Significant hip osteoarthritis has been reported in 8–28% of patients with Down Syndrome. The prolonged life expectancy of these patients has allowed many of them to become disabled by their hip arthritis with the need for hip replacement. We have been able to perform a multi-center study evaluating total hip replacement in patients with Down Syndrome. Twenty patients (25 hips) with Down Syndrome underwent primary THA at a mean age of 35 years old with a mean 105-month follow-up. Cementless acetabular fixation with screws were used in all cases and all but one femoral component was cementless. Constrained liners were used in 8 cases to enhance stability. Five hips required revision surgery: two femoral components (one for periprosthetic fracture and one for aseptic loosening), two acetabular components (one for recurrent dislocation and one for wear with metallosis), and one hip required a two-stage revision for infection. Other than the hip revised for loosening, no other hip had radiographic evidence of loosening. The mean Harris Hip score improved from 42 points pre-operatively to 83 points at final follow-up. THA is a reliable surgical intervention in patients with Down Syndrome and symptomatic coxarthrosis. These patients and their families have been tremendously satisfied with this procedure. Strategies to prevent dislocation post THA are appropriate and need continued evaluation

Significant hip osteoarthritis has been reported in 8–28% of patients with Down Syndrome. The prolonged life expectancy of these patients has allowed many of them to become disabled by their hip arthritis with the need for hip replacement. We have been able to perform a multi-center study evaluating total hip replacement in patients with Down Syndrome. Twenty patients (25 hips) with Down Syndrome underwent primary THA at a mean age of 35 years old with a mean 105 month follow-up. Cementless acetabular fixation with screws were used in all cases and all but one femoral component was cementless. Constrained liners were used in 8 cases to enhance stability. Five hips required revision surgery: two femoral components (one for periprosthetic fracture and one for aseptic loosening), two acetabular components (one for recurrent dislocation and one for wear with metallosis), and one hip required a two-stage revision for infection. Other than the hip revised for loosening, no other hip had radiographic evidence of loosening. The mean Harris Hip score improved from 42 points preoperatively to 83 points at final follow-up. THA is a reliable surgical intervention in patients with Down Syndrome and symptomatic coxarthrosis. These patients and their families have been tremendously satisfied with this procedure

Down syndrome (DS), is a genetic disorder caused by a third copy of the 21st chromosome (Trisomy 21), featuring typical facial characteristics, growth delays and varying degrees of intellectual disability. Some degree of immune deficiency is variably present. Multiple orthopaedic conditions are associated, including stunted growth (90%), ligamentous laxity (90%), low muscle tone (80%), hand and foot deformities (60%), hip instability (30%), and spinal abnormalities including atlanto-axial instability (20%) and scoliosis. Hip disease severity varies and follows a variable time course. Rarely a child presents with DDH, but during the first 2 years the hips are characteristically stable but hypermobile with well-formed acetabulae. Spontaneous subluxation or dislocation after 2 presents with painless clicking, limping or giving way. Acute dislocation is associated with moderate pain, increased limp and reduced activity following minor trauma. Hips are reducible under anesthesia, but recurrence is common. Eventually concentric reduction becomes rarer and radiographic dysplasia develops. Pathology includes: a thin, weak fibrous capsule, moderate to severe femoral neck anteversion and a posterior superior acetabular rim deficiency. A number of femoral and acetabular osteotomies have been reported to treat the dysplasia, with acetabular redirection appearing to be most successful. However, surgery can be associated with a relatively high infection rate (20%). Additionally, symptomatic femoral head avascular necrosis can occur as a result of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Untreated dysplasia patients can walk with a limp and little pain into the early twenties even with fixed dislocation. Pain and decreasing hip function is commonly seen as the patient enters adult life. Occasionally the hip instability begins after skeletal maturity. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the standard treatment when sufficient symptoms have developed. The clinical outcomes of 42 THAs in patients with Down syndrome were all successfully treated with standard components. The use of constrained liners to treat intra-operative instability occurred in eight hips and survival rates were noted between 81% and 100% at a mean follow-up of 105 months (6 – 292 months). A more recent study of 241 patients with Down syndrome and a matched 723-patient cohort from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample compared the incidence of peri-operative medical and surgical complications in those who underwent THA. Compared to matched controls, Down syndrome patients had an increased risk of complications: peri-operative (OR, 4.33; P<.001), medical (UTI & Pneumonia OR, 4.59; P<.001) and surgical (bleeding OR, 3.51; P<.001), Mean LOS was 26% longer (P<.001). While these patients can be challenging to treat, excellent surgical technique and selective use of acetabular constraint can reliably provide patients with excellent pain-relief and improved function. Pre-operative education of all clinical decision makers should also reinforce the increased risk of medical and surgical complications (wound hemorrhage), and lengths of stay compared to the general population

The best algorithm, measurements, and criteria for screening children with Down syndrome for upper cervical instability are controversial. Many authors have recommended obtaining flexion and extension views. We noted that patients who require surgical stabilization due to myelopathy or cord compression typically have grossly abnormal radiographic measurements on the neutral upright lateral cervical spine radiograph (NUL). This study was designed to determine whether a full series of cervical spine images including flexion/extension lateral radiographs (FEL) was important to avoid missing upper cervical instability. This is a retrospective evaluation of cervical spine images obtained between 2006 and 2012 for the purposes of “screening” children with Down syndrome for evidence of instability. The atlanto-dental interval, space available for cord, and basion axial interval were measured on all films. The Weisel-Rothman measurement was made in the FEL series. Clinical outcome of those with abnormal measurements were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of NUL and FEL x-rays for identifying clinically significant cervical spine instability were calculated. Two-hundred and forty cervical spine series in 213 patients with Down syndrome between the ages of four months and 25 years were reviewed. One hundred and seventy-two children had a NUL view, and 88 of these patients also had FEL views. Only one of 88 patients was found to have an abnormal ADI (≥6mm), SAC (≤14mm), or BAI (>12mm) on an FEL series that did not have an abnormal measurement on the NUL. This patient had no evidence of cord compression or myelopathy. Obtaining a single NUL x-ray is an efficient method for radiographic screening of cervical spine instability. Further evaluation may be required if abnormal measurements are identified on the NUL x-ray. We also propose new “normal” values for the common radiographic measurements used in assessing risk of cervical spine instability in patients with Down syndrome

There is an increased incidence of dislocation, dysplasia, slipped epiphysis, Perthes’ disease, and avascular necrosis leading to degenerative arthritis which occurs in up to 28% of Down's syndrome patients. As the life expectancy for patients with Down's syndrome has increased, so has the presence of hip disease. Hip replacement has been shown to have good results in this population. Special considerations include a high risk of postoperative dislocation and leg length inequality which often require large head THR or dual mobility type reconstruction to reduce these risks. Numerous spine deformities including scoliosis and C1-2 subluxation need to be taken into account-anesthesia consult

Hip osteoarthritis is prevalent in 8%–28% of patients with Down's Syndrome. Presence of disabling hip pain is increased along with prolonged life expectancy, suggesting total hip arthroplasty (THA). Seven consecutive patients (9 hips) with Down's syndrome had primary THA. Coxarthrosis was secondary to developmental hip dysplasia in 6 patients and slipped capital epiphysis in 1 patient. In 5 patients (7 hips) a previous hip surgery was performed. Average clinical and radiological follow up was 9.9 ± 6.4 years (range 2–22.5, median 9.3). Average age of patients at THA was 34.8 ± 7.5 years (range 25–47, median 35.4). In 2 patients (3 hips) a trochanteric slide was used for the surgical approach, while a lateral transgluteal approach was used in the remaining patients. One way ANOVA test was used to compare Harris Hip Scores (HHS) at post-operative follow-up. HHS improved significantly (p=0.008) improved from 4.1 ± 15.1 (range 18.5–65, median 45) to 84.3 ± 7.7 (range 70–93, median 85.8 at 4 year follow up. HHS (average 70.9 ± 6.2, range 66.5–80, median 68) remained essentially unchanged (p=0.43) at 8 year follow-up. Two patients required revision arthroplasty for stem loosening at 6 and 16 years post THA, respectively. The first patient is 7 years post revision and ambulates without aids. The second patient is 6.1 years post revision and ambulates with a walker. Six of the THAs required a constrained liner. No dislocations or deep infections were encountered. THA is reliable surgical intervention in patients with Down's Syndrome and symptomatic coxarthrosis

In primary total hip replacements there are numerous options available for providing hip stability in difficult situations (i.e. Down's syndrome, Parkinson's disease). We have considered constrained liners in some of these cases. However, in the revision situation in general and in revision for recurrent dislocation situation specifically it is important to have all options available including tripolar constrained liners in order to optimise the potential for hip stability as well as function of the arthroplasty. Even with the newer options available dislocation rates of higher than 10–15% have been reported following revision surgery at institutions where high volumes of revision surgery are performed. Because of the deficient abductors, other soft tissue laxity and the requirement for large diameter cups revision cases will always have more potential for dislocation. In these situations in the lower demand patient, constraint has provided excellent success in terms of preventing dislocation and maintaining implant construct fixation to bone at intermediate- term follow-up. Hence in these situations tripolar constrained liners remains the option we utilise. We are also confident in using this device in cases with instability or laxity where there is a secure well- positioned acetabular shell. We cement a dual mobility constrained liner in these situations using the technique described below. Present indication for tripolar constrained liners: low demand patient, large outer diameter cups, instability with well-fixed shells that are adequately positioned, abductor muscle deficiency or soft tissue laxity, multiple operations for instability. Technique of cementing liner into shell: score acetabular shell if no holes, score liner in spider web configuration, all one or two millimeters of cement mantle. Results. Constrained Dual Mobility Liner. For Dislocation: 56 Hips, 10 yr average f/u, 7% failure of device, 5% femoral loosening, 4% acetabular loosening. For Difficult Revisions:101 hips, 10 yr average f/u, 6% failure of device, 4% femoral loosening, 4% acetabular loosening. Cementing Liner into Shell: 31 hips, 3.6 yr average f/u (2–10 years), 2 of 31 failures

In primary total hip replacements there are numerous options available for providing hip stability in difficult situations (i.e. Down's syndrome, Parkinson's disease). However, in the revision situation in general and in revision for recurrent dislocation specifically, it is important to have all options available including dual mobility constrained liners in order to optimise the potential for hip stability as well as function of the arthroplasty. Even with the newer options, available dislocation rates of higher than 5% have been reported in the first two years following revision surgery at institutions where high volumes of revision surgery are performed. Because of the deficient abductors, other soft tissue laxity and the requirement for large diameter cups, revision cases will always have more potential for dislocation. In these situations in the lower demand patient and where, a complex acetabular reconstruction that requires time for ingrowth before optimal implant bone stability to occur isn't present, dual mobility with constraint has provided excellent success in terms of preventing dislocation and maintaining implant construct fixation to bone at intermediate term follow-up. Hence in these situations dual mobility with constraint remains the option we utilise. We are also confident in using this device in cases with instability or laxity where there is a secure well-positioned acetabular shell. We cement a dual mobility constrained liner in these situations using the technique described below. Present indication for dual mobility constrained liners: low demand patient, large outer diameter cups, instability with well-fixed shells that are adequately positioned, abductor muscle deficiency or soft tissue laxity, multiple operations for instability. Technique of cementing liner into shell: score acetabular shell if no holes, score liner in spider web configuration, all one or two millimeters of cement mantle. Results: Constrained Dual Mobility Liner – For Dislocation: 56 Hips, 10 year average follow-up, 7% failure of device, 5% femoral loosening, 4% acetabular loosening. For Difficult Revisions: 101 hips, 10 year average follow-up, 6% failure of device, 4% femoral loosening, 4% acetabular loosening. Cementing Liner into Shell: 31 hips, 3.6 year average follow-up (2–10 years), 2 of 31 failures

In primary total hip replacements there are numerous options available for providing hip stability in difficult situations i.e. Down's syndrome, Parkinson's disease. However, in the revision situation, in general, and in revision for recurrent dislocation situations specifically, it is important to have all options available including dual mobility constrained liners in order to optimise the potential for hip stability as well as function of the arthroplasty. Even with the newer options available dislocation rates of higher than 5% have been reported in the first two years following revision surgery at institutions where high volumes of revision surgery are performed [Della Valle, Sporer, Paprosky unpublished data]. Because of the deficient abductors, other soft tissue laxity and the requirement for large diameter cups, revision cases will always have more potential for dislocation. In these situations in the lower demand patient and where, a complex acetabular reconstruction that requires time for ingrowth before optimal implant bone stability to occur isn't present, dual mobility with constraint has provided excellent success in terms of preventing dislocation and maintaining implant construct fixation to bone at intermediate term follow-up. Hence in these situations dual mobility with constraint remains the option we utilise. We are also confident in using this device in cases with instability or laxity where there is a secure well-positioned acetabular shell. We cement a dual mobility constrained liner in these situations using the technique described below. Present indication for dual mobility constrained liners: low demand patient, abductor muscle deficiency or soft tissue laxity, large outer diameter cups, multiple operations for instability, and instability with well-fixed shells that are adequately positioned. Technique of cementing liner into shell: score acetabular shell if no holes; score liner in spider web configuration; all one or two millimeters of cement mantle. Results. Constrained Dual Mobility Liner. For Dislocation: 56 Hips 10 yr average f/u, 7% failure of device, 5% femoral loosening, 4% acetabular loosening. For Difficult Revisions: 101 hips 10 yr average f/u, 6% failure of device, 4% femoral loosening, 4% acetabular loosening. Cementing Liner into Shell: 31 hips 3.6 yr average f/u (2–10 years), 2 of 31 failures

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic drastically affected elective orthopaedic services globally as routine orthopaedic activity was largely halted to combat this global threat. Our institution (University College London Hospital, UK) previously showed that during the first peak, a large proportion of patients were hesitant to be listed for their elective lower limb procedure. The aim of this study is to assess if there is a patient perception change towards having elective surgery now that we have passed the peak of the second wave of the pandemic.

Introduction. Through the paediatric LCP Hip plating system, the highly successful technique of the locking compression plate used in adult surgery, has been incorporated in a system dedicated to paediatrics. The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of the paediatric LCP Hip plate use in children, both with and without neuromuscular disease, for fixation of proximal femoral osteotomy for a variety of indications. Materials and methods. We retrospectively reviewed the notes and radiographs of all those children who have had Paediatric LCP Hip Plate for the fixation of proximal femoral osteotomy and proximal femur fractures in our institution, between October 2007 and July 2010, for their clinical progress, mobilization status, radiological healing and any complications. Results. Forty-three Paediatric LCP hip plates were used in forty patients for the fixation of proximal femoral osteotomies (n=40) and proximal femur fractures (n=3). The osteotomies were performed for a variety of indications including Perthes disease, DDH, Cerebral Palsy, Down's syndrome, coxa vara, Leg length discrepancy and previous failed treatment of SUFE. Twenty-five children were allowed touch to full weight bearing post operatively. Two were kept non-weight bearing for 6 weeks. The remaining 13 children were treated in hip spica due to simultaneous pelvic osteotomy or multilevel surgery for cerebral palsy. All osteotomies and fractures radiologically healed within 6 months (majority [n=40] within 3 months). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.45) in the neck shaft angle between the immediately postoperative and final x-rays after completion of bone healing. There were no implant related complications. Conclusion. The Paediatric LCP Hip Plate provides a stable and reliable fixation of the proximal femoral osteotomy performed for a variety of paediatric hip conditions in children with and without neuromuscular disease

Through the paediatric LCP Hip plating system (Synthes GmBH Eimattstrasse 3 CH- 4436 Oberdorff), the highly successful technique of the locking compression plate used in adult surgery, has been incorporated in a system dedicated to pediatrics. We are presenting the outcome of the paediatric LCP hip plating system used for a variety of indications in our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the notes and radiographs of all those children who have had Paediatric LCP Plate for the fixation of proximal femoral osteotomy and proximal femur fractures in our institution, between October 2007 and July 2010, for their clinical progress, mobilization status, radiological healing and any complications. Forty-three Paediatric LCP hip plates were used in forty patients (24 males and 13 females) for the fixation of proximal femoral osteotomies (n=40) and proximal femur fractures (n=3). The osteotomies were performed for a variety of indications including Perthes disease, developmental dysplasia of hip, Cerebral Palsy, Down's syndrome, coxa vara, Leg length discrepancy and previous failed treatment of Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis. Twenty-five children were allowed touch to full weight bearing post operatively. Two were kept non-weight bearing for 6 weeks. The remaining 13 children were treated in hip spica due to simultaneous pelvic osteotomy or multilevel surgery for cerebral palsy. All osteotomies and fractures radiologically healed within 6 months (majority [n=40] within 3 months). There was no statistically significant difference (p= 0.45) in the neck shaft angle between the immediately postoperative and final x-rays after completion of bone healing. Among the children treated without hip spica, 1 child suffered a periprosthetic fracture. Of the children treated in hip spica, 2 had pressure sores, 3 had osteoporotic distal femur fractures and 2 had posterior subluxations requiring further intervention. There were no implant related complications. The Paediatric LCP Hip Plate provides a stable and reliable fixation of the proximal femoral osteotomy performed for a variety of paediatric orthopaedic conditions