Advances in the performance and longevity of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have been enabled by related progress in implant materials, device designs, and surgical techniques. Successful TJA also depends upon adequate bone quality to provide an enduring mechanical foundation. Bone quality can be defined as the ability to repetitively withstand physiologically-relevant loads without excess deformation or fracture. It is now recognized that bone quality encompasses more than just material quantity, i.e. densitometrically-measured bone mass. Bone quality is also determined by: material composition and arrangement, cortical and cancellous structure, and extent of microdamage. These properties, together with the appropriate mass, confer bone with the biomechanical competence needed to meet the repetitive load-bearing demands imposed by total joint implants. The need for TJA continues to increase in the aging global baby-boomer population. Unfortunately, this group is also experiencing increases in related comorbidities including: osteoporosis, kidney dysfunction, and diabetes, among others. Collectively these three comorbidities afflict more than 74 million Americans, and each is increasing at 2–8% annually. More importantly, each of these comorbidities negatively affects bone quality through alterations in bone turnover independent of bone mass changes commonly associated with these diseases. Specifically, alterations in bone turnover result in abnormal mineral-to-matrix ratios as measured by Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy (Fig. 1) and altered Young's moduli (shape-independent resistance to deformation) as measured by nanoindentation (Fig. 2). These parameters are related to bones' fracture toughness and load-bearing capabilities, respectively. Also, low bone turnover is associated with mechanically important structural changes, i.e., decreased trabecular thickness (Fig. 3), cortical thickness and cancellous volume. Furthermore, low bone turnover may result in reducing the repair rate of physiologically – induced bone microdamage. This may lead to increases in the number or length of bone cracks, crack coalescence, and ultimately reduced energy needed for fracture. Therefore, patients needing TJA who also have comorbidities associated with abnormal bone quality are at risk for inferior arthroplasty results. Recognition and treatment of the TJA-relevant biomechanical implications of these comorbidities may help improve outcomes

In cases of poor bone quality intraoperative torque measurement might be an alternative to preoperative dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess bone quality in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). 14 paired fresh frozen human femurs were included for trabecular peak torque measurement. We evaluated an existing intraoperative torque measurement method to assess bone quality and bone strength. We modified the approach to use this method in total hip arthroplasty (THA), which has not been published before. Since there are several approaches used in THA to exposure the hip joint, we decided to prefer the measurement in the femoral head which allows every surgeon to perform this measurement. Here a 6.5 × 23 mm blade was inserted into the proximal femur without harming the lateral cortical bone (figure 1). Further tests of the proximal femur evaluated the results of this new method: DXA, micro-computed tomography (μCT) and biomechanical load tests. Basic statistical analyses and multiple regressions were done. In the femoral head mean trabecular peak torque was 4.38 ± 1.86 Nm. These values showed a strong correlation with the values of the DXA, the μCT and the biomechanical load test. In comparison to the bone mineral density captured by DXA, the results of the intraoperative torque measurement showed a superior correlation with high sensitive bone quality evaluating methods (mechanical load tests and micro-computed tomography). Hence, the use of this intraoperative torque measurement seems to be more accurate in evaluating bone strength and bone quality than DXA during THA. The torque measurement provides sensitive information about the bone strength, which may affect the choice of implant in cases of poor bone stock and osteoporosis. In clinical use the surgeon may alter the prosthesis if the device indicates poor bone quality. Furthermore, we assume that the disadvantages associated with DXA scans like radiation exposure or errors caused by potential extraosteal sclerosis and interindividual soft-tissue artifacts could be excluded

Purpose. Stress fractures (SFs) are highly prevalent in female athletes, especially runners (1337%), and result in pain and lost training time. There are numerous risk factors for SFs in athletes; however, the role of bone quality in the etiology of SFs is currently unknown. Therefore, our primary objective was to examine whether there are characteristic differences in bone quality and bone strength in female athletes with lower limb SFs using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). A secondary objective was to compare muscle strength between SF subjects and controls. Method. Female athletes with (n=19) and without (n=19) lower limb SFs were recruited from the local community. All SFs were medically confirmed by a physician and subjects were assessed within 1–47 weeks (12.7 13.7) of diagnosis. Controls were age-, training volume- and sport-matched to SF athletes. Bone density and microarchitectural bone parameters such as cortical thickness and porosity, as well as trabecular thickness, separation and number of all subjects were assessed using HR-pQCT at two distal tibia scanning sites (distal, ultra-distal). Finite element (FE) analysis was employed to estimate bone strength and load sharing of cortical and trabecular bone from the HR-pQCT scans. Regional analysis was applied to the HR-pQCT scans to investigate site-specific bone differences between groups. Muscle torque was measured by a Biodex dynamometer as a surrogate of muscle strength. Independent sample t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for statistical analyses (p < 0.05). Results. Significant differences and trends indicated compromised trabecular bone and slightly thicker cortices with fewer pores in SF subjects compared with controls. This was most pronounced in the posterior region of the distal tibia, which is the site of highest tensile stresses during running and a common SF site. FE analysis indicated significantly higher cortical loads (median 4.2% higher; p=0.03) in the distal tibia site (but not ultra-distal site) of SF subjects compared to controls. The SF group exhibited significantly reduced knee extension strength (median 18.3% lower; p=0.03) and a trend towards reduced plantarflexion (median 17.3% lower; p=0.24) and eversion strength (median 9.6% lower; p=0.49) compared to controls. Conclusion. This is the first study to compare bone microarchitectural quality and lower-limb muscle strength between female athletes with SFs and health controls. A reduced trabecular bone quality in SF subjects may result in an insufficient ability to absorb and distribute tibial loads. This, in turn, may lead to higher stresses in the cortex and a higher risk for SFs. Low muscle strength may increase SF risk by providing insufficient muscular support to counteract shear stresses associated with reaction forces during running. Further study is needed to determine whether a resistance-training program can improve bone quality and in turn, reduce SF risk

Introduction. Initial large-scale clinical studies of porous tantalum implants have been generally promising with well-fixed implants and few cases of loosening [1–3]. An initial retrieval study suggests increased bone ingrowth in a modular tibial tray design compared to the monoblock design [4]. Since micromotion at the bone-implant interface is known to influence bone ingrowth [5], the goal of this study was to determine the effect of implant design, bone quality and activity type on micromotion at the bone-implant interface, through FE modeling. Patients & Methods. Our case-specific FE model of bone was created from CT data (68 year-old female, right tibia, Fig-1). Isotropic properties of cortical and trabecular bone were derived from the calibrated CT data. Modular and monoblock porous tantalum tibial implants were virtually placed in the tibia following surgical guidelines. All models parts were 3D meshed with 4-noded tetrahedral elements (MSC.MARC-Mentat 2013, MSC Software Corporation, USA). Frictional contact was applied to the bone-tantalum interface (µ=0.88) and UHWMPE-Femoral condyle interface (µ=0.05) with all other interfaces bonded. Loading was applied to simulate walking, standing up and descending stairs. For each activity, a full load cycle [6] was applied to the femoral condyles in incremental steps. The direction and magnitude of micromotions were calculated by tracking the motions of nodes of the bone, projected onto the tibial tray. Micromotions were calculated parallel to the implant surface (shear), and perpendicularly (tensile). We report the maximum (resultant) micromotion that occurred during a cycle of each activity. The bone properties were varied to represent a range in BMD (−30%BMD, Norm, +30%BMD). We compared design type, bone quality and activity type considering micromotion below 40 µm to be favorable for bone ingrowth [5]. Results. The modular tibial tray showed lower shear micromotion than the monoblock design for shear micromotion (Fig-2). Tensile micromotion was similar between the two designs (Fig-2). Lower bone quality resulted in higher shear micromotion for the modular tibial tray design. The effect of lower bone quality on shear micromotion was less apparent for the monoblock tibial tray design. For both designs, change in the bone quality had minimal effect on the tensile micromotion. For both designs, standing up and descending stairs showed lower micromotion than walking for both the tensile and shear micromotion (Fig-3). The monoblock design showed higher micromotion for standing up and descending stairs compared to the modular design (Fig-3). Discussion. In our analysis, activity type had the highest effect on micromotion. Additionally, the modular design showed lower shear micromotion than the monoblock. Although the designs were similar for the the modular and monoblock implants, the difference in micromotion, representing the initial stability of the implant, may partially explain why retrieved modular porous tantalum tibial trays had higher bone ingrowth than the monoblock design

The quality of bone in the skeleton depends on the amount of bone, geometry, microarchitecture and material properties, and the molecular and cellular regulation of bone turnover and repair. This study aimed to identify material and structural factors that alter in fragility hip fracture patients treated with antiresorption therapies (FxAr) compared to fragility hip fracture patients not on treatment (Fx). Bone from the intertrochanteric site, femoral head (FH: FxAr = 5, Fx = 8), compression screw cores and box chisel were obtained from patients undergoing hemi-arthroplasty surgery, FxAr (6f, 2m, mean 79 and range [64–89] years), and Fx (7f, 1m, age 85 [75–93] years). Control bone was obtained at autopsy (9f, 4m, 77 [65–88] years). Treated patients were on various bisphosphonates. Samples were resin-embedded, for quantitative backscattered electron imaging of the degree of mineralisation and assessment of bone architecture. Trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and architectural parameters were not significantly different between FxAr and Fx groups. Both groups showed normal distributions of weight (wt) % Ca; however, the FxAr was less mineralised than the Fx and the control group (mean wt % Ca: FxAr = 24.3%, Fx = 24.8%, Control = 24.9%). When comparing the FH specimens only, we found that BV/TV in the FxAr was greater than the Fx group (18% vs 15%). All other parameters were not significantly different. In addition, the mineralisation was greater in the FxAr group compared to the Fx group (25.5 % vs 25.0%) but was not significantly different. Collectively, these data suggest the effect on bone of antiresorptives may be different for patients on antiresorptive treatment that do not subsequently fracture. Assessment of bone material property data together with other bone quality measures may hold the key to better understanding of antiresorptive treatment efficacy

Dorr bone type is both a qualitative and quantitative classification. Qualitatively on x-rays the cortical thickness determines the ABC type. The cortical thickness is best judged on a lateral x-ray and the focus is on the posterior cortex. In Type A bone it is a thick convex structure (posterior fin of bone) that can force the tip of the tapered implant anteriorly – which then displaces the femoral head posteriorly into relative retroversion. Fractures in DAA hips have had increased fractures in Type A bone because of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch (metaphysis is bigger than diaphysis in relation to stem size). Quantitatively, Type B bone has osteoclastic erosion of the posterior fin which proceeds from proximal to distal and is characterised by flattening of the fin, and erosive cysts in it from osteoclasts. A tapered stem works well in this bone type, and the bone cells respond positively. Type C bone has loss of the entire posterior fin (stove pipe bone), and the osteoblast function at a low level with dominance of osteoclasts. Type C is also progressive and is worse when both the lateral and AP views show a stove pipe shape. If just the lateral x-ray has thin cortices, and the AP has a tapered thickness of the cortex a non-cemented stem will work, but there is a higher risk for fracture because of weak bone. At surgery Type C bone has “mushy” cancellous bone compared to the hard structure of type A. Tapered stems have high risk for loosening because the diaphysis is bigger than the metaphysis (opposite of Type A). Fully coated rod type stems fix well, but have a high incidence of stress shielding. Cemented fixation is done by surgeons for Type C bone to avoid fracture, and insure a comfortable hip. The large size stem often required to fit Type C bone causes an adverse-stem-bone ratio which can cause chronic thigh pain. I cement patients over age 70 with Type C bone which is most common in women over that age.

Femoral knee implants have promising outcomes, although some high-flex designs have shown rather high loosening rates (Han et al., 2007). In uncemented implants, it is vital to limit micromotions at the implant-bone interface, to facilitate secondary fixation through bone ingrowth (kienapfel et al., 1999). Hence, it is essential to investigate how micromotions of different uncemented implants are affected by various loading conditions when a range of bone qualities as a patient-related factor is applied. Using finite element (FE) analysis, we simulated implant-bone interface micromotions during four consecutive cycles of normal gait and squat movements. An FE model of a distal femur was generated based on calibrated CT-scans, after which Sigma® and LCS® Cruciate-Retaining Porocoat® components (DePuy Synthes, Leeds, UK) were implanted. Using a frictional contact algorithm (µ=0.95), an initial press-fit fixation was simulated, which was previously validated against experimental data. The micromotions were calculated by tracking the projection of implant nodes on the bone surface excluding overhang area. The applied loading patterns were based on discretized simulations, providing incremental loads for each activity based on implant-specific kinematics, which was derived from Orthoload database using inverse dynamics (Fitzpatrick et al., 2012). This provided the opportunity to calculate incremental micromotions, but also the resulting micromotions for each single cycle, for both activities. In addition, the percentage of implant surface area with resulting micromotions less than a defined threshold was calculated. Regardless of the type of loading, in all simulations, the predicted micromotions were highest in the first cycle, suggesting settling of the implant during initial cycle. The Sigma®implant displayed a 30% larger area with micromotions below the threshold of 5 microns, for both loading conditions (Fig. 1A). The highest micromotions occurred at the anterior flange, regardless of type of activity or design. Squatting had a more detrimental effect on the primary stability, with smaller areas of low micromotions as compared to the gait load (Fig. 1B). Bone stiffness had a minor effect, which was more apparent for squatting (Fig. 1B). We found acceptable low ranges of micromotions in both implant designs, although demanding activities such as squatting generated higher motions. In addition, LCS® experienced higher micromotions, probably caused by the smaller contact area at bone-implant interface compared with Sigma®. Nevertheless, the predicted micromotions were all below the clinically relevant threshold for bone ingrowth (<40 microns) (kienapfel et al., 1999). Furthermore, our simulated settling behavior stresses the necessity for simulating multiple loading cycles, rather than just a single cycle. The effect of bone stiffness was evident, but only to a limited extent. The main current limitation of our study is the utilization of an elastic material model for the bone which is probably the reason to predict a low range of micromotions. We are planning to make the material model more realistic, by including plasticity and viscoelastic bone behavior

Bone turnover and the accumulation of microdamage are impacted by the presence of skeletal metastases which can contribute to increased fracture risk. Treatments for metastatic disease may further impact bone quality. The present study aims to establish a preliminary understanding of microdamage accumulation and load to failure in osteolytic vertebrae following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), zoledronic acid (ZA), or docetaxel (DTX) treatment. Twenty-two six-week old athymic female rats (Hsd:RH-Foxn1rnu, Envigo, USA) were inoculated with HeLa cervical cancer cells through intracardiac injection (day 0). Institutional approval was obtained for this work and the ARRIVE guidelines were followed. Animals were randomly assigned to four groups: untreated (n=6), spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) administered on day 14 (n=6), zoledronic acid (ZA) administered on day 7 (n=5), and docetaxel (DTX) administered on day 14 (n=5). Animals were euthanized on day 21. T13-L3 vertebral segments were collected immediately after sacrifice and stored in −20°C wrapped in saline soaked gauze until testing. µCT scans (µCT100, Scanco, Switzerland) of the T13-L3 segment confirmed tumour burden in all T13 and L2 vertebrae prior to testing. T13 was stained with BaSO. 4. to label microdamage. High resolution µCT scans were obtained (90kVp, 44uA, 4W, 4.9µm voxel size) to visualize stain location and volume. Segmentations of bone and BaSO. 4. were created using intensity thresholding at 3000HU (~736mgHA/cm. 3. ) and 10000HU (~2420mgHA/cm. 3. ), respectively. Non-specific BaSO. 4. was removed from the outer edge of the cortical shell by shrinking the segmentation by 105mm in 3D. Stain volume fraction was calculated as the ratio of BaSO. 4. volume to the sum of BaSO. 4. and bone volume. The L1-L3 motion segments were loaded under axial compression to failure using a µCT compatible loading device (Scanco) and force-displacement data was recorded. µCT scans were acquired unloaded, at 1500µm displacement and post-failure. Stereological analysis was performed on the L2 vertebrae in the unloaded µCT scans. Differences in mean stain volume fraction, mean load to failure, and mean bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) were compared between treatment groups using one-way ANOVAs. Pearson's correlation between stain volume fraction and load to failure by treatment was calculated using an adjusted load to failure divided by BV/TV. Stained damage fraction was significantly different between treatment groups (p=0.0029). Tukey post-hoc analysis showed untreated samples to have higher stain volume fraction (16.25±2.54%) than all treatment groups (p<0.05). The ZA group had the highest mean load to failure (195.60±84.49N), followed by untreated (142.33±53.08N), DTX (126.60±48.75N), and SBRT (95.50±44.96N), but differences did not reach significance (p=0.075). BV/TV was significantly higher in the ZA group (49.28±3.56%) compared to all others. The SBRT group had significantly lower BV/TV than the untreated group (p=0.018). Load divided by BV/TV was not significantly different between groups (p=0.24), but relative load to failure results were consistent (ZA>Untreated>DTX>SBRT). No correlations were found between stain volume fraction and load to failure. Focal and systemic cancer treatments effect microdamage accumulation and load to failure in osteolytic vertebrae. Current testing of healthy controls will help to further separate the effects of the tumour and cancer treatments on bone quality

Bone turnover and the accumulation of microdamage are impacted by the presence of skeletal metastases which can contribute to increased fracture risk. Treatments for metastatic disease may further impact bone quality. The present study aims to establish a preliminary understanding of microdamage accumulation and load to failure in osteolytic vertebrae following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), zoledronic acid (ZA), or docetaxel (DTX) treatment. Twenty-two six-week old athymic female rats (Hsd:RH-Foxn1rnu, Envigo, USA) were inoculated with HeLa cervical cancer cells through intracardiac injection (day 0). Institutional approval was obtained for this work and the ARRIVE guidelines were followed. Animals were randomly assigned to four groups: untreated (n=6), spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) administered on day 14 (n=6), zoledronic acid (ZA) administered on day 7 (n=5), and docetaxel (DTX) administered on day 14 (n=5). Animals were euthanized on day 21. T13-L3 vertebral segments were collected immediately after sacrifice and stored in −20°C wrapped in saline soaked gauze until testing. µCT scans (µCT100, Scanco, Switzerland) of the T13-L3 segment confirmed tumour burden in all T13 and L2 vertebrae prior to testing. T13 was stained with BaSO. 4. to label microdamage. High resolution µCT scans were obtained (90kVp, 44uA, 4W, 4.9µm voxel size) to visualize stain location and volume. Segmentations of bone and BaSO. 4. were created using intensity thresholding at 3000HU (~736mgHA/cm. 3. ) and 10000HU (~2420mgHA/cm. 3. ), respectively. Non-specific BaSO. 4. was removed from the outer edge of the cortical shell by shrinking the segmentation by 105mm in 3D. Stain volume fraction was calculated as the ratio of BaSO. 4. volume to the sum of BaSO. 4. and bone volume. The L1-L3 motion segments were loaded under axial compression to failure using a µCT compatible loading device (Scanco) and force-displacement data was recorded. µCT scans were acquired unloaded, at 1500µm displacement and post-failure. Stereological analysis was performed on the L2 vertebrae in the unloaded µCT scans. Differences in mean stain volume fraction, mean load to failure, and mean bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) were compared between treatment groups using one-way ANOVAs. Pearson's correlation between stain volume fraction and load to failure by treatment was calculated using an adjusted load to failure divided by BV/TV. Stained damage fraction was significantly different between treatment groups (p=0.0029). Tukey post-hoc analysis showed untreated samples to have higher stain volume fraction (16.25±2.54%) than all treatment groups (p<0.05). The ZA group had the highest mean load to failure (195.60±84.49N), followed by untreated (142.33±53.08N), DTX (126.60±48.75N), and SBRT (95.50±44.96N), but differences did not reach significance (p=0.075). BV/TV was significantly higher in the ZA group (49.28±3.56%) compared to all others. The SBRT group had significantly lower BV/TV than the untreated group (p=0.018). Load divided by BV/TV was not significantly different between groups (p=0.24), but relative load to failure results were consistent (ZA>Untreated>DTX>SBRT). No correlations were found between stain volume fraction and load to failure. Focal and systemic cancer treatments effect microdamage accumulation and load to failure in osteolytic vertebrae. Current testing of healthy controls will help to further separate the effects of the tumour and cancer treatments on bone quality

Introduction. Loosening of the baseplate is one of the most common causes of failure in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. To allow osteo-integration to occur and thus provide long-term stability, initial screws fixation plays a pivotal role. In particular, tightening torque and force of nonlocking screws are two parameters that are considered to have a clear impact on implant stability, yet the relation is not fully understood. For this reason, this study aims to define an experimental set-up, to measure force and torque in artificial bone samples of different quality, in order to estimate ranges of optimal surgical values and give guidelines to maximize screw fixation and therefore initial implant stability. Methods. A custom-made torque sensor (Figure 1a) was built and calibrated using a lever deadweight system. To measure the compression force generated by the screw head, three thin FlexiForce sensors (Tekscan, South Boston, US) were enclosed between two 3D printed plates with a central hole to allow screw insertion (Figure 1b). The tightening force, represented by the sum of the three sensors, was calibrated using a uniaxial testing machine (Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany). Multiple screw lengths (26mm, 32mm and 47mm) were selected in the protocol. Synthetic bone blocks (Sawbones; Malmö, Sweden) of 20 and 30 PCF were used to account for bone quality variation. To evaluate the effect of a cortical bone layer, for each density three blocks were considered with 0 mm (no layer), 1.5 mm and 3 mm of laminate foam of 50 PCF. The holes for the screws were pre-drilled in the same way as in the operation room. For each combination of screw dimensions and bone quality, ten measurements were performed by acquiring the signal of the insertion torque and tightening force until bone breaking. Results. The typical output signal shows a maximum in the torque and force measurements, corresponding to bone breaking. After failure, a drop in the torque is visible, while a residual force remains present. For the base case (20 PCF), both torque and force show increasing mean values with longer screws, passing from 0.39 Nm (26mm) to 1.12 Nm (47mm) and from 180 N (26mm) to 419 N (47mm) respectively. Similar patterns were observed when the cortical layer was present or the bone quality was increased. Discussion. The findings of this study demonstrate that tightening force and torque are strongly impacted by bone quality and screw length. As main outcome, the maximum torque values could be used in clinical practice as a safety threshold for the surgeon. Compression force could also be used as input parameter in stability predictions of numerical models. Since only bone substitute was used, future research should include the extension to cadaveric bones. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

OSSTEC is a pre-spin-out venture at Imperial College London seeking industry feedback on our orthopaedic implants which maintain bone quality in the long term. Existing orthopaedic implants provide successful treatment for knee osteoarthritis, however, they cause loss of bone quality over time, leading to more dangerous and expensive revision surgeries and high implant failure rates in young patients. OSSTEC tibial implants stimulate healthy bone growth allowing simple primary revision surgery which will provide value for all stakeholders. This could allow existing orthopaedics manufacturers to capture high growth in existing and emerging markets while offering hospitals and surgeons a safer revision treatment for patients and a 35% annual saving on lifetime costs. For patients, our implant technology could mean additional years of quality life by revising patients to a primary TKA before full revision surgery. Our implants use patent-filed additive manufacturing technology to restore a healthy mechanical environment in the proximal tibia; stimulating long term bone growth. Proven benefits of this technology include increased bone formation and osseointegration, shown in an animal model, and restoration of native load transfer, shown in a human cadaveric model. This technology could help capture the large annual growth (24%) currently seen in the cementless knee reconstruction market, worth $1.2B. Furthermore, analysis suggests an additional market of currently untreated younger patients exists, worth £0.8B and growing by 18% annually. Making revision surgery and therefore treatment of younger patients easier would enable access to this market. We aim to offer improved patient treatment via B2B sales of implants to existing orthopaedic manufacturer partners, who would then provide them with instrumentation to hospitals and surgeons. Existing implant materials provide good options for patient treatments, however OSSTEC's porous titanium structures offer unique competitive advantages; combining options for modular design, cementless fixation, initial bone fixation and crucially long term bone maintenance. Speaking to surgeons across global markets shows that many surgeons are keen to pursue bone preserving surgeries and the use of porous implants. Furthermore, there is a growing demand to treat young patients (with 25% growth in patients younger than 65 over the past 10 years) and to use cementless knee treatments, where patient volume has doubled in the past 4 years and is following trends in hip treatments. Our team includes engineers and consultant surgeons who have experience developing multiple orthopaedic implants which have treated over 200,000 patients. To date we have raised £175,000 for the research and development of these implants and we hope to gain insight from industry professionals before further development towards our aim to begin trials for regulatory approval in 2026. OSSTEC implants provide a way to stimulate bone growth after surgery to reduce revision risk. We hope this could allow orthopaedic manufactures to explore high growth markets while meaning surgeons can treat younger patients in a cost effective way and add quality years to patients' lives

Abstract. Background. Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a well known complication of Bisphosphonate therapy. Due to prolonged suppression of bone re-modelling in these fractures, surgical complications are difficult to manage. The aim of this study was to analyze the causes of surgical complications in AFF fixations and provide algorithm for management. Method. In this retrospective 10-year study (2010–2020), we identified patients surgically treated for AFF. We included patients who underwent revision surgery for any cause. Data collection included demographics, surgical complications, details of revision surgery and time to union. Result. Out of 57 patients who were operated for AFF, 17 underwent revision fixation. The average age was 69 with only 2 males. Around two-third (64%) were sub-trochanteric fractures and method of fixation in 64% cases was intra-medullary nail. The most common complication was non-union (12), followed by stress fracture and infection in 3 and 2 cases respectively. In most cases inadequate reduction and sub-optimal fixation was perceived as cause of failure except two cases which got infected. Revision fixation in all cases included improved bone contact (non-union site osteotomy), use of bone morphogenic proteins and improved fixation with augmentation device (either nail or plate). Follow up at 1 year showed fracture union in 12 cases, remaining 5 revision fixations failed, 3 of which were managed with proximal femur replacement. Conclusion. High rate of non-union after fixation in AFF. Optimizing the fixation construct results in union in most cases. However, arthroplasty should be considered in elderly patients with poor bone quality

The use of endoprosthesis implants is frequent for tumours involving the proximal third of the femur and not amenable to primary arthroplasty or internal fixation. In this population, these implants are preferentially cemented given poor bone quality associated with systemic diseases and treatments. Loosening is a common complication of these implants that have been linked to poor bone quality, type of implants and importantly cementing technique. Thus, these techniques vary between different surgeons and based mainly on previous experience. One of the most successful cementing techniques in the arthroplasty literature is the French paradox. This technique involves removing the cancellous bone of the proximal femoral metaphysis and selects the largest stem to tightly fit the created cavity delineated by cortical bone. Cementing the implant results in a very thin cement layer that fills the inconsistent gaps between the metal and the bone. To our knowledge, no previous report exists in the literature assessing loosening in proximal femur replacement using the French paradox cementing technique. In this study, we sought to examine (1) rates of loosening in proximal femur replacement, and (2) the oncological outcomes including tumour recurrence and implant related complications. A retrospective study of 42 patients underwent proximal femur replacement between 1990 and 2018 at our institution. Of these, 30 patients met our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers have evaluated the preoperative and the most recent postoperative radiographs using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) radiographic scoring system and Gruen classification for femoral stem loosening. Additionally, the acetabulum was evaluated for erosion according to the criteria of Baker et al. The mean age of this cohort was 60.5 (19–80), with 60% being males. The primary origin was metastatic in 17 (56.7%) patients, bone sarcoma in 10 (33.3%) patients and soft tissue sarcoma in 3 (10%) patients. Pathological fractures were present in 11 (36.7%) patients. Seven (23.3%) patients had prior intramedullary nailing. Preoperative radiotherapy was used in 8 (26.7%) and postoperative radiotherapy in 17 (56.7%) patients. The mean clinical follow-up was 25.2±26.3 months and the mean radiographical follow-up was 24.8±26 months. The mean ISOLS score for both reviewers was found to be 89±6.5% and 86.5±6.1%, respectively. Additionally, the first reviewer found two patients to be possibly loos (6.7%) compared to one (3.3%) patient for the second reviewer. No components scored as probably or definitely loose and non-required revision for either loosening or metal failure. Furthermore, both reviewers showed no acetabular erosion in 25 (83.3%) and 24 (80%) patients, respectively. On the other hand, the overall rate of complications was 36.6% with 11 complications reported in 30 patients. Local recurrence occurred in five (16.6%) patients. Prosthetic Dislocation was the most frequent complications with eight dislocations in four patients. Despite complications, our results showed no radiographic evidence of stem loosening. Cementing proximal femur prosthesis with a tight canal fit and with a thin cement mantle appears to be a viable option at short and medium term

Patients undergoing revision surgery of a primary total hip arthroplasty often exhibit bone loss and poor bone quality, which make achieving stable fixation and osseointegration challenging. Implant components coated in porous metals are used clinically to improve mechanical stability and encourage bone in-growth. We compared ultra-porous titanium coatings, known commercially as Gription and Porocoat, in an intra-articular model by press-fitting coated cylindrical implants into ovine femoral condyles and evaluating bone in-growth and fixation strength 4, 8 and 16 weeks post-operatively. Bilateral surgery using a mini-arthrotomy approach was performed on twenty-four Dorset-Rideau Arcott rams (3.4 ± 0.8 years old, 84.8 ± 9.3 kg) with Institutional Animal Care Committee approval in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Cylindrical implants, 6.2 mm in diameter by 10 mm in length with surface radius of curvature of 35 mm, were composed of a titanium substrate coated in either Porocoat or Gription and press-fit into 6 mm diameter recipient holes in the weight-bearing regions of the medial (MFC) and lateral (LFC) femoral condyles. Each sheep received 4 implants; two Gription in one stifle (knee) and two Porocoat in the contralateral joint. Biomechanical push-out tests (Instron ElectroPuls E10000) were performed on LFCs, where implants were pushed out relative to the condyle at a rate of 2 mm/min. Force and displacement data were used to calculate force and displacement at failure, stiffness, energy, stress, strain, elastic modulus, and toughness. MFCs were fixed in 70% ethanol, processed undecalcified, and polished sections, approximately 70 µm thick (Exakt Micro Grinding system) were carbon-coated. Backscattered electron images were collected on a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi SU3500) at 5 kV and working distance of 5 mm. Bone in-growth within the porous coating was quantified using software (ImageJ). Statistical comparisons were made using a two-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD post-hoc test (Statistica v.8). Biomechanical evaluation of the bone-implant interface revealed that by 16 weeks, Gription-coated implants exhibited higher force (2455±1362 N vs. 1002±1466 N, p=0.046) and stress (12.60±6.99 MPa vs. 5.14±7.53 MPa, p=0.046) at failure, and trended towards higher stiffness (11510±7645 N/mm vs. 5010±8374 N/mm, p=.061) and modulus of elasticity (591±392 MPa vs. 256±431 MPa, p=0.61). Similarly, by 16 weeks, bone in-growth in Gription-coated implants was approximately double that measured in Porocoat (6.73±3.86 % vs. 3.22±1.52 %, p=0.045). No statistically significant differences were detected at either 4 nor 8 weeks, however, qualitative observations of the exposed bone-implant interface, made following push-out testing, showed more bony material consistently adhered to Gription compared to Porocoat at all three time points. High variability is attributed to implant placement, resulting from the small visual window afforded during surgery, unique curvatures of the condyles, and presence of the extensor digitorum longus tendon which limited access to the LFC. Ultra-porous titanium coatings, know commercially as Gription and Porocoat, were compared for the first time in a challenging intra-articular ovine model. Gription provided superior fixation strength and bone in-growth, suggesting it may be beneficial in hip replacement surgeries where bone stock quality and quantity may be compromised

Introduction. Charcot Arthropathy related foot and ankle deformities are a serious challenge. Surgical treatment of these deformities is now well established. The traditional surgical method of extensive surgical exposure, excision of bone, acute correction and internal fixation is not always appropriate in presence of active ulceration, deep infection and poor bone quality. Minimally invasive osteotomies and gradual correction of deformities with a circular frame are proving helpful in minimizing complications. We present our experience with the use of Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) in 10 patients with recurrent ulceration and deformity. Materials and Methods. Our indication for the treatment with TSF is recurrent or intractable ulceration with or without active bone infection or a history of infection in a deformed foot and/or ankle. There are 2 female and 8 male patients in this cohort. We used a long bone module for ankle and hindfoot deformities (3 patients) and a forefoot 6×6 butt frame (7 patients) for midfoot deformities. An osteotomy through midfoot was performed in all chronic stable midfoot deformity cases and a calcaneal osteotomy and gradual correction through ankle in when hindfoot and ankle deformities co-existed. Results. Our outcome measures are a complete healing of ulcer and infection without recurrence, clinically plantigrade foot and ability to wear regular shoes or diabetic footwear. We achieved this outcome in 9 out of 10 patients. Successful patients remain ulcer free at minimum 7 and maximum 14 years follow up. Complications included eight episodes of pin infection that responded to oral antibiotics only and two pin breakages. Conclusions. Our results confirm that Taylor Spatial Frame treatment is a good alternative to traditional surgery in high-risk complex Charcot neuroarthropathy foot and ankle deformities

Introduction. Open fractures are fortunately rare but pose an even greater challenge due to poor soft tissues, in addition to poor bone quality. Co-morbidities and pre-existing medical conditions, in particular, peripheral vascular diseases make them often unsuitable for free flaps. We present our experience in treating severe open fractures of tibia with Acute Intentional Deformation (AID) to close the soft tissues followed by gradual correction of deformity to achieve anatomical alignment of the tibia and fracture healing with Taylor Spatial Frame. Materials and Methods. We treated 4 geriatric (3 female and 1 male) patients with Gustillo-Anderson III B fractures of the tibia between 2017–18. All were unfit to undergo orthoplastic procedures (free flap or local flaps). The age range is 69 yrs to 92 years. Co-morbidities included severe rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and heart failure. The procedure involved wound debridement, application of two ring Taylor Spatial Frame, acute deformation of the limb on the table to achieve soft-tissue closure/approximation. Regular neurovascular assessments were performed in the immediate post-operative period to monitor for compartment syndrome and nerve compression symptoms. After 7–10 days of latent period, the frame was gradually manipulated, according to a method we had previously published, to achieve anatomical alignment. The frame was removed in clinic after fracture healing. Results. Time in frame ranged from 1.5 months to 7 months. In one patient (92 yr old with an open fracture of the ankle) hindfoot nail was inserted after soft-tissue closure was achieved at 1.5 months, and frame removed. We achieved complete healing of soft tissue wounds without any input from plastic surgeons in all patients. All fractures healed in anatomical alignment. 3 patients had one episode of superficial pin infection each requiring 5 days of oral antibiotics. None of the patients developed a deep infection. Conclusions. Acute intentional deformation (AID) with Taylor Spatial Frame achieves good closure of soft tissues in physiologically compromised geriatric patients who were deemed unfit for plastic surgery. We also achieved fracture healing in all four cases without any major complications

The most common classification of periprosthetic femoral fractures is the Vancouver classification. The classification has been validated by multiple centers. Fractures are distinguished by location, stability of the femoral component, and bone quality. Although postoperative and intraoperative fractures are classified using the same three regions, the treatment algorithm is slightly different. Type A fractures involve the greater and lesser trochanter. Fractures around the stem or just distal to the stem are Type B and subcategorised depending on stem stability and bone quality. Type C fractures are well distal to the stem and are treated independent of the stem with standard fixation techniques. The majority of fractures are either B1 (stable stem) or B2 (unstable stem). The stem is retained and ORIF of the fracture performed for B1 fractures. B2 and B3 fractures require stem revision with primary stem fixation distal to the fracture. Intraoperative fractures use the same A, B, C regions but are subtyped 1–3 as cortical perforations, nondisplaced, and displaced unstable fractures, respectively. With the exception of A1 intraoperative fractures all other intraoperative fractures require surgical treatment. A recent publication utilizing a New York state registry highlighted the patient risk of mortality associated with periprosthetic hip fractures. One month, 6 month and 1 year mortality was 3.2%, 3.8% and 9.7%, respectively. The mortality risk was lower for periprosthetic fractures treated with ORIF at 1 and 6 months compared to fractures requiring revision total hip

The Failed Femoral Neck Fracture. For the young patient: Attempt to preserve patient's own femoral head. Clinical results reasonably good even if there are patches of avascular necrosis. Preferred methods of salvage: valgus-producing intertrochanteric femoral osteotomy: puts the nonunion under compression. Other treatment option: Meyer's vascularised pedicle graft. For the older patient: Most reliable treatment is prosthetic replacement. Decision to use hemiarthroplasty (such as bipolar) or THA based on quality of articular cartilage, perceived risk of instability problem. In most patients THA provides higher likelihood of excellent pain relief. Specific technical issues: (1) hardware removal: usually remove after hip has first been dislocated (to reduce risk of femur fracture); (2) Hip stability: consider methods to reduce dislocation risk: larger diameter heads/dual mobility/anteriorly-based approaches; (3) Acetabular bone quality: poor because it is not sclerotic from previous arthritis; caution when impacting a pressfit cup; low threshold to augment fixation with screws; don't overdo reaming; just expose the bleeding subchondral bone. A reasonable alternative is a cemented cup. The Failed Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture. For the young patient: Attempt to salvage hip joint with nonunion takedown, autogenous bone grafting and internal fixation. For the older patient: Decision to preserve patient's own hip with internal fixation versus salvage with hip arthroplasty should be individualised based on patient circumstances, fracture pattern, bone quality. THA is an effective salvage procedure for this problem in older patients. If prosthetic replacement is chosen special considerations include:. THA vs. hemiarthroplasty: hemiarthroplasty better stability; THA more reliable pain relief. Removal of hardware: be prepared to remove broken screws in intramedullary canal. Management of bone loss: bone loss to level of lesser trochanter common. Often requires a calcar replacement implant. Proximal calcar build-up size dictated by bone loss. Length of stem: desirable to bypass screw holes from previous fixation, if possible. Stem fixation: cemented or uncemented fixation depending on surgeon preference, bone quality. If uncemented, consider diaphyseal fixation. Greater trochanter: often a separate piece, be prepared to fix with wires or cable grip. Residual trochanteric healing, hardware problems not rare after THA

As an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) provides the advantage of retaining bone stock. However, femoral component loosening and femoral neck fracture continue to be leading causes of revision in HRA. Surgical technique including cementation method and bone preparation, and patient selection are known to be important for fixation. This study was designed to understand if and to what extent compromise in bone quality and the presence of cysts in the proximal femur contribute to resurfacing component loosening. A finite element (FE) model of a proximal femur was used to calculate the stress in the cement layer. Bone density to Young's modulus relationship was used to calibrate the bone stiffness in the model using computed tomography. A contemporary resurfacing implant (BHR, Smith & Nephew) was used in the FE model. The effect of reduced bone quality (35% reduction relative to normal baseline; osteoporosis threshold) and presence of cysts on stress in the bone cement layer was then assessed using the same FE model. The center of the cyst (a localized spherical cavity 1 cm in diameter) was located directly under the contact patch. Simulations were run with two locations of the center of the cyst, on the surface of the resected bone and 1 cm below it. The surface cyst was filled with bone cement, but the inner cyst was empty. The contact force and location for the model were obtained from instrumented implant studies. Simulations were run representing the peak loads during two activities, jogging and stand-up from seated position. While density reduction of the bone reduced the stress in the CoCr femoral head, the Von-Mises stress in the cement layer was amplified. The peak Von-Mises stress in the cement layer under the contact patch increased more than six times for the jogging activity, and more than ten times for the stand-up activity, relative to values for normal bone density. The impact of cysts on the cement layer stress or the strain distributions in the bone were minimal. The results show a greater risk of failure of the cement layer under conditions of reduced bone density. In contrast cement stresses and bone strains appeared to be relatively immune to a surface cyst filled with bone cement or an empty inner cyst. Contraindications of hip resurfacing include severe osteopenia and multiple cysts of the femoral head, however no strict or quantitative criteria exist to guide patient selection. Research similar to the one presented herein, maybe key to developing better patient selection criteria to reduce risk associated with compromised femoral head fixation

The primary objectives of this study were to: 1) identify risk factors for subsequent surgery following initial treatment of proximal humerus fractures, stratified by initial treatment type; 2) generate risk prediction tools to predict subsequent shoulder surgery following initial treatment; and 3) internally validate the discriminative ability of each tool. We identified patients ≥ 50 years with a diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture from 2004 to 2015 using linkable health datasets in Ontario, Canada. We used procedural and fee codes within 30 days of the index fracture to classify patients into treatment groups: 1) surgical fixation; 2) shoulder replacement; and 3) conservative. We used intervention and diagnosis codes to identify all instances of complication-related subsequent shoulder surgery following initial treatment within two years post fracture. We developed logistic regression models for randomly selected two thirds of each treatment group to evaluate the association of patient, fracture, surgical, and hospital variables on the odds of subsequent shoulder surgery following initial treatment. We used regression coefficients to compute points associated with each of the variables within each category, and calculated the risk associated with each point total using the regression equation. We used the final third of each cohort to evaluate the discriminative ability of the developed risk tools (via the continuous point total and a dichotomous point cut-off value for “higher” vs. “lower” risk determined by Receiver Operating Curves) using c-statistics. We identified 20,897 patients with proximal humerus fractures that fit our inclusion criteria for analysis, 2,414 treated with fixation, 1,065 treated with replacement, and 17,418 treated conservatively. The proportions of patients who underwent subsequent shoulder surgery within two years were 13.8%, 5.1%, and 1.3%, for fixation, replacement, and conservative groups, respectively. Predictors of reoperation following fixation included the use of a bone graft, and fixation with a nail or wire vs. a plate. The only significant predictor of reoperation following replacement was poor bone quality. The only predictor of subsequent shoulder surgery following conservative treatment was more comorbidities while patients aged 70+, and those discharged home following initial presentation (vs. admitted or transferred to another facility) had lower odds of subsequent shoulder surgery. The risk tools developed were able to discriminate between patients who did or did not undergo subsequent shoulder surgery in the derivation cohorts with c-statistics of 0.75–0.88 (continuous point total), and 0.82–0.88 (dichotomous cut-off), and 0.53–0.78 (continuous point total) and 0.51–0.79 (dichotomous cut-off) in the validation cohorts. Our results present potential factors associated with subsequent shoulder surgery following initial treatment of proximal humerus fractures, stratified by treatment type. Our developed risk tools showed good to strong discriminative ability in both the derivation and validation cohorts for patients treated with fixation, and conservatively. This indicates that the tools may be useful for clinicians and researchers. Future research is required to develop risk tools that incorporate clinical variables such as functional demands