The optimal method of tibial fixation when using a hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is unclear. This study aimed to compare the risk of revision ACL reconstruction between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side.

Prospective data on primary ACL reconstructions recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry between April 2014 and December 2019 were analyzed. Only patients with a hamstring tendon autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side were included. The rate of revision ACL reconstruction was compared between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side. Univariate Chi-Square test and multivariate Cox regression was performed to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for age, gender, time-to-surgery, activity at the time of injury, number of graft strands and graft diameter.

6145 cases were analyzed, of which 59.6% were fixed with a suspensory device on the tibial side (n = 3662), 17.6% fixed with an interference screw with a sheath (n = 1079) and 22.8% fixed with an interference screw without a sheath (n = 1404). When compared to suspensory devices (revision rate = 3.4%), a higher risk of revision was observed when using an interference screw with a sheath (revision rate = 6.2%, adjusted HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.20 – 3.52, p = 0.009) and without a sheath (revision rate = 4.6%, adjusted HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.02 – 3.23, p = 0.044). The number of graft strands and a graft diameter of ≥8 mm did not influence the risk of revision.

When reconstructing the ACL with a hamstring tendon autograft, the use of an interference screw, with or without a sheath, on the tibial side has a higher risk of revision when compared to a suspensory device.

Most previous studies investigating autograft options (quadriceps, hamstring, bone-patella-tendon-bone) in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are confounded by concomitant knee injuries. This study aims to investigate the differences in patient reported outcome measures and revision rates for quadriceps tendon in comparison with hamstring tendon and bone-patella-tendon-bone autografts. We use a cohort of patients who have had primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injuries.

All patients from the New Zealand ACL Registry who underwent a primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with minimum 2 year follow-up were considered for the study. Patients who had associated ipsilateral knee injuries, previous knee surgery, or open procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and MARX scores at 2 years post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were all-cause revision and time to revision with a total follow-up period of 8 years (time since inception of the registry).

2581 patients were included in the study; 1917 hamstring tendon, 557 bone-patella-tendon-bone, and 107 quadriceps tendon. At 2 years, no significant difference in MARX scores were found between the three groups (2y mean score; 7.36 hamstring, 7.85 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 8.05 quadriceps, P = 0.195). Further, no significant difference in KOOS scores were found between the three groups; with the exception of hamstring performing better than bone-patella-tendon-bone in the KOOS sports and recreation sub-score (2y mean score; 79.2 hamstring, 73.9 bone-patella-tendon-bone, P < 0.001). Similar revision rates were reported between all autograft groups (mean revision rate per 100 component years; 1.05 hamstring, 0.80 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 1.68 quadriceps, P = 0.083). Autograft revision rates were independent of age and gender variables.

Quadriceps tendon is a comparable autograft choice to the status quo for primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injury. Further research is required to quantify the long-term outcomes for quadriceps tendon use.

Structural bulk autografts restore the severe bone loss at primary hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips and have shown to have good long term outcomes. There are only a few reports of revision arthroplasty for these sockets that fail eventually. We report on a series of such primary hips which underwent cemented revision of the socket for aseptic loosening and their outcomes.

A retrospective review was performed from our database to identify fifteen acetabular revisions after previous bulk autograft. The mean age at revision was 53.9 years (range 31–72.1). The mean duration between the primary and revision arthroplasty was 12.4 years (range 6.6 – 20.3). All procedures were done using trochanteric osteotomy and three hips also needed the femoral component revision. All fifteen hips needed re-bone grafting at the revision surgery to restore the new socket to the level of the true acetabulum. Of these ten hips had morsellised impaction allograft, and the remaining five also needing a structural bulk allograft.

Two sockets underwent re-revision at mean 7.5 years for aseptic loosening. One patient had a dislocation that was reduced closed. At a mean follow up of 5.7 years, one socket showed superior migration, but was stable and did not need further intervention. Two other sockets also showed radiological evidence of loosening, and are being closely monitored.

The medium term results of cemented acetabular revision in this younger age group are satisfactory, with repeat bone grafting being required to restore the true acetabular position. Though the primary arthroplasty with bulk bone graft recreates the acetabular bone stock, significant bone loss due to the mechanical loosening of the socket needs to be anticipated in revision surgery.

Between 1993 and 2003, 67 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties were performed in 65 patients, including 52 women and 13 men, using hydroxyapatite (HA) granules supported by a Kerboull-type reinforcement acetabular device. The average age at the time of index surgery was 68.6 years. The Acetabular bone loss according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) system was type II for 7 hips, type III for 58 hips, and type IV for one hip. The Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device used was Kerboull Cross Plate in 18 hips and KT Plate in 49 hips. HA granules of sizes 0.9 to1.2 mm (G4) and 3.0–5.0 mm (G6) were mixed in a ratio of 1:1. Autografts were used to reconstruct the major segmental defects in 7 hips. At the time of this study 30 hips were lost of follow-up. Among 30 hips 22 hips were lost of follow-up because of the death of the patients. The remaining 37 hips were examined clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up period of the series was 12.8 years. Complications were examined and clinical evaluation was done using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score. The criterion for loosening of the acetabular component was cup migration exceeding 3 mm or angular rotation exceeding 3 degrees or breakage of the device. Among the entire series of 67 hips postoperative complications included dislocation in 3 hips, infection in 2 hips and revision in 4 hips. Two hips were revised for loosening and the other two hips were revised for infection. The JOA hip score increased from a mean value of 48.0 preoperatively to 76.8 at the last follow-up. Radiologically 5 hips were loose. Two hips among them were revised. Survival rate of the acetabular component at 10 years was 97.1% using acetabular revision for loosening as the end point and 90.6% using radiological loosening as the end point. Acetabular reconstruction with HA granules and a Kerboull-type acetabular device provided satisfactory clinical and radiographic results at 12.8 post-operative years

Purpose. The prevalence of focal chondral lesions reported inthe literature during knee arhroscopy can be as high as 63%. Of these, more than half are either grade III or grade IV lesions (Outerbridge). Full thickness cartilage lesions ranging from 2cm2 to 10cm2 are the most challenging to treat. To goal of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of pain, function and quality of life, along with radiological outcomes of cartilage repair using microfracture, autologous minced cartilage and polymeric scaffold. Method. A cohort of thirty-eight patients with Outerbridge grade III or IV cartilage injuries larger than 2cm2 in the knee's femoral condyle, trochlea or patella were prospectively folowed since 2008. They were all treated with microfracture, fresh minced autologous cartilage grafting and a polymeric scaffold technique through mini-arthrotomy of the knee. Autografts and scaffolds were secured to subchondral bone using fibrin glue and tran-sosseous resorbable sutures. Patients were evaluated pre and postoperatively using VAS scores for pain, WOMAC and IKDC scores for knee function and SF-36 questionnaire for quality of life. Clinical evaluations were done by physical examination, and imaging was done using X-Rays, MRI and arthro-CT. Results. Mean follow-up time was14.64.6 months. Mean age was 48.39.3 years old. Pre-op lesions averaged 3.51.5 cm2. VAS pain scores were significantly reduced after surgery (7,62 to 2,52.3, p<. 0001). Improvement in knee function using IKDC score improved from 26,717.5 to 55,415.3, p<. 001). In addition, WOMAC total scores showed significant reduction from 55,520.3 to 27,517.6. SF-36 quality of life Physical Component Summary improved from 26,411.4 to 45,812.3, p<. 01; Mental Component Summary improved from 41,916.8 to 49,411.2, p<. 048). Imaging results indicate sustained cartilage thickness from 6 to 18 months. One patient was an early failure due to scaffold loosening, and two patients had no clinical improvement and no significant cartilage regeneration on MRI and Arthro-CT imaging at 6 months post-op. Conclusion. The combination of microfractures, fresh minced autologous cartilage grafting and polymeric scaffold fixation seems to be an effective treatment option for post-traumatic and focal cartilage lesions of the knee in the short term. A longer-term follow-up to evaluate the sustainability of these results is ongoing. Shortcomings of this study are its short term, the lack of second look arthroscopies and cartilage biopsies to evaluate cartilage microstructure, and the absence of a gold standard treatment for full-thickness cartilage lesions larger than 2cm2 that could be used as a control