Treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is controversial in many respects, including the choice of surgical approach for fixation when using a locking plate. The classic deltopectoral (DP) approach is believed to increase the risk of avascular necrosis while making access to the greater tuberosity more difficult. The deltoid split (DS) approach was developed to respect minimally invasive surgery principles. The purpose of the present study (NCT-00612391) was to compare outcomes of PHF treated by DP and DS approaches in terms of function (Q-DASH, Constant score), quality of life (SF12), and complications in a prospective randomized multicenter study. From 2007 to 2016, all patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria in two University Trauma Centers were invited to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were: PHF Neer II/III, isolated injury, skeletal maturity, speaking French or English, available for follow-up (FU), and ability to fill questionnaires. Exclusion criteria: Pre-existing pathology to the limb, patient-refusing or too ill to undergo surgery, patient needing another type of treatment (nail, arthroplasty), axillary nerve impairment, open fracture. After consent, patients were randomized to one of the two treatments using the dark envelope method. Pre-injury status was documented by questionnaires (SF12, Q-DASH, Constant score). Range of motion was assessed. Patients were followed at two weeks, six weeks, 3-6-12-18-24 months. Power calculation was done with primary outcome: Q-DASH. A total of 92 patients were randomised in the study and 83 patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. The mean age was 62 y.o. (+- 14 y.) and 77% were females. There was an equivalent number of Neer II and III, 53% and 47% respectively. Mean FU was of 26 months. Forty-four patients were randomized to the DS and 39 to the DP approach. Groups were equivalent in terms of age, gender, BMI, severity of fracture and pre-injury scores. All clinical outcome measures were in favor of the deltopectoral approach. Primary outcome measure, Q-DASH, was better statistically and clinically in the DP group (12 vs 26, p=0,003). Patients with DP had less pain and better quality of life scores than with DS (VAS 1/10 vs 2/10 p=0,019 and SF12M 56 vs 51, p=0,049, respectively). Constant-Murley score was higher in the DP group (73 vs 60, p=0,014). However, active external rotation was better with the DS approach (45° vs 35°). There were more complications in DS patients, with four screw cut-outs vs zero, four avascular necrosis vs one, and five reoperations vs two. Calcar screws were used for a majority of DP fixations (57%) vs a minority of DS (27%) (p=0,012). The primary hypothesis on the superiority of the deltoid split incision was rebutted. Functional outcome, quality of life, pain, and risk of complication favoured the classic deltopectoral approach. Active external rotation was the only outcome better with DS. We believe that the difficulty of adding calcar screws and intramuscular dissection in the DS approach were partly responsible for this difference. The DP approach should be used during Neer II and III PHF fixation

Aim. Clavicular osteotomy was described as an adjunct to deltopectoral approach for improved exposure of the glenohumeral joint. This study aims to present contemporary outcomes and complications associated with the routine use of clavicular osteotomy by a single surgeon in a regional setting within New Zealand. Methods. A retrospective case series of patients who have undergone any shoulder arthroplasty for any indication between March 2017 to August 2022. This time period includes all patients who had clavicular osteotomy(OS) and patients over an equal time period prior to the routine use of osteotomy as a reference group (N-OS). Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and a Simple Shoulder Test (STT) were used to assess functional outcomes and were compared with the reported literature. Operative times and Complications were reviewed. Results. 66 patients were included in the study. 33 patients in the OS group and 33 in the N-OS group. No difference in age, sex, indications for operative intervention and the surgery provided was identified. No significant difference in operative time between groups (N-OS 121 minutes; OS 128 minutes). No clinically significant difference was identified in the OSS (N-OS; mean 38 vs OS 39) or the STT (N-OS 8.3 vs OS 9). The outcomes scores of both groups are in keeping with published literature. Two post operative clavicle fractures, one prominent surgical knot occurred in the OS that required further surgical intervention. Two cases of localized pain over the clavicle and one case of the prominent lateral clavicle were reported in the OS group. Two cases of localized pain over clavicle reported in the N-OS group. Conclusion. Use of clavicular osteotomy is not associated with inferior patient reported. The osteotomy introduces specific risks, however, the study provides evidence that these complications are infrequent and avoidable. Surgeons should feel confident in using this adjunct when exposure to the shoulder is difficult

The standard approach is through the deltopectoral interval. Among patients with prior incisions, one makes every effort to either utilise the old incision or to incorporate it into a longer incision that will allow one to approach the deltopectoral interval and retract the deltoid laterally. The deltopectoral interval is most easily developed just distal to the clavicle, where there is a natural infraclavicular triangle of fat that separates the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles even in very scarred or stiff shoulders. Typically, the deltoid is retracted laterally leaving the cephalic vein on the medial aspect of the exposure. The anterior border of the deltoid is mobilised from the clavicle to its insertion on the humerus. The anterior portion of the deltoid insertion together with the more distal periosteum of the humerus may be elevated slightly. The next step is to identify the plane between the conjoined tendon group and the subscapularis muscle. Dissection in this area must be done very carefully due to the close proximity of the neurovascular group, the axillary nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve. Scar is then released from around the base of the coracoid. The subacromial space is freed of scar and the shoulder is examined for range of motion. Particularly among patients with prior rotator cuff surgery, there may be severe scarring in the subacromial space. Internal rotation of the arm with dissection between the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid is critical to develop this plane. If external rotation is less than 30 degrees, one can consider incising the subscapularis off bone rather than through its tendinous substance. For every 1 cm that the subscapularis is advanced medially, one gains approximately 20 to 30 degrees of external rotation. The rotator interval between the subscapularis and supraspinatus is then incised. This release is then continued inferiorly to incise the inferior shoulder capsule from the neck of the humerus. This is performed by proceeding from anterior to posterior with progressive external rotation of the humerus staying directly on the bone with electrocautery and great care to protect the axillary nerve. The key for glenoid exposure as well as improvement in motion is deltoid mobilization, a large inferior capsular release, aggressive humeral head cut and osteophyte removal

Revision of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty is frequently necessary during revision surgery. Newer devices have been developed that allow for easy extraction or conversion at the time of revision preserving bone stock and simplifying the procedure. However, early generation anatomic and reverse humeral stems were frequently cemented into place. Monoblock or fixed collar stems make accessing the canal from above challenging. The cortex of the Humerus is far thinner than the femur and stress shielding has commonly led to osteopenia. Many stem designs have fins that project into the tuberosities putting them at risk for fracture on extraction. Extraction starts with an extended deltopectoral incision from the clavicle to the deltoid insertion. The proximal humerus needs to be freed from adhesions of the deltoid and conjoined tendon. The deltopectoral interval is fully developed. Complete subscapularis and anterior capsular release to the level of the latissimus tendon permits full exposure of the humeral head. After head removal the stem can be assessed for loosening and signs of periprosthetic joint infection. The proximal bone around the fin of the implant should be removed from the canal. If possible, the manufacturer's extractor should be utilised. If not, then a blunt impactor can be placed from below against the collar of the stem to assist in extraction. With luck the stem can be extracted from the cement mantle. If there is no concern for infection, the cement-in-cement technique can be used for revision. Otherwise, attempts should be made to extract all the cement and cement restrictor, if present. The small cement removal tools from the hip set can be used and specialised shoulder tools are available. An ultrasound cement removal device can be very helpful. The surgeon must be particularly careful to avoid perforation of the humeral cortex. This is especially important when near the radial nerve as injury can occur. When a well-fixed stem is encountered, an osteotomy of the proximal humerus is necessary. The surgeon can utilise a linear cut with an oscillating saw along the bicipital groove for the length of the implant. An osteotome is used to crack the cement mantle allowing stem extraction. Alternatively, a window can be created to offer additional access to the cement mantle. In the event the surgeon has required an osteotomy or window, cerclage wires, cables or suture will be needed and when the bone is potentially compromised, allograft bone graft struts (tibial shaft) are used for additional support. Care is needed when passing cerclage wires to avoid injury to the radial nerve which is adjacent to the deltoid insertion. If infection is suspected or confirmed an ALBC spacer is placed. When single stage revision is planned both cemented and uncemented stem options are available. Cement placed around the humeral stem has been suggested to decrease infection incidence. Revision of cemented humeral stems is a continued challenge in revision shoulder surgery. Newer systems and reverse total shoulder options have improved the surgeon's ability to achieve good outcomes when revising prior shoulder arthroplasty

Anatomic and accurate placement of components is a primary goal in all arthroplasty procedures. Unique to total shoulder arthroplasty, challenging glenoid exposure and osteoarthritic glenoid deformity offer significant challenges and impediments to this goal. Despite thorough pre-operative planning strategies and contemporary cannulated pin-based shoulder systems, it is often times still difficult to accurately aim the guide pin to the medial border of the scapula when the deformity is substantial or exposure is difficult. Even small errors in guide pin position can result in problems with final component version, inclination and glenoid vault perforation. In addition, a malpositioned glenoid component has been shown to have a negative impact on implant longevity and clinical performance. Image-based patient specific instrumentation has been available in the lower extremity for nearly a decade with reliable results. The application of similar technology in the shoulder has demonstrated reliable positioning of the guide pin to a pre-operative plan with subsequent accurate placement of the glenoid component. This surgical demonstration will feature one of the currently available CT-based patient specific glenoid guides using a standard deltopectoral approach

Hemi shoulder arthroplasty is a rather successful procedure although revision surgery due to secondary glenoid erosion is reported in more than 25%. The downside of common shoulder arthroplasty is that in a deltopectoral approach the subscapularis tendon needs to be detached for exposure of the humeral head. Refixation of subscapularis tendon is associated with a retear rate of 4%, furthermore with progressing fatty muscle infiltration and loss of function. In case of revision surgery a second subscapularis tendon detachment is even more associated with worse function. Thus, arthroscopic humeral head resurfacing is an expedient alternative for minimal invasive humeral head arthroplasty without compromising subscapularis function. The purpose of this study was to report first clinical and subjective results after arthroscopic-assisted resurfacing of the humeral head. For this prospective case series, 24 patients (7 females, 17 males; mean age 59 years, range 42–73 years) undergoing arthroscopic-assisted partial shoulder resurfacing with the partial eclipse prosthesis were included in the study. Clinical conditions and subjective assessments were evaluated before surgery and annually thereafter using the Constant score (CS), active range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (ASES). Radiological outcomes and major complications were monitored. The mean CS for all patients improved significantly from 51 points preoperatively to 83 points 12 months after surgery (p=0.005). Trends towards increasing ROMs were detected. Subjective scores significantly improved from baseline to the 1-year follow-up (VAS: from 6.4 to 2.5, p=0.010; ASES: from 47 to 76, p=0.026). The majority of patients (88%) stated that they would undergo the procedure again. Revisions were indicated in 17% due to progression of osteoarthritis. Arthroscopic-assisted partial humeral head resurfacing as a minimal invasive procedure with the advantages of bone stock preservation and intact subscapularis tendon allowed immediate postoperative active mobilization and provided significant improvements in subjective outcome. In case of revision surgery a primary situation was encountered with postoperative results comparable to primary arthroplasty

Aim. Recent studies have indicated that the presence of P. acnes in the skin of the shoulder and around the acromion is higher than other body regions like the knee or the hip. The aim of this study was to estimate the presence of P. acnes in a real set of primary shoulder arthroplasty, after skin preparation with chlorhexidine and administration of empirical antibiotic therapy. Method. A prospective observational study involving 63 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty was designed. In all patients two skin biopsies with a 3 mm dermal punch and one subcutaneous tissue sample after surgical incision were obtained. Skin biopsies were obtained at the most anterior part of the surgical wound in case of superior approach and at the upper part in the deltopectoral approach. All patients underwent preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin 2g ev and skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine alcoholic tinted before the start of surgery twice. The aerobic cultures were incubated at 37ºC for 7 days whereas the anaerobic ones incubated for 14 days. Results. A total of 63 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty (58 reverse shoulder arthroplasty and 5 anatomical) were analysed. 54 women and 9 men, mean age of 73.94 (SD 6.19). The indication for arthroplasty was a secondary arthropathy cuff injury in 42 cases, primary osteoarthritis in 3, acute fracture in 9 and fracture sequelae in 9. We obtained 189 tissue cultures (126 skin cultures and 63 subcutaneous) and 4 cultures were positive (2.02%) for P. acnes in 3 different patients. A first patient (female) had both positive skin cultures, the second patient (male) only had positive the subcutaneous tissue cultures and the third patient had positive also the subcutaneous tissue culture. The first patient underwent anatomical shoulder arthroplasty whereas the second and third patients underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The time to grow was 15 days in first patient and 14 days in the second and third patient (mean 14.5 days). Conclusions. In a real setting of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty using antibiotic prophylaxis and standard preoperative skin preparation with chlorhexidine we found a low rate of positive cultures for P. acnes (2.02 %). The higher rate of P. acnes positive cultures in skin reported in previous studies may be caused by a different population study group (healthy and younger volunteers without antibiotic prophylaxis) or suboptimal culture technique (use of swaps)

Introduction. The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. In recent years indications for use have expanded to include elderly patients in whom either internal fixation is not possible due to fracture configuration, poor bone quality, or presence of a rotator cuff deficiency. There is however relatively little evidence to support its use in these circumstances. Objective. This study aims to assess the viability of RSA as a salvage procedure in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures or irreducible dislocations, quantified in terms of functional outcome, complication rates and patient reported satisfaction. Methods. All patients presenting between January 2011 and December 2013 with a complex 3- or 4-part humeral fracture or a delayed presentation with an irreducible non-acute dislocation, treated with salvage RSA were eligible for inclusion. All operations were performed in a single centre by one of two specialist upper limb surgeons. Standard deltopectoral approach was performed. Tournier reverse fracture stem with two choices of inserts and graft hole in the stem with proximal hydroxyapatite coating was the implant of choice. All patients and underwent a standardised rehabilitation programme. Clinical outcome was measured at final follow up using (1) patient reported satisfaction, (2) clinician measured range of movement (3) complication rate. Results. A total of 16 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. Mean age at time of operation was 72.8 years (41–91 years) with a mean follow-up of 7 months (2–13 months). At time of last follow-up 100 per cent of patients were satisfied with the results of their operation and functionally independent with activities of daily living. Mean oxford score was 39 (36–48). Range of movement post-operatively had a mean active forward extension 97° (70–150°) and abduction 101° (80–170°). 43% of patients were pain-free, whilst the remainder only required the use of occasional analgesia. One patient developed heterotrophic ossification post operatively and underwent surgical excision. One patient sustained a peri-prosthetic avulsion fracture at 18months treated non-operatively. Patients who underwent RSA for dislocation fared better than for those with proximal humeral fractures. The mean active forward extension was 107.5° (90–150°) and abduction 112.5° (90–170°) in the dislocation group (N=5) compared with those who had a fracture (N= 11) in which the forward extension was 91.4° (70–120°) and abduction 95° (80–120°). Conclusion. Reverse TSA should be considered in patients with complex proximal humeral fractures or delayed presentation with irreducible dislocation. Early results demonstrate good outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction, pain relief and preservation of function. These early result are encouraging however a further study with longer follow-up is required to confirm sustained benefit

Background. Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) has been shown to improve the function and pain of patients with severe degeneration. Recently, TSA has been of interest for younger patients with higher post-operative expectations; however, they are treated using traditional surgical approaches and techniques, which, although amenable to the elderly population, may not achieve acceptable results with this new demographic. Specifically, to achieve sufficient visualization, traditional TSA uses the highly invasive deltopectoral approach that detaches the subscapularis, which can significantly limit post-operative healing and function. To address these concerns, we have developed a novel surgical approach, and guidance and instrumentation system (for short-stemmed/stemless TSA) that minimize muscle disruption and aim to optimize implantation accuracy. Development. Surgical Approach: A muscle splitting approach with a reduced incision size (∼6–8cm) was developed that markedly reduces muscle disruption, thus potentially improving healing and function. The split was placed between the infraspinatus and teres-minor (Fig.1) as this further reduces damage, provides an obvious dissection plane, and improves access to the retroverted articular surfaces. This approach, however, precludes the use of standard bone preparation methods/instruments that require clear visualization and en-face articular access. Therefore, a novel guidance technique and instrumentation paradigm was developed. Minimally Invasive Surgical Guidance: 3D printed Patient Specific Guides (PSGs) have been developed for TSA; however, these are designed for traditional, highly invasive approaches providing unobstructed access to each articular surface separately. As the proposed approach does not offer this access, a novel PSG with two opposing contoured surfaces has been developed that can be inserted between the humeral and scapular articular surfaces and use the rotator cuff's passive tension to self-locate (Fig.2). During computer-aided pre-operative planning/PSG design, the two bones are placed into an optimized relative pose and the PSG is constructed between and around them. This ensures that when the physical PSG is inserted intra-operatively, the bones are locked into the preoperatively planned pose. New Instrumentation Paradigm: With the constraints of this minimally invasive approach, a new paradigm for bone preparation/instrumentation was required which did not rely on en-face access. This new paradigm involves the ability to simultaneously create glenoid and humeral guide axes – the latter of which can guide humeral bone preparation and be a working channel for tools – by driving a short k-wire into the glenoid by passing through the humerus starting laterally (Fig.3). By preoperatively defining the pose produced by the inserted PSG as one that collinearly aligns the bones’ guide axes, the PSG and an attached c-arm drill guide facilitate this new lateral drilling technique. Subsequently, bone preparation is conducted using novel instruments (e.g. reamers and drills for creating holes radial to driver axis) powered using a trans-humeral driver and guided by the glenoid k-wire or humeral tunnel. Conclusion. To meet the expectations of increasingly younger TSA patients, advancements in procedural invasiveness and implantation accuracy are needed. This need was addressed by developing a novel, fully integrated surgical approach, PSG system, and instrumentation paradigm, the initial in-vitro results of which have demonstrated acceptable accuracy while significantly reducing invasiveness

Purpose. While reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) corrects vertical muscle imbalance, it cannot restore the horizontal imbalance seen in cuff-deficient shoulders with combined loss of active elevation and external rotation (CLEER). We report the medium-term results of the modified latissimus dorsi/teres major tendon transfer (L'Episcopo procedure) associated with RSA, performed via a single deltopectoral approach. Method. Sixteen CLEER patients underwent the procedure and were followed up at a mean of 49 months (range, 36–70). All patients had lost spatial control of their arm, were unable to maintain neutral rotation, and had abnormal infraspinatus and teres minor muscles on imaging. Outcome measures included Constant score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and ADLER score (activities of daily living requiring external rotation). Results. Fifteen patients were satisfied or very satisfied. There were significant improvements (p<0.05) in active elevation (72 degrees to 139 degrees), active external rotation (−24 degrees to 4 degrees), CS (27 to 64), ADLER score (5.0 to 23.8) and SSV (23% to 77%). Active internal rotation decreased from 6 to 3 points. Scapular notching was observed in 3 patients and spurs in 3 patients. One deep infection required two-stage revision of the prosthesis and the patient was disappointed with the result. One patient required reoperation (arthrolysis and acromioclavicular joint excision). Conclusion. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with the modified L'Episcopo procedure improves shoulder function in patients with CLEER. Patients regain spatial control of their arm. The observed internal rotation loss has led us to modify the surgical technique by fixing the transferred tendons more posteriorly on the humerus

Introduction. The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. Standard RSA technique involves medialising the centre of rotation (COR) maximising the deltoid lever arm and compensating for rotator cuff deficiency. However reported complications include scapular notching, prosthetic loosening and loss of shoulder contour. As a result the use of Bony Increased Offset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) has been gaining in popularity. The BIO-RSA is reported to avoid these complications by lateralising the COR using a modified base plate, longer central post and augmentation with cancellous bone graft harvested from the patients humeral head. Objectives. This study aims to compare the outcome in terms of analgesic effect, function and satisfaction, in patients treated with standard RSA and BIO-RSA. Methods. All cases were performed in a single centre by one of two upper limb consultant orthopaedic surgeons over a consecutive 2-year period. At time of listing for operation, the decision as to whether to undertake a bony-increased offset reverse total shoulder was made. Standard deltopectoral approach was performed. Standard and Bony increased offset Tournier reverse was the implant of choice (BIO-RSA). All patients underwent a standardised rehabilitation programme. Standard follow up was clinical review with radiographs at 2 weeks, 6weeks and 3months. Retrospective data was collected using case notes on patient reported stausfaction and oxford shoulder score, analgesia requirement at final follow up, and final range of movement. Results. A total of 60 patients (65 shoulders) were treated with reverse total shoulder replacements (RSA) within a 2-year period in a single centre for chronic complex shoulder conditions. Mean age at time of intervention was 74.1years (49.3 – 88.7). Mean follow up was 7.1 months (3.4 – 24). Average time to discharge 16.1 months (3.4 – 37.4). 43 patients currently under review. Of the 65 shoulders, 40 underwent BIO-RSA procedures. Indications for surgery were predominantly rotator cuff arthropathy (N=36). Other indications included severe osteoarthritis (N=1) and complex proximal humeral fracture (N=3). The remaining 25 patients treated with standard RSA were similar in terms of indication and basic demographics. In terms of range of movement, outcomes between the two groups were broadly similar. Patients receiving BIO-RSA demonstrated mean active forward flexion of 92.2° (70–120°) and abduction 93.3° (80–120°). The RSA group had mean forward flexion 90.5° (50–130°) and mean abduction 88.6° (40–160°). Both groups had excellent analgesic effect with 92% in each either being completely pain free or requiring only occasional analgesia. The majority of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. Mean Oxford shoulder score for the BIO-RSA group was 4.9 (0–13) preoperatively and 43.7 (36–48) postoperatively. The mean RSA pre-operative score was 7.9 (0–19) and postoperatively 40.2(32–48). In total three patients experienced complications; 1 haematoma (BIO-RSA), 1 brachial plexus contusion (BIO-RSA) and 1 deep infection (RSA). Conclusion. If grafting is necessary, the use of BIO-RSA within this centre seems to have comparable results to those undergoing standard RSA. Early results also suggest the Bio-RSA allows earlier improvement and conserves a larger bone stock. These early result are encouraging however a further study with longer follow-up is required

Introduction:. The subscapularis muscle experiences significant strain as it accommodates common movements of the shoulder. Little is known about what happens with this obligatory strain once the subscapularis insertion is disrupted and repaired in the course of shoulder arthroplasty. Subscapularis failure is a serious known complication after shoulder arthroplasty. It is not known what the effect of increasing the thickness of the shoulder head will have on subscapularis strain. It is our hypothesis that the use of large or expanded humeral heads during shoulder replacement will cause increased tension in the repaired subscapularis. The primary purpose of this study was to identify the optimal manner to perform a passive range of motion (PROM) program without invoking a significant increase in strain in the repaired subscapularis. The secondary purpose was to determine the impact of varying the thickness of the humeral head on subscapularis strain using the same PROM protocol. Methods:. Eight fresh-frozen, forequarter cadaver (four female, four male) specimens were obtained following IRB approval. An extended deltopectoral incision was performed so that the subscapularis insertion site could be well visualized. PROM exercises with the following motions were evaluated: external rotation, abduction, flexion and scaption. An optical motion analysis system was used to measure strain in the subscapularis. The same measurement protocol was repeated after performing a subscapularis osteotomy and after placement of an anatomic hemiarthroplasty of three different thicknesses (short, tall, expanded). Results:. A decrease in joint laxity (less strain but more tension on the subscapularis) was observed in abduction, external rotation, and forward flexion, following implantation of the shoulder arthroplasty components. For abduction and forward flexion, we observed a trend of decreasing laxity with increasing humeral head component thickness. For external rotation, all components displayed a similar reduction in joint laxity. With the short humeral head, strain was similar to native joint with passive scaption and flexion but not with external rotation or abduction. Discussion:. The PROM that tends to minimize tension on the subscapularis is forward flexion and scaption whereas external rotation and abduction will stress the subscapularis repair. Therefore passive forward flexion or scaption do not need to be limited but clearly external rotation should have passive limits and abduction should probably be avoided. The subscapularis muscle is under greater preload tension after shoulder joint arthroplasty. Even the short head size humeral component demonstrated decreased laxity compared to the intact joint. This suggests that even the shortest head size available may not be anatomical and perhaps a thinner humeral head size would be more representative of the normal anatomy

Introduction. Persistent problems and relatively high complication rates with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are reported (1, 2). It is assumed that some of these complications are affected by improper intraoperative soft tissue tension. Achieving proper intraoperative soft tissue tension is an obvious surgical goal. However, intraoperative soft tissue tension measurements and methods for RTSA have not been reported. One way to quantify soft tissue tension is to measure intraoperative joint forces using an instrumented prosthesis. Hence, we have developed an instrumented RTSA to measure shoulder joint forces intraoperatively. The goal of this study was to measure intraoperative shoulder joint forces during RTSA. Materials and Methods. The instrumented shoulder prosthesis measures the contact force vector between the glenosphere and humeral tray. This force sensor is a custom instrumented trial implant that can be used with an existing RTSA system (EQUINOXE, Exactech Inc, Gainesville, FL) just as a standard trial implant is used. Four uniaxial foil strain gauges (QFLG-02-11-3LJB, Tokyo Sokki Kenkyujo Co., Ltd., JP) are instrumented inside the sensor. Using a calibration matrix, the three force components were calculated from four strain gauge outputs (3). Sixteen patients who underwent RTSA took part in this IRB approved study. All patients were greater than 50 years of age and willing to review and sign the study informed consent form. After obtaining informed consent for surgery, a standard deltopectoral approach to the shoulder was performed. The instrumented trial prostheses were assembled on the glenoid baseplate instead of a standard glenosphere. After the joint was reduced, joint forces were recorded during cyclic rotation, flexion, scapular plane movement (scaption), and adduction of the shoulder. Strain gauge outputs were recorded during these movements as well as the neutral position just before movements. Mean values of forces with each motion were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A multiple comparisons test was subsequently performed to examine differences between motions. Results. Three sensors failed due to intraoperative breakage of strain gauge wires, leaving 13 subjects with measured joint reaction forces. During abduction, for example, the force vector varied from superior to antero-medial, and the resultant joint force in abduction was 83 N in a representative subject (Figure 1). Average joint reaction forces decreased with shoulder motion from a neutral position to external rotation or scaption. Conversely, they increased with flexion or abduction (Figure 2). Mean force values were not the same for each movement (p = 0.018). Forces recorded during flexion and scaption movements differed significantly (p = 0.012). Discussion. The intraoperative forces acting in the RTSA have been measured for the first time, and these measurements are ongoing. We expect more measurements will permit surgeons objectively to place and align implant components to achieve predictable and durable RTSA results

Patients using a neutral rotation brace post proximal humerus fracture fixation have improved functional outcome and external rotation of the shoulder compared to patients using a standard polysling. Patients who have proximal humerus fracture fixation with extramedullary plates and screws have a risk of reduced range of movement especially external rotation. Gerber et al showed that the average external rotation after fixation of proximal humeral fractures was 39 degrees in their patient cohort compared to a normal range of 80–100 degrees. This can lead to reduced function and poor patient related outcomes. Geiger et al showed that in a cohort of 28 patients, poor functional outcome was noted in 39.3% with an average Constant-Murley Score of 57.9. Current practice is to utilise a polysling holding the shoulder in internal rotation post-shoulder fixation. Patients usually wear the sling for up to 6 weeks. We believe that this increases the risk of adhesion formation with the shoulder in internal rotation in the shoulder joint. Therefore this can cause loss of external rotation in the shoulder joint. We believe that holding the shoulder in a neutral alignment, with a neutral rotation brace post-fixation, will enable an increased rate of external rotation post-operatively thus improving external rotation and functional outcome. There is currently no literature comparing the different slings used post-operatively and we believe that this study would be the first of its kind. It would have a substantial change in the way clinicians manage proximal humeral fractures and will potentially reduce the numbers of re-operations to divide adhesions or perform capsular releases. Secondary benefits include a potential earlier return to full function and work and improved patient satisfaction. Study proposal: Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of the neutral rotation brace compared to the standard, currently used, polysling post proximal humerus fracture fixation. No blinding of either participants or clinicians. Three surgeons utilising similar fixation techniques via the deltopectoral approach and using Philos plate fixation (Synthes Ltd.). Standardised post-operative rehabilitation protocol for all patients. Follow up: clinical review and postal outcomes for 1 year. Primary outcomes: Post operative functional outcome scores (Oxford, DASH, EQL) obtained at 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 3 months and 1 year). These will be compared to scores taken pre-operatively. Secondary outcomes: Clinical review at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year with range of movement measurements. Radiographs also taken at 6 weeks and 3 months to assess union. Patient questionnaire at 1 year (with outcome scores) assessing patient return to work, complications and patient satisfaction. Inclusion criteria: Proximal humeral fractures requiring operative intervention with extramedullary plate fixation (i.e. fractures displaced by 1cm and/or angulated by 45 degrees or more). Age>18. Exclusion Criteria: Patients having intra-operative findings of complete Pectoralis major rupture or if operative exposure requires complete Pectoralis major tenotomy. (These patients need to be held in internal rotation with a standard polysling to allow healing of the Pectoralis major tendon)