Abstract. Objectives. Clavicle fractures are common, yet debate exists regarding which patients would benefit from conservative versus operative management. Traditionally shortening greater than 2cm has been accepted as an indicator for surgery. However, clavicle length varies between individuals. In a cadaveric study clavicle shortening greater than 15% was suggested to affect outcomes. There is no clinical correlation of this in the literature. In this study we investigate outcomes following middle third clavicle fractures and the effect of percentage shortening on union rates. Methods. We identified a consecutive series of adults with primary midshaft clavicle fractures presenting to our institution from April 2015-March 2017. Clinical records and radiographs were reviewed to elicit outcomes. Time to union was measured against factors including; percentage shortening, displacement, comminution and smoking. Statistical significance was calculated. Results. 127 patients were identified, of whom 90 were managed conservatively and 37 operatively. Fractures were displaced in 86 patients (68%). Mean age was 41.7 years (range 18–89). Mean time to union for displaced fractures was longer than for undisplaced at 13.4 and 8.9 weeks respectively (p=0.0948). Displaced fractures treated operatively had mean time to union of 12.8 weeks, three weeks shorter than those managed conservatively (p=0.0470). Mean time to union for fractures with >15% shortening was 16.0 weeks, nearly double the 8.7 weeks with <15% shortening (p= 0.0241). Smokers had 8 weeks longer time to union (p=0.0082). Nonunion rate was 10% in fractures managed conservatively and 0% in those treated operatively. Complications following operative management were plate removal (13.5%), frozen shoulder (8.1%) and infection (2.9%). Conclusions. Nonunion rate is higher in fractures managed conservatively. Shortening >15% leads to significantly longer union time and should therefore be used as an indicator for surgery. Displacement and smoking also lengthen time to union and should be considered in the operative decision process. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Displaced fractures of the neck of femur are routinely treated in the elderly by either cemented hemiarthoplasty, in the fit, or uncemented hemiarthroplasty, in the less fit. In Scotland the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines are followed to identify which patients should have a cemented prosthesis. This is based on cardiovascular status, and the age and fragility of the patient. An uncemeted prosthesis should be a final operation. A peri-prosthetic fracture is considered a failure of treatment as the patient then has to undergo an operation with a far greater surgical insult. We looked at all neck of femur fractures over a period of Jan 2007 to June 2010. The number of the peri-prosthetic fractures for uncemented hip hemiarthroplasties was established and a case note review carried out. There were 397 neck of femur fractures. 546 hemiarthroplasties were carried out, of which 183 were cemented, and 363 uncemented. 14 patients (4% of uncemented arthoplasties) had peri-prosthetic fractures. The case notes of these patients were analysed. There was a common link of significant cardiovascular risk, lack of falls assessment, and confusion. Cemented implants should be considered in those who have failed falls assessment, or are confused; even if the cardiovascular risk is significant. This decision should be made in conjunction with a senior anaethetist. This is being implemented in our unit and a prospective audit is being carried out over the same time period (July 2010 to Dec 2013) to assess the benefit

Displaced fractures of the neck of femur are routinely treated in the elderly by either cemented hemiarthoplasty, in the fit, or uncemented hemiarthroplasty, in the less fit. In Scotland the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines are followed to identify which patients should have a cemented prosthesis. This is based on cardiovascular status, and the age and fragility of the patient. An uncemented prosthesis should be a final operation. A peri-prosthetic fracture is considered a failure of treatment as the patient then has to undergo an operation with a far greater surgical insult. We looked at all neck of femur fractures over a period of Jan 2007 to June 2010. The number of the peri-prosthetic fractures for uncemented hip hemiarthroplasties was established, and a case note review was carried out. There was 1397 neck of femur fractures. 546 hemiarthroplasties were carried out, of which 183 were cemented, and 363 uncemented. 15 patients (4% of uncemented hemiarthoplasties) had peri-prosthetic fractures. There were no peri-prosthetic fractures in the cemented group, p = 0.004 using Fisher's exact test. The case notes of these patients were analysed. We found there was a common link of significant cardiovascular risk, lack of falls assessment (only 14% of the patients had a completed falls assessment and 21% sustained their fracture during an admission to hospital) and confusion (50% had a degree of dementia that caused significant confusion). Cemented implants should be considered in all patients, especially those who are cognitively impaired or have failed falls assessments; even if the cardiovascular risk is significant. This decision should be made in conjunction with a senior anaesthetist. This is being implemented in our unit and a prospective audit is being carried out over the same time period (July 2010 to Dec 2013) to assess the benefit

Olecranon fractures account for 20% of elbow fractures. Displaced fractures can be treated by several methods – Tension Band Wiring (TBW), Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with a plate (ORIF) or conservative measures. Studies from UK specialist centres have demonstrated infection rates of up to 15% and metal ware removal rates of up to 80%. In addition studies have shown that conservative treatment provides a good function and pain relief in the elderly and infirm. We aimed to look at all displaced olecranon fractures within our unit over a 4 year period and analyse their case notes for patient features, age stratification, treatment methods, complications and outcomes. We also aimed to compare our results to outcomes in studies published by specialist centres. All olecranon fractures admitted to our unit in calendar years 2007–2010 were identified from our trauma database. Case sheets were analysed for patient's age, co-morbidities, treatment, complications and outcome. X-rays were analysed to classify the fractures and assess outcome of treatment. 71 patients were identified, Male: Female = 33:38. Age range was 7–93, mean was 62.8 years. Treatment used – TBW 42 (59.1%), ORIF 9 (12.7%), and Conservative 20 (28.2%). In the surgical group of 51 patients there were 4 infections (7.8%). There were no incidences of nerve palsy. Metalware was removed in 15 patients (29.4%) – for TBW this was 11/42 (26.25%) and ORIF 4/9 (44.4%) – however the difference was not significant (p=0.06). The conservative group had no complications. In our study group we have demonstrated a lower infection rate and a far lower rate of metal ware removal than published studies. We have a high rate of patients treated conservatively who do well. Further work is being performed into the functional outcome of the whole group

Olecranon fractures account for 20% of elbow fractures. Displaced fractures can be treated by several methods – Tension Band Wiring (TBW), Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with a plate (ORIF) or conservative measures. Studies from UK specialist centres have demonstrated infection rates of up to 15% and metalware removal rates of up to 80%. In addition studies have shown that conservative treatment provides good function and pain relief in the elderly and infirm. To look at all displaced olecranon fractures within our unit (the busiest district general hospital in Scotland) over a 4 year period and analyse for patient features, age stratification, identify treatment methods, complications and outcomes. To compare this to outcomes in studies published by specialist centres. All olecranon fractures admitted to our unit in calendar years 2007–2010 were identified from our trauma database. Case sheets were analysed for patient's age, co-morbidities, treatment, complications & outcome. Xrays were analysed to classify the fractures and assess outcome of treatment. 71 patients were identified, Male: Female = 33:38. Age range was 7–93. Mean 62.8. Treatment used – TBW 42 (59.1%), ORIF 9 (12.7%), Conservative 20 (28.2%). In the surgical group of 51 patients there were 4 infections (7.8%). There were no incidences of nerve palsy. Metalware was removed in 15 patients (29.4%) – for TBW this was 11/42 (26.25) and ORIF 4/9 (44.4%) – however the difference was not significant (p=0.06). The conservative group had no complications. In our study group we have demonstrated a lower infection rate and a far lower rate of metalware removal than published studies.?We have a high rate of patients treated conservatively who do well. Further work is being performed into the functional outcome of the whole group