surgery. None of the patients who had a normal NCS had an operation. Conclusion. NCS provided a diagnosis for 63.3% of the patients. Following NCS, the management plan changed in 44% of patients who were initially considered for surgery (4/9) and in 7.8% of patients who were initially considered for nonoperative management (4/51). This investigation is a useful adjunct in guiding the management of patients who present with atypical non specific foot pain

Aims

The aim was to compare long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture in the context of a randomized controlled trial.

Nice guidelines recommend VTE prophylaxis to patients in below knee casts following foot and ankle surgery following risk assessment. The guidelines are controversial and BOFAS recommendations reiterate the risk factors but highlight poor evidence to support these guidelines. Implementation has been variable dependent on interpretation. 58 patients who underwent hindfoot procedures and were immobilised in a cast were identified. These patients were under the care of two consultants, one of whom anticoagulates with daily enoxaparin and one who does not, providing a de facto case-control design. The patients were followed up to identify those who subsequently suffered a DVT or PE, and the clinical circumstances. 2 cases of VTE events were noted in 58 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Both were elective cases managed postoperatively in cast and treated with prophylaxic enoxaparin. Both of these presented to hospital with signs of VTE greater than 6 weeks following surgery after cast removal and discontinuation of enoxaparin. No patients were considered high risk according to NICE guidelines. None of the patients who received no thromboprophylaxis had a clinical DVT. Within our study group we found that VTE thromboprophylaxis does not influence clinically evident VTE rates. Patients who developed VTE were not considered high risk by definition of NICE guidelines but only at increased risk due to their immobility. The VTE events were initiated while the patients were receiving thromboprophylaxis. The effectiveness of the guidelines in predicting patients who would benefit from chemoprophylaxis is questionable from this study. NICE guidelines on VTE thromboprophylaxis have been received with some concerns. Although this investigation studied only a relatively small number of patients, it raises issues about the clinical effectiveness of the guidelines in foot and ankle patients

Introduction. Greater length of stay (LOS) after elective surgery results in increased use of health care resources and higher costs. Within the realm of foot and ankle surgery, improved perioperative care has enabled a vast majority of procedures to be performed as a day surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the perioperative factors that predict a prolonged LOS after elective ankle replacement or fusion. Methods. Data was prospectively collected on patients undergoing either an ankle fusion or ankle replacement for end-stage ankle arthritis at our institution (2003–2010). In the analysis, LOS was the outcome and age, sex, physical and mental functional scores, comorbid factors, ASA grades, type and length of operation and body mass index (BMI) were potential perioperative risk factors. Univariate and multivariate generalized linear regression models with gamma distribution and log link function were conducted. Results. A total of 336 patients were included in the study. The median LOS was 76 hours with interquartile range of 52.5–97. Using regression analysis, we showed aging, female gender, a higher ASA score, multiple medical comorbidities, rheumatoid arthritis, a lower score in the physical component (PCS) and general health domain (GH) of SF-36, open surgery and an increased length of surgical time were all significantly associated with an increased LOS. Conversely, obesity, the SF-36 Mental Component Score and the date of admission were noninfluential of LOS. A predictive model was also developed using these same risk factors. Conclusions. Increased age, female gender, high ASA scores, low SF-36 GH and PCS scores, increased number of medical comorbidities, rheumatoid arthritis and open surgery were all factors that increased LOS significantly after ankle fusion or ankle replacement. This group of patients may warrant better education and more focused perioperative care when it comes to designing care pathways and allocating health care resources