Background. Evidence suggests classification system (CS) guided treatments are more effective than generalized and practice guidelines based treatments for low back pain (LBP) patients. This study evaluated clinicians' and managers' attitudes towards LBP classification and its usefulness in guiding LBP management. Methods. Data from 3 semi-structured interviews with physiotherapy service managers and advanced spinal physiotherapy practitioner and a focus group (5 physiotherapists) in two NHS Health Boards, South Wales, UK, was thematically analysed. Results. Five themes emerged. CS knowledge: Clinicians and managers know different CSs and agree with its usefulness. Clinicians have specific CSs knowledge, managers viewed classification related to referral pathways and prognosis. Current CS use: Clinicians classify using their experience and clinical reasoning skills shifting between multiple CSs. Managers are confident that staff provide evidence-based service though believe classification is not always practiced across services. CS advantages/disadvantages: Effectively targeting the right patients for right treatments using evidence-based practice is advantageous. Prevalence of “guru led” CSs developed for research and of limited clinical use is disadvantageous. Barriers: Patients' treatment expectations, threat to clinical autonomy, lack of sufficiently complex CSs, lack of resources to up-skill clinicians and overall CSs fit into complex referral pathways. Enablers: CSs sufficiently complex & placed within clinical reasoning process, mentoring for inexperienced staff, positive engagement with all stakeholders and patients. Conclusion. Clinicians and managers are aware of CSs and agree with its usefulness to guide LBP management. Clinicians classify LBP though there is no formalized CS process in place. Whilst clinicians view classification as the relationship between patients and physiotherapy managers have a broader, whole service view. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: Wales School of Primary Care Research, Cardiff, UK. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has been presented previously at a national meeting

Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a rare and serious complication. Previous studies have shown that septic arthritis is associated with inferior outcome of ACLR. Despite that, there is no standardized treatment protocol, and the course of the disease has mainly been studied within single institutions with a small number of patients. The aim of the present study is to describe the course of septic arthritis following ACLR in a large nationwide cohort. The hypothesis was that the clinical presentation of septic arthritis following ACLR varies according to the infectious agent. The present cohort represents patients with septic arthritis identified in a previous study that analyzed compensation claims reported to the Swedish national insurance company (Löf) in 2005–2014 (1). The diagnosis was confirmed by medical experts at Löf after review of medical records. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the medical records as well as data available from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry (SNKLR) for the study group. The study involved 158 patients who received compensation due to developing septic arhtirits. 94 (59.9%) patients were infected with Coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS), and 25 patients by Staphyolococcus Aureus (S.Aureus) (15.9%). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding Maximum CRP (p<0.001), and duration between ACLR and first washout operation (p<0.005). S.aureus group had the higest maximum CRP (281) and the shortest duration between ACLR and first washout operation (12 days). The Clinical presentation of septic arthritis following ACLR can vary according to the agent causing the infection, and low virulent agents are responsible for the majority of the infections. Clinicians need to be aware of these differences and consider them when making diagnosis or treatment decisions

Introduction. Patients (2.7M in EU) with positive cancer prognosis frequently develop metastases (≈1M) in their remaining lifetime. In 30-70% cases, metastases affect the spine, reducing the strength of the affected vertebrae. Fractures occur in ≈30% patients. Clinicians must choose between leaving the patient exposed to a high fracture risk (with dramatic consequences) and operating to stabilise the spine (exposing patients to unnecessary surgeries). Currently, surgeons rely on their sole experience. This often results in to under- or over-treatment. The standard-of-care are scoring systems (e.g. Spine Instability Neoplastic Score) based on medical images, with little consideration of the spine biomechanics, and of the structure of the vertebrae involved. Such scoring systems fail to provide clear indications in ≈60% patients. Method. The HEU-funded METASTRA project is implemented by biomechanicians, modellers, clinicians, experts in verification, validation, uncertainty quantification and certification from 15 partners across Europe. METASTRA aims to improve the stratification of patients with vertebral metastases evaluating their risk of fracture by developing dedicated reliable computational models based on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (AI) and on personalised Physiology-based biomechanical (VPH) models. Result. The METASTRA-AI model is expected to be able to stratify most patients with limited effort end cost, based on parameters extracted semi-automatically from the medical files and images. The cases which are not reliably stratified through the AI model, are examined through a more detailed and personalised biomechanical VPH model. These METASTRA numerical tools are trained through an unprecedentedly large multicentric retrospective study (2000 cases) and validated against biomechanical ex vivo experiments (120 specimens). Conclusion. The METASTRA decision support system is tested in a multicentric prospective observational study (200 patients). The METASTRA approach is expected to cut down the indeterminate diagnoses from the current 60% down to 20% of cases. METASTRA project funded by the European Union, HEU topic HLTH-2022-12-01, grant 101080135

To investigate differences in the drop vertical jump height in female adolescents with an ACL injury and healthy controls and the contribution of each limb in this task. Forty female adolescents with an ACL injury (ACLi, 15.2 ± 1.4 yrs, 164.6 ± 6.0 cm, 63.1 ± 10.0 kg) and thirty-nine uninjured (CON, 13.2 ± 1.7 yrs, 161.7 ± 8.0 cm, 50.6 ± 11.0 kg) were included in this study. A 10-camera infrared motion analysis system (Vicon, Nexus, Oxford, UK) tracked pelvis, thigh, shank, and foot kinematics at 200Hz, while the participants performed 3 trials of double-legged drop vertical jumps (DVJ) on two force plates (Bertec Corp., Columbus, USA) sampled at 2000Hz.The maximum jump height normalised by dominant leg length was compared between groups using independent samples t-test. The maximum vertical ground reaction force (GRFz) and sagittal ankle, knee and hip velocities before take-off were compared between limbs in both groups, using paired samples t-test. The normalised jump height was 11% lower in the ACLi than in the CON (MD=0.04 cm, p=0.020). In the ACLi, the maximum GRFz (MD=46.17N) and the maximum velocities of ankle plantar flexion (MD=79.83°/s), knee extension (MD=85.80°/s), and hip extension (MD=36.08°/s) were greater in the non-injured limb, compared to the injured limb. No differences between limbs were found in the CON. ACL injured female adolescents jump lower than the healthy controls and have greater contribution of their non-injured limb, compared to their injured limb, in the DVJ task. Clinicians should investigate differences in the contribution between limbs during double-legged drop vertical jump when assessing patients with an ACL injury, as this could help identify asymmetries, and potentially improve treatment, criteria used to clear athletes to sport, and re-injury prevention

Obese patients show a higher incidence of tendon-related pathologies. These patients present a low inflammatory systemic environment and a higher mechanical demand which can affect the tendons. In addition, inflammation might have a role in the progression of the disease as well as in the healing process. A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria were studies of any level of evidence published in peer-reviewed journals reporting clinical or preclinical results. Evaluated data were extracted and critically analysed. PRISMA guidelines were applied, and risk of bias was assessed, as well as the methodological quality of the included studies. We excluded all the articles with high risk of bias and/or low quality after the assessment. Due to the high heterogeneity present among the studies, a metanalysis could not be done. Thus, a descriptive analysis was performed. After applying the previously described criteria, thirty articles were included, assessed as medium or high quality. We analysed the data of 50865 subjects, 6096 of which were obese (BMI over 30 accordingly to the WHO criteria). The overall risk of re-tear after surgery is about the 10% more than normal BMI subjects. The rupture risk fluctuates in the studies without showing a significant trend. Obese subjects have a higher risk to develop tendinopathy and a worse outcome after surgery as confirmed in several human studies. The obesity influence on tendon structure and mechanical properties may rely on the fat tissue endocrine proprieties and on hormonal imbalance. Clinicians should consider obesity as a predisposing factor for the development of tendinopathies and for a higher risk of complications in patients who underwent surgical repair of tendons

Prophylactic treatment is advised for metastatic bone disease patients with a high risk of fracture. Clinicians face the task of identifying these patients with high fracture risk and determining the optimal surgical treatment method. Subject-specific finite element (FE) models can aid in this decision process by predicting the mechanical effect of surgical treatment. In this study, we specifically evaluated the potential of FE models to simulate femoroplasty, as uncertainty remains whether this prophylactic procedure provides sufficient mechanical strengthening to the weight-bearing femur. In eight pairs of human cadaveric femurs artificial metastatic lesions were created. In each pair, an identical defect was milled in the left and right femur. Four pairs received a spherical lesion in the neck and the other four an ellipsoidal lesion in the intertrochanteric region, each at the medial, superior/lateral, anterior and posterior side, respectively. One femur of each pair was augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (5–10 ml), while the contralateral femur was left untreated. CT scans were made at three different time points: from the unaffected intact femurs, the defect femurs with lesion and the augmented femurs. Bone strength was measured by mechanical testing until failure in eight defect and eight augmented femurs. Nonlinear CT-based FE models were developed and validated against the experimentally measured bone strength. Subsequently, the validated FE model was applied to the available CT scans for the three different cases: intact (16 scans), defect (16) and augmented (8). The FE predicted strength was compared for the three different cases. The FE models predicted the experimental bone strength with a strong correspondence, both for the defect (R. 2. = 0.97, RMSE= 0.75 kN) and the augmented femurs (R. 2. = 0.90, RMSE = 0.98 kN). Although all lesions had a “moderate” to “high” risk for fracture according to the Mirels’ scoring system (score 7 or 8), three defect femurs did not fracture through the lesion (intertrochanteric anterior, lateral and posterior), indicating that these lesions did not act as a critical weak spot. In accordance with the experimental findings, the FE models indicated almost no reduction in strength between the intact and defect state for these femurs (0.02 ± 0.1%). For the remaining “critical” lesions, bone strength was reduced with 15.7% (± 14.9%) on average. The largest reduction was observed for lesions on the medial side (up to 43.1%). For the femurs with critical lesions, augmentation increased bone strength with 29.5% (± 29.7%) as compared to the defect cases, reaching strength values that were 2.5% (± 3.7%) higher than the intact bone strength. Our findings demonstrate that FE models can accurately predict the experimental bone strength before and after augmentation, thereby enabling to quantify the mechanical benefit of femoroplasty. This way FE models could aid in identifying suitable patients for whom femoroplasty provides sufficient increase in strength. For all lesions evaluated in this study, femoroplasty effectively restored the initial bone strength. Yet, additional studies on larger datasets with a wide variation of lesion types are required to confirm these results

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a chronic, malignant B-cell disorder, with a less than 50% 5-year survival rate [1]. This disease is responsible for vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) in 34 to 64% of diagnosed patients [1], and at least 80% of MM patients experience pathological fractures [3]. Even though reduced DXA-derived bone mineral density (BMD) has been observed in MM patients with vertebral fractures [4], the current quantitative standard method is insufficient in MM due to the osteo-destructive bone changes. Finite-element (FE) analysis is a computational and non-destructive modeling and testing approach to determine bone strength using 3D bone models from CT images. Thus, this study aimed to assess the differences in FE-predicted critical fracture load in MM patients with and without VCFs in the thoracic and lumbar segments of the spine. Multi-detector CT (MDCT) images of two radiologically assessed MM patients (1 with VCFs and 1 without VCFs) were used to generate three-dimensional (3D) models of the whole spine. For each subject, the thoracic segments, 1 to 12 (T1-T12) and lumbar segments, 1 to 5 (L1-L5) were segmented and meshed. Heterogeneous, non-linear anisotropic material properties were applied by discretizing each vertebral segment into 10 distinct sets of materials. A compressive load was simulated by constraining the surface nodes on the inferior endplate in all directions, and a displacement load was applied on the surface nods on the superior endplate [2]. This analysis was performed using ABAQUS version 6.10 (Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI, USA). The MM subject with VCFs had originally experienced fractures in the T4, T5, T12, L1, and L5 segments whereas the MM subject without VCFs experienced none. The former displayed large and abrupt differences in fracture loads between adjacent vertebrae segments, unlike the latter, which exhibited progressive differences instead (no abrupt changes between adjacent vertebrae segments observed). Results from this preliminary study suggest that segments at high risk of fracture are collectively involved in an unstable network, which place the vertebral segments with high values of fracture loads (peaks) as well as the adjacent segments at risk of VCF. For instance, the high fracture load at T11 places T10, T11 and T12 at risk of fracture. Accordingly, T12 has already fractured, and T10 and T11 remain at risk. The relative changes between adjacent vertebrae segments that indicate instability (extremely high fracture load values) enables ease of identification of segments at high fracture risk. Clinicians would be able to work with pre-emptive treatment strategies in future as they can focus on more targeted therapy options at the high-risk vertebrae segments [3]

Physical functioning in patients undergoing hip surgery is commonly assessed in three ways: patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), performance test, or clinician-administered measure. It is recommended that several types of measures are used concurrently to capture an extended picture of function. Patient fatigue and burden, time, resources and logistical constraints of clinic and research appointments mean that collecting multiple measures is seldom feasible, leading to focus on a limited number of measures, if not a single one. While there is evidence that performance-tests and PROMs do not fully correlate, correlations between PROMs, performance tests and clinician-administrated measures are yet to be evaluated. It is also not known if the associations between function and patient characteristics depend on how function is measured. The aim of our study was to use different measures to assess function in the same group of patients before their hip surgery to determine 1. how well PROMs, performance tests and clinician-administrated measures correlate with one another and 2. Whether these measures are associated with the same patient characteristics. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the pre-operative information of 125 participants listed for hip replacement. The WOMAC function subscale, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and walk-, step- and balance-tests were assessed by questionnaire or during a clinic visit. Participant socio-demographics and medical characteristics were also collected. Correlations between functional measures were investigated with correlation coefficients (r). Regression models were used to test the association between the patient's characteristics and each of the three types of functional measures. None of the correlations between the PROM, clinician-administrated measure and performance tests were very high (r<0.90). The highest correlations were found between the WOMAC-function and the HHS (r=0.7) or the Walk-test (r=0.6), and between the HHS and the walk-test(r=0.7). All the other performance-tests had low correlations with the other measures(r ranging between 0.3 and 0.5). The associations between patient characteristics and functional scores varied by type of measure. Psychological status was associated with the WOMAC function (p-value<0.0001) but not with the other measures. Age was associated with the performance test measures (p-value ranging from ≤0.01 to <0.0001) but not with the WOMAC function. The clinician-administered (HHS) measure was not associated with age or psychological status. When evaluating function prior to hip replacement clinicians and researchers should be aware that each assessment tool captures different aspects of function and that patient characteristics should be taken into account. Psychological status influences the perception of function; patients may be able to do more than they think they can do, and may need encouragement to overcome anxiety. A performance test like a walk-test would provide a more comprehensive assessment of function limitations than a step or balance test, although performance tests are influenced by age. For the most precise description of functional status a combination of measures should be used. Clinicians should supplement their pre-surgery assessment of function with patient-reported measure to include the patient's perspective

Primary bony tumours of the elbow account for approximately 1% of all osseous tumours. The delayed diagnosis is commonly reported in the literature as a result of lack of clinician familiarity. We present the largest series of primary bone tumours of the elbow in the English literature. We sought to identify characteristics specific to primary elbow tumours and compare these to the current literature. We discuss cases of misdiagnosis and reasons for any delay in diagnosis. The authors also recommend a collaborative protocol for the diagnosis and management of these rare tumours. A prospectively collected national database of all bone tumours is maintained by an independent clerk. The registry and case notes were retrospectively reviewed from January 1954 until June 2013. Eighty cases of primary osseous elbow tumours were studied. Tumours were classified as benign or malignant and then graded according to the Enneking spectrum. There were no benign latent cases in this series. All cases in this series required surgical intervention. These cases presented with persistent rest pain, with or without swelling. The distal humerus was responsible for the majority and most aggressive of cases. The multidisciplinary approach at a specialist centre is integral to management. Misdiagnosis was evident in 12.5 % of all cases. Malignant tumours carried a 5-year mortality of 61%. Benign tumours exhibited a 19% recurrence rate and in particular, giant cell tumour was very aggressive. The evolution in treatment modalities has clearly benefited patients. Clinicians should be aware that elbow tumours can be initially misdiagnosed as soft tissue injuries or cysts. The suspicion of a tumour should be raised in the patient with unremitting, unexplained non-mechanical bony elbow pain. We suggest an investigatory and treatment protocol to avoid a delay to diagnosis. With high rates of local recurrence, we recommend regular postoperative reviews

Objectives

The evidence base to inform the management of Achilles tendon rupture is sparse. The objectives of this research were to establish what current practice is in the United Kingdom and explore clinicians’ views on proposed further research in this area. This study was registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN68273773) as part of a larger programme of research.