Persistent post-surgical pain remains a problem after knee replacement with some studies reporting up to 20% incidence. Pain is usually felt by those who do not operate to be a monolithic entity. All orthopaedic surgeons know that this is not the case. At its most basic level, pain can be divided into two categories, mechanical and non-mechanical.

Mechanical pain is like the pain of a fresh fracture. If the patient does not move, the pain is less. This type of pain is relieved by opiates. Mechanical pain is seen following knee replacement, but is fortunately becoming less frequent. It is caused by a combination of malrotations and maltranslations, often minor, which on their own would not produce problems. The combination of them, however, may produce a knee in which there is overload of the extensor mechanism or of the medial stabilizing structures. If these minor mechanical problems can be identified, then corrective surgery will help.

Non-mechanical pain is present on a constant basis. It is not significantly worsened by activities. Opiates may make the patient feel better, but they do not change the essential nature of the pain. Non-mechanical pain falls into three broad groups, infection, neuropathic and perceived pain. Infection pain is usually relieved by opiates. Since some of this pain is probably due to pressure, its inclusion in the non-mechanical pain group is questionable, but it is better left there so that the surgeon always considers it. Low grade chronic infection can be extremely difficult to diagnose. Loosening of noncemented knee components is so rare that when it is noted radiologically, infection should be very high on the list of suspicions. The name neuropathic pain suggests that we know much more about it than we do in reality. Causalgia or CRPS-type two is rare following knee replacement. CRPS type one or reflex sympathetic dystrophy probably does exist, but it is probably over-diagnosed especially by the author of this abstract. The optimum treatment I have found is lumbar sympathetic blocks. Perceived pain is the largest group. It does not matter what you tell the patient, some believe a new knee should be like a new car, i.e. you step into it and drive away. The fact that they have to work to make it work is horrifying. Some of this pain is actually mechanical, especially in those with no benefits such as hairstylists. Perceived pain is widespread. The classic treatise on this is Dr. Ian McNabb's book “Backache”. It should be studied by all orthopaedic surgeons, who wish to understand pain complaints.

Any experienced knee surgeon will have his list of red flags or caveats. These are often politically incorrect and this information is transferred to young surgeons, usually in dim bars late at night. I will list only a few. If the patient comes in with a form asking for a disability pension on the first visit. If the patient's mother answers the questions. If the patient comes in taking massive doses of opiates. If the patient is referred to you by a surgeon, who does more knee replacements than you do. There is also the recently described Fern Silverman's syndrome.

Persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) remains a problem after knee replacement with some studies reporting up to 20% incidence. Pain is usually felt by those who do not operate to be a monolithic entity. All orthopaedic surgeons know that this is not the case. At its most basic level, pain can be divided into two categories, mechanical and non-mechanical.

Mechanical pain is like the pain of a fresh fracture. If the patient does not move, the pain is less. This type of pain is relieved by opiates. Mechanical pain is seen following knee replacement, but is becoming less frequent. It is caused by a combination of malrotations and maltranslations, often minor, which on their own would not produce problems. The combination of them, however, may produce a knee in which there is overload of the extensor mechanism or of the medial stabilizing structures. If these minor mechanical problems can be identified, then corrective surgery will help.

Non-mechanical pain is present on a constant basis. It is not significantly worsened by activities. Opiates may make the patient feel better, but they do not change the essential nature of the pain. Non-mechanical pain falls into three broad groups, infection, neuropathic and perceived pain. Infection pain is usually relieved by opiates. Since some of this pain is probably due to pressure, its inclusion in the non-mechanical pain group is questionable, but it is better left there so that the surgeon always considers it. Low grade chronic infection can be extremely difficult to diagnose. Loosening of noncemented knee components is so rare that when it is noted radiologically, infection should be very high on the list of suspicions. The name neuropathic pain suggests that we know much more about it than we do in reality. Causalgia or CRPS-type two is rare following knee replacement. CRPS-type one or reflex sympathetic dystrophy probably does exist, but it is probably over-diagnosed. The optimum treatment I have found is lumbar sympathetic blocks. Lyrica, Gabapentin and Cymbalta may also help. Perceived pain is the largest group. It does not matter what you tell the patient, some believe a new knee should be like a new car, i.e. you step into it and drive away. The fact that they have to work to make it work is horrifying. Perceived pain is widespread. The classic treatise, Dr. Ian McNabb's book “Backache”, should be studied by all who wish to understand pain complaints.

Any experienced knee surgeon will have his list of red flags or caveats. I will list only a few. If the patient comes in with a form asking for a disability pension on the first visit. If the patient's mother answers the questions. If the patient comes in taking massive doses of opiates. If the patient is referred to you by a surgeon who does more knee replacements than you do.

There are other issues such as good old fibromyalgia, which appears to have gone the way of the dodo. It has been replaced by something equally silly called central sensitization. The theory of central sensitization is that if one has pain somewhere or other for three months or six months or whatever, there are going to be changes in the brain and spinal cord. It then does not matter what happens to the original pain, i.e. whether or not it goes away, the pain will persist because of the changes in the brain, hence, the title of the pain in the brain syndrome. If this theory was correct, we might as well all go home because we have all been wasting our time for the last 30 years because none of our patients would get any better. After all, all of our patients have had pain for a lot longer than three months, many of them have been involved in trauma and sometimes, compensation is at issue. The pain in the brain theory, therefore, sounds about as realistic as the flat earth society or the treatment of Galileo.

Persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) remains a problem after knee replacement with some studies reporting up to 20% incidence. At its most basic level, pain can be divided into two categories, mechanical and non-mechanical.

Mechanical pain is like the pain of a fresh fracture. If the patient does not move, the pain is less. This type of pain is relieved by opiates. Mechanical pain is seen following knee replacement, but is fortunately becoming less frequent. It is caused by a combination of malrotations and maltranslations, often minor, which on their own would not produce problems. The combination of them, however, may produce a knee in which there is overload of the extensor mechanism or of the medial stabilizing structures. If these minor mechanical problems can be identified, then corrective surgery will help.

Non-mechanical pain is present on a constant basis. It is not significantly worsened by activities. Opiates may make the patient feel better, but they do not change the essential nature of the pain. Non-mechanical pain falls into three broad groups, infection, neuropathic and perceived pain.

Infection pain is usually relieved by opiates. Since some of this pain is probably due to pressure, its inclusion in the non-mechanical pain group is questionable, but it is better left there so that the surgeon always considers it. Low grade chronic infection can be extremely difficult to diagnose. Loosening of noncemented knee components is so rare that when it is noted radiologically, infection should be very high on the list of suspicions.

The name neurogenic pain suggests that we know much more about it than we do in reality. Causalgia or CRPS-type two is rare following knee replacement. CRPS type one or reflex sympathetic dystrophy probably does exist, but it is probably over-diagnosed especially by the author of this abstract. The optimum treatment I have found is lumbar sympathetic blocks. Lyrica, Gabapentin and Cymbalta may also help.

Perceived pain is the largest group. It does not matter what you tell patient, some believe a new knee should be like a new car, i.e. you step into it and drive away. The fact that they have to work to make it work is horrifying. Some of this pain is actually mechanical, especially in those with no benefits such as hairstylists. Perceived pain is widespread. The classic treatment on this is Dr. Ian McNabb's book “Backache”. It should be studied by all orthopaedic surgeons, who wish to understand pain complaints.

There are other issues such as good old fibromyalgia, which appears to have gone the way of the dodo. It has been replaced by something equally silly called central sensitization. The theory of central sensitization is that if one has pain somewhere or other for three months or six months or whatever, there are going to be changes in the brain and spinal cord. It then does not matter what happens to the original pain, i.e. whether or not it goes away, the pain will persist because of the changes in the brain, hence, the title of the pain in the brain syndrome.

If this theory was correct, we might as well all go home because we have all been wasting our time for the last 30 years because none of our patients would get any better. After all, all of our patients have had pain for a lot longer than three months, many of them have been involved in trauma and sometimes, compensation is at issue. The pain in the brain theory, therefore, sounds about as realistic as the flat earth society or the treatment of Galileo.

There are two types of pain, mechanical and non-mechanical. Mechanical pain hurts with movement/use, is not constant and is helped by morphine-type products. Non-mechanical pain is different. It is present 24 hours a day, often worse at night, and except for the pain of infection, is not relieved by morphine-type products.

If the cause of mechanical pain can be determined, it can be corrected by an operation. The usual cause of postoperative mechanical knee pain nowadays is multifactorial, i.e. a combination of minor errors, none of which on their own would require revision.

Non-mechanical pain, other than infection, is much more difficult to handle. The commonest cause is not really a pain complaint, it is disappointment due to a failure of expectation. It does not matter how often you tell patients, some patients still think they should step in a drive away. A lot of these failures of expectations become much more realistic by the end of year one.

There are several other categories. Incipient osteoarthritis or sensitive people (The Princess and the Pea). If the pain complaints were severe with minimal arthritis, an operation is not likely to help.

The patient on disability for no clear reason is unlikely to get a good result and Workmen's Compensation Board and motor vehicle accident patients are also a very bad prognostic sign and will often produce the postoperative painful knee. Preoperative use of large doses of morphine is also a very bad sign. It is not clear if it is the morphine, which influences the patient or the patient, who influences the morphine.

There are several pain syndromes, some of which are purely psychiatric such as Conversion Disorders and Somatoform Pain Disorders. Treatment of purely psychiatric conditions should be a referral to a psychiatrist is in order.

Complex regional pain syndrome is an organic pain disorder. Type 2 is causalgia or an actual nerve injury. This is unusual following knee replacement other than the odd drop foot, which even after recovery, leaves an area of dysaethesia on the dorsum of the foot. Type 1 used to be called reflex sympathetic dystrophy. This is not uncommon after total knee replacement. I managed to collect more than 40 cases. One problem is that the diagnosis to some extent is a diagnosis of exclusion. If the diagnosis can be made, then treatment is available including Cymbalta, Lyrica or Gabapentin. I have found most success with lumbar sympathetic blocks, but it is difficult to find someone, who can do these. Some patients have been treated with implantable electrical spinal stimulators with variable results.

The current flavour of the month pain syndrome is called central sensitization. The theory is that if someone has pain for more than six months, then there will be changes in the brain, which will remain after the original pain goes away, hence, the title the pain in the brain syndrome. If this theory were correct, then we as arthroplasty surgeons have been collectively wasting our time for the last 40 years as no patient would have recovered. The likelihood, therefore, of this theory having any basis in reality is pretty remote.

Fortunately, by the end of year one, the vast majority of our knee replacement patients are reasonably content with the procedure.

The evolution of orthopedic implants has witnessed a great evolution and allowed insights into the various metals and alloys compatible with the human body. However, some recent reports have raised concerns regarding hypersensitivity to several metals used in orthopedic implants. These cases are mostly documented in the field of arthroplasty. Metal ion release following hip or knee arthroplasty is a known phenomenon and associated immune reactions to these metal ions have been implicated in the causation of these hypersensitivity reactions. These reactions frequently lead to poor outcome following these implant surgeries. We here present two rare cases of metal induced hypersensitivity reactions following orthopedic surgeries. We have also reviewed the literature in this context to look into the various causes of metal reactions, types of implant involved in hypersensitivity, methods of testing and management options in these cases

Aims

The aims of this study were to describe the demographic, socioeconomic, and educational factors associated with core surgical trainees (CSTs) who apply to and receive offers for higher surgical training (ST3) posts in Trauma & Orthopaedics (T&O).

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) is a common paediatric disorder with documented racial predilection. No data exists regarding the Australian indigenous and Australian non-indigenous populations. This study provides a comprehensive demographic and epidemiologic analysis of SCFE in South Australia, with emphasis on establishing associations between increasing obesity and incidence. A demographic review of all cases of SCFE managed in South Australian public hospitals between 1988 and 2007 was performed. Clinical presentation, surgical management and complication profile information was collected. Given that obesity is implicated in the biomechanical causation of SCFE due to increased shearing forces, particular emphasis was placed on gathering weight, race, gender and age data. A profile of the incidence and nature of SCFE was generated. Comparisons were then drawn between this profile and existing epidemiologic percentile data of weight, age and gender in South Australia. A rising prevalence of obesity in South Australia corresponded with a rising incidence of SCFE. However, this relationship was not linear as the incidence of SCFE has doubled in the last 20 years and the average weight of SCFE patients has increased markedly. The indigenous population was found to have higher rates of obesity than the non- indigenous population in South Australia. The indigenous population also has a relative risk of developing a SCFE of over three times the non-indigenous population. The overall rate of complications in South Australian public hospitals was low, with avascular necrosis being recognised in our profile. The rise in incidence of SCFE in South Australia; especially noticeable in the indigenous population is associated with an increasing prevalence of obesity. The considerable morbidity associated with SCFE was confirmed in our analysis and further highlights the importance of public health initiatives to tackle obesity in our community

Introduction. Reaming of the canal is an important step in the debridement phase of treating intramedullary infections. Numerous techniques of radical canal debridement have been successfully reported. The use of the Reamer-Irrigation-Aspiration system (RIA-Synthes) is currently expanding to include this clinical scenario. Materials and methods. Prospective collection of data related to infected cases treated with the use of the RIA in a tertiary referral centre referring to a 3 year period. Peri-operative details, microbiology results, and follow-up outcome over a minimum period of 12 months post-surgery are reported. Results. Twenty patients (13 men), with average age 44.8 years (18–75), suffering from 7 tibial and 13 femoral infections represent the study cohort. There were 19 surgical-site-infections, and 1 spontaneous haematogenous infection in non-previously operated extremity. The canal was stabilised using an antibiotic-loaded-cement-nail in 18 cases. The antibiotic nail was subsequently removed after 6–8 weeks. The most commonly isolated organism was staphylococcus aureus. There were followed-up regularly (2,6, 12 weeks, and then at 6 months and 12, 24, 36 months). At 6 months follow up (range 12–43 months) no recurrence was observed. Two patients died during the course of the study. One patient at the day after surgery due to septic shock, and another one at 2 years due to irrelevant causation. Another patient had a below knee amputation after debriding of the canal for pan-medullary osteomyelitis. However, there was no recurrence in the stump at the latest follow up after 1 year. Conclusion. The usage of this new device shows promising results in the treatment of intramedullary osteomyelitis. Reaming under simultaneous irrigation and suction appears to be an effective and safe alternative for debridement of the intra medullary infections of femur and tibia. Long term follow up is essential, as post traumatic osteomyelitis can occur at any time after surgical treatment although the majority of recurrences are seen within 2 years

Introduction. Fracture non-union is a devastating cause of patient morbidity. The cost of NU treatment ranges from £7,000 to £79,000. With an estimated 11,700 cases in the UK pa the financial implications are huge, potentially costing several hundreds of million of pounds annually. Successful outcome in the management of non-union is based upon correctly identifying the underlying cause(s) and addressing them appropriately. Aim. The aim of this study was to assess the causative factors in non-union in order to optimize the management of non-union. The causes of NU were categorized into 4 groups (infection, dead bone/gap, host factors, mechanical). Method. 100 consecutive patients who had surgery for long bone non-union were analysed. Information was obtained from the patient clinic visits, notes, radiographs and laboratory results. The cause(s) of the non-union were identified, recorded and divided into 4 groups; host, mechanical, dead bone/gap at NU site and infection. Results. The mean age at time of injury was 41.4(±16.7)years; male/female ratio was 3:1, 80% were lower limb (52% of all cases were tibial). 69% were high energy, 38% were open. 26% of patients had a single attributable cause, 59% had two causes, 14% had three causes and one had all four. Mechanical causation was found in 56% of cases, dead bone/gap in 50%, host factors in 44%, infection in 40% of patients. 5.7% of the infections were unexpected new/occult positive findings. 73% of patients with previously treated infection but without ongoing infection had multiple positive cultures. Conclusion/discussion. Surgical procedures for non-union often address a single aspect yet 74% had more than one attributable cause. With a 6% occult infection rate multiple tissue samples for microbiology and pathology investigation should be carried out routinely in every patient with non-union. The multi-factorial nature of non-union makes meticulous patient assessment vital to maximise the chance of treatment success

Aims

Orthopaedic infection is a potentially serious complication of elective and emergency trauma and orthopaedic procedures, with a high associated burden of morbidity and cost. Optimization of vitamin D levels has been postulated to be beneficial in the prevention of orthopaedic infection. This study explores the role of vitamin D in orthopaedic infection through a systematic review of available evidence.

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) is a surgical technique that has become more popular in recent years for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis in young patients. For these patients, an HRA offers the advantages of preserving the physiologic anatomy of a patient's femoral head size and neck offset, which has been theoretically suggested to improve range of motion and muscle function, as well as preserving bone stock for future revision surgeries. Although the improvements in quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) are well-documented, there is a lack of literature documenting the improvements in quality of life in patients undergoing HRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred and four consecutive patients presenting for elective HRA at our institution were recruited between 2004 and 2008 for participation in this study, which was approved by the Ethics Review Board at our institution. The mean age was 51±6y, male:female ratio 79:24 and mean BMI of 29.7±4.4 Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to preoperatively plan each procedure, and intraoperative procedures were performed using individualized templates [Kunz M, Rudan JF, Xenoyannis GL, Ellis RE. Computer assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(4):600–6]. Surgery time was 90±28 min including time for intraoperative verification of templating accuracy. Mobilization with physiotherapy began within 24 hrs of surgery and continued until the patient was discharged, usually within 2–3 days of surgery. Each patient completed the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS), the UCLA activity rating, the SF-36 mental and physical health score and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires at their preoperative appointment, then at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperative. In addition, radiographs were taken at these appointments to confirm component position, and to check for signs of loosening or heterotopic ossification. Chi-square and t-tests were used for within and between group comparisons on selected variables and across times. RESULTS. Only four patients required revision to THA, with one case of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, one femoral neck fracture and two infections. The mean of the preoperative modified Harris Hip Scores was 51±19.7 with a significant improvement in the mean score at 6 months, 1 and 2 years postoperative (p<0.01). The preoperative UCLA activity index averaged 4 (range 2–9), improving to a mean of 6 at 6 months (p<0.001) then at 1 to 2 years to 7 (p<0.001). Mental state and further assessment of physical function were performed using the SF-36 scores, with the physical score initially 27.5 and improving to 45.2 after 2 years (p<0.01). The mental component score (MCS) means were almost unchanged, from 50.3 preoperatively to 51.5 after 2 years (p<0.21). Further data processing showed that patients who began with a below-average mental score also had significantly worse WOMAC scores for pain, stiffness and function; these patient showed a significantly higher MCS at 2 years (p<0.05). Those whose MCS were above average preoperatively showed little difference after 2 years. DISCUSSION. The computer-assisted surgical procedure allowed excellent reproduction of the patients' native anatomy, with an average postoperative difference in neck-shaft angle of 8°. We found that template-guided HRA provided reliable improvements in the patients' self-reported quality of life, based on improvements in the modified HHS, WOMAC, UCLA activity index, and SF-36 physical and mental scores. The stiffness scores did not improve as significantly as did the pain and function scores; we suspect this is partly due to the patients continuing to rely on coping mechanisms they used preoperatively to reduce the range of motion in their hips. Regarding mental component scores, the lower MCS group had worse WOMAC scores preoperatively, as well as worse general physical and physical role subscales of the SF-36 and worse scores in all of the mental component subscales of the SF-36. It is difficult to determine causation because our study was not designed to focus keenly on mental components. However, it is reassuring that these patients with worse mental well-being experienced such significant improvements in their mental well-being with surgical management of their hip symptoms, and surgeons should thus not shy away from performing surgery on patients due to concerns that a patient's depressive symptoms may indicate a potential for a poorer result. We conclude that template-guided HRA provided significant and reproducible improvements in patient quality of life, irrespective of preoperative mental well-being, making this procedure attractive for carefully selected patients with early-onset hip osteoarthritis

Plots are an elegant and effective way to represent data. At their best they encourage the reader and promote comprehension. A graphical representation can give a far more intuitive feel to the pattern of results in the study than a list of numerical data, or the result of a statistical calculation.

The temptation to exaggerate differences or relationships between variables by using broken axes, overlaid axes, or inconsistent scaling between plots should be avoided.

A plot should be self-explanatory and not complicated. It should make good use of the available space. The axes should be scaled appropriately and labelled with an appropriate dimension.

Plots are recognised statistical methods of presenting data and usually require specialised statistical software to create them. The statistical analysis and methods to generate the plots are as important as the methodology of the study itself. The software, including dates and version numbers, as well as statistical tests should be appropriately referenced.

Following some of the guidance provided in this article will enhance a manuscript.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1593–1603.

We aimed to determine quality of life and burnout among Dutch orthopaedic trainees following a modern orthopaedic curriculum, with strict compliance to a 48-hour working week. We also evaluated the effect of the clinical climate of learning on their emotional well-being.

We assessed burnout, quality of life and the clinical climate of learning in 105 orthopaedic trainees using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, linear analogue scale self-assessments, and Dutch Residency Educational Climate Test (D-RECT), respectively.

A total of 19 trainees (18%) had poor quality of life and 49 (47%) were dissatisfied with the balance between their personal and professional life. Some symptoms of burnout were found in 29 trainees (28%). Higher D-RECT scores (indicating a better climate of learning) were associated with a better quality of life (r = 0.31, p = 0.001), more work-life balance satisfaction (r = 0.31, p = 0.002), fewer symptoms of emotional exhaustion (r = -0.21, p = 0.028) and depersonalisation (r = -0,28, p = 0.04).

A reduced quality of life with evidence of burnout were still seen in a significant proportion of orthopaedic trainees despite following a modern curriculum with strict compliance to a 48-hour working week. It is vital that further work is undertaken to improve the quality of life and reduce burnout in this cohort.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1133–8.