Abstract
Background
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost-effective surgical procedure for degenerative knee disease and has good long-term results. However, these results are not always related to patient satisfaction and functional outcome. With an increasing demand of surgeons and patients on functioning of total knee implants, the need for adequate objective outcome measures is high. Imaging of the knee is commonly used in clinical practice and research to objectively measure many different outcome parameters concerning the implant, such as alignment and complications.1 However, techniques on comparison of the sagittal contour of the knee before and after implant placement are scarce.
Goal
To develop and describe a standardized method for measuring the sagittal contour of the implant in a 3D model of the knee before and after implant placement.
Methods
Images of the static knee of a subject are obtained in-vivo using fluoroscopy over a 180° sweep at 15 frames per second (MultiDiagnost Eleva, Philips, The Netherlands). A 3D model of the knee is constructed in accompanying software (3D-RX, Philips, The Netherlands) and is subsequently imported in OsiriX imaging software (Pixmeo, Switzerland). In Osirix, a reproducible coordinate system is obtained using the bone stub axis and the anatomical epicondylar axis as references [Fig. 1]. We quantified the sagittal contour of the distal femur in two parameters: the flexion angle of femoral component and the sagittal profile of the implant. To measure the flexion angle, the image is located in the midtrochlear plane. The angle is measured between the bone stub axis and the neutral line of the femoral component [Fig. 2]. To measure the sagittal profile of the distal femur, the lengths of three lines connecting the anatomical epicondylar axis of the distal femur and the outer border of the femur/prosthesis are summed. This is done both anterior and posterior [Fig. 3]. These profiles are measured in planes of the lateral and medial condyle and of the midtrochlear plane. Due to the reproducible coordinate system, the profiles can be compared for the knee before and after implant placement.
Conclusion
Using fluoroscopy and readily available 3D imaging software we have developed a technique for measuring valuable parameters concerning implant placement in TKA. This technique can be used for scientific purposes concerning comparison of the knee before and after implant placement and to study its effect on functional and biomechanical outcome after TKA.
