Introduction. There is widespread variation in the management of rare orthopaedic disease, in a large part owing to uncertainty. No individual surgeon or hospital is typically equipped to amass sufficient numbers of cases to draw robust conclusions from the information available to them. The programme of research will establish the British Orthopaedic Surgery Surveillance (BOSS) Study; a nationwide reporting structure for rare disease in orthopaedic surgery. Methods. The BOSS Study is a series of nationwide observational cohort studies of pre-specified orthopaedic disease. All relevant hospitals treating the disease are invited to contribute anonymised case details. Data will be collected digitally through REDCap, with an additional bespoke software solution used to regularly confirm case ascertainment, prompt follow-up reminders and identify potential missing cases from external sources of information (i.e. national administrative data). With their consent, patients will be invited to enrich the data collected by supplementing anonymised case data with patient reported outcomes. The study will primarily seek to calculate the incidence of the rare diseases under investigation, with 95% confidence intervals. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the case mix, treatment variations and outcomes. Inferential statistical analysis may be used to analyze associations between presentation factors and outcomes. Types of analyses will be contingent on the disease under investigation. Discussion. This study builds upon other national rare disease supporting structures, particularly those in obstetrics and paediatric surgery. It is particularly focused on addressing the evidence base for quality and safety of surgery, and the design is influenced by the specifications of the IDEAL collaboration for the development of surgical research

Background. Patellar instability is a complex, multi-factorial disorder. Radiological assessment is regarded as an important part of the management of this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of common radiological measurements used to evaluate patellar instability. Methods. One hundred and fifty x-rays from 51 individuals were reviewed by five reviewers: two orthopaedic trainees, a radiological trainee, a consultant radiologist and an orthopaedic physiotherapist. Radiological measurements assessed included patellar shape, sulcus angle, congruence angle, lateral patellofemoral angle (LPA), lateral patellar displacement (LPD), lateral displacement measurement (LDM), boss height, and patellar height ratios (Caton-Deschamps, Blackburne-Peel, Insall-Salvati). All assessors were provided with a summary document outlining the method of assessing each measurement. Bland-Altman analyses were adopted to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability. Results. The results indicated generally low measurement error on intra-rater reliability assessment, particularly for LPD (within-subject variance 0.7mm to 3.7mm), LDM (0.7mm to 3.5mm) and boss height (0.4mm to 1.6mm) for all assessors. There was greater measurement error for the calculation of sulcus angle (0.7° to 10.6°), congruence angle (0.8° to 18.4°) and LPA (0.8° to 16.5°). Whilst the inter-rater reliability between assessors indicated a low mean difference for assessments of patellar height measurements (0.0° to 0.6°), there was greater variability for LPA (0.1° to 3.6°), LPD (0.2mm to 4.6mm) and LDM (0.1mm to 4.0mm), with wide 95% limits of agreement for all measurements indicated poor precision. Conclusions. Many of the standard measurements used to assess the patellofemoral joint on plain radiographs have poor precision. Intra-rater reliability may be related to experience but it seems likely that to achieve good inter-rater reliability, specific training may be required to calibrate observers. More formal training in the technique of radiological measurement for those who were inexperienced might have improved the inter-rater reliability

The battle of revision TKA is won or lost with safe, effective, and minimally bony-destructive implant removal, protecting all ligamentous stabilisers of the knee and, most importantly, the extensor mechanism. For exposure, incisions should be long and generous to allow adequate access. A standard medial parapatellar capsular arthrotomy is preferred. A synovectomy is performed followed by debridement of all scar tissue, especially in the medial and lateral gutters. All peripatellar scar tissue is excised followed by release of scar tissue within the patellar tendon, allowing for displacement or everting of the patella. As patellar tendon avulsion at any time of knee surgery yields disastrous results, the surgeon should be continuously evaluating the patellar tendon integrity, especially while displacing/everting the patella and bringing the knee into flexion. If displacement/eversion is difficult, consider rectis-snip, V-Y quadricepsplasty, or tibial tubercle osteotomy. The long-held requisite for patellar eversion prior to component removal is inaccurate. In most cases simple lateral patellar subluxation will provide adequate exposure. If a modular tibial system is involved, removal of the tibial polyethylene will decompress the knee, allowing for easier access to patellar, femoral, and tibial components. For patellar component removal, first identify the border of the patella, then carefully clean and debride the interface, preferably with electrocautery. If the tibial component is cemented all-polyethylene, remove using an oscillating saw at the prosthetic-bone interface. Debride the remaining cement with hand tools, ultrasonic tools, or burrs. Remove the remaining peg using a low-speed burr. If the tibial component is metal-backed, then utilise a thin saw blade or reciprocating saw to negotiate the undersurface of the component between the pegs. If pegs are peripherally located, cut with a diamond disc circular cutting tool. Use a trephine to remove the pegs. For femoral component removal, identify the prosthetic-bone/prosthetic-cement interface then remove soft tissue from the interface, preferably with electrocautery. Disrupt the interface around all aspects of the component, using any of following: Gigli saw for cementless components only, micro saw, standard oscillating saw, reciprocating saw, a series of thin osteotomes, or ultrasonic equipment. If the femoral component is stemmed, remove the component in two segments using an appropriate screwdriver to remove the screw locking the stem to the component. Remove the femoral component with a retrodriver or femoral component extractor. Debride cement with hand tools or burr, using care to avoid bone fracture. If a stem is present, then remove with the appropriate extraction device. If “mismatch” exists, where femoral (or likewise, tibial) boss is smaller in diameter than the stem, creating a cement block prohibiting stem removal, remove the cement with hand tools or burr. If the stem is cemented, use hand tools, ultrasonic tools, or a burr to debride the cement. Curette and clean the canals. For tibial component removal, disrupt the prosthetic-cement/prosthetic-bone interface using an oscillating or reciprocating saw. Gently remove the tibial component with a retrodriver or tibial extractor. If stem extensions are utilised, disengage and debride all proximal cement prior to removing the stem. If stem is present, then remove stem with appropriate extraction device. If stem is grit-blasted and well-fixed, create 8mm burr holes 1.5 to 2.5cm distal to tibial tray on medial aspect and a small divot using burr, then drive implant proximally with Anspach punch. Alternatively, a tibial tubercle osteotomy may be performed. If the stem is cemented, use hand tools, ultrasonic tools or burr to debride cement

Introduction. Patellar crepitus and clunk are tendofemoral-related complications predominantly associated with posterior-stabilizing (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs [1]. Contact between the quadriceps tendon and the femoral component can cause irritation, pain, and catching of soft-tissue within the intercondylar notch (ICN). While the incidence of tendofemoral-related pathologies has been documented for some primary TKA designs, literature describing revision TKA is sparse. Revision components require a larger boss resection to accommodate a constrained post-cam and stem/sleeve attachments, which elevates the entrance to the ICN, potentially increasing the risk of crepitus. The objective of this study was to evaluate tendofemoral contact in primary and revision TKA designs, including designs susceptible to crepitus, and newer designs which aim to address design features associated with crepitus. Methods. Six PS TKA designs were evaluated during deep knee bend using a computational model of the Kansas knee simulator (Figure 1). Prior work has demonstrated that tendofemoral contact predictions from this model can differentiate between TKA patients with patellar crepitus and matched controls [2]. Incidence of crepitus of up to 14% has been reported in Insall-Burstein® II and PFC® Sigma® designs [3]. These designs, in addition to PFC® Sigma® TC3 (revision component), were included in the analyses. Primary and revision components of newer generation designs (NexGen®, Attune® and Attune® Revision) were also included. Designs were evaluated in a patient model with normal Insall-Salvati ratio and a modified model with patellar tendon length reduced by two standard deviations (13mm) to assess worst-case patient anatomy. Results. During simulations with normal patellar tendon length, only PFC® Sigma® and PFC® Sigma® TC3 showed tendofemoral contact within the trochlea, and no design showed contact at the transition to the ICN (Figure 2). In simulations with patella baja, Insall-Burstein® II, PFC® Sigma®, and PFC® Sigma® TC3, demonstrated tendofemoral contact across the trochlea at the transition into the notch. In contrast, NexGen®, Attune® and Attune® Revision showed tendon contact for approximately half the width of the transition to the notch (Figure 3). PFC® Sigma® and Attune® demonstrated very similar tendofemoral contact to their equivalent revision components, although the shorter trochlear groove of Attune® Revision marginally increased contact at the transition. Discussion. Insall-Burstein® II, PFC® Sigma®, and PFC® Sigma® TC3 designs showed full contact with the quadriceps tendon at the anterior border of the ICN when combined with a short patellar tendon. NexGen®, Attune® and Attune® Revision had a more gradual transition between the trochlea and the notch, which resulted in less exposure to tendon contact. Even with the shorter trochlear groove required for revision components, Attune® Revision showed minimal difference in tendofemoral contact when compared with Attune®. There appears to be distinct benefit in a femoral design which reduces tendofemoral contact at the transition to the ICN; this may be of particular importance for patients with patella baja