Abstract
Introduction
Patellar crepitus and clunk are tendofemoral-related complications predominantly associated with posterior-stabilizing (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs [1]. Contact between the quadriceps tendon and the femoral component can cause irritation, pain, and catching of soft-tissue within the intercondylar notch (ICN). While the incidence of tendofemoral-related pathologies has been documented for some primary TKA designs, literature describing revision TKA is sparse. Revision components require a larger boss resection to accommodate a constrained post-cam and stem/sleeve attachments, which elevates the entrance to the ICN, potentially increasing the risk of crepitus. The objective of this study was to evaluate tendofemoral contact in primary and revision TKA designs, including designs susceptible to crepitus, and newer designs which aim to address design features associated with crepitus.
Methods
Six PS TKA designs were evaluated during deep knee bend using a computational model of the Kansas knee simulator (Figure 1). Prior work has demonstrated that tendofemoral contact predictions from this model can differentiate between TKA patients with patellar crepitus and matched controls [2]. Incidence of crepitus of up to 14% has been reported in Insall-Burstein® II and PFC® Sigma® designs [3]. These designs, in addition to PFC® Sigma® TC3 (revision component), were included in the analyses. Primary and revision components of newer generation designs (NexGen®, Attune® and Attune® Revision) were also included. Designs were evaluated in a patient model with normal Insall-Salvati ratio and a modified model with patellar tendon length reduced by two standard deviations (13mm) to assess worst-case patient anatomy.
Results
During simulations with normal patellar tendon length, only PFC® Sigma® and PFC® Sigma® TC3 showed tendofemoral contact within the trochlea, and no design showed contact at the transition to the ICN (Figure 2). In simulations with patella baja, Insall-Burstein® II, PFC® Sigma®, and PFC® Sigma® TC3, demonstrated tendofemoral contact across the trochlea at the transition into the notch. In contrast, NexGen®, Attune® and Attune® Revision showed tendon contact for approximately half the width of the transition to the notch (Figure 3). PFC® Sigma® and Attune® demonstrated very similar tendofemoral contact to their equivalent revision components, although the shorter trochlear groove of Attune® Revision marginally increased contact at the transition.
Discussion
Insall-Burstein® II, PFC® Sigma®, and PFC® Sigma® TC3 designs showed full contact with the quadriceps tendon at the anterior border of the ICN when combined with a short patellar tendon. NexGen®, Attune® and Attune® Revision had a more gradual transition between the trochlea and the notch, which resulted in less exposure to tendon contact. Even with the shorter trochlear groove required for revision components, Attune® Revision showed minimal difference in tendofemoral contact when compared with Attune®. There appears to be distinct benefit in a femoral design which reduces tendofemoral contact at the transition to the ICN; this may be of particular importance for patients with patella baja.
