Abstract
Objectives
Neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis is a posture dependant complaint typically affecting patients aged 50 years or older. Various treatment options exist for the management of this potentially debilitating condition. Non-surgical treatments: activity modification, exercise, NSAIDs, epidural injections. Surgical treatment options include decompression surgery and interspinous process device surgery. Interspinous process decompression is a relatively new, minimally invasive, stand-alone alternative to conservative and standard surgical decompressive treatments. The aim of this review is to evaluate the use of the X-Stop interspinous implant in all patients with spinal stenosis who were managed using the device in Northern Ireland up to June 2009.
Method
We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had the X-Stop device inserted for spinal stenosis by all consultant spinal surgeons in Northern Ireland. Patient demographics, clinical symptomatology, investigative modality, post-operative quality of life, cost effectiveness, complications and long-term outcomes were assessed. Information was collected from patients using a questionnaire which was posted to them, containing the SF-36 generic questionnaire and some additional questions.
Results
A total of 23 patients underwent X-stop insertion in Northern Ireland at the time of this review, 19 patients returned their questionnaires and of these 17 were completed in full and therefore included. The mean age of the study population was 60.1 years and all patients included in the study had symptoms of neurogenic claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed on MRI scan. The average hospital stay was 1.5 days compared to 7.5 days for decompressive laminectomy patients. Also, at a mean follow-up of 17.8 months, 2 patients suffered direct complications of device insertion requiring removal of the implant both of these patients agreed that they would undergo the operation again in the future. SF-36 scores indicate a quality of life improvement which equates to that of other popular orthopaedic operations such as total hip and total knee replacement. X-stop insertion has been shown to be much more cost-effective than decompressive laminectomy in previous studies.
Conclusion
Decompression of the lumbar spine with the X-stop interspinous implant device is safe, cost-effective, minimally invasive, and at least as effective at improving symptomatology from lumbar spinal stenosis. It is obviously more invasive than non-surgical techniques, but is less invasive than lumbar decompression procedures, is less destructive to surrounding tissues and if it fails to produce the desired results can be removed easily and the option remains for the patient to under decompression.
