Abduction braces are commonly prescribed following the closed reduction of a dislocated prosthetic hip joint. Their use is controversial with limited evidence to support their use. We have conducted a retrospective review of dislocations in primary total hip replacements over a nine year period and report redislocation rates in patients braced, compared to those who were not. 67 patients were identified. 69% of those patients who were braced had a subsequent dislocation. Likewise 69% of those who did not receive a brace re-dislocated. 33% of patients that were braced dislocated whilst wearing the brace. Bracing was associated with patient discomfort, sleep disturbance, skin irritation and breakdown. Small femoral head size, monoblock femoral components and poor biomechanical reconstruction was prevalent amongst dislocators. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of a total hip replacement is costly(e950), does not prevent redislocation and may be the cause of considerable morbidity to the patient

Purpose. To correlate the initial brace correction with quantity and quality of brace wear within the first 6 months for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Method. Brace treatment for AIS has been debated for years. Prediction of treatment outcomes is difficult as the actual brace usage is generally unknown. As technology became more advanced, electronic devices were able to measure adherence in both quantity (how much time the brace has been worn) and quality (how tightly the brace has been worn) of brace usage without need for patient interaction. The developed adherence monitor consisted of a force sensor and a data acquisition unit. Subjects were monitored within the first 6 months of brace wear. The data sample rate was set to be one sample per minute. Data was downloaded at the patients routine clinical visits. The prescription, first in-brace and first follow-up out-of-brace Cobb angles were measured. Twelve AIS subjects (10F, 2M), age between 9.8 and 14.7 years, average 11.9 1.5 years, who were prescribed a new TLSO and full-time brace wear (23 hours/day) participated. All braces were made by the same orthotist. The force value at the major pressure pad at the prescribed tightness level was recorded as the individualized reference value. The normalized force value (measured force magnitude relative to the individualized reference value) was used for the quality factor. The time of brace usage relative to the prescribed time was used as the quantity factor. Results. The first in-brace follow-up visit was approximately 2 months after the brace fitting session and the first out-of-brace follow-up visit was scheduled after 4 months. The Cobb angle of the major curve prior to bracing, in-brace and at the first follow-up out-of-brace were 31.3 6.2, 16.5 8.7 and 31.8 7.1 degrees, respectively. The mean reference force value was 1.1 0.23N. The average quantity and quality of the brace usage were 61.2 12.2% and 63.4 8.8%, respectively. A relationship was found between wear time with a change in Cobb angle (pre brace – the first follow-up out-of-brace) (r = 0.77). The more time that the brace was worn resulted in a better treatment result. A moderate correlation was found between the force value at the major pressure pad and the in-brace correction (r = 0.40). Also, a moderate relationship was found between wear quality during daytime with a change in Cobb angle (r = 0.67). The more time that the brace was worn close to the prescribed tightness level during the daytime resulted in a better outcome. Conclusion. This study showed the brace effectiveness is dependent on both the quantity and quality of brace usage

There is a significant positive association between hours of brace wear and rate of success in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). The abandon rate reported in the literature averages 18%. In a recent randomized trial conducted at our center; the abandon rate was 4%. We aim to document the abandon rate towards brace treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on AIS progression. We reviewed a database of AIS patients recruited between March and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients with AIS under brace treatment according to SRS criteria. The patients were divided in 2 cohorts: those with a self-reported good adherence to treatment and those who voluntarily abandoned treatment during follow-up. Patients with irregular adherence were excluded. Data analysis included age, gender, Risser stage, type of brace, Cobb angles at first visit and last follow-up (mean 11 months) and % of progression. Unpaired student tests were used for comparison. 154 patients met inclusion criteria. 20 patients were excluded due to irregular adherence. 89 patients (age: 12.1 y.o. ±1.4) reported good adherence to treatment, while 45 patients (age: 12.6 y.o. ±1.5) abandoned treatment, an abandon rate of 29%. The cohort of compliant patients started treatment with a mean main thoracic (MT) curve of 26° and finished with 27°. The mean difference between measurements was +0.65°±7.5; mean progression rate was −4.6%. However, patients who abandoned treatment started with a mean MT curve of 28° and finished with 33°, with a mean increase of +5°±8 and a mean progression rate of −11%. The differences between the 2 cohorts were statistically significant (p=0.002). Five (5) patients from the abandon group were offered for surgery because of curve progression. The abandon rate of brace treatment in AIS significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who voluntarily discontinued treatment had significant increases in curve progression and surgical indication rates

The Pavlik harness (PH) is commonly used to treat infantile dislocated hips. Variability exists in the duration of brace treatment after successful reduction of the dislocated hip. In this study we evaluate the effect of prescribed time in brace on acetabular index (AI) at two years of age using a prospective, international, multicenter database. We retrospectively studied prospectively enrolled infants with at least one dislocated hip that were initially treated with a PH and had a recorded AI at two-year follow-up. Subjects were treated at one of two institutions. Institution 1 used the PH until they observed normal radiographic acetabular development. Institution 2 followed a structured 12-week brace treatment protocol. Hip dislocation was defined as less than 30% femoral head coverage at rest on the pre-treatment ultrasound or IHDI grade III or IV on the pre-treatment radiograph. Fifty-three hips met our inclusion criteria. Hips from Institution 1 were treated with a brace 3x longer than hips from institution 2 (adjusted mean 8.9±1.3 months vs 2.6±0.2 months)(p < 0 .001). Institution 1 had an 88% success rate and institution 2 had an 85% success rate at achieving hip reduction (p=0.735). At 2-year follow-up, we observed no significant difference in AI between Institution 1 (adjusted mean 25.6±0.9˚) compared to Institution 2 (adjusted mean 23.5±0.8˚) (p=0.1). However, 19% of patients from Institution 1 and 44% of patients from Institution 2 were at or below the 50th percentile of previously published age- and sex- matched AI normal data (p=0.049). Also, 27% (7/26) of hips from Institution 1 had significant acetabular dysplasia, compared to a 22% (6/27) from Institution 2 (p=0.691). We found no correlation between age at initiation of bracing and AI at 2-year follow-up (p=0.071). Our findings suggest that prolonged brace treatment does not result in improved acetabular index at age two years. Hips treated at Institution 1 had the same AI at age two years as hips treated at Institution 2, while spending about 1/3 the amount of time in a brace. We recommend close follow-up for all children treated for dislocated hips, as ~1/4 of infants had acetabular index measurements at or above the 90th percentile of normal. Continued follow-up of this prospective cohort will be critical to determine how many children require acetabular procedures during childhood. The PH brace can successfully treat dislocated infant hips, however, prolonged brace treatment was not found to result in improved acetabular development at two-year follow-up

Introduction. Mode of non-operative management of thoracolumbar spine fracture continues to remain controversial with the most common modality hinging on bracing. TLSO is the device with a relative extension locked position, and many authors suggest they may have a role in the healing process, diminishing the load transferred via the anterior column, limiting segmental motion, and helping in pain control. However, several studies have shown prolonged use of brace may lead to skin breakdown, diminished pulmonary capacity, weakness of paraspinal musculature with no difference in pain and functional outcomes between patients treated with or without brace. Aims. To identify number of spinal braces used for spinal injury and cost implications (in a DGH), to identify the impact on length of stay, to ascertain patient compliance and quality of patient information provided for brace usage, reflect whether we need to change our practice on TLSO brace use. Methods. Data collected over 18-month period (from Jan.2020 to July 2021). Patients were identified from the TLSO brace issue list of the orthotic department, imaging (X-rays, CT, MRI scans) reviewed to confirm fracture and records reviewed to confirm neurology and non-operative management. Patient feedback was obtained via post or telephone consultation. Inclusion criteria- patients with single or multi -level thoracolumbar osteoporotic or traumatic fractures with no neurological involvement treated in a TLSO brace. Exclusion criteria- neurological involvement, cervical spine injuries, decision to treat surgically, concomitant bony injuries. Results. 72 braces were issued in the time frame with 42 patients remaining in the study based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patient feedback reflected that 62% patients did not receive adequate advice for brace usage, 73% came off the brace earlier than advised, and 60% would prefer to be treated without a brace if given a choice. The average increase in length of stay was 3 days awaiting brace fitting and delivery. The average total cost burden on the NHS was £127,500 (lower estimate) due to brace usage. Conclusion. If there is equivalence between treatment with/without a brace, there is a need to rethink the practice of prescribing brace for all non-operatively treated fractures and a case-by-case approach may prove more beneficial

Individuals with multi-compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) frequently experience challenges in activities of daily living (ADL) such as stair ambulation. The Levitation “Tri-Compartment Offloader” (TCO) knee brace was designed to reduce pain in individuals with multicompartment KOA. This brace uses novel spring technology to reduce tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces via reduced quadriceps forces. Information on brace utility during stair ambulation is limited. This study evaluated the effect of the TCO during stair descent in patients with multicompartment KOA by assessing knee flexion moments (KFM), quadriceps activity and pain. Nine participants (6 male, age 61.4±8.1 yrs; BMI 30.4±4.0 kg/m2) were tested following informed consent. Participants had medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades two to four) diagnosed by an orthopaedic surgeon. Joint kinetics and muscle activity were evaluated during stair descent to compare three bracing conditions: 1) without brace (OFF); 2) brace in low power (LOW); and 3) brace in high power (HIGH). The brace spring engages from 60° to 120° and 15° to 120° knee flexion in LOW and HIGH, respectively. Individual brace size and fit were adjusted by a trained researcher. Participants performed three trials of step-over-step stair descent for each bracing condition. Three-dimensional kinematics were acquired using an 8-camera motion capture system. Forty-one spherical reflective markers were attached to the skin (on each leg and pelvis segment) and 8 markers on the brace. Ground reaction forces and surface EMG from the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) were collected for the braced leg. Participants rated knee pain intensity performing the task following each bracing condition on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale ranging from “no pain” (0) to “worst imaginable pain” (100). Resultant brace and knee flexion angles and KFM were analysed during stair contact for the braced leg. The brace moment was determined using brace torque-angle curves and was subtracted from the calculated KFM. Resultant moments were normalized to bodyweight and height. Peak KFMs were calculated for the loading response (Peak1) and push-off (Peak2) phases of support. EMG signals were normalized and analysed during stair contact using wavelet analysis. Signal intensities were summed across wavelets and time to determine muscle power. Results were averaged across all 3 trials for each participant. Paired T-tests were used to determine differences between bracing conditions with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (α=0.025). Peak KFM was significantly lower compared to OFF with the brace worn in HIGH during the push-off phase (p Table 1: Average peak knee flexion moments, quadriceps muscle power and knee pain during stair descent in 3 brace conditions (n=9). Quadriceps activity, knee flexion moments and pain were significantly reduced with TCO brace wear during stair descent in KOA patients. These findings suggest that the TCO assists the quadriceps to reduce KFM and knee pain during stair descent. This is the first biomechanical evidence to support use of the TCO to reduce pain during an ADL that produces especially high knee forces and flexion moments. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Although surgical remedies tend to be the long-term solutions for patients with osteoarthritis (OA), many alternatives exist that offer the potential to slow progression, alleviate pain, and/or restore function. One such option is the unloader OA knee brace. The objective of this study was to assess the in vivo medial joint space narrowing with and without the brace during weight-bearing portion of gait. Methods. Twenty subjects were evaluated after being clinically assessed by a single surgeon to be bone-on-bone on the medial side. In vivo gait kinematics were collected using a validated 3D-to-2D fluoroscopic registration technique (Figure 1). Subjects were asked to first walk on a treadmill without a brace (Figure 2), and then, after a qualified technician fit a properly sized brace to each subject, they were asked to walk again (Figure 3). In vivo fluoroscopic images were captured and registered at heel-strike (HS) and mid stance (MS) for both scenarios. CT scans were used to acquire the patient-specific bone models that were used in the registration process. Results. All twenty subjects experienced a positive increase in medial joint space and verbally stated their knee pain lessened while wearing the brace. The average medial joint space change was 1.7±0.8 mm (3.1 max, 0.3 min) at HS and 1.6±0.8 mm (3.7 max, 0.4 min) at MS (Figure 4). Five patients experienced more than 2.5 mm of medial joint space change when wearing the unloader brace, indicating substantial effectiveness of the brace. Conclusion. While previous unloader brace studies have focused on outcome scores and patient satisfaction to analyze brace effectiveness, this study quantifiably demonstrated improvement in joint space narrowing due to the unloader brace. These results suggest that unloader braces may provide benefit in the interim when symptoms of OA are present prior to need for surgical intervention. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Abstract. Background. The gold standard treatment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury is reconstruction (ACL-R). Graft failure is the concern and ensuring a durable initial graft with rapid integration is crucial. Graft augmentation with implantable devices (internal brace reinforcement) is a technique purported to reduce the risk of rupture and hasten recovery. We aim to compare the short-term outcome of ACL-R using augmented hamstring tendon autografts (internally braced with neoligament) and non-augmented hamstring autografts. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing augmented and non-augmented ACL-R. All procedures were performed in a single centre using the same technique. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] was used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results. There were 70 patients in the augmented and 111 patients in the control group. Mean graft diameter in the augmented group was 8.82mm versus 8.44mm in the non-augmented. Six strand graft was achievable in 73.5% of the augmented group compared to 33% in the non-augmented group. Two graft failures were reported in the non-augmented group and none in the augmented group. Patient satisfaction rates were higher in the augmented group. There was a statistically insignificant improvement in the postoperative KOOS in the augmented group compared to the non-augmented group (p 0.6). Irrespective of augmentation status, no correlation was found between the functional score and age, or femoral tunnel width. Conclusion. Augmented ACL-R may achieve superior graft diameters, lower failure rates and better patient reported outcomes when compared to nonaugmented ACL-R. Prospective trials are needed to examine this further

In total knee arthroplasty, polyethylene wear has been a major cause of revision surgery. However, it is sometimes difficult to determine the time of revision surgery in elderly people due to their concomitant diseases. Therefore, the brace for measuring polyethylene wear under computed tomography was developed. Methods. The brace works by strapping a femoral component tightly to a polyethylene insert by applying compression force between the sole of the foot and the thigh. Holes of 1, 2, 5, 10 mm in diameter and 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1 mm in depth were created in the posteromedial part of polyethylene inserts. The inserts were provided from Teijin-nakashima Co. ltd. (Jodo, Okayama, Japan). The Hi-tech knee artificial joint (Teijin-nakashima Co. ltd.) was applied to a cadaveric knee and CT images of the knee were taken with a combination of insets with varying diameters and depths holes, using Aquilion ONE (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Ohtawara, Japan). The finding conditions were as follows, Voltage; 120V, Current; 5A, slice thickness; 0.5 mm helical. The patient, who received total knee arthroplasty over 15 years ago, wore the brace and was examined using computed tomography. Afterward, the patient received revision surgery to replace the worn insert into new one. The removed insert was measured with a three-dimensional measuring machine (Cyclon, Mitsutoyo Co. ltd., Kawasaki, Japan). Results. At a 1.0 mm depth, all holes could be detected. At a 0.5 mm depth, holes of 2, 5, 10 mm in diameter could be detected. At a 0.1∼0.2 mm depth, there was no hole detected. After revision surgery, a three-dimensional measuring machine revealed a 1.8 mm thickness of the insert on the medial side. The CT reconstruction image showed a1.84 mm thickness similar to the virtually measured figure. Conclusion. The brace and CT imaging was useful for the detection of polyethylene wear

Introduction. Dislocation is one of the most common complications following total hip arthroplasty. The literature suggests a frequency of 1–3% for primary total hip replacement (THR) and 7–10% for revision procedures. No definitive treatment algorithm exists for their management, with some surgeons attempting to constrain hip motion with casting or bracing initially. The evidence for this practice is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the current practice for managing THR dislocation within our unit, and to determine the effectiveness of abduction bracing. Method. A retrospective case-note analysis was performed on all patients admitted with a dislocated THR between 01/01/08 and 31/12/10. Patients were categorised into three groups: first time dislocators, recurrent dislocators, or dislocation occurring following revision surgery. The following data was collected; time from original surgery, closed or open reduction, surgical approach, prescription of abduction brace post-operatively, and the number of subsequent dislocations. Any patients who underwent open reduction were excluded from the study. Results. A total of 45 patients were included in the study. Of the first time dislocators, 75% treated with abduction brace re-dislocated, and 26% of patients treated without bracing re-dislocated. In the recurrent group 63% had been braced after their initial dislocation. Conclusion. Based on this study the benefit of abduction braces is limited and patient compliance tends to be poor. The cost of these appliances is significant (£450/£525) and patients typically have a prolonged hospital stay for ordering and application. Our unit has subsequently discontinued the use of such braces. Goals to reducing THR dislocation remain; meticulous preoperative planning and patient selection, accurate component positioning with intraoperative stability testing, good soft tissue repair, and early patient education

Introduction. The aims of this study were to undertake a prospective randomised trial to compare functional outcome, strength and range of motion after treatment of medial collateral ligament injuries by either early unprotected mobilisation or mobilisation with a hinged brace. Methods. Patients were randomised into either unprotected mobilisation or mobilisation with a hinged brace. Assessments occurred at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Outcome measures included validated questionnaires (International Knee Documentation Committee and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores), range of motion measurements and strength testing. Results. Eighty six patients (mean age 30.4) were recruited. There were 53 men and 33 women. The mode of injury was sport in 56 patients (65%) with football, rugby and skiing being the most common types of sport involved. The mean time to return to full weight bearing was 3 weeks in both groups. The mean time to return to work was 4.6 weeks in the braced group and 4.1 weeks in the non-braced group (p=0.79). Return to running was at a mean of 14.3 weeks in the braced group and 12.8 weeks in the non-braced group (p=0.64). Return to full sport was 22 weeks in the braced group and 22.1 weeks in the non-braced group (p=0.99). There was no significant difference in range of movement or pain scores between the two groups at 2,6,12 and 24 weeks. Conclusions. The use of a hinged knee brace does not influence recovery after a medial collateral injury

A prospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the success of Ossur Unloader knee brace as non-operative management of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. We recruited 12 volunteers (14 knees, mean age 63) with isolated medial compartment arthritis. They were clinically assessed, demographic data and Oxford knee scores were collected before the use of the braces. At 6 months, patient satisfaction, change in symptoms and repeat Oxford scores were noted. Improvement was noted in 5 patients (6 knees, 42%) whose mean BMI was 29. They gained confidence, knee stability and pain relief. Their mean Oxford score had improved from 28 to 41. Bracing was unsuccessful in 7 patients (8 knees, 58%) whose mean BMI was 33. These patients were disappointed and had discontinued its regular use. Their mean Oxford score only improved from 21 to 23. As yet no patient has undergone a knee Arthroplasty. Comparative weight bearing radiographs with and without brace reveal no change in the weight bearing alignment. 42% of the patients with a mean baseline Oxford score of above 25 and a mean BMI of below 30 responded favourably. The main causes of failure were lack of improvement in symptoms, discomfort, skin irritation and poor patient compliance

There are a multitude of studies internationally that have considered the rates of redislocation of shoulders, where, after first time anterior dislocation, initial management has consisted of an internal rotation sling immobiliser or no immobility. The majority of these have indicated poor results. This is in comparison with recurrence rates of dislocation, post shoulder stabilisation (arthroscopic or open), after first time anterior dislocation, which have demonstrated excellent results. The question remains, is there a non-operative alternative that will give similarly good results for these patients. A selection criteria was set up for use of the external rotation brace for first time anterior dislocators. Thirty-five patients were used that fit the criteria and were able to be followed over time. A physiotherapy program was initiated at the two-week stage in combination with clinic reviews. We encouraged use of the brace for six weeks in total, with removal only for hygiene purposes. At two years, post first time anterior dislocation, patients were reviewed clinically and a quick DASH score performed. Any recurrence of dislocation was recorded and an MRI was also undertaken to show residual injury. The compliance with the brace and physiotherapy program were excellent, with only one reported redislocation, during this period, in the 31 patients that were followed up. The majority of patients were functioning at predislocation levels at review and no one had required surgical intervention for instability. Quick-Dash results were also very good, with a vast majority scoring less than 2/100 level of disability. Conclusion. The external rotation brace with a Physiotherapy program is an excellent alternative to early shoulder stabilisation for first time anterior dislocators

Patients using a neutral rotation brace post proximal humerus fracture fixation have improved functional outcome and external rotation of the shoulder compared to patients using a standard polysling. Patients who have proximal humerus fracture fixation with extramedullary plates and screws have a risk of reduced range of movement especially external rotation. Gerber et al showed that the average external rotation after fixation of proximal humeral fractures was 39 degrees in their patient cohort compared to a normal range of 80–100 degrees. This can lead to reduced function and poor patient related outcomes. Geiger et al showed that in a cohort of 28 patients, poor functional outcome was noted in 39.3% with an average Constant-Murley Score of 57.9. Current practice is to utilise a polysling holding the shoulder in internal rotation post-shoulder fixation. Patients usually wear the sling for up to 6 weeks. We believe that this increases the risk of adhesion formation with the shoulder in internal rotation in the shoulder joint. Therefore this can cause loss of external rotation in the shoulder joint. We believe that holding the shoulder in a neutral alignment, with a neutral rotation brace post-fixation, will enable an increased rate of external rotation post-operatively thus improving external rotation and functional outcome. There is currently no literature comparing the different slings used post-operatively and we believe that this study would be the first of its kind. It would have a substantial change in the way clinicians manage proximal humeral fractures and will potentially reduce the numbers of re-operations to divide adhesions or perform capsular releases. Secondary benefits include a potential earlier return to full function and work and improved patient satisfaction. Study proposal: Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of the neutral rotation brace compared to the standard, currently used, polysling post proximal humerus fracture fixation. No blinding of either participants or clinicians. Three surgeons utilising similar fixation techniques via the deltopectoral approach and using Philos plate fixation (Synthes Ltd.). Standardised post-operative rehabilitation protocol for all patients. Follow up: clinical review and postal outcomes for 1 year. Primary outcomes: Post operative functional outcome scores (Oxford, DASH, EQL) obtained at 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 3 months and 1 year). These will be compared to scores taken pre-operatively. Secondary outcomes: Clinical review at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year with range of movement measurements. Radiographs also taken at 6 weeks and 3 months to assess union. Patient questionnaire at 1 year (with outcome scores) assessing patient return to work, complications and patient satisfaction. Inclusion criteria: Proximal humeral fractures requiring operative intervention with extramedullary plate fixation (i.e. fractures displaced by 1cm and/or angulated by 45 degrees or more). Age>18. Exclusion Criteria: Patients having intra-operative findings of complete Pectoralis major rupture or if operative exposure requires complete Pectoralis major tenotomy. (These patients need to be held in internal rotation with a standard polysling to allow healing of the Pectoralis major tendon)

Abstract

Poor availability of allografts in South Africa has led to an increased use of synthetic augmentation to stabilize knee joints in the treatment of knee dislocations. This study aims to evaluate multiligament knee injuries treated with a posterior cruciate ligament internal brace. The study included patients with knee dislocations who were treated with a PCL internal brace. The internal brace involved the insertion of a synthetic suture tape, which was drilled into the femoral and tibial footprint. Chronic injuries were excluded. Patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs), range of motion, stress X-Rays, and MRI scans were reviewed to assess outcomes. Acceptable outcomes were defined as a Lysholm score of 84 or more, with grade II laxity in no more than one ligament and a range of motion from full extension to 90° or more. The study included eight patients, with a median age of 42, of which five were female. None of the patients had knee flexion less than 90° or an extension deficit of more than 20°. PROMs indicated acceptable outcomes (EQ5D, Tegner Lysholm). Stress radiographs showed less than 7mm (Grade I) of posterior translation laxity in all patients. Four patients underwent MRI scans 1–2 years after the initial surgery, which revealed healing of the PCL in all patients. However, increased signal in a continuous ligament suggested only partial healing in two patients. Tunnel widening of 200% and 250% was noted around the tibial and femoral PCL footprints, respectively. All patients demonstrated stable knees and acceptable PROMs. Tunnel widening was observed in all patients who had MRI scans. Factors such as suspensory fixation, anisometric tunnel position, and the absence of PCL tear repair may have contributed to the tunnel widening

Specific brace-fitting complications in idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) have been rarely described in published series, and usually focus on non-compliance. Our primary aim was to compare the rate of persistent pressure sores in patients fitted with Markell boots and Mitchell boots. Our additional aims were to describe the frequency of other brace fitting complications and identify age trends in these complications. A retrospective analysis of medical files of 247 idiopathic CTEV patients born between 01/01/2010 - 01/01/2021 was performed. Data was collected using a REDCap database. Pressure sores of sufficient severity for clinician to recommend time out of brace occurred in 22.9% of Mitchell boot and 12.6% of Markell boot patients (X. 2. =6.9, p=0.009). The overall rate of bracing complications was 51.4%. 33.2% of parents admitted to bracing non-compliance and 31.2% of patients required re-casting during the bracing period for relapse. For patients with a minimum follow-up of age 6 years, 44.2% required tibialis anterior tendon transfer. Parents admitting to non-compliance were significantly more likely to have a child who required tibialis anterior tendon transfer (X. 2. =5.71, p=0.017). Overall rate of capsular release (posteromedial release or posterior release) was 2.0%. Neither medium nor longterm results of Ponseti treatment in the Australian and New Zealand clubfoot have been published. Globally, few publications describe specific bracing complications in clubfoot, despite this being a notable challenge for clinicians and families. Recurrent pressure sores is a persistent complication with the Mitchell boots for patients in our center. In our population of Australian clubfoot patients, tibialis anterior tendon transfer for relapse is common, consistent with the upper limit of tibialis anterior tendon transfer rates reported globally

Hinged elbow orthoses (HEO) are often used to allow protected motion of the unstable elbow. However, biomechanical studies have not shown HEO to improve the stability of a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow. This lack of effectiveness may be due to the straight hinge of current HEO designs which do not account for the native carrying angle of the elbow. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a custom-designed HEO with adjustable valgus angulation on stabilizing the LCL deficient elbow. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An LCL injured (LCLI) model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. The adjustable HEO was secured to the arm and its effect with 0°, 10°, and 20° (BR00, BR10, BR20) of valgus angulation was investigated. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. We examined 5 elbow states, intact, LCLI, BR00, BR10, BR20. There were significant differences in varus and ER angulation between different elbow states with the forearm both pronated and supinated (P=0 for all). The LCLI state with or without the brace resulted in significant increases in varus angulation and ER of the ulnohumeral articulation compared to the intact state (P 0.05). The difference between each of the brace angles and the LCLI state ranged from 1.1° to 2.4° for varus angulation and 0.5° to 1.6° for ER. Although there was a trend toward decreasing varus and external rotation angulation of the ulnohumeral articulation with the application of this adjustable HEO, none of the brace angles examined in this biomechanical investigation was able to fully restore the stability of the LCL deficient elbow. This lack of stabilizing effect may be due to the weight of the brace exerting unintentional varus and torsional forces on the unstable elbow. Previous investigations have shown that the varus arm position is highly unstable in the LCL deficient elbow. Our results demonstrate that application of an HEO with an adjustable carrying angle does not sufficiently stabilize the LCL deficient elbow in this highly unstable position and varus arm position should continue to be avoided in the rehabilitation programs of an LCL deficient elbow

Complex acetabular reconstruction for oncology and bone loss are challenging for surgeons due to their often hostile biological and mechanical environments. Titrating concentrations of silver ions on implants and alternative modes of delivery allow surgeons to exploit anti-infective properties without compromising bone on growth and thus providing a long-term stable fixation. We present a case series of 12 custom acetabular tri-flange and custom hemipelvis reconstructions (Ossis, Christchurch, New Zealand), with an ultrathin plasma coating of silver particles embedded between layers of siloxane (BioGate HyProtect™, Nuremberg, Germany). At the time of reporting no implant has been revised and no patient has required a hospital admission or debridement for a deep surgical site infection. Routine follow up x-rays were reviewed and found 2 cases with loosening, both at their respective anterior fixation. Radiographs of both cases show remodelling at the ilium indicative of stable fixation posteriorly. Both patients remain asymptomatic. 3 patients were readmitted for dislocations, 1 of whom had 5 dislocations within 3 weeks post-operatively and was immobilised in an abduction brace to address a lack of muscle tone and has not had a revision of their components. Utilising navigation with meticulous implant design and construction; augmented with an ultrathin plasma coating of silver particles embedded between layers of siloxane with controlled and long-term generation of silver ion diffusion has led to outstanding outcomes in this series of 12 custom acetabular and hemipelvis reconstructions. No patients were revised for infection and no patients show signs of failure of bone on growth and incorporation. Hip instability remains a problem in these challenging mechanical environments and we continue to reassess our approach to this multifaceted problem

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations is a common disorder amongst our population for which numerous techniques have been described. It is thought that by using this novel technique combining a CC and AC repair with a reconstruction will result in high maintenance of anatomical reduction and functional results. 12 consecutive patients ACJ dislocations were included. An open superior clavicular approach is used. Firstly, the CC ligaments are repaired after which a CC reconstruction is performed using a tendon allograft. Secondly, the AC ligaments are repaired using an internal brace construct combined with a tendon allograft reconstruction (Figure 1). The acute:chronic ratio was 6:6. Only IIIB, IV and V AC-joint dislocations were included. The Constant-Murley Score improved from 27.6 (8.0 – 56.5) up to 61.5 (42.0 – 92.0) at 12 months of follow up. Besides one frozen shoulder from which the patient recovered spontaneously no complications were observed with this technique. The CCD was reduced from 18.7 mm (13.0 – 24.0) to 10.0 mm (6.0 – 16.0) and 10.5 mm (8.0 – 14.0) respectively 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. There is some evidence, suggesting to address as well as the vertical (coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments) as the horizontal (acromioclavicular (AC) ligaments) direction of instability. This study supports addressing both entities however comparative studies discriminating chronic as acute cases should be conducted to further clarify this ongoing debate on treating ACJ instability. This study describes a novel technique to treat acute and chronic Rockwood stage IIIB – IV ACJ dislocations with promising short-term clinical and radiological results. This suggests that the combined repair and reconstruction of the AC and CC ligaments is a safe procedure with low complication risk in experienced hands. Addressing the vertical as well as horizontal stability in ACJ dislocation is considered key to accomplish optimal long-term results