Primary implant stability is critical for osseointegration and subsequent implant success. Small displacements on the screw/bone interface are necessary for implant success, however, larger displacements can propagate cracks and break anchorage points which causes the screw to fail. Limited information is available on the progressive degradation of stability of an implanted bone screw since most published research is based on monotonic, quasi-static loading [1]. This study aims to address this gap in knowledge.

A total of 100 implanted trabecular screws were tested using multi-axial loading test set-up. Screws were loaded in cycles with the applied force increasing 1N in each load cycle. In every load cycle, Peak forces, displacements, and stiffness degradation (calculated in the unloading half of the cycle) where recorded. 10 different loading configurations where tested.

The damage vs displacement shows a total displacement at the point of failure between 0.3 and 0.4 mm while an initial stiffness reduction close to 40%. It is also shown that at a displacement of ~0.1 mm, the initial stiffness of every sample had degraded by 20% (or more) meaning that half of the allowable degradation occurred in the first 25-30% of the total displacement.

Other studies on screw overloading [1] suggests similar results to our concerning initial stiffness degradation at the end of the loading cycle. Our results also show that the initial stiffness degrades faster with relatively small deformations suggesting that the failure point of an implanted screw might occur before the common failure definition (pull-out force, for example). These results are of great significance since primary implant stability is better explained by the stiffness of the construct than by its failure point.

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are the third most common fractures in the elderly. Treatment of complex PHF has remained challenging with mechanical failure rates ranging up to 35% even when state-of-the-art locked plates are used. Secondary (post-operative) screw perforation through the articular surface of the humeral head is the most frequent mechanical failure mode, with rates up to 23%. Besides other known risk factors, such as non-anatomical reduction and lack of medial cortical support, in-adverse intraoperative perforation of the articular surfaces during pilot hole drilling (overdrilling) may increase the risk of secondary screw perforation. Overdrilling often occurs during surgical treatment of osteoporotic PHF due to minimal tactile feedback; however, the awareness in the surgical community is low and the consequences on the fixation stability have remained unproved. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically whether overdrilling would increase the risk of cyclic screw perforation failure in unstable PHF.

A highly unstable malreduced 3-part fracture was simulated by osteotomizing 9 pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric proximal humeri from elderly donors (73.7 ± 13.0 ys, f/m: 3/6). The fragments were fixed with a locking plate (PHILOS, DePuy Synthes, Switzerland) using six proximal screws, with their lengths selected to ensure 6 mm tip-to-joint distance. The pairs were randomized into two treatment groups, one with all pilot holes accurately predrilled (APD) and another one with the boreholes of the two calcar screws overdrilled (COD). The constructs were tested under progressively increasing cyclic loading to failure at 4 Hz using a previously developed setup and protocol. Starting from 50 N, the peak load was increased by 0.05 N/cycle. The event of initial screw loosening was defined by the abrupt increase of the displacement at valley load, following its initial linear behavior. Perforation failure was defined by the first screw penetrating the joint surface, touching the artificial glenoid component and stopping the test via electrical contact.

Bone mineral density (range: 63.8 – 196.2 mgHA/cm3) was not significantly different between the groups. Initial screw loosening occurred at a significantly lower number of cycles in the COD group (10,310 ± 3,575) compared to the APD group (12,409 ± 4,569), p = 0.006. Number of cycles to screw perforation was significantly lower for the COD versus APD specimens (20,173 ± 5,851 and 24,311 ± 6,318, respectively), p = 0.019. Failure mode was varus collapse combined with lateral-inferior translation of the humeral head. The first screw perforating the articular surface was one of the calcar screws in all but one specimen.

Besides risk factors such as fracture complexity and osteoporosis, inadequate surgical technique is a crucial contributor to high failure rates in locked plating of complex PHF. This study shows for the first time that overdrilling of pilot holes can significantly increase the risk of secondary screw perforation. Study limitations include the fracture model and loading method. While the findings require clinical corroboration, raising the awareness of the surgical community towards this largely neglected risk source, together with development of devices to avoid overdrilling, are expected to help improve the treatment outcomes.

Coronoid fractures account for 2 to 15% of the cases with elbow dislocations and usually occur as part of complex injuries. Comminuted fractures and non-unions necessitate coronoid fixation, reconstruction or replacement. The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare the axial stability achieved via an individualized 3D printed prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem to both radial head grafted reconstruction and coronoid fixation with 2 screws. It was hypothesized that the prosthetic replacement will provide superior stability over the grafted reconstruction and screw fixation.

Following CT scanning, 18 human cadaveric proximal ulnas were osteotomized at 40% of the coronoid height and randomized to 3 groups (n = 6). The specimens in Group 1 were treated with an individually designed 3D printed stainless steel coronoid prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem, individually designed based on the contralateral coronoid scan. The ulnas in Group 2 were reconstructed with an ipsilateral radial head autograft fixed with two anteroposterior screws, whereas the osteotomized coronoids in Group 3 were fixed in situ with two anteroposterior screws.

All specimens were biomechanically tested under ramped quasi-static axial loading to failure at a rate of 10 mm/min. Construct stiffness and failure load were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed at a level of significance set at 0.05.

Prosthetic treatment (Group 1) resulted in significantly higher stiffness and failure load compared to both radial head autograft reconstruction (Group 2) and coronoid screw fixation, p ≤ 0.002. Stiffness and failure load did not reveal any significant differences between Group 2 and Group 3, p ≥ 0.846.

In cases of coronoid deficiency, replacement of the coronoid process with an anatomically shaped individually designed 3D printed prosthesis with a curved cemented intramedullary stem seems to be an effective method to restore the buttress function of the coronoid under axial loading. This method provides superior stability over both radial head graft reconstruction and coronoid screw fixation, while achieving anatomical articular congruity. Therefore, better load distribution with less stress at the bone-implant interface can be anticipated. In the clinical practice, implementation of this prosthesis type could allow for early patient mobilization with better short- and long-term treatment outcomes and may be beneficial for patients with irreparable comminuted coronoid fractures, severe arthritic changes or non-unions.