Introduction. Transtibial osseointegration (TFOI) for amputees has limited but clear literature identifying superior quality of life and mobility versus a socketed prosthesis. Some amputees have knee arthritis that would be relieved by a total knee replacement (TKR). No other group has reported performing a TKR in association with TTOI (TKR+TTOI). We report the outcomes of nine patients who had TKR+TTOI, followed for an average 6.5 years. Materials & Methods. Our osseointegration registry was retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients who had TTOI and who also had TKR, performed at least two years prior. Four patients had TKR first the TTOI, four patients had simultaneous TKR+TTOI, and one patient had 1 OI first then TKR. All constructs were in continuity from hinged TKR to the prosthetic limb. Outcomes were: complications prompting surgical intervention, and changes in daily prosthesis wear hours, Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (QTFA), and Short Form 36 (SF36). All patients had clinical follow-up, but two patients did not have complete survey and mobility tests at both time periods. Results. Six (67%) were male, average age 51.2±14.7 years. All primary amputations were performed to manage traumatic injury or its sequelae. No patients died. Five patients (56%) developed infection leading to eventual transfemoral amputation 36.0±15.3 months later, and 1 patient had a single debridement six years after TTOI with no additional surgery in the subsequent two years. All patients who had transfemoral amputation elected for and received transfemoral osseointegration, and no infections occurred, although one patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture which was managed with internal fixation and implant retention and walks independently. The proportion of patients who wore their prosthesis at least 8 hours daily was 5/9=56%, versus 7/9=78% (p=.620). Even after proximal level amputation, the QTFA scores improved versus prior to TKR+TTOI, although not significantly: Global (45.2±20.3 vs 66.7±27.6, p=.179), Problem (39.8±19.8 vs 21.5±16.8, p=.205), Mobility (54.8±28.1 vs 67.7±25.0, p=.356). SF36 changes were also non-significant: Mental (58.6±7.0 vs 46.1±11.0, p=.068), Physical (34.3±6.1 vs 35.2±13.7, p=.904). Conclusions. TKR+TTOI presents a high risk for eventual infection prompting subsequent transfemoral amputation. Although none of these patients died, in general, TKR infection can lead to patient mortality. Given the exceptional benefit to preserving the knee joint to preserve amputee mobility and quality of life, it would be devastating to flatly force transtibial amputees with severe degenerative knee joint pain and unable to use a socket prosthesis to choose between TTOI but a painful knee, or preemptive transfemoral amputation for transfemoral osseointegration. Therefore, TTOI for patients who also request TKR must be considered cautiously. Given that this frequency of infection does not occur in patients who have total hip replacement in association with transfemoral osseointegration, the underlying issue may not be that linked joint replacement with osseointegrated limb replacement is incompatible, but may require further consideration of biological barriers to ascending infection and/or significant changes to implant design, surgical technique, or other yet-uncertain factors

Not all degenerative knees need a total knee replacement. Over the last few decades we have shifted our surgical treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee to a “compartmental approach” resulting in approximately half of end-stage OA knees receiving a partial knee replacement. Of these an emerging procedure is isolated lateral compartment replacement with the indications being isolated bone-on-bone osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis of the lateral compartment of the knee. Associated significant patellofemoral disease and inflammatory arthritis are contraindications. The purpose of this study is to present the indications, surgical technique, and early outcome of lateral partial knees from our institution. From Aug 2011 until June 2017 we have performed 3,548 knee arthroplasties. Of these 147 were fixed bearing lateral partial knee replacements via a lateral parapatellar approach (4%), 1,481 medial partial knee replacements (42%), and 1,920 total knee replacements (54%). The average age was 66 years old and 76% were female. Average follow-up in the lateral partials was 1.3 years (range 0.5 years to 6 years). Knee Society Scores improved from 41 (pre-op) to 86 points (post-op). Range of motion improved from 6 – 113 degrees (pre-op) to 0 – 123 degrees (post-op). No knees were revised to a TKA. One knee required I&D for traumatic wound dehiscence. This is the largest single center series of lateral partial knee replacements. We have observed this cohort to have more female patients and gain additional range of motion compared to our historic cohorts of TKA's. Longer-term follow-up is needed for determination of implant and unreplaced compartment survivorship. We believe the lateral partial knee replacement to be a viable option for isolated lateral compartment disease in approximately 4% of patients

Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost-effective surgical procedure for degenerative knee disease and has good long-term results. However, these results are not always related to patient satisfaction and functional outcome. With an increasing demand of surgeons and patients on functioning of total knee implants, the need for adequate objective outcome measures is high. Imaging of the knee is commonly used in clinical practice and research to objectively measure many different outcome parameters concerning the implant, such as alignment and complications.1 However, techniques on comparison of the sagittal contour of the knee before and after implant placement are scarce. Goal. To develop and describe a standardized method for measuring the sagittal contour of the implant in a 3D model of the knee before and after implant placement. Methods. Images of the static knee of a subject are obtained in-vivo using fluoroscopy over a 180° sweep at 15 frames per second (MultiDiagnost Eleva, Philips, The Netherlands). A 3D model of the knee is constructed in accompanying software (3D-RX, Philips, The Netherlands) and is subsequently imported in OsiriX imaging software (Pixmeo, Switzerland). In Osirix, a reproducible coordinate system is obtained using the bone stub axis and the anatomical epicondylar axis as references [Fig. 1]. We quantified the sagittal contour of the distal femur in two parameters: the flexion angle of femoral component and the sagittal profile of the implant. To measure the flexion angle, the image is located in the midtrochlear plane. The angle is measured between the bone stub axis and the neutral line of the femoral component [Fig. 2]. To measure the sagittal profile of the distal femur, the lengths of three lines connecting the anatomical epicondylar axis of the distal femur and the outer border of the femur/prosthesis are summed. This is done both anterior and posterior [Fig. 3]. These profiles are measured in planes of the lateral and medial condyle and of the midtrochlear plane. Due to the reproducible coordinate system, the profiles can be compared for the knee before and after implant placement. Conclusion. Using fluoroscopy and readily available 3D imaging software we have developed a technique for measuring valuable parameters concerning implant placement in TKA. This technique can be used for scientific purposes concerning comparison of the knee before and after implant placement and to study its effect on functional and biomechanical outcome after TKA

Patients with skeletal dysplasia are prone to developing advanced degenerative knee disease requiring total knee replacement (TKR) at a younger age than the general population. TKR in this unique group of patients is a technically demanding procedure due to the bone deformity, flexion contracture, generalised hypotonia and ligamentous laxity. We set out to retrospectively review the outcome of 11 TKR's performed in eight patients with skeletal dysplasia at our institution using the SMILES custom-made rotating-hinge total knee system. There were 3 males and 5 females with mean age 57 years (range, 41–79 years), mean height 138 cm (range, 122–155 cm) and mean weight 56 kg (range, 40–102 kg). Preoperative diagnoses included achondroplasia, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, pseudoachondroplasia, multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, morquio syndrome, diastrophic dysplasia and Larson's Syndrome. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 7 years (range, 3–11.5 years). Knee pain and function improved in all 11 joints. Mean Knee Society clinical and function scores improved from 24 (range, 14–36) and 20 points (range, 5–40) preoperatively to 68 (range, 28–80) and 50 points (range, 22–74) respectively at final follow-up. Four complications were recorded (36%), including a patellar fracture following a fall, a tibial periprosthetic fracture, persistent anterior knee pain and a femoral component revision for aseptic loosening. Our results suggest that custom rotating-hinge TKR in patients with skeletal dysplasia is effective at relieving pain, optimising movement and improving function. It compensates for bony deformity and ligament deficiency and reduces the need for corrective osteotomy. Patellofemoral joint complications are frequent and functional outcome is worse than primary TKR in the general population. Submission endorsed by Mr Peter Calder, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Society member

Aims

The aetiologies of common degenerative spine, hip, and knee pathologies are still not completely understood. Mechanical theories have suggested that those diseases are related to sagittal pelvic morphology and spinopelvic-femoral dynamics. The link between the most widely used parameter for sagittal pelvic morphology, pelvic incidence (PI), and the onset of degenerative lumbar, hip, and knee pathologies has not been studied in a large-scale setting.