Abstract
Background
Advanced technologies, like robotics, provide enhanced precision for implanting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components; however, optimal component position and limb alignment remain unknown. This study purpose was to identify the ideal target sagittal component position and coronal limb alignment that produce optimal clinical outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective review of 1,091 consecutive TKAs was performed. All TKAs were PCL retaining or sacrificing with anterior lipped (49.4%) or conforming bearings (50.6%) performed with modern perioperative protocols. Posterior tibial slope, femoral flexion, and tibiofemoral limb alignment were measured with a standardized protocols. Patients were grouped by the ‘how often does your knee feel normal?’ outcome score at latest follow-up. Machine learning algorithms were used to identify optimal alignment zones which predicted improved outcomes scores.
Results
Mean age and BMI were 66 years and 34 kg/m2 with 67% female. Demographics and relevant covariates did not affect outcomes (p≥0.145) except for BMI (p=0.077) but the difference was not clinically significant. For sagittal alignment, approximating native tibial slope within 0 to +2° with some amount of femoral flexion within 0 to +3° (possibly up to +9°) was predictive of knees always feeling normal. For knees in preoperative varus or neutral, knees were more likely to always feel normal when postoperative tibiofemoral alignment was in varus (>−1°). Knees aligned in valgus preoperatively were more likely to always feel normal in valgus (<−7°) or varus (>−4°) postoperatively.
Conclusion
Superior patient-reported outcomes correlated with approximating native tibial slope and incorporating some femoral flexion while maintaining similar preoperative coronal limb alignment. Excessive deviation from native tibial slope, excessive femoral flexion or any femoral component extension, or coronal alignment overcorrection beyond the preoperative limb alignment correlated with worse outcomes.
