Aims. To report the development of the technique for minimally invasive lumbar decompression using robotic-assisted navigation. Methods. Robotic planning software was used to map out bone removal for a laminar decompression after registration of CT scan images of one cadaveric specimen. A specialized acorn-shaped bone removal robotic drill was used to complete a robotic lumbar laminectomy. Post-procedure advanced imaging was obtained to compare actual bony decompression to the surgical plan. After confirming accuracy of the technique, a minimally invasive robotic-assisted laminectomy was performed on one 72-year-old female patient with lumbar spinal stenosis. Postoperative advanced imaging was obtained to confirm the decompression. Results. A workflow for robotic-assisted lumbar laminectomy was successfully developed in a human cadaveric specimen, as excellent decompression was confirmed by postoperative CT imaging. Subsequently, the workflow was applied clinically in a patient with severe spinal stenosis. Excellent decompression was achieved intraoperatively and preservation of the dorsal midline structures was confirmed on postoperative MRI. The patient experienced improvement in symptoms postoperatively and was discharged within 24 hours. Conclusion. Minimally invasive robotic-assisted lumbar decompression utilizing a specialized robotic bone removal instrument was shown to be accurate and effective both in vitro and in vivo. The robotic bone removal technique has the potential for less invasive removal of laminar bone for spinal decompression, all the while preserving the spinous process and the posterior ligamentous complex. Spinal robotic surgery has previously been limited to the insertion of screws and, more recently, cages; however, recent innovations have expanded robotic capabilities to decompression of neurological structures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(9):809–817

Retrospective review of blood loss during posterior instrumented fusion in Adult Deformity Surgery before and after the introduction of the ultrasonic bone cutter into routine surgical technique. We retrospectively reviewed a large series of adult patients undergoing four or more levels of posterior instrumented fusion (+/− osteotomies/decompressions) over an eight year period. The senior surgeon (SM) switched to using the ultrasonic bone cutter instead of conventional cutting techniques at a specific point in time. We reviewed the clinical records of cases performed both before and after this time point and were able to identify blood loss from the clinical records. We reviewed actual blood loss by evaluating several aspects, including suction volumes, swab weights, re-infusion volumes, pre- and post- operative haemoglobin values and the type and amount of haemostatic agents used. We demonstrated that a significant reduction in blood loss intra-operatively occurred with reduced use of haemostatic agents following introduction of the ultrasonic bone cutter as the method of bone removal. Significant reductions in blood loss were achieved with implications in terms of patient mortality and morbidity, improved surgical field and reduced amount and cost of haemostatic agents

Costoplasty remains useful in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, rib hump and associated chest wall deformities. However traditional costoplasty increases morbidity and blood loss. We examine the feasibility and possible effectiveness of a more conservative costoplasty using an animal model. 4 fresh half Ovine rib cages from separate animals were obtained, stored at +4 °C and warmed to room temperature before testing. Each rib cage was randomly assigned to group 1, 2, 3 or 4. Ribs 2–10 were dissected out for testing. The ribs then underwent stepwise deconstruction according to their group. Beginning at the convexity, removing first the convex cortex, then the cancellous, then the cranial and caudal cortices to leave just the concave cortex. Testing for stiffness was by three-point bending on the concave side of each rib with the rib fixed at the head of the rib and 5 cm from the resected area. The ribs were deformed at a constant rate of 0.5 mm.sec . −. 1 up to a maximum load of 9.99 kg or until fracturing. Then stress was plotted against strain to find the Young's modulus of each group and statistics carried out with an ANOVA test. The ribs in each group were as follows: Group 1= control, group 2= 30 mm long convex side cortical bone removed 10 mm from lateral tubercle, group 3= convex, cortical and cancellous bone removal and group 4= removal of convex, caudal and cranial cortices with cancellous removal. The Young's Modulus of the groups were: 1= 3.38 N-m (+/− 0.84), 2= 2.65 N-m (+/− 1.58), 3= 1.55 N-m (+/− 0.55) and 4= 0.74 N-m (+/− 0.55). Groups 3 and 4 were significantly less stiff than group 1 (p< 0.01.) No ribs in groups 1, 2 and 4 fractured under the maximum load. 5/8 ribs in group 3 fractured before the maximum load was administered. By deconstructing the rib down to only the concave side it becomes significantly more flexible by approximately 4.5 times than the control Ribs. Coupled with its increase in flexibility it still retains its ability to withstand up to 10 kg of load without fracture. It may be possible to perform a costoplasty whilst preserving ventilatory integrity. This may improve rib hump correction, and curve correction due to increased flexibility of the stiff thoracic cage