Abstract
Background
Wear and osteolysis are major contributors, which limit the durability of total hip Arthroplasty (THA) and ultimately cause it to fail. Efforts were made to decrease wear by highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) and using ceramic bearings.
Questions/Purposes
The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the five year performance of large sized (32mm and 36mm) ceramic and metal heads on X3 HXLPE (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA).
Materials and Methods
One hundred and twenty near-consecutive patients that underwent primary THA between January 2006 and December 2009 for osteoarthritis with five-year radiographic and clinical follow-up were identified from our institutional review board-approved prospective database. All patients received a non-cemented THA with larger femoral head (32 or larger) on X3 HXLPE, either a ceramic (n=60) or metal (n=60). Linear and volumetric wear was measured using the computer-assisted Roman software.
Results
At final follow up, the mean wear rates were not significantly different (p=0.63): 0.018 ± 0.06 mm/yr and 0.021 ± 0.06 mm/yr for ceramic-on-X3 and metal-on-X3, respectively. When negative values were considered zero as worst-case scenario, wear rates for ceramic-on-X3 and metal-on-X3 HXLPE groups were 0.032 ± 0.04 mm/yr and 0.041 ± 0.05 mm/yr, respectively (P=0.55). Mean volumetric wear rates were also statistically similar: 68.56 mm3/y and 79.96 mm3/y for the ceramic-on-X3 and metal-on-X3 HXLPE groups respectively (p=0.78); when negatives were considered zeroes, they were 121.42 mm3/y and 164.63 mm3/y, respectively (p=0.20). Patients with ceramic heads were significantly younger (p <0.01), more active (p<0.01) and had better clinical scores than those with metal heads.
Conclusions
Large ceramic and metal heads on HXLPE have excellent durability at minimum 5 years followup without any statistical significant difference in linear or volumetric wear rates.
