Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVIII | Pages 100 - 100
1 May 2012
Bills P Underwood RJ Cann PM Hart A
Full Access

INTRODUCTION. There is increasing worldwide interest in the assessment of wear in explanted hip components. This is due is part to high profile failures of orthopaedic components in the US, whilst in the UK hip resurfacings have been experiencing a higher than expected failure rate. The reasons for these failures are not well understood, with data from the NJR suggesting the 43% of MoM resurfacing failures are unexplained. Wear analysis is a vital tool in determining failure mechanisms and ultimately improving the longevity of joint replacements through improved design and manufacturing control. There are currently no relevant measurement standards for the evaluation of retrieved orthopaedic components. This paper will assess two of the most commonly used techniques namely roundness measurement and co-ordinate measurement. The advantages and disadvantages of both techniques are considered in this paper. ROUNDNESS MACHINE. The Talyrond 365 is a stylus based roundness machine. The component is located on a rotating table and the stylus measures the deviation from a perfect circle as the component is slowly rotated. The Talyrond measures a single profile to an accuracy of 30 nm and up to 72,000 data points per revolution. The air spindle has a radial accuracy of <0.02 μm and the Talymin gauge a minimum resolution of 12 nm. Individual roundness profiles can be stitched together to build up 3D cylinder maps, allowing 3D pictures of sections of explanted hip components to be generated. COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINE. Co-ordinate measuring machines (CMMs) have been widely used in manufacturing quality and research departments for a number of years and the CMM is recognised as a powerful and important tool capable of ascertaining geometric data from a component. The CMM used in this study was a Zeiss Prismo CMM (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Rugby, UK) with a probing error of 0.7 μm. Components are securely held in a chuck fixture arrangement and the dimensions of the component in the portion of the bearing that is unworn is ascertained through measurement. The initial measurements are used to produce a reverse engineered 3D CAD surface which represents the component ‘pre-wear’ surface. The surface of the component is then scanned and the deviation from this pre-wear surface is mapped. The maximum linear wear and wear volume are then calculated directly. DISCUSSION. The main advantage of CMM and Talyrond is that they are available in most metrology and measurement rooms. The CMM is a particularly versatile machine and can be used to measure any orthopaedic components. There is a need to develop a suitable Standard for both machines detailing a protocol to measure explanted hip and quantify the wear. A study is underway to measure a set of explanted hip components to allow a detailed comparison between of measurements between the Talyrond and CMM. The result of this study will be included in the paper. CONCLUSIONS. The CMM and Talyrond are both instruments suited to measuring wear of explanted hips. A full evaluation of the systems and the development of robust measurement protocol and standard would be advantageous to the orthopaedic industry


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Mar 2021
Pryce G Al-Hajjar M Thompson J Wilcox R Board T Williams S
Full Access

Abstract. Objectives. Impingement of total hip replacements (THRs) can cause rim damage of polyethylene liners, and lead to dislocation and/or mechanical failure of liner locking mechanisms[1]. A geometric model of a THR in situ was previously developed to predict impingement for different component orientations and joint motions of activities[2]. However, the consequence of any predicted impingement is unknown. This study aimed to develop an in-vitromethod to investigate the effects of different impingement scenarios. Method. A ProSim electro-mechanical single-station hip simulator (Simulation Solutions) was used, and the 32mm diameter metal-on-polyethylene THRs (DePuy Synthes) were assessed. The THR was mounted in an inverted orientation, and the input (motion and loading) applied simulated a patient stooping over to pick an object from the floor[3]. The impingement severity was varied by continuing motion past the point of impingement by 2.5° or 5°, and compressive load applied in the medial-lateral direction was varied from 100N to 200N. Each test condition was applied for 40,000 cycles (n=3). Rim penetration was assessed using a CMM and component separation was measured during the tests. Results. Varying the impingement severity from 2.5° to 5° increased rim penetration two-fold (by >0.05mm) and increased medial-lateral component separation three-fold (by >0.3mm) (both p<0.001). Increasing the medial-lateral load had less effect on the rim penetration and component separation, with exception of rim penetration with the higher impingement severity condition. Conclusion. The impingement severity influenced the medial-lateral component separation, suggesting that increasing the impingement severity could increase the risk of dislocation. The impingement severity, which could be predicted from geometric modelling, was also found to significantly affect rim penetration, meaning this method could be used alongside geometric modelling to predict impingement severity in a range of scenarios. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 75 - 75
1 Mar 2013
Bone M Langton D Lord J Patil S Partington P Joyce T
Full Access

Introduction. There is much current debate concerning wear and corrosion at the taper junctions of large head total hip replacements, particularly metal-on-metal hips. Is such damage a modern concern or has it always occurred in total hip replacement but not previously noted. To investigate this five explanted V40 Exeter femoral stems (Stryker Howmedica) were obtained following revision surgery at a single centre. In all cases, the 24–26 mm femoral heads were still attached. Hypothesis. In conventional ‘small head’ modular hip prostheses such as the Exeter, negligible wear and corrosion is seen at the taper junction of explanted devices. Methods. The articulating surface and the taper junction of each femoral heads was measured using a Mitutoyo LEGEX322 co-ordinate measuring machine (CMM) In each case a wear map was generated and the wear volume from the contact surface was calculated using a bespoke MATLAB program. The accuracy of such measurements has been previously shown to be within 0.5mm3. Results. Wear analysis of the articulating surfaces found unworn surfaces with each femoral head having less than 1 mm. 3. volumetric wear. All tapers had minimal wear with volumetric wear of less than 0.5 mm. 3. . Discussion and Conclusion. The wear volumes measured fall within the CMM measuring accuracy of 0.5mm. 3. Furthermore all tapers showed low wear volumes indicating that the taper junction had functioned correctly and distributed the load across the length of the truneon. Significance. This work adds to the growing evidence that taper problems in modern hip prostheses are associated with increasing head diameter and smaller taper dimensions


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Mar 2013
Bolland B Roques A Maul C Cook R Wood R Tuke M Latham J
Full Access

The poor outcome of large head metal on metal total hip replacements (LHMOMTHR) in the absence of abnormal articulating surface wear has focussed attention on the trunnion / taper interface. The RedLux ultra-precision 3D form profiler provides a novel indirect optical method to detect small changes in form and surface finish of the head taper as well as quantitative assessment of wear volume. This study aimed to assess and compare qualitatively tapers from small and large diameter MOMTHR's. Tapers from 3 retrieval groups were analysed. Group 1: 28mm CoCr heads from MOMTHRs (n=5); Group 2: Large diameter CoCr heads from LHMOMTHRs (n=5); Gp 3 (control): 28mm heads from metal on polyethylene (MOP) THRs; n=3). Clinical data on the retrievals was collated. RedLux profiling of tapers produced a taper angle and 3D surface maps. The taper angles were compared to those obtained using CMM measurements. There was no difference between groups in mean 12/14 taper angles or bearing surface volumetric and linear wear. Only LHMOMs showed transfer of pattern from stem trunnion to head taper, with clear demarcation of contact and damaged areas.3D surface mapping demonstrated wear patterns compatible with motion or deformations between taper and trunnion in the LHMOM group. These appearances were not seen in tapers from small diameter MOM and MOP THRs. Differences in appearance of the taper surface between poorly functioning LHMOMTHRs and well functioning MOP or MOM small diameter devices highlight an area of concern and potential contributor to the mode of early failure