Autologous cell therapy using stem cells and progenitor cells is considered to be a popular approach in regenerative medicine for the repair and regeneration of tissue and organs. In orthopaedic practice, autologous cell therapy has become a major focus, particularly, as a feasible treatment for tendon injury. Tendons are dense connective tissue that bridge bone to muscle and transmit forces between muscle and bone to maintain mechanical movement. Tendons are poorly vascularised and have very little capacity to self-regenerate. Degeneration of tendon is often caused by injury. The pathogenesis of tendon injury, commonly known as tendinosis, is not an inflammatory condition but is secondary to degenerative changes, including disruption of the collagen matrix, calcification, vascularisation and adipogenesis. The aetiology of tendinosis is considered to be multifactorial and the pathogenesis is still unclear. Intrinsic factors such as a lack of blood and nutrition supply and extrinsic factors such as acute trauma and overuse injury caused by repetitive strain, have been implicated as contributors to the pathogenesis of tendinosis. More recent studies suggest that programmed tendon cell death (tenocyte apoptosis) may play a major role in the development of tendinosis. Such cellular abnormalities may influence the capacity of tendon to maintain its integrity. Traditional treatments such as anti-inflammatory drugs, steroid injections and physiotherapy are aimed at symptom relief and do not address the underlying pathological changes of degeneration. Here, we propose that autologous cell therapy may be an innovative and promising treatment for tendon injury. We will present evidence that suggest that autologous tendon cell therapy may be feasible to repair and regenerate tendon. We will also present data summarising the preclinical evaluation of autologous tendon cell therapy in animal models and the safety and tolerability of autologous tendon cell therapy in humans in studies, which are currently conducted at the Centre for Orthopaedic Research at the University of Western Australia

Introduction. The natural history of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is not cleanly understood, but most of them progresse to the joint destruction and requires total hip replacement arthroplasty. There are several head preserving procedure, but no single therapeutic method proved to be effective in preventing progression of the disease. The possibility has been raised that implantation of bone marrow containing osteogenic precursors may be effective in the treatment of this disease. However, there are no long-term follow-up results of cell therapy for ONFH. AS far as we know, there are no reports about bone graft and cell therapy for ONFH. Therefore, we performed a prospective clinical and radiological evaluation on ONFH treated with core decompression combined with autoiliac bone graft and an implantation of autologous bone marrow cells as a therapeutic method of ONFH. Materials and Methods. Sixty-one hips in 52 patients with ONFH were included in this study. The average follow-up of the patients was 68 (60∼88) months. The necrotic lesions were classified according to their size and location, and we compared the results. Results. At the last follow-up, the rate of excellent or good results was 80% (12/15 hips) in the small lesion group, 65% (17/26 hips) in the medium size group, and 28% (6/20 hips) in the large size group. The procedures were a clinical success in 4 of 5 hips(80%) with stage I, 23 of 35 hips (65.7%) with Stage II and 7 hips of 18 hips(38.9%) with stage III and 1 of 3 hips(33.3%) with stage IV. Among the 20 cases with large sized necrotic lesions, 17 cases were laterally located and this group showed the worst outcome with 13 hips (76.5%) having bad or failed clinical results. Conclusions. The outcome of cancellous bone grafting combined with implantation of autologous bone marrow cells differed depending on the size and location of the lesion. The patients who have a large sized lesion or medium sized lateral located lesion would not be considered as a good candidate for head preserving procedure. However for the medium sized lesions, this procedure showed a competent clinical result against other head preserving procedures

The ability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to differentiate in vitro into chondrocytes, osteocytes and myocytes holds great promise for tissue engineering. Skeletal defects are emerging as key targets for treatment using MSCs due to the high responsiveness of bone to interventions in animal models. Interest in MSCs has further expanded in recognition of their ability to release growth factors and to adjust immune responses.

Despite their increasing application in clinical trials, the origin and role of MSCs in the development, repair and regeneration of organs have remained unclear. Until recently, MSCs could only be isolated in a process that requires culture in a laboratory; these cells were being used for tissue engineering without understanding their native location and function. MSCs isolated in this indirect way have been used in clinical trials and remain the reference standard cellular substrate for musculoskeletal engineering. The therapeutic use of autologous MSCs is currently limited by the need for ex vivo expansion and by heterogeneity within MSC preparations. The recent discovery that the walls of blood vessels harbour native precursors of MSCs has led to their prospective identification and isolation. MSCs may therefore now be purified from dispensable tissues such as lipo-aspirate and returned for clinical use in sufficient quantity, negating the requirement for ex vivo expansion and a second surgical procedure.

In this annotation we provide an update on the recent developments in the understanding of the identity of MSCs within tissues and outline how this may affect their use in orthopaedic surgery in the future.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:291–8.

Autologous tendon cell injection (ATI) is a promising non-surgical treatment for tendinopathies and tendon tear that address its underlying pathology. The procedure involves harvesting autologous tendon tissue, the isolation of the tendon cells, expansion under quality assured GMP cell laboratory and the injection of the tendon cells via U/S into the degenerative tendon tissue. In clinical practice, the patella (PT) and palmaris longus (PL) tendons are common sites used for tendon tissue biopsy. The objective of this study is to compare the tendon cell quality, identity, purity, doubling time and yield of cells between PT and PL tendons for ATI. Tendon tissue biopsies were harvested from PT via U/S using a 14-gauge needle or resected surgically from the PL tendon. The biopsies were transported to a GMP cell laboratory, where tendon cells were isolated, cultured and expanded for 4 to 6 weeks, and analysed for viability, cell doubling time, cellular characteristics including cell purity, potency and identity (PPI). Tendon samples from 149 patients were analysed (63 PT). Average biopsy weight was 62mg for PT and 119mg for PI (p<0.001). Average cell doubling time (83.9 vs 82.7 hours), cellular yield (16.2 vs 15.2x106), viability (98.7 vs 99.0%) and passage number (3 vs 3) were not significantly different between tendons. Additionally, ddPCR analyses showed no differences of PPI including tendon cell markers of collagen type I, scleraxis and tenomodulin. No post-biopsy complications or contamination were reported for either group. Assessing tendon tissue from palmaris tendon is relatively easier. Tendon tissue biopsy tissue for autologous tendon cell therapy can be obtained from either the PT or PL tendons. Tendon cells isolated from PT and PL were equal in growth characteristics and PPI. There are no differences in the quality of tendon cells isolated from the PT or PL

Osteoarthritis is a global problem and the treatment of early disease is a clear area of unmet clinical need. Treatment strategies include cell therapies utilising chondrocytes e.g. autologous chondrocyte implantation and mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) e.g. microfracture. The result of repair is often considered suboptimal as the goal of treatment is a more accurate regeneration of the tissue, hyaline cartilage, which requires a more detailed understanding of relevant biological signalling pathways. In this study, we describe a modulator of regulatory pathways common to both chondrocytes and MSCs. The chondrocytes thought to be cartilage progenitors are reported to reside in the superficial zone of articular cartilage and are considered to have the same developmental origin as MSCs present in the synovium. They are relevant to cartilage homeostasis and, like MSCs, are increasingly identified as candidates for joint repair and regenerative cell therapy. Both chondrocytes and MSCs can be regulated by the Wnt and TGFβ pathways. Dishevelled Binding Antagonist of Beta-Catenin (Dact) family of proteins is an important modulator of Wnt and TGFβ pathways. These pathways are key to MSC and chondrocyte function but, to our knowledge, the role of DACT protein has not been studied in these cells. DACT1 and DACT2 were localised by immunohistochemistry in the developing joints of mouse embryos and in adult human cartilage obtained from knee replacement. RNAi of DACT1 and DACT2 was performed on isolated chondrocytes and MSCs from human bone marrow. Knockdown efficiency and cell morphology was confirmed by qPCR and immunofluorescence. To understand which pathways are affected by DACT1, we performed next-generation sequencing gene expression analysis (RNAseq) on cells where DACT1 had been reduced by RNAi. Top statistically significant (p < 0 .05) 200 up and downregulated genes were analysed with Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis software. We observed DACT1 and DACT2 in chondrocytes throughout the osteoarthritic tissue, including in chondrocytes forming cell clusters. On the non-weight bearing and visually undamaged cartilage, DACT1 and DACT2 was localised to the articular surface. Furthermore, in mouse embryos (E.15.5), we observed DACT2 at the interzones, sites of developing synovial joints, suggesting that DACT2 has a role in cartilage progenitor cells. We subsequently analysed the expression of DACT1 and DACT2 in MSCs and found that both are expressed in synovial and bone marrow-derived MSCs. We then performed an RNAi knockdown experiment. DACT1 knockdown in both chondrocyte and MSCs caused the cells to undergo apoptosis within 24 hours. The RNA-seq study of DACT1 silenced bone marrow-derived MSCs, from 4 different human subjects, showed that loss of DACT1 has an effect on the expression of genes involved in both TGFβ and Wnt pathways and putative link to relevant cell regulatory pathways. In summary, we describe for the first time, the presence and biological relevance of DACT1 and DACT2 in chondrocytes and MSCs. Loss of DACT1 induced cell death in both chondrocytes and MSCs, with RNA-seq analysis revealing a direct impact on transcript levels of genes involved in the Wnt and TFGβ signalling, key regulatory pathways in skeletal development and repair

Introduction. Problematic bone defects are encountered regularly in orthopaedic practice particularly in fracture non-union, revision hip and knee arthroplasty, following bone tumour excision and in spinal fusion surgery. At present the optimal source of graft to ‘fill’ these defects is autologous bone but this has significant drawbacks including harvest site morbidity and limited quantities. Bone marrow has been proposed as the main source of osteogenic stem cells for the tissue-engineered cell therapy approach to bone defect management. Such cells constitute a minute proportion of the total marrow cell population and their isolation and expansion is a time consuming and expensive strategy. In this study we investigated human bone marrow stem cells as a potential treatment of bone defect by looking at variability in patient osteogenic cell populations as a function of patient differences. We produced a model to predict which patients would be more suited to cell based therapies and propose possible methods for improving the quality of grafts. Methods. Bone marrow was harvested from 30 patients undergoing elective total hip replacement surgery in Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast (12 males, 18 females, age range 52-82 years). The osteogenic stem cell fraction was cultured and subsequently analysed using colony forming efficiency assays, flow cytometry, fluorescence activated cell sorting and proteomics. Results. The number and proliferative capacity of osteogenic stem cells varied markedly between patients. Statistical analysis revealed significantly better osteogenic capacity in:. male patients. samples in which the growth hormone Fibroblastic Growth Factor-2 was added to culture medium. patients who used the cholesterol lowering agent simvastatin. Patient use of inhaled steroids and NSAIDs were found to have detrimental effects. A statistical model to predict marrow profiles based on these variables was produced. Conclusions. Stem cell based tissue engineering represents the future of the treatment of bone defect. This study provides evidence that inter-patient variability in marrow cell colony forming and proliferation ability can in some way be explained by patient associated factors. Using this knowledge, we can identify which patients would be best suited to this method of treatment and propose techniques for enhancement of their graft profiles

There is currently no cure for osteoarthritis (OA), although there are ways to manage it, but most require quite invasive surgeries. There is a resident mesenchymal progenitor cell (MPC) population within the synovial membrane of the joint that have the ability to differentiate into bone, fat, and cartilage. We hypothesise that in vivo and in vitro cell surface marker expression comparisons of the MPCs can determine which population has the highest chondrogenic capacity and is best suited for future clinical trials. Method optimisation protocol: Synovial biopsies (2 or 5mm) were obtained from patients undergoing surgery. The biopsies were digested in either collagenase type I, IA, IV or II at a concentration of 0.5 or 1.0 mg/mL. Digestion was conducted at 37°C for 30, 60, 90 or 120min. To assay for the number of MPCs obtained, the cell suspension was stained with CD90 (a synovial MPC marker) and magnetically purified. The purified cells were then assayed by flow cytometry (Co-stained with a live/dead cell marker, BV510) or bright-field microscopy. Study protocol: Synovial tissues were digested in type IV collagenase for two hours to obtain a single cell suspension. The cells were subsequently stained with mesenchymal stem cell markers, including CD 90, CD 271, CD 44, CD73, and CD105, a macrophage marker, CD68. The macrophages were excluded and the remaining cells were index sorted into 96-well plates. The cells were expanded, and underwent 21-day chondrogenic, adipogenic, and osteogenic differentiation. Differentiation was assayed using RT-qPCR and histological methods. Additionally, the cells were re-analysed for marker expression after culturing. Optimisation: Synovial biopsies of 5mm produced a greater number of live CD90+ cells than 2mm biopsies. It was observed that type IV collagenase at 1mg/ML treatment for 120 min (hip) and 90 min (knee) obtained the greatest number of CD90+ MPCs from the synovium. Results: A single cell was isolated from an OA hip biopsy and was positive for the markers CD90, CD44, CD73, and negative for the markers CD68, CD271, CD105. Following differentiation, PCR analysis suggested that the cell line was able to differentiate into chondrocytes and adipocytes, but not osteoblasts. Histology data agreed with the PCR data with the adipocytes and chondrocytes having positive staining, whereas the osteoblasts were negative. FACS analysis following proliferation showed that the expression in vivo versus in vitro was the same except CD105 that became positive after proliferation in vitro. MPCs express cell surface markers that provide information as to populations have the best cartilage regeneration abilities. By determining the properties of the MPCs in OA hips that allow for better chondrogenic differentiation abilities in vitro, selecting the optimal cells for regenerating cartilage can be done more efficiently for novel cell therapies for OA

Osteochondral (OC) defects of the knee are associated with pain and significant limitation of activity. Studies have demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapies in treating osteochondral defects. There is increasing evidence that the efficacy of MSC therapies may be a result of the paracrine secretion, particularly exosomes. Here, we examine the effects of MSC exosomes in combination with Hyaluronic Acid (HA) as an injectable therapy on functional osteochondral regeneration in a rabbit osteochondral defect model. Exosomes were purified from human MSC conditioned medium by size fractionation. A circular osteochondral defect of 4.5 mm diameter and 2.5 mm depth was surgically created in the trochlear grooves of 16 rabbit knees. Thereafter, eight knees received three weekly injections of 200 µg of exosomes in one ml of 3% HA, and the remaining eight knees received three weekly injections of one ml of 3% HA only. The rabbits were sacrificed at six weeks. Analyses were performed by macroscopic and histological assessments, and functional competence was analysed via Young Modulus calculation at five different points (central, superior, inferior, medial and lateral) of the repaired osteochondral defect site. MSC exosomes displayed a modal size of 100 nm and expressed exosome markers (CD81, TSG101 and ALIX). When compared to HA alone, MSC exosomes in combination with HA showed significantly better repair histologically and biomechanically. The Young Modulus was higher in 4 out of the 5 points. In the central region, the Young Modulus of MSC exosome and HA combination therapy was significantly higher: 5.42 MPa [SD=1.19, 95% CI: 3.93–6.90] when compared to HA alone: 2.87 MPa [SD=2.10, 95% CI: 0.26–5.49], p < 0 .05. The overall mean peripheral region was also significantly higher in the MSC exosome and HA combination therapy group: 5.87 MPa [SD=1.19, 95% CI: 4.40–7.35] when compared to HA alone: 2.70 MPa [SD=1.62, 95% CI: 0.79–4.71], p < 0 .05. The inferior region showed a significantly higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 7.34 MPa [SD=2.14, 95% CI: 4.68–10] compared to HA alone: 2.92 MPa [SD=0.98, 95% CI: 0.21–5.63], p < 0.05. The superior region showed a significantly higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 7.31 MPa [SD=3.29, 95% CI: 3.22–11.39] compared to HA alone: 3.59 MPa [SD=2.55, 95% CI: 0.42–6.76], p < 0.05. The lateral region showed a significantly higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 8.05 MPa [SD=2.06, 95% CI: 5.49–10.61] compared to HA alone: 3.56 MPa [SD=2.01, 95% CI: 1.06–6.06], p < 0.05. The medial region showed a higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 6.68 MPa [SD=1.48, 95% CI: 4.85–8.51] compared to HA alone: 3.45 MPa [SD=3.01, 95% CI: −0.29–7.19], but was not statistically significant. No adverse tissue reaction was observed in all the immunocompetent animals treated with MSC exosomes. Three weekly injections of MSC exosomes in combination with HA therapy results in a more functional osteochondral regeneration as compared to HA alone

Conservative management of osteoarthritis is boring, boring, boring! After all, we are surgeons. We operate, we cut! We all know that to retain respectability we have to go through the motions of ‘conservative management’, just so that we don't appear too anxious to apply a ‘real’ solution to the problem. However, the statistics are overwhelming. An estimated 43 million Americans have ‘arthritis’, but only 400,000 are coming forward each year for TKR. That means that in one way or another 42,600,000 are being treated conservatively. Most of those are self treating by self medication, use of external support, but mostly by decreasing their activities to a level where they can tolerate symptoms. They come to us when these measures stop working. We know what to do. 1. Weight loss – patients don't do it, 2. Physical therapy – very limited effectiveness 3. NSAIDS – patients have already tried OTC NSAIDS and have heard scary stories about therapeutic NSAIDS, 4. Hyaluronans – expensive, labour intensive, modest effectiveness, 5. Glucosamine/Chondroitin – might work, won't hurt, mixed evidence, 6. SAM-e, MSM – limited evidence – who knows?. What's on the horizon? Could OA of the knee go the way of RA, i.e. dramatically disappear from the population seeking TKR? It could happen. Electrical stimulation – it does good things for chondrocytes, circulation, suppresses destructive enzymes and in controlled studies reduces symptoms and improves function, deferring TKR. Cell therapy – possibly an effective solution to early cartilage lesions in the knee

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of bone marrow derived stromal cells (BMSC) for the treatment of non-unions in fractures. Methods. An ethically approved single centre randomised control trial recruited 35 patients for treatment of non-unions with BMSC during 2006–2010. Autologous BMSC were culture expanded at the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standard Oscell® laboratory in the hospital. Following in vitro expansion- cells in autologous serum and serum alone were randomised for insertion at one of the two fracture sides by StratOs® computer software. Patients and the operating surgeon were blinded to the side of cell insertion. Such method of randomisation created internal controls at the fracture sites- one side receiving the cell (‘test side’) and other, not (‘control’). Serial radiographs extending up to an average of twelve months were evaluated by six independent assessors blinded to side of cell insertion. Callus formation and bridging of fracture was compared for ‘test’ and ‘control’ side. Radiological and clinical outcome at final follow-up was also noted. Results. The study had 21 males and 14 females with a mean age of 51.2±13.2 years (range 18–76). The average duration of non-union was 3±2 years (range 1–10 years) with mean 3.5 (range 1–12) surgical interventions prior to BMSC insertion. Independent assessment of ‘test’ and ‘control’ side revealed that the callus formation and fracture bridging was slow although a trend to improvement on the side of the BMSC insertion was observed at 9–12 months. At final follow-up 22 patients progressed to bony union; 13 patients had persisting non union. Conclusion. BMSC can achieve progression to union in substantial number of cases of resistant non-unions where the alternative is extensive reconstructive procedures or amputations. Larger trials are required to study the pattern of early healing following cell therapy in such cases