Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

IS BONE CONSOLIDATION CHANGED BY PLATING AFTER LENGTHENING OF THE TIBIA? A REVIEW OF 35 CASES

The British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS) 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting, Virtual Conference, held online, 15 April 2021.



Abstract

Introduction

To determine the advantages and risks of plating after lengthening (PAL) of tibia in children and adolescents

Materials and Methods

35 consecutive tibial lengthenings were done for limb length discrepancy (LLD) in 26 patients. Gradual lengthening by an external fixator from a tibial (usually diaphyseal) osteotomy was followed by internal fixation with a lateral tibial submuscular plate. The mean age at the time of the lengthening was 10.3 years (4.8 – 16.8 years). The aetiology for LLD was congenital in 21, acquired in 3, and developmental in 2 patients. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years (8 months – 9.9 years).

Results

The mean lengthening was 5cm (3–8.6cm) or 19.1% (10.8 – 35.2%) of the initial length of tibia. It took 78.8 days to reach the target length at a lengthening rate of 0.75mm/day. The mean time to plate substitution after cessation of lengthening was 24.7days/109 days after osteotomy. This led to an average external fixation index (EFI) of 23.1days/cm. Optimisation of this technique by judicious estimation of timing of plate substitution would reduce the EFI. Consolidation was recorded at 192 days after osteotomy. Bone healing index (BHI) was 39.8days/cm and was age dependent: <12 year olds = 37.5 days/cm; 12 years = 44.7 days/cm. Using the estimated consolidation time if treatment was solely by external fixator, calculated by tripling the time taken to reach target length after osteotomy, the BHI in this series would have been 52.9 days/cm (p < 0.001). Knee flexion recovery to > 90 degrees was noted at 153.5 days after plating. One greenstick fracture occurred 116 days after plate insertion, 1 tibial shaft fracture occurred 315 days post removal of plate - both following injury and were treated conservatively. Six episodes of sepsis, 5 superficial and 1 deep were treated with antibiotic suppression. The plates were removed from 28 tibiae, 437.4 days after insertion.

Conclusions

Plating after lengthening not only reduces the fixator time but appears to achieve consolidation faster than if treatment was by external fixation alone. This facilitates early recovery of joint motion and limb function.