Introduction. Previous registry studies of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) have focused on revision outcomes following primary surgery. Less is known about the effect of ceramic bearings on infection, dislocation, and mortality as outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the Medicare population. We asked (1) does the use of C-PE bearings influence outcomes following THA as compared with metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE); and (2) does the use of COC bearings influence outcomes following THA as compared with M-PE?. Methods. A total of 315,784 elderly Medicare patients (65+) who underwent primary THA between 2005 and 2014 with known bearing types were identified from the Medicare 100% inpatient sample administrative database. Outcomes of interest included relative risk of 90-day readmission, infection, dislocation, revision, or mortality at any time point after primary surgery. Propensity scores were developed to adjust for selection bias in the choice of bearing type at index primary surgery. Cox regression incorporating propensity score stratification (10 levels) was then used to evaluate the impact of bearing surface selection on outcomes, after adjusting for patient-, hospital-, and surgeon-related factors. Results. For primary THA patients treated with C-PE bearings and COC bearings, there was significantly reduced risk of infection relative to M-PE bearings (C-PE Hazard Ratio, HR: 0.86, p=0.001; COC Hazard Ratio, HR: 0.74, p=0.01). For the C-PE cohort, we also observed reduced risk of 90-day readmission (HR: 0.94, p<0.001); dislocation (HR: 0.81, p<0.001); and mortality (HR: 0.92, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in risk of revision for either the C-PE or COC bearing cohorts when compared with M-PE. For the COC cohort, there was no significant difference in readmission, dislocation, or mortality risk. Conclusions. The results indicate that, after adjusting for selection bias and various confounding patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-related factors, Medicare patients treated with primary THA with ceramic bearings exhibit lower risk of infection than those treated with M-PE bearings. In addition, C-PE bearings were associated with lower risk of dislocation and mortality. As in previous registry studies, we found that ceramic bearings have similar revision risk as M-PE bearings in primary THA at between 8 and 9 years of follow-up. The findings of this study support further research into the long-term association between ceramic bearings in primary THA and clinical outcomes

Introduction. Previous studies of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) hip bearings have focused on outcomes following primary surgery. Less is known about the utilization or outcomes of ceramic bearings in revision total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) for the Medicare population in the US. We asked (1) what is the utilization of ceramic bearings for R-THA in the Medicare population and how has it evolved over time; (2) does the use of C-PE bearings influence outcomes following R-THA as compared with metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE); and (3) does the use of COC bearings influence outcomes following R-THA as compared with M-PE?. Methods. A total of 31,809 Medicare patients (aged > 65y) who underwent R-THA between 2005 and 2013 with known bearing types were identified from the Medicare 100% inpatient sample administrative database. Outcomes of interest included relative risk of readmission (90 days) or infection, dislocation, rerevision, or mortality at any time point after revision. Propensity scores were developed to adjust for selection bias in the choice of bearing type at revision surgery. Cox regression incorporating propensity score stratification (10 levels) was then used to evaluate the impact of bearing surface selection on outcomes, after adjusting for patient-, hospital-, and surgeon-related factors. Results. The utilization of C-PE and COC bearings in RHA increased from 5.3% to 26.6% and from 1.8% to 2.5% between 2005 and 2013, respectively. For R-THA patients treated with C-PE bearings, there was reduced risk of 90-day readmission (Hazard Ratio, HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.96, p=0.007). We also observed a trend for reduced risk of infection with C-PE (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.74–1.04) that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.14). For R-THA patients treated with COC, there was reduced risk of dislocation (Hazard Ratio, HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58–0.99, p=0.04). There was no significant difference in risk of rerevision or mortality for either the C-PE or COC bearing cohorts when compared with M-PE. Discussion. The results indicate that, after adjusting for selection bias and various confounding patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-related factors, Medicare patients treated in a revision scenario with ceramic bearings exhibit similar risk of rerevision, infection, or mortality as those treated with M-PE bearings. Conversely, we found an association between the use of specific ceramic bearings in R-THA and reduced risk of readmission (C-PE) and dislocation (COC). The findings of this study support further research into the association between ceramic bearings in R-THA and lower risk of hospital readmission, dislocation, and, potentially, infection

Aim. Alumina ceramic on ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may reduce the prevalence of osteolysis due to its properties of low wear and chemical inertness. This is critical in the younger patient population as they place increased demands over a longer period. This study reports on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of modern cementless ceramic on ceramic THA at a minimum of 10 years in this younger group. Method. A series of 120 consecutive third generation ceramic cementless THA were performed at a single centre in 110 patients from 1997 to 1999. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 45 years (20 to 55 years). All procedures were carried out via the posterior approach using the same implant by the two senior authors. Results. At 10 years, 4 patients had died and 6 were lost to follow-up (5%). The mean Harris Hip Score was 94.7 points. All surviving implants analysed radiographically had evidence of stable bony ingrowth, with no cases of osteolysis. Wear rates were undetectable. There were 3 revisions (2.5%). One stem was revised following periprosthetic fracture, one stem was revised to facilitate a femoral shortening osteotomy. One cup was revised for anterior impingement causing psoas tendonitis. There was one incident of intraoperative ceramic liner chipping, which was changed without complication. There were no postoperative bearing fractures. Two patients reported intermittent squeaking at extreme hip flexion and internal rotation, the hips otherwise functioned well. The survival for both components with revision for any cause was 97.5%. Conclusion. Alumina ceramic on ceramic bearings in cementless primary THA in this series have resulted in good clinical and radiographic outcomes with low wear rates and excellent function in the demanding younger patient group at 10 years

Introduction. The success of total hip arthroplasty has meant its indications have been extended to the younger more active patient. Due to the higher activity levels and increased demands of these patients, revision rates have been traditionally higher than when compared to older patients [1]. Ceramic on ceramic bearings may offer a viable long term solution as manufacturing methods have evolved resulting in improved mechanical properties, particularly of third and fourth generation ceramics. We report the outcome of primary cementless, alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty with a minimum 10 year follow up in 110 patients under the age of 55 years of age at time of surgery. Methods. A series of 120 consecutive total hip arthroplasties in 110 patients were performed between June 1997 and February 1999 by the two senior authors. All patients had an Osteonics ABC acetabular component and SecurFit or SecurFit Plus femoral component (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) with an alumina C-taper ceramic head (Biolox Forte, Ceramtec, Plochingen, Germany). Results. Of the 110 patients originally in the study, 4 (3.6%) patients died, 6 (5%) were lost to follow up and 4 hips (3.6%) were revised by the time of the latest follow up. Clinical information was available for 106 hips in 96 surviving patients at a minimum of ten years of follow-up, and radiographic information was available for 90 hips from the same 96 patients. The mean follow up was 11.5 years (range 10 to 13.5 years). Survivorship analysis with revision for any reason as an endpoint was 96.5% at 10 years (CI 94.5% −98.7%) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Modified mean UCLA scores improved from 6.4 (range 4 to 10) pre operatively to 9 (range 4 to 10) at latest follow up. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 53.4 points (range 15 to 86) preoperatively, to 94.7 points (range 63 to 100) at latest follow up. All femoral stems had stable bone ingrowth, with no migration. Osteolysis was not observed around the femoral or acetabular components and there were no signs of radiological wear. 98 patients (92.4%) managed to continue with their current occupations during the follow up period whilst 5 patients (4.7%) changed occupation to work that required increased activity. Complications included 3 cases of iliopsoas tendonitis, 2 cases of squeaking, a ceramic liner chipping during insertion and sciatic nerve palsy. There were no cases of ceramic fracture in this younger, active cohort of patients. No evidence of bearing failure was demonstrated nor any signs of adverse reaction to wear debris. Conclusions. Alumina ceramic on ceramic bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty show good clinical and radiological outcomes in the higher demand younger age patient. Based on these results we now support heavy occupational work and regular impact sports in these patients once they have recovered from surgery

Large bearing surfaces are appealing in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as they may help create a greater range of impingement free motion and reduce the risk of dislocation. However, attempts to achieve this with a metal bearing surface have been blighted by adverse reactions to metal debris. Ceramic bearings have a good long-term track record in more conventional head sizes, and manufacturing techniques now permit the use of larger ceramic bearing surfaces using monoblock uncemented acetabular components. In this study, we are reviewing the early results of the Maxera® acetabular component (Zimmer, Indiana) at our institution. All data was collected prospectively. Maxera® acetabular component is a Titanium (Ti) shell with plasma sprayed Ti for the osteointegrative surface. Delta ceramic liner is inserted & locked into the cup shell by the manufacturer (non-modular). With the Maxera cup system, the bearing diameter is dictated by the acetabular component size. Acetabular components (AC) of 46 and 48 mm have a bearing diameter (BD) of 36 mm, AC of 50 and 52 mm: have a 40 mm BD, AC of 54 and 56 mm: have a BD of 44 mm and AC of 58–64: have a 48mm BD. Delta ceramic femoral head size of 44 and 48 mm have a modular Ti sleeve between the head and femoral stem trunnion. Femoral head sizes of 36 and 40 mm have no Ti sleeve. All THA had an uncemented femoral stem. Implants were inserted with a posterior approach. Patients were reviewed at 6 weeks, 6 months and then annually with radiographs. Clinical function was evaluated using WOMAC and UCLA scores along with joint perception questionnaires. Five hundred components have been implanted in 442 patients (250 women, 192 men) with a mean age of 55, (min 17, max 80) and a mean BMI of 26.9 (min 17.8, max 51). The mean acetabular size was 54 (min 46, max 64), leading to a mean femoral head size of 44. At a minimum of two years follow-up (mean 3.8 years): 5 patients have been revised, 4 secondary to undetected intraoperative fracture of the femur and only one due to early displacement of a Maxera® cup (0.2%). Five patients reported a mild squeaking; two reported clicking and one patient presented with a symptomatic heterotopic ossification. The WOMAC score improved significantly post-operatively, (57.4 compared to 4.4 post-operatively, p<0.001). The mean post-operative UCLA score was 6.9. Sixty percent (60.6%) of patients rated their joint perception as either “natural” or “artificial without limitation”. two patients (0.4%) suffered a dislocation after high velocity trauma without recurrence after closed reduction. No ceramic component fracture was recorded. This prospective study shows that this monoblock acetabular component provides an easy implantation with minimal complications. The ceramic bearing surface provides good clinical function and joint perception. Bearing surfaces of this design may provide an alternative to large head metal on metal (MoM) implants without the side effects of metal debris/ions

The objective of this study was to determine whether the bearing surface is a risk factor for revision after late dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Data from primary THAs were extracted from the New Zealand Joint Registry over a 13-year period. The mean age of patients was 68.9 years; 53.2% were female. The surgical approach used was posterior in 66% of THAs, lateral in 29% and anterior in 5%. There were 53,331 (65.1%) metal-on-polyethylene THAs, 14,093 (17.2%) ceramic-on-polyethylene, 8,177 (10.0%) ceramic-on-ceramic, 461 (0.5%) ceramic-on-metal, 5910, and (7.2%) metal-on-metal.

The primary endpoint was late revision for dislocation, with ‘late’ defined as greater than one year post-operatively. 73,386 hips were available for analysis. The overall revision rate was 4.3% (3,130 THAs), 1.1% (836) were revised for dislocation. Only 0.65% (470) hips were revised for dislocation after the first post-operative year.

The unadjusted hazard ratios (HR) showed significantly higher rates of revision for dislocation in ceramic-on-polyethylene (HR 2.48; p=0.001) and metal-on-polyethylene (HR 2.00; 95% p =0.007) compared to ceramic-on-ceramic. However, when adjusted for head size, age and surgical approach, only ceramic-on-polyethylene (HR 2.10; p=0.021) maintained a significantly higher rate of revision, whereas metal-on-polyethylene approached significance (HR 1.76; 95% p = 0.075).

In New Zealand, dislocation is the most common reason for revision, ahead of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. The relationships between bearing materials and risk of revision for late dislocation is controversial. However, in this study ceramic-on-ceramic shows lower risk rates for revision than other bearing surface combinations. Low wear and less debris, limited peri-articular inflammatory reaction and an healthy fibrotic pseudo-capsule are potential factors determining long-term stability of the hip joint.

Purpose

The fourth generation ceramic, in which zirconia is incorporated into the alumina matrix, was developed to reduce the risk of ceramic fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, clinical and radiographic results, and bearing-related failures associated with total hip arthroplasty using zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings over a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Ceramic bearings are currently the most widely used alternative to metal-on-polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A workgroup at International Consensus Meeting (ICM) analyzed the potential link between the type of bearing surface and the subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and found a higher incidence of PJI when using a metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surface. A potential reason is that the failure of a MoM bearing surface can result in adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR), which might provide a favorable environment for bacterial proliferation. In the last few years, several observational studies including national registries, showed that metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearing surfaces are associated with a higher rate of infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to ceramic bearings, in particular with the use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing (CoC) surfaces. After adjusting for selection bias and various confounding factors, patients treated with ceramic bearings experienced reduced risk of infection and MoP bearing surface is an independent risk factor correlating with higher incidence of PJI. The meta-analysis by Lee et al. comparing MoM with CoC cementless THA confirmed that the MoM is associated with a significantly higher revision rate than CoC group for any reason as well as for PJI. Furthermore, initial in-vitro studies have shown lower bacterial biofilm formation on ceramic bearing surfaces. Summarizing the current literature, ceramic bearings are associated with a lower risk of infection following THA

A standard is defined as something established by authority, custom, or general consent. Clearly that does not exist for ceramic on ceramic total hip replacement. A better question is: Is there any indication for a ceramic on ceramic total hip. The answer to that question should when possible be based on clinical outcome data including the value added (or not) with this more expansive technology. Ceramic on ceramic has been popularised based on its low wear. Is this clinically relevant? Probably not, based on currently available data. Both metal on highly crosslinked polyethylene and ceramic on highly crosslinked polyethylene have very low clinically documented wear rates with excellent outcomes in multiple studies. In addition, ceramic on ceramic bearings are more sensitive to implant position. Whereas polyethylene may tolerated edge loading and impingement, ceramic bearings are less likely to do so. Dislocation remains one of if not the top reason for early revision. Even with newer ceramics, there are still less options to fine tune hip stability with ceramic on ceramic bearing surfaces. When looking at the overall, risk of revision, Bozic et al concluded that hard bearings provided no benefit in terms of risk reduction of revision. Considering their higher cost, they questioned the use of these products especially in the 65 and older age group. Looking at the Australian Registry, the cumulative percent revision for ceramic-ceramic THA was 5.7% at 11 years compared to 5.1% for metal on crosslinked poly. The hazard ratio (adjusted for age and gender) was 1.09 in favor of ceramic on poly and the difference was highly significant (p=0.012). When one take into account the increased cost of ceramic on ceramic bearings, it is hard to make a case for ceramic on ceramic bearings. Any use of ceramic on ceramic bearings would have to be based on the hypothesis that in the long run in young active patients they may provide an advantage. This is a hypothesis with no data to support it currently

Background/Purpose. Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with ceramic bearings are widely performed in young, active patients and thus, long-term outcome in these population is important. Moreover, clinical implication of noise, in which most studies focused on ‘squeaking’, remains controversial and one of concerns unsolved associated with the use of ceramic bearings. However, there is little literature regarding the long-term outcomes after THAs using these contemporary ceramic bearings in young patients. Therefore, we performed a long-term study with a minimum follow-up of . 1. 5 years after THAs using contemporary ceramic bearings in young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) less than fifty. Materials and Methods. Among sixty patients (71 hips) with a mean age of 39.1 years, 7 patients (7 hips) died and 4 patients (4 hips) were lost before 15-year follow-up. The remaining 60 hips were included in this study with an average follow-up period of 16.3 years (range, 15 to 18). All patients underwent cementless THA using a prosthesis of identical design and a 28-mm third-generation alumina head by single surgeon. The clinical evaluations included the modified Harris hip score (HHS), history of dislocation and noise around the hip joint: Noise was classified into squeaking, clicking, grinding and popping and evaluated at each follow-up. Snapping was excluded through physical examination or ultrasonography. Radiographic analysis was performed regarding notching on the neck of femoral component, loosening and osteolysis. Ceramic fracture and survivorship free from revision were also evaluated. Results. The mean Harris hip score improved from 55.3 to 95.5 points (range, 83 to 100) at the time of the final follow-up. Seventeen patients (34.7%) reported noise around the hip joint: “squeaking” in one and “clicking” in 16 patients. Notching on the neck of femoral component suggesting impingement between neck and ceramic liner was demonstrated in 9 hips (15%) at average of 6.9 years postoperatively and located at 2 to 3.5 mm distal to edge of ceramic head. Although no chip fracture of ceramic ‘liner’ occurred, notching was associated with “clicking” sound (p<0.01). One patient who reported clicking sound underwent a revision THA because of ceramic ‘head’ fracture. Loosening, osteolysis or dislocation was not observed in any hip and survivorship free from revision at 5 years was 98%. Conclusion. Cementless THAs using 28-mm contemporary alumina ceramic head demonstrated excellent long-term outcome in young, active patients with ONFH. Despite this encouraging result, however, we remain concerned about ‘clicking’ sound, because we did observe it associated with notching on the neck of stem. Acknowledgement. This work was supported by Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (#B0101-14-1081)

Introduction and Aims. The 21. st. Century has seen ceramic bearings become an increasingly popular choice in total hip arthroplasty due to their high wear resistance and inert wear debris without osteolysis promising a long term bearing solution. Early ceramic bearings were hindered by fracture but improved manufacturing processes and materials subsequently produced stronger ceramics. These third generation ceramics showed greatly reduced fracture rates but there is limited evidence in the literature reporting their long term survival and wear characteristics. The purpose of this study was to determine osteolysis and survival rates of Alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of 15 years. Methods. We analyzed a series of 301 third-generation alumina-on-alumina cementless primary total hip replacements in 283 patients. The average age of the patients at the time of the arthroplasty was fifty-eight years, 51% were in women and 54% were right sided. All procedures were performed using the same surgical technique and the same implant at a single centre. Patients were followed up at six weeks, one, two, five, ten and 15 years. At 15 years postoperatively 46 patients (17%) had died of unrelated causes and 31 (10.2%) were lost to follow-up. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically. Retrieved bearings were analyzed for wear. Results. At the time of the latest follow-up the mean Harris Hip Score was 94 points and 97% of the patients scored an excellent or good result with less than 4% having moderate residual pain. Radiographically, all patients assessed had evidence of stable bony ingrowth. Minor osteolysis was seen adjacent to 4% of cups and in none of the stems. There were eleven revisions in all, four stem revisions due to periprosthetic fracture, one secondary to aseptic loosening and one to facilitate a femoral shortening osteotomy. One cup was revised for aseptic loosening and one cup was revised for soft tissue impingement. One cup underwent revision due to acetabular osteolysis due to metallosis with some ceramic wear caused by neck impingement. There were two revisions for ceramic fracture, one liner and one femoral head. Overall, the survival rate of the implants for any cause revision was 96% at 15 years, with. The rate of survival of both components, with revision because of aseptic loosening or osteolysis as the end point, was 99% at 15 years. Analysis of retrieved femoral heads identified a median wear rate of 0.2mm3/year. Conclusion. Ceramic bearings were designed to overcome the problem of osteolysis due to wear from polyethylene bearings. This study has shown that Alumina bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty have an excellent survival rate at 15 years with good function, low wear rate and no adverse radiographic changes typical of osteolysis. The fracture rate was low in our study. These findings strongly supporting the use of Ceramic as a bearing choice for the 21. st. Century

Introduction. Two types of ceramic materials currently used in total hip replacements are third generation hot isostatic pressed (HIPed) alumina ceramic (commercially known as BIOLOX®forte, CeramTec) and fourth generation alumina matrix composite ceramic consisting of 75% alumina, 24% zirconia, and 1% mixed oxides (BIOLOX®delta, CeramTec). Delta ceramic hip components are being used worldwide, but very few studies have analyzed retrieved delta bearings. The aim of this study is to compare edge loading ‘stripe’ wear on retrieved femoral heads from delta-on-delta, delta-on-forte and forte-on-forte ceramic bearings revised within 2 years in vivo. Material and Methods. Ceramic bearings revised at one center from 1998 to 2010 were collected (61 bearings). Eleven delta heads revised between 1–33 months were compared to 24 forte femoral heads with less than 24 months in vivo (Figure 1). The surface topography of the femoral heads was measured using a RedLux AHP (Artificial Hip Profiler, RedLux Ltd, Southampton, UK). Three representative samples were examined with a FEI Quanta 200 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Results. The median time to revision for delta femoral heads was 12 months, compared to 13 months for forte femoral heads. Sixteen out of 20 forte femoral heads and 6 out of 11 delta femoral heads had edge loading wear (Figure 2). The average volumetric wear rate for forte was 0.96 mm. 3. /yr (median 0.13 mm. 3. /yr), and 0.06 mm. 3. /yr (median 0.01 mm. 3. /yr) for delta (p=0.03). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in age, gender, time to revision or femoral head diameter between the two groups. Conclusions. Edge loading wear occurs in BIOLOX®delta ceramic bearings. Edge loading wear volumes and wear rates are less in these bearings compared to BIOLOX®forte bearings. These findings are consistent with hip simulator studies. Early analysis of retrieved implants is important to check the in vivo performance of biomaterials

Aims. Will Hydroxyapatite ceramic coated (HAC) arthroplasty perform well in patients under the age of fifty?. Methods. This is a study of 269 Hydroxyapatite ceramic coated (HAC) hip arthroplasties in patients under, the age of fifty with annual review using Harris Hip Score (HHS) and plain X-rays. Assessments were over a maximum of 19 years. Early patients (46) had implants with ceramic/plastic bearings. Later patients (223) all had ceramic on ceramic bearings. Results. HHS showed 90.3% scoring over 90 or 100. Lower scores mostly relate to other joint and medical problems. Aseptic loosening and thigh pain has not been a problem. Osteolysis and debris disease have only been seen rarely in hips with ceramic on polythene bearings. Fractured alumina components have been encountered (6 heads and 3 acetabular liners, 2.1%). Ceramic/ceramic hips have otherwise remained successful. Wear in polythene liners developed in 21 patients followed up more than 15 years (45.7%). 3 have been revised. The others are currently asymptomatic. Other complications include one post operative death and 14 dislocations (5.2%). Conclusions. HAC hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty does well. Hydroxyapatite bonding provides lasting implant/bone stability. No patients have thigh pain. Considering bearing surfaces, polythene will wear out and contribute to osteolysis and debris disease. Alumina bearings occasionally fracture. Zirconia Toughened Alumina has superseded Alumina which should reduce or eliminate the incidence of ceramic failure. HAC hip arthroplasty with ceramic bearings is advocated for patients under the age of fifty

Osteonecrosis is a pathologic bone condition caused by a disruption in the osseous circulation and impairment of normal cellular function which ultimately leads to bone infarction, osteocyte death, and joint degeneration. The incidence of osteonecrosis in the general population has been reported to be approximately 3 per 100,000 people. Up to 20,000 new cases are diagnosed each year and this condition is the indication for surgery in approximately 10% of all total hip arthroplasties performed in the United States. The hip is the most common joint affected, with approximately 75% of cases occurring in this joint, although multifocal osteonecrosis (defined as involvement of more than 3 joints) can also occur. Other commonly observed locations for osteonecrotic lesions include the knee, shoulder, wrist, and ankle. Joint preserving procedures may be performed for early stages without evidence of collapse, while intermediate lesions (e.g. femoral head collapse < 2 mm) may be candidates for joint preserving procedures such as bone grafting and rotational or proximal femoral varus osteotomies. However, total hip arthroplasty is usually required in advanced cases where there are large lesions, deformation of the femoral head, or acetabular involvement. Osteonecrosis has been traditionally associated with poor outcomes following total hip arthroplasty. However, recent studies using newer implant designs and surgical techniques have demonstrated outcomes comparable to the general total hip arthroplasty population. Johansson and colleagues, in a systematic reviewed of the literature, observed a decrease in the revision rate from 17% to 3% for arthroplasties performed later than 1990. The clinical outcomes were also comparable between patients who had osteoarthritis and those who had osteonecrosis. The young age at which these patients often present makes bearing surface choice challenging. Bearings that have low liner wear rates, such as ceramic bearings, had concerns with implant durability following reports of chipping and fracture of the ceramic. However, recent studies evaluating ceramic bearings in young patients with osteonecrosis have demonstrated that newer third and fourth generation ceramics have solved many of these issues. Byun et al. evaluated the clinical outcomes of ceramic bearings in patients younger than 30 years who had osteonecrosis and observed that at six year follow-up, none of the bearings had failed and that 95% of patients were able to continue with their prior occupation. Similar results at even longer follow-up periods were reported by Kim and colleagues who observed no failures in 93 ceramic hips at a mean follow-up of 11 years. Polyethylene wear continues to be a concern for these younger, more active patients. Early studies with non-highly cross linked polyethylene demonstrated high wear rates in these patients. Although newer polyethylene designs have become available which have demonstrated substantially lower wear than the traditional ultra high molecular weight polyethylene cups of the recent past, further studies are needed with these newer polyethylene bearings in the osteonecrosis population. The goal of treatment for femoral head osteonecrosis remains early diagnosis and joint preservation. For patients who present with femoral head collapse or acetabular involvement, total hip arthroplasty often is the only treatment option left. Although clinical outcomes for these patients were initially poor in earlier reports, the advent of modern cementless arthroplasty components, refined surgical techniques, and newer bearing designs have greatly improved the outcomes of this procedure

Introduction. The successful performance of ceramic on ceramic bearings in today's THA can mainly be addressed to the excellent tribological behaviour and the minimal wear of ceramic bearings. The clearance between head and shell plays a major role in this functionality of artificial hip joints. Knowledge about the deformation behaviour of the shell during implantation but also under daily loads is essential to be able to define a minimum clearance of the system. The aim of this work is to establish a tool for determining maximum ceramic shell deformation in order to predict minimum necessary clearance between heads and monolithic ceramic shells. Materials and Methods. In order to determine the minimum clearance the following in vivo, in vitro and in silico tests were taken into account:. Eight generic metal shells were implanted into cadaveric pelvises of good quality bone realizing an underreaming of 1 mm. Maximum deformation of the metal shells (u. m. ) after implantation were determined using an validated optical system. The deformations were measured 10 min. after implantation. The stiffnesses of the metal shells (C. m. ) were experimentally determined within a two-point-loading frame acc. to ISO 7206-12. The stiffness of a monolithic ceramic shell (C. c. ) representing common shell designs (outer diameter 46 mm, 3 mm constant wall thickness) were determined acc. to ISO 7206-12 using Finite-Element-Method (FEM). Maximum deformation for the ceramic shells (u. c,dl. ) under daily loading, represented by jogging (5kN, Bergmann et. al), was determined applying FEM. Press-fit forces (F. pf. = u. m. C. m. ) can be calculated with the results of test 1 and 2 considering linear elastic material behaviour. Assuming force equilibrium and applying the evaluated stiffness from test 3 the deformation of the ceramic shell (u. c. ) occurring after implantation can be estimated (u. c. = u. m. C. m. /C. c. ). For minimum clearance calculation of a monolithic ceramic shell (u. c,lt. ) in vivo deformation (u. c,dl. ) has to be considered additionally (u. c,lt. = u. c. + u. c,dl. ). Results. An average deformation of 177 µm was measured for the metal shells (average shell stiffness of 4368 N/mm). From the FEM the stiffness of the monolithic ceramic shell was calculated to be 9510 N/mm (46 mm). Deformation of 13 µm need to be considered from in-vivo relevant loading. The calculation of the minimum clearance for a generic monolithic ceramic shell (46 mm; 3 mm constant wall thickness) would result in 94 µm. Discussion. The above described method can be taken as a worst-case approach as long-term bone relaxation has deliberately been not taken into account, intra-operative and post-operative deformation has been superposed and a 1 mm underreaming represents an upper limit for good bone quality. More intra-operative shell deformation values would improve the power of the approach. The new tool can be used to define a necessary minimum clearance for a customer specific monolithic ceramic shell

Due to issues related to osteolysis which became increasingly evident in the 1990's, approaches to combat wear focused upon either improving ultra-high molecular grade polyethylene or to abandon it and employ alternative bearings: metal upon metal or ceramic upon ceramic (COC). Ceramics have played a role in hip bearings for decades with much of the experience coming from Europe. While there is consistent evidence of low wear rates in this bearing couple due to its surface hardness, wettability and resultant low friction, problems unique to this bearing couple were noted: a small but real incidence of fracture, surface damage due to metal transfer and stripe wear as well as the unique issue of squeaking. What we have learned is that these hard bearings (either COC or Metal on Metal) despite being able to use larger diameter heads, are exquisitely sensitive to component position and orientation. With the tremendous improvements in 2nd and now 3rd generation crosslinked polyethylenes demonstrating vastly reduced wear rates and having none of the issues of fracture, stripe wear, or squeaking, it remains unclear what role ceramic bearings have in modern use. Until the aforementioned issues are resolved, ceramic on ceramic bearings in the young patient should be used with caution. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: incidence of instability and noise

Introduction. Dislocation is one of the leading causes of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Polyethylene wear is one of the risk factors for late dislocations (>2 years). It can induce an inflammatory response resulting in distension and thinning of the pseudocapsule, predisposing the hip to dislocation. Alternatively, eccentric seating of the femoral head in a worn out socket may result in an asymmetric excursion arc predisposing the hip to impingement, levering out and dislocation. Highly cross linked polyethylene has a significantly lower wear rate as compared to conventional polyethylene. Incidence of late dislocations has been shown to be significantly greater with conventional polyethylene bearings as compared to ceramic bearings. However, there is no literature comparing the risk of dislocation between ceramic- on- ceramic (CoC) bearings with metal/ceramic- on- cross linked polyethylene (M/CoP) bearings and this was the aim our study. Methods. Data regarding revision for dislocation after primary THA for osteoarthritis (OA) between September 1999 and December 2013 was obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOA NJRR). Revision risk for dislocation was compared between CoC, CoP, and MoP bearings. Only those THAs with 28 mm, 32 mm, or 36 mm heads were included in the study. Results. The numbers at risk (0 years) in the CoC, CoP, and MoP groups were 53,648; 23,746; and 90,040 THAs respectively. The overall revision (dislocation)/100 observed years was 0.13. Revision rate/100 observed years in the CoC, CoP, and MoP groups was 0.12, 0.12, and 0.16 respectively. The cumulative percentage revision for dislocation (CPRD) for the three bearing types is shown in figure 1. The CPRD at 12 years in the CoC, CoP, and MoP groups was 0.9, 1.0 and 1.2 respectively. The rise in CPRD between 2 and 12 years (late dislocations) was 0.4, 0.6, and 0.6 in the CoC, CoP, and MoP groups respectively (Figure 1). The age and gender adjusted hazards ratio (HR) for revision for dislocation in CoC vs. CoP groups was 1.05 (p=0.684, 1month+); in MoP vs. CoP group was 1.45 (p<0.001, entire period) and MoP vs. CoC group was 1.55 (p<0.001, 6 month+). Computation of age and gender adjusted HR comparing the three bearing groups after stratification according to head sizes (28 mm, 32 mm and 36 mm) showed no significant difference in HR after 3 months (p≥0.061). Conclusion. The revision (dislocation)/100 observed years was greater in the MoP group as compared to CoC and CoP groups (MoP > CoC = CoP). The age and gender adjusted HR (revision for dislocation) was significantly greater in the MoP group as compared to CoC and CoP groups after 6 months. However, when the data was stratified according to head sizes, the age and gender adjusted HR was similar between the three bearing groups after 3 months. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in the risk of revision for dislocation between CoC, CoP, and MoP bearings after adjusting for age, gender, and head size after 3 months

Age is often used as a surrogate for activity. However, it has been demonstrated that BMI has a stronger correlation to post-operative activity than age. The fundamental exercise in choosing a bearing is maximizing the benefit-to-risk ratio. The following question should be addressed on a patient by patient basis: what available bearing is most likely to meet the needs of this patient, with an acceptable risk of revision surgery during their lifetime, is accepted in my community, and with a justifiable cost?. The risk of ceramic fracture is very low with Biolox® Delta, and that risk decreases with increasing head size. However, concerns of taper corrosion, not wear and osteolysis, have driven the increase in utilization of ceramic heads. More research is needed into the etiology of taper corrosion, especially surgeon variability in taper assembly. Crosslinked polyethylene has substantially reduced wear, osteolysis, and revision rates compared to non-crosslinked polyethylene, regardless of the countersurface. In the AOA National Joint Replacement Registry, ceramic/ceramic, metal/XLPE, ceramic/XLPE, and ceramicised metal/XLPE are the most commonly used bearing surfaces. With 12–15 year follow-up, there is no difference in the cumulative percent revision of these four bearings in patients aged <55. Ceramic heads are variably more expensive. The ability to recoup the increased cost of ceramic heads through a diminished lifetime revision cost is dependent on the price premium for ceramic and the age of the patient. A wholesale switch to ceramic bearings regardless of age or cost differential could result in an economic burden to the health system. One measure of “standard” is simply “the most frequently used”. In this regard, market data alone makes the determination of “standard” without regard to clinical or economic outcomes. However, longer follow-up, including financial data, is necessary to better assess the relative value (benefit-to- risk ratio) of all the available bearing couples

Hip arthroplasty surgeons have various bearing choices to make on behalf of their patients. We make those choices based on our knowledge of pre-clinical wear testing data and the outcome of clinical and radiological follow-up studies. The initial use of conventional polyethylene revealed limitations in its use in younger patients. Modern highly crosslinked polyethylene is a vastly improved bearing surface that means less wear and its consequences. Despite this, registry data still suggests that loosening, lysis and dislocation are problematic causes of implant failure. The functional success of hip replacement surgery, the ageing population and younger patients requesting arthroplasty means we should predict ongoing issues consequent to wear related events even with the newer polyethylenes. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings surfaces have a long history of successful clinical use. The benefits of ceramic bearings are its superior wear characteristics, the minimal biological response to the ceramic wear products and the ability of ceramics to be offered in larger head sizes. Its limitations have been reports of fracture and squeaking. Fourth generation ceramic articulations have reduced the fracture incidence. Squeaking has been reported to occur in 3% to 20% in different series but revision for squeaking is extremely, low suggesting it is not a significant clinical problem. Edge loading occurs in most hip articulations and is thought to be the primary mechanism in the squeaking event. Modern methodologies of “functional” implant orientation may reduce the incidence of squeaking. While wear and its consequences remain significant issues in hip arthroplasty, the future will require a bearing with reduced wear and biologically inert wear products. This bearing exists already. “The future is now”

Background. Wear and osteolysis are major contributors, which limit the durability of total hip Arthroplasty (THA) and ultimately cause it to fail. Efforts were made to decrease wear by highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) and using ceramic bearings. Questions/Purposes. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the five year performance of large sized (32mm and 36mm) ceramic and metal heads on X3 HXLPE (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA). Materials and Methods. One hundred and twenty near-consecutive patients that underwent primary THA between January 2006 and December 2009 for osteoarthritis with five-year radiographic and clinical follow-up were identified from our institutional review board-approved prospective database. All patients received a non-cemented THA with larger femoral head (32 or larger) on X3 HXLPE, either a ceramic (n=60) or metal (n=60). Linear and volumetric wear was measured using the computer-assisted Roman software. Results. At final follow up, the mean wear rates were not significantly different (p=0.63): 0.018 ± 0.06 mm/yr and 0.021 ± 0.06 mm/yr for ceramic-on-X3 and metal-on-X3, respectively. When negative values were considered zero as worst-case scenario, wear rates for ceramic-on-X3 and metal-on-X3 HXLPE groups were 0.032 ± 0.04 mm/yr and 0.041 ± 0.05 mm/yr, respectively (P=0.55). Mean volumetric wear rates were also statistically similar: 68.56 mm3/y and 79.96 mm3/y for the ceramic-on-X3 and metal-on-X3 HXLPE groups respectively (p=0.78); when negatives were considered zeroes, they were 121.42 mm3/y and 164.63 mm3/y, respectively (p=0.20). Patients with ceramic heads were significantly younger (p <0.01), more active (p<0.01) and had better clinical scores than those with metal heads. Conclusions. Large ceramic and metal heads on HXLPE have excellent durability at minimum 5 years followup without any statistical significant difference in linear or volumetric wear rates