Abstract
Costoplasty remains useful in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, rib hump and associated chest wall deformities. However traditional costoplasty increases morbidity and blood loss. We examine the feasibility and possible effectiveness of a more conservative costoplasty using an animal model.
4 fresh half Ovine rib cages from separate animals were obtained, stored at +4 °C and warmed to room temperature before testing. Each rib cage was randomly assigned to group 1, 2, 3 or 4. Ribs 2–10 were dissected out for testing. The ribs then underwent stepwise deconstruction according to their group. Beginning at the convexity, removing first the convex cortex, then the cancellous, then the cranial and caudal cortices to leave just the concave cortex. Testing for stiffness was by three-point bending on the concave side of each rib with the rib fixed at the head of the rib and 5 cm from the resected area. The ribs were deformed at a constant rate of 0.5 mm.sec −1 up to a maximum load of 9.99 kg or until fracturing. Then stress was plotted against strain to find the Young's modulus of each group and statistics carried out with an ANOVA test. The ribs in each group were as follows: Group 1= control, group 2= 30 mm long convex side cortical bone removed 10 mm from lateral tubercle, group 3= convex, cortical and cancellous bone removal and group 4= removal of convex, caudal and cranial cortices with cancellous removal.
The Young's Modulus of the groups were: 1= 3.38 N-m (+/− 0.84), 2= 2.65 N-m (+/− 1.58), 3= 1.55 N-m (+/− 0.55) and 4= 0.74 N-m (+/− 0.55). Groups 3 and 4 were significantly less stiff than group 1 (p< 0.01.) No ribs in groups 1, 2 and 4 fractured under the maximum load. 5/8 ribs in group 3 fractured before the maximum load was administered.
By deconstructing the rib down to only the concave side it becomes significantly more flexible by approximately 4.5 times than the control Ribs. Coupled with its increase in flexibility it still retains its ability to withstand up to 10 kg of load without fracture. It may be possible to perform a costoplasty whilst preserving ventilatory integrity. This may improve rib hump correction, and curve correction due to increased flexibility of the stiff thoracic cage.
