Aims. To compare the efficacy of decompression alone (DA) with i) decompression and fusion (DF) and ii) interspinous process device (IPD) in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Outcomes of interest were both patient-reported measures of postoperative pain and function, as well as the perioperative measures of blood loss, operation duration, hospital stay, and reoperation. Methods. Data were obtained from electronic searches of five online databases. Included studies were limited to randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) which compared DA with DF or IPD using patient-reported outcomes such as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), or perioperative data. Patient-reported data were reported as part of the systematic review, while meta-analyses were conducted for perioperative outcomes in MATLAB using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Forest plots were generated for visual interpretation, while heterogeneity was assessed using the I. 2. -statistic. Results. A total of 13 articles met the eligibility criteria. Of these, eight compared DA with DF and six studies compared DA with IPD. Patient-rated outcomes reported included the ODI and ZCQ, with mixed results for both types of comparisons. Overall, there were few statistically significant and no clinically significant differences in patient-rated outcomes. Study quality varied greatly across the included articles. Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes revealed DF to result in greater blood loss than DA (MD = 406.74 ml); longer operation duration (MD = 108.91 min); and longer postoperative stay in hospital (MD = 2.84 days). Use of IPD in comparison to DA led to slightly reduced operation times (MD = –25.18 min), but a greater risk of reoperation compared to DA (RR = 2.70). Conclusion. Currently there is no evidence for the use of DF or IPD over DA in both patient-rated and perioperative outcomes. Indeed, both procedures can potentially lead to greater cost and risk of complications, and therefore, a stronger evidence base for their use should be established before they are promoted as routine options in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis

The rate of arterial injury in trauma patients with pelvic ring fractures has been cited as high as 15%. Addressing this source of hemorrhage is essential in the management of these patients as mortality rates are reported as 50%. Percutaneous techniques to control arterial bleeding, such as embolization and REBOA, are being employed with increasing frequency due to their assumed lower morbidity and invasiveness than open exploration or cross clamping of the aorta. There are promising results with regards to the mortality benefits of angioembolization. However, there are concerns with regards to morbidity associated with embolization of the internal iliac vessels and its branches including surgical wound infection, gluteal muscle necrosis, nerve injury, bowel infarction, and thigh / buttock claudication. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether pelvic arterial embolization is associated with surgical site infection (SSI) in trauma patients undergoing pelvic ring fixation. This observational cohort study was conducted using US trauma registry data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Trauma Database for the year of 2018. Patients over the age of 18 who were transported through emergency health services to an ACS Level 1 or 2 trauma hospital and sustained a pelvic ring fracture treated with surgical fixation were included. Patients who were transferred between facilities, presented to the emergency department with no signs of life, presented with isolated penetrating trauma, and pregnant patients were excluded from the study. The primary study outcome was surgical site infection. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate treatment effects of angioembolization of pelvic vessels on surgical site infection, adjusting for known risk factors for infection. Study analysis included 6562 trauma patients, of which 508 (7.7%) of patients underwent pelvic angioembolization. Overall, 148 (2.2%) of patients had a surgical site infection, with a higher risk (7.1%) in patients undergoing angioembolization (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.0; 95% CI 2.7, 6.0; p < 0 .0001). Controlling for potential confounding, including patient demographics, vitals on hospital arrival, open fracture, ISS, and select patient comorbidities, pelvic angioembolization was still significantly associated with increased odds for surgical site infection (adjusted OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3, 3.2; p=0.003). This study demonstrates that trauma patients who undergo pelvic angioembolization and operative fixation of pelvic ring injuries have a higher surgical site infection risk. As the use of percutaneous hemorrhage control techniques increase, it is important to remain judicious in patient selection

Abstract. Objective. Flexible stabilisation has been utilised to maintain spinal mobility in patients with early-stage lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Previous literature has not yet established any non-fusion solution as a viable treatment option for patients with severe posterior degeneration of the lumbar spine. This feasibility study evaluates the mean five-year outcomes of patients treated with the TOPS (Total Posterior Spine System) facet replacement system in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods. Ten patients (2 males, 8 females, mean age 59.6) were enrolled into a non-randomised prospective clinical study. Patients were evaluated with standing AP, lateral, flexion and extension radiographs and MRI scans, back and leg pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) and the SF-36 questionnaires, preoperatively, 6 months, one year, two years and latest follow-up at a mean of five years postoperatively (range 55–74 months). Flexion and extension standing lumbar spine radiographs were obtained at 2 years to assess range of motion (ROM) at the stabilised segment. Results. The clinical outcome scores for the cohort improved significantly across all scoring systems. Radiographs at 2 years did not reveal any loss of position or loosening of metal work. There were two incidental durotomies and no failures at 5 years with no patient requiring revision surgery. Conclusions. The TOPS implant maintains clinical improvement and motion in the surgical management of LSS and spondylolisthesis, indicating it can be considered an option for these indications

Hypothesis. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is diagnosed by a history of claudication, clinical investigation, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dural sac on MRI or CT, and walking distance on the treadmill test. As radiological findings do not always correlate with clinical symptoms, additional diagnostic signs are needed. In patients without LSS, we observe the sedimentation of lumbar nerve roots to the dorsal part of the dural sac on supine MRI scans. In patients with LSS, this sedimentation is rarely seen. We named this phenomenon ‘sedimentation sign’ and defined the absence of sedimenting nerve roots as positive sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of LSS. We hypothesised that the new sedimentation sign discriminates between non-specific low back pain (LBP) and LSS. Methods and analysis. This prospective case-control study included 200 patients in an orthopaedic in- and outpatient clinic. Patients in the LBP group (n=100) had low back pain, a cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dural sac >120mm. 2. , and a walking distance >1000m; patients in the LSS group (n=100) showed claudication, a CSA < 80mm. 2. , and a walking distance < 200m. Results. A positive sedimentation sign was identified in 94 patients in the LSS group but in no patient in the LBP group. There was no difference in the detection of the sign between segmental levels L1 - L5 in the LSS group. Conclusion. Our findings show that a positive sedimentation sign exclusively and reliably occurs in patients with LSS, suggesting its usefulness in clinical practice. If future accuracy studies confirm the sign's high specificity, a positive sedimentation sign can rule in LSS, and with a high sensitivity, a negative sedimentation sign can rule out LSS. The sedimentation sign is potentially a valuable tool to identify patients who will benefit from spinal surgery

Objectives. Neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis is a posture dependant complaint typically affecting patients aged 50 years or older. Various treatment options exist for the management of this potentially debilitating condition. Non-surgical treatments: activity modification, exercise, NSAIDs, epidural injections. Surgical treatment options include decompression surgery and interspinous process device surgery. Interspinous process decompression is a relatively new, minimally invasive, stand-alone alternative to conservative and standard surgical decompressive treatments. The aim of this review is to evaluate the use of the X-Stop interspinous implant in all patients with spinal stenosis who were managed using the device in Northern Ireland up to June 2009. Method. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had the X-Stop device inserted for spinal stenosis by all consultant spinal surgeons in Northern Ireland. Patient demographics, clinical symptomatology, investigative modality, post-operative quality of life, cost effectiveness, complications and long-term outcomes were assessed. Information was collected from patients using a questionnaire which was posted to them, containing the SF-36 generic questionnaire and some additional questions. Results. A total of 23 patients underwent X-stop insertion in Northern Ireland at the time of this review, 19 patients returned their questionnaires and of these 17 were completed in full and therefore included. The mean age of the study population was 60.1 years and all patients included in the study had symptoms of neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed on MRI scan. The average hospital stay was 1.5 days compared to 7.5 days for decompressive laminectomy patients. Also, at a mean follow-up of 17.8 months, 2 patients suffered direct complications of device insertion requiring removal of the implant both of these patients agreed that they would undergo the operation again in the future. SF-36 scores indicate a quality of life improvement which equates to that of other popular orthopaedic operations such as total hip and total knee replacement. X-stop insertion has been shown to be much more cost-effective than decompressive laminectomy in previous studies. Conclusion. Decompression of the lumbar spine with the X-stop interspinous implant device is safe, cost-effective, minimally invasive, and at least as effective at improving symptomatology from lumbar spinal stenosis. It is obviously more invasive than non-surgical techniques, but is less invasive than lumbar decompression procedures, is less destructive to surrounding tissues and if it fails to produce the desired results can be removed easily and the option remains for the patient to under decompression

Study design. Prospective randomized study. Objective. Primary aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with posterolateral (interlaminar) instrumented lumbar fusion (PLF) in adult low grade (Meyerding 1 & 2) spondylolisthesis patients. Background data. Theoretically, TLIF has better radiological result than PLF in spondylolisthesis in most of the studies. Method. 24 patients of low grade adult spondylolisthesis were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group 1- PLF and group 2-TLIF. Study period was between August 2010 to March 2013. All patients were operated by a single surgeon (CN). Posterior decompression was performed in all patients. Average follow up period was 18.4 months. Quality of life was accessed with Visual analogue scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. Fusion was assessed radiologically by CT scan and X-ray. Result. Though fusion was significantly better in TLIF group, clinical outcome including relief of back pain and neurogenic claudication were better in PLF group. Rate of complication was also lower in PLF group. Conclusion. Considering the low complication rate and similar or better clinical results, posterolateral instrumented lumbar fusion is the better option in low grade adult spondylolisthesis

The causes of pain after TKA can be local (intra or extra-articular) or referred from a remote source. Local intra-articular causes include prosthetic loosening, infection, aseptic synovitis (wear debris, hemarthrosis, instability, allergy), impingement (bone soft tissue or prosthetic), an un-resurfaced patella and stress fracture of bone or the prosthesis. Some surgeons think that isolated component mal-rotation can be a source of pain, but component mal-rotation is rarely present in the absence of other technical abnormalities. Local extra-articular causes include pes anserine bursitis, saphenous neuroma/dysasthesias, post-tourniquet dysasthesias, complex regional pain syndrome and vascular claudication. Referred pain is most often from an arthritic hip or radicular pain from a spinal source. Patients with fibromyalgia can have persistent pain following their knee arthroplasty and should be warned of this possibility. Evaluation of the patient includes a history, physical exam, joint aspiration and plain radiographs. In selected patients, an anesthetic joint injection, bone scan, CT scan or MRI with metal subtraction may be helpful in the diagnosis. The joint aspiration should include a CBC and differential as well as an aerobic and anaerobic culture. Fungal and TB cultures are sometimes indicated. Re-operation for pain of unknown etiology following TKA is unlikely to yield an excellent result and both surgeons and patients should be aware of this probability

Aim. To evaluate morbidity and outcome associated with lumbar spine decompression for central spinal stenosis in the elderly compared with younger age groups. Patients & methods. Case notes review of patients with symptomatic and MRI proven central lumber canal stenosis, under the care of a single surgeon. The study population was 3 age groups: patients < 60 year of age (Group 1, n=21), patients between 60 and 79 years (Group 2, n=54), and > age of 80 years (Group 3, n=15). Data with regard to intra- and post-operative complications and subjective outcome variables were collected. These included pain (VAS), walking distance, Oswestry Disability score (ODI) and patient satisfaction scores. Results. There was a statistically significant improvement in VAS score for leg pain (p<0.05) and back pain (p<0.05) after surgery for each group. All three groups reported improvement in their walking distance. The average walking distance improved by factor 5 in groups 1 and 2 and by factor 2.5 in group 3 (p< 0.05). However the improvement in group 3 was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant improvement in ODI for all three groups (mean ODI improvement in Group 1, 16 points, Group 2, 23 points and Group 3, 15 points). Overall 96% of patients were satisfied and would consider the same treatment again under similar circumstances. The overall complication was 19% in group 1, 18% in group 2, and 33% in group 3. Conclusions. Surgery for neurogenic claudication in the octogenarian is associated with a higher complication rate. The outcomes however in this patient group are comparable to younger patients. Lumbar decompression surgery in octogenarians is a worthwhile procedure