Aims. Patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with manual jig-based instruments has been reported to be as high as 30%. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has been increasingly used in an effort to improve patient outcomes, however there is a paucity of literature examining patient satisfaction after RA-TKA. This study aims to identify the incidence of patients who were not satisfied following RA-TKA and to determine factors associated with higher levels of dissatisfaction. Methods. This was a retrospective review of 674 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2016 and September 2020 with a minimum two-year follow-up. A five-point Likert satisfaction score was used to place patients into two groups: Group A were those who were very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or neutral (Likert score 1 to 3) and Group B were those who were satisfied or very satisfied (Likert score 4 to 5). Patient demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, were compared between groups. Results. Overall, 45 patients (6.7%) were in Group A and 629 (93.3%) were in Group B. Group A (vs Group B) had a higher proportion of male sex (p = 0.008), preoperative chronic opioid use (p < 0.001), preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.01), prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (p < 0.001), and preoperative symptomatic lumbar spine disease (p = 0.004). Group A was also younger (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative opioid use (p = 0.012), prior ACL reconstruction (p = 0.038), male sex (p = 0.006), and preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.001) as independent predictive factors of patient dissatisfaction. Conclusion. The use of RA-TKA demonstrated a high rate of patient satisfaction (629 of 674, 93.3%). Demographics for patients not satisfied following RA-TKA included: male sex, chronic opioid use, chronic psychotropic medication use, and prior ACL reconstruction. Patients in these groups should be identified preoperatively and educated on realistic expectations given their comorbid conditions. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(9):758–765

Aims. The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depend on many factors. The impact of implant design on patient-reported outcomes is unknown. Our goal was to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after primary TKA in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA using five different brands of posterior-stabilized implant. Patients and Methods. Using our institutional registry, we identified 4135 patients who underwent TKA using one of the five most common brands of implant. These included Biomet Vanguard (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana) in 211 patients, DePuy/Johnson & Johnson Sigma (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, Massachusetts) in 222, Exactech Optetrak Logic (Exactech, Gainesville, Florida) in 1508, Smith & Nephew Genesis II (Smith & Nephew, London, United Kingdom) in 1415, and Zimmer NexGen (Zimmer Biomet) in 779 patients. Patients were evaluated preoperatively using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12). Demographics including age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anethesiologists status, sex, and smoking status were collected. Postoperatively, two-year KOOS, LEAS, SF-12, and satisfaction scores were compared between groups. Results. Outcomes were available for 4069 patients (98%) at two years postoperatively. In multiple regression analysis, which separately compared each implant group with the aggregate of all others, there were no clinically significant differences in the change of KOOS score from baseline to two-year follow-up between any of the groups. More than 80% of patients in each group were satisfied at this time in all domains. In a multivariate regression model, patients in the NexGen group were the most likely to be satisfied (odds ratio (OR) 1.63; p = 0.006) and Optetrak Logic patients were the least likely to be satisfied (OR 0.60; p < 0.001). Conclusion. TKA provides improvement in function and satisfaction regardless of the type of implant. We could not demonstrate superiority of one design above others across these groups of implants, and any price premium for one above the other systems may not be justified. Healthcare administrators may find these similarities in outcomes helpful when negotiating purchasing contracts. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):48–54

Background. Advanced technologies, like robotics, provide enhanced precision for implanting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components; however, optimal component position and limb alignment remain unknown. This study purpose was to identify the ideal target sagittal component position and coronal limb alignment that produce optimal clinical outcomes. Methods. A retrospective review of 1,091 consecutive TKAs was performed. All TKAs were PCL retaining or sacrificing with anterior lipped (49.4%) or conforming bearings (50.6%) performed with modern perioperative protocols. Posterior tibial slope, femoral flexion, and tibiofemoral limb alignment were measured with a standardized protocols. Patients were grouped by the ‘how often does your knee feel normal?’ outcome score at latest follow-up. Machine learning algorithms were used to identify optimal alignment zones which predicted improved outcomes scores. Results. Mean age and BMI were 66 years and 34 kg/m. 2. with 67% female. Demographics and relevant covariates did not affect outcomes (p≥0.145) except for BMI (p=0.077) but the difference was not clinically significant. For sagittal alignment, approximating native tibial slope within 0 to +2° with some amount of femoral flexion within 0 to +3° (possibly up to +9°) was predictive of knees always feeling normal. For knees in preoperative varus or neutral, knees were more likely to always feel normal when postoperative tibiofemoral alignment was in varus (>−1°). Knees aligned in valgus preoperatively were more likely to always feel normal in valgus (<−7°) or varus (>−4°) postoperatively. Conclusion. Superior patient-reported outcomes correlated with approximating native tibial slope and incorporating some femoral flexion while maintaining similar preoperative coronal limb alignment. Excessive deviation from native tibial slope, excessive femoral flexion or any femoral component extension, or coronal alignment overcorrection beyond the preoperative limb alignment correlated with worse outcomes

Introduction. Previous studies have demonstrated that higher volume hospitals have better outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), in current literature there are no reports investigating the effect of surgeon volume. The purpose of this study is to investigate if patients of high-volume revision surgeons have better outcomes following rTKA as compared to patients of low volume surgeons. Methods. This retrospective observational analysis examined the rTKA database at a large urban academic medical center for aseptic, unilateral rTKA between January 2016 and March 2019 with at least 1-year of follow-up. Surgeon operative volume during the same time period was evaluated. Surgeons who performed at least 18 aseptic rTKA per year were considered high volume (HV), whereas surgeons who performed fewer than 18 aseptic rTKA per year were considered low volume (LV). Demographics, surgical factors, and post-operative outcomes were collected and compared between the two cohorts. A post-hoc power analysis was conducted for full revisions (1-ß=0.909, α=0.05). Results. 307 cases were identified: 177 performed by LV surgeons and 130 performed by HV surgeons. The only demographic difference was a greater proportion of non-smokers in the LV cohort (59.4% vs. 50.0%; p=0.031). Patients of HV surgeons were more likely to receive a full revision (64.6% vs. 47.5%; p<0.001). For all revisions, HV surgeons had shorter surgical times by about 17 minutes (p=0.010). For the 168 full revisions (84 HV, 84 LV), patients of HV surgeons had shorter hospital stays (2.92±1.62 vs. 3.57±2.69 days; p=0.048), shorter surgical times (131.42±33.86 vs. 171.65±49.88 minutes; p<0.001), lower re-revision rates (7.1% vs. 19.0%; p=0.038), and fewer re-revisions (0.07±0.26 vs. 0.29±0.74 re-revisions; p=0.018). Conclusions. Patients of HV revision surgeons have better outcomes following full rTKA. These findings support the development of revision teams within arthroplasty centers of excellence to offer patients the best possible outcomes following rTKA

Aims. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Medicare Inpatient Only (IPO) list on our Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative in 2018. Methods. We examined our institutional database to identify all Medicare patients who underwent primary TKA from 2017 to 2018. Hospital inpatient or outpatient status was cross-referenced with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) claims data. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between patients classified as ‘outpatient’ and ‘inpatient’ TKA. Episode-of-care BPCI costs were then compared from 2017 to 2018. Results. Of the 2,135 primary TKA patients in 2018, 908 (43%) were classified as an outpatient and were excluded from BPCI. Inpatient classified patients had longer mean length of stay (1.9 (SD 1.4) vs 1.4 (SD 1.7) days, p < 0.001) and higher rates of discharge to rehabilitation (17% vs 3%, p < 0.001). Post-acute care costs increased when comparing the BPCI patients from 2017 to 2018, ($5,037 (SD $7,792) vs $5793 (SD $8,311), p = 0.010). The removal of TKA from the IPO list turned a net savings of $53,805 in 2017 into a loss of $219,747 in 2018 for our BPCI programme. Conclusions. Following the removal of TKA from the IPO list, nearly half of the patients at our institution were inappropriately classified as an outpatient. Our target price was increased and our institution realized a substantial loss in 2018 BPCI despite strong quality metrics. CMS should address its negative implications on bundled payment programmes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):19–23

Introduction. Identifying knee osteoarthritis patient phenotypes is relevant to assessing treatment efficacy. Biomechanical variability has not been applied to phenotyping, yet features may be related to outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an inherently mechanical surgery. This study aimed to i) identify biomechanical phenotypes among TKA candidates based on demographic and gait mechanic similarities, and ii) compare objective gait improvements between phenotypes post-TKA. Methods. TKA patients underwent 3D gait analysis one-week pre (n=134) and one-year post-TKA (n=105). Principal component analysis was applied to frontal and sagittal knee angle and moment gait waveforms, extracting major patterns of variability. Demographics (age, sex, BMI), gait speed, and frontal and sagittal pre-TKA angle and moment principal component (PC) scores previously found to differentiate sex, osteoarthritis (OA) severity, and symptoms of TKA recipients were standardized (mean=0, SD=1, [134×15]) to perform multidimensional scaling and machine learning based hierarchical clustering. Final clusters were validated by examining inter-cluster differences at baseline and gait changes (Post. PCscore. –Pre. PCscore. ) by k-way Chi-Squared, and ANOVA tests. Results. Four (k=4) TKA candidate groups yielded optimum clustering metrics, interpreted as 1) high-functioning males, 2) older stiff-kneed males, 3) slower stiff-kneed females, and 4) high-functioning females. Pre-TKA, higher-functioning clusters (1 & 4) had more dynamic loading/un-loading kinetic patterns during stance (flexion moment PC2, 3<2<4<1, P<0.001; adduction moent PC2; 3,2<4<1; P<0.001). Post-TKA, higher-functioning clusters demonstrated less gait improvement (flexion angle ΔPC2, 1,2,4<3, P<0.001; flexion moment ΔPC2, 4<2,3, P<0.001; adduction moment ΔPC2, 1<3, P=0.01). Conclusions. TKA candidates can be characterized by four clusters, interpreted as 1) high-functioning males, 2) older stiff-kneed males, 3) slower stiff-kneed females, and 4) high-functioning females, differing by demographics and biomechanical severity features. Functional gains after TKA were cluster-specific; stiff-gait clusters experienced more improvement, while higher-functioning clusters demonstrated some functional decline. Results suggest the presence of cohorts who may not benefit functionally from TKA. Cluster profiling may aid in triaging and developing osteoarthritis management and surgical strategies that meet individual or group-level function needs. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aims

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) is an advised treatment for anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. While long-term survival after mUKA is well described, reported incidences of short-term surgical complications vary and the effect of surgical usage on complications is less established. We aimed to describe the overall occurrence and treatment of surgical complications within 90 days of mUKA, as well as occurrence in high-usage centres compared to low-usage centres.

Introduction. Low serum Vitamin D (VitD) levels are often found in patients being investigated for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). VitD deficiency is associated with poor pre/post-operative functional scores and higher rate of complications. Studies report VitD as an important modifiable risk factor to improve outcomes post TKA. Aim. Aim of our study was 1) To examine the trajectory of VitD in TKA patients over 2 weeks, which included VitD sufficient and deficient patients who were supplemented orally or intramuscularly (IM) for comparision. 2) To compare early (2weeks) functional recovery in VitD sufficient and deficient patients. Material & Methods. We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon. Based on preoperative VitD levels (25OH VitD ≥30 being sufficient or <30 ng/mL being deficient) and means of supplementation(none, IM or Oral Injection Arachitol, Cholecalciferol IP 6,00,000 IU), we formed three groups: Group A (VitD sufficient, no supplementation); Group B (VitD deficient, IM supplementation); and Group C (VitD deficient, Oral supplementation). Study was approved by ethics committee. All patients gave informed consent and underwent TKA by same surgeon with uniform intra/post-operative protocols. VitD deficiency was supplemented orally/IM on the morning of surgery based on their randomization sequence. VitD levels (ng/mL) and outcome parameters of Flexion (degrees) and Timed up-and-go (TUG) test in seconds were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively on Day 3 and 14. 60 patients (20 per group) were enrolled. Demographics of all three groups were comparable. Results. VitD:. Group A:. Mean preoperative level of 42.3, fell to mean 40.4 by Day 3 (p < 0.001), and further to mean 38.9 by Day 14 (p<0.001). 6 and 4 patients became VitD deficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Group B:. Mean preoperative level of 21.5 rose to 31.2 by Day 3 (p=0.06), and further to 36.9 by Day 14 (p=0.001). 7 and 11 patients became sufficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Group C:. Mean preoperative level of 20.2 rose to mean 69.9 by Day 3 (p<0.001) and to a mean of 67.2 by Day 14 (p < 0.001). 19 and 20 patients became sufficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Outcome. Flexion:. Preoperative Flexion in Groups A, B, C was 133, 129 & 125 respectively (p=0.5). Day 3 Flexion was 88, 84 & 83 (p=0.2); Day 14 Flexion was 99, 90 & 95 (p=0.013) respectively. Posthoc Schaffe test showed statistical significance (p<0.05) only between Group A (99) and Group B (90) at Day 14. This indicated better flexion achieved in VitD sufficient patients at 2 weeks than in deficient patients with IM supplementation. TUG Test. was 17.1, 14.1 & 14.7 preoperatively in Groups A, B, C (p=0.5); on Day 3, it was 52.5, 62.6 & 58.2 (p=0.07); on Day 14, it was 33, 38.8 & 37.8 (p=0.2) respectively. Day 3 TUG time was longest (62.6) in Group B and shortest (52.5) in Group A indicating that IM supplemented patients had poor function compared to sufficient group though without statistical significance (p=0.07) with numbers available. Conclusion. We found that VitD deficient patients can be rapidly supplemented on the morning of surgery. High dose oral VitD increased levels by Day 3, whereas IM VitD increased levels only by Day 14 which remained significantly lesser than oral group. Interestingly, about 25% of VitD sufficient patients who were not supplemented, became deficient postoperatively. Flexion achieved on Day 14 was significantly better with VitD sufficiency, compared to deficient patients treated with IM VitD. Significance. VitD deficiency can be rapidly corrected by high dose oral supplementation on the morning of surgery. Also, TKA can deplete VitD and can make VitD sufficient patients deficient as early as Day 3 post surgery. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Hip and knee replacements are being performed at increasing rates and currently account for one of the largest procedure expenditures in the Medicare budget. Outcomes of total knee replacement (TKR) depend on surgeon, patient and implant factors. The impact that the specific implants might have on patient-reported outcomes is unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported functional outcomes and satisfaction after primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis who underwent TKR using five different brands of posterior-stabilized implants. Specifically, the aim was to evaluate for any difference in patient-reported outcomes based on implant brand used. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference in functional outcome that could be attributed to the implant used in primary TKR. Methods. Using our institution's total joint arthroplasty registry, we identified 4,135 patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) using one of the five most common implant brands used at our institution. These included Biomet Vanguard (N=211 patients), Depuy/Johnson&Johnson Sigma (N=221), Exactech OptetrakLogic (N=1,507), Smith & Nephew Genesis II (N=1,414), and Zimmer NexGen (N=779). Only posterior-stabilized primary TKRs in patients with osteoarthritis were included. Patients were evaluated preoperatively using the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), and Short Form-12 (SF-12). Demographics including age, body mass index (BMI), Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA physical status classification, sex, and smoking status were collected. Postoperatively, 2-year KOOS, LEAS, SF-12, and satisfaction scores were compared between implant groups. Results. At 2-year follow-up, patient-reported outcome scores were available for a total of 4,069 patients. In multiple regression analysis which separately compared each implant group to the aggregate of all others, after accounting for age, BMI, CCI, ASA status, and sex, there were no clinically significant differences in KOOS score changes from baseline to 2-year follow-up between any of the implants. In 2-year satisfaction, >80% of patients in each implant group were satisfied in all domains measured. In the multivariate regression model, patients in the NexGen group had the highest likelihood of being satisfied (OR 1.63, p=0.006) and OptetrakLogic patients had the lowest likelihood of being satisfied (OR 0.60, P<0.001) although these differences were below the minimal clinically important thresholds. Conclusion. TKR provides patient satisfaction and improvement in function regardless of implant type. While some implant systems had higher outcome scores than others, these differences were all below clinically significant thresholds. Whether these differences are a function of surgeon expertise or implant design is unknown. Future research should focus on identifying specific design elements that contribute to improved patient outcomes. Healthcare administrators may find the similarities in clinical outcomes to be a useful consideration when negotiating implant purchasing contracts

Introduction. New implants for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are frequently introduced with the promise of improved performance. Infrequently there is accompanying data to document relative performance. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of an implant widely used for decades (Existing TKA), compared to a new implant (New TKA) from the same manufacturer. Methods. From October 2011-March 2015, 19 sites prospectively enrolled and implanted 752 Subjects with Existing TKA. Between November 2012 and May 2015, 23 sites (18 sites had enrolled Existing TKAs), implanted 1131 Subjects with the New TKA. Demographics were similar between groups. Subjects were seen preoperatively, <1-year, 1-year, and 2-years to collect patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographs and any complications. PROMs consisted of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (permits WOMAC scoring), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP) and EQ5D-3L and a p-value of 0.01 was established for statistical significance for PROMs comparisons. Kaplan-Meier (KM) implant survivorship (revision of any component for any reason) estimates were calculated. Results. The mean follow-up for the Existing and New groups was 2.2 years (SD: 0.7) and 2.5 years (SD: 0.8), respectively. The difference in KM survivorship was not statistically significant (p=0.9727, Figure 1). In the Existing TKA group, 11/752 Subjects required component revision with 6 involving removal of metal components for the following reasons: infection (4), pain (5), loosening (1) and instability (1). In the New TKA group, 19/1137 Subjects required component revision with 7 involving removal of metal components for the following reasons: infection (6), joint stiffness (6), pain (3), bone fracture (2), crepitus (1), and loosening (1). The 2-year PROMs were compared between groups and demonstrated similar or improved scores in favor of the New vs. Existing TKA. Mean outcomes for New TKA vs. Existing TKA at 2 years were: KOOS (ADL: 89.0 vs. 86.9, p=0.005; Pain: 89.0 vs. 87.1, p=0.018; Symptoms: 84.1 vs. 82.1, p=0.010; Sport/Rec: 63.9 vs. 58.8, p=0.001, QOL: 77.0 vs. 73.5, p=0.003), PKIP (Overall: 76.5 vs. 73.5, p=0.003; Confidence: 8.4 vs. 8.1, p=0.003; Stability: 8.6 vs. 8.3, p=0.006; Satisfaction: 8.3 vs. 8.1, p=0.053; Modify Activities: 6.6 vs. 6.4, p=0.335), OKS (42.0 vs. 41.1, p=0.023), and EQ5D-3L (0.88 vs. 0.88, p=0.906). There was no difference between the two groups in the percent of Subjects with immediate postop radiographic interface gaps or radiolucencies (metal-cement or the bone-cement interfaces). Conclusion. The implant survivorship and radiographic assessments showed similar outcomes between the two groups. The New TKA demonstrated modest improvements in PROMs across a broad spectrum of measures. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe and compare joint-specific and generic health-related quality of life outcomes of the first versus second knee in patients undergoing staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) for osteoarthritis.

Aims

To identify variables independently associated with same-day discharge (SDD) of patients following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and to develop machine learning algorithms to predict suitable candidates for outpatient rTKA.

Aims

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging as the symptoms are similar to other conditions, and the markers used for diagnosis have limited sensitivity and specificity. Recent research has suggested using blood cell ratios, such as platelet-to-volume ratio (PVR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to improve diagnostic accuracy. The aim of the study was to further validate the effectiveness of PVR and PLR in diagnosing PJI.

Aims

The mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI?

Aims

Despite recent literature questioning their use, vancomycin and clindamycin often substitute cefazolin as the preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially in the setting of documented allergy to penicillin. Topical povidone-iodine lavage and vancomycin powder (VIP) are adjuncts that may further broaden antimicrobial coverage, and have shown some promise in recent investigations. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to compare the risk of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary TKA patients who received cefazolin and VIP to those who received a non-cephalosporin alternative and VIP.

Aims

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and safe orthopaedic procedure. Zimmer Biomet's NexGen is the second most popular brand of implant used in the UK. The primary cause of revision after the first year is aseptic loosening. We present our experience of using this implant, with significant concerns around its performance with regards early aseptic loosening of the tibial component.

Aims

The aims of this study were to investigate the ability to kneel after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, and its effect on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary aims included identifying which kneeling positions were most important to patients, and the influence of radiological parameters on the ability to kneel before and after TKA.

Aims

The aim of this study was to screen the entire genome for genetic markers associated with risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury.

Aims

Debate remains whether the patella should be resurfaced during total knee replacement (TKR). For non-resurfaced TKRs, we estimated what the revision rate would have been if the patella had been resurfaced, and examined the risk of re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing.

Aims

Our purpose was to describe an unusual series of 21 patients with fungal osteomyelitis after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R).