Aims

The Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system has demonstrated significant benefits over external fixation lengthening methods, leading to a paradigm shift in limb lengthening. This study compares outcomes following antegrade and retrograde femoral lengthening in both adolescent and adult patients.

Introduction. To determine the advantages and risks of plating after lengthening (PAL) of tibia in children and adolescents. Materials and Methods. 35 consecutive tibial lengthenings were done for limb length discrepancy (LLD) in 26 patients. Gradual lengthening by an external fixator from a tibial (usually diaphyseal) osteotomy was followed by internal fixation with a lateral tibial submuscular plate. The mean age at the time of the lengthening was 10.3 years (4.8 – 16.8 years). The aetiology for LLD was congenital in 21, acquired in 3, and developmental in 2 patients. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years (8 months – 9.9 years). Results. The mean lengthening was 5cm (3–8.6cm) or 19.1% (10.8 – 35.2%) of the initial length of tibia. It took 78.8 days to reach the target length at a lengthening rate of 0.75mm/day. The mean time to plate substitution after cessation of lengthening was 24.7days/109 days after osteotomy. This led to an average external fixation index (EFI) of 23.1days/cm. Optimisation of this technique by judicious estimation of timing of plate substitution would reduce the EFI. Consolidation was recorded at 192 days after osteotomy. Bone healing index (BHI) was 39.8days/cm and was age dependent: <12 year olds = 37.5 days/cm; 12 years = 44.7 days/cm. Using the estimated consolidation time if treatment was solely by external fixator, calculated by tripling the time taken to reach target length after osteotomy, the BHI in this series would have been 52.9 days/cm (p < 0.001). Knee flexion recovery to > 90 degrees was noted at 153.5 days after plating. One greenstick fracture occurred 116 days after plate insertion, 1 tibial shaft fracture occurred 315 days post removal of plate - both following injury and were treated conservatively. Six episodes of sepsis, 5 superficial and 1 deep were treated with antibiotic suppression. The plates were removed from 28 tibiae, 437.4 days after insertion. Conclusions. Plating after lengthening not only reduces the fixator time but appears to achieve consolidation faster than if treatment was by external fixation alone. This facilitates early recovery of joint motion and limb function

We report the results of using a combination of fixator-assisted nailing with lengthening over an intramedullary nail in patients with tibial deformity and shortening. Between 1997 and 2007, 13 tibiae in nine patients with a mean age of 25.4 years (17 to 34) were treated with a unilateral external fixator for acute correction of deformity, followed by lengthening over an intramedullary nail with a circular external fixator applied at the same operating session. At the end of the distraction period locking screws were inserted through the intramedullary nail and the external fixator was removed. The mean amount of lengthening was 5.9 cm (2 to 8). The mean time of external fixation was 90 days (38 to 265). The mean external fixation index was 15.8 days/cm (8.9 to 33.1) and the mean bone healing index was 38 days/cm (30 to 60). One patient developed an equinus deformity which responded to stretching and bracing. Another developed a drop foot due to a compartment syndrome, which was treated by fasciotomy. It recovered in three months. Two patients required bone grafting for poor callus formation. We conclude that the combination of fixator-assisted nailing with lengthening over an intramedullary nail can reduce the overall external fixation time and prevent fractures and deformity of the regenerated bone

Aims

Distraction osteogenesis with intramedullary lengthening devices has undergone rapid development in the past decade with implant enhancement. In this first single-centre matched-pair analysis we focus on the comparison of treatment with the PRECICE and STRYDE intramedullary lengthening devices and aim to clarify any clinical and radiological differences.

Lengthening of the humerus is now an established technique. We compared the complications of humeral lengthening with those of femoral lengthening and investigated whether or not the callus formation in the humerus proceeds at a higher rate than that in the femur. A total of 24 humeral and 24 femoral lengthenings were performed on 12 patients with achondroplasia. We measured the pixel value ratio (PVR) of the lengthened area on radiographs and each radiograph was analysed for the shape, type and density of the callus. The quality of life (QOL) of the patients after humeral lengthening was compared with that prior to surgery. The complication rate per segment of humerus and femur was 0.87% and 1.37%, respectively. In the humerus the PVR was significantly higher than that of the femur. Lower limbs were associated with an increased incidence of concave, lateral and central callus shapes. Humeral lengthening had a lower complication rate than lower-limb lengthening, and QOL increased significantly after humeral lengthening. Callus formation in the humerus during the distraction period proceeded at a significantly higher rate than that in the femur.

These findings indicate that humeral lengthening has an important role in the management of patients with achondroplasia.