Autografts containing bone marrow (BM) are current gold standard in the treatment of critical size bone defects, delayed union and bone nonunion defects. Although reaching unprecedented healing rates in bone reconstruction, the mode of action and cell-cell interactions of bone marrow mononuclear cell (BM-MNC) populations have not yet been described. BM-MNCs consist of a heterogeneous mixture of hematopoetic and non-hematopoetic lineage fractions. Cell culture in a 3D environment is necessary to reflect on the complex mix of these adherend and non-adherend cells in a physiologically relevant context. Therefore, the main aim of this approach was to establish conditions for a stable 3D BM-MNC culture to assess cellular responses on fracture healing strategies. BM samples were obtained from residual material after surgery with positive ethical vote and informed consent of the patients. BM-MNCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation, and cellular composition was determined by flow cytometry to obtain unbiased data sets on contained cell populations. Collagen from rat tail and human fibrin was used to facilitate a 3D culture environment for the BM-MNCs over a period of three days. Effects on cellular composition that could improve the regenerative potential of BM-MNCs within the BM autograft were assessed using flow cytometry. Cell-cell-interactions were visualized using confocal microscopy over a period of 24 hours. Cell localization and interaction partners were characterized using immunofluorescence labeled paraffin sectioning. Main BM-MNC populations like Monocytes, Macrophages, T cells and endothelial progenitor cells were determined and could be conserved in 3D culture over a period of three days. The 3D cultures will be further treated with already clinically available reagents that lead to effects even within a short-term exposure to stimulate angiogenic, osteogenic or immunomodulatory properties. These measures will help to ease the translation from “bench to bedside” into an intraoperative protocol in the end

Aims. Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the use of different types of graft. Materials and Methods. A search was performed of Medline and Pubmed using the terms “Anterior Cruciate Ligament” and “ACL” combined with “revision”, “re-operation” and “failure”. Only studies that reported the outcome at a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Two authors reviewed the papers, and outcomes were subdivided into autograft and allograft. Autograft was subdivided into hamstring (HS) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). Subjective and objective outcome measures were analysed and odds ratios with confidence intervals were calculated. Results. A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies used HS autografts, eight reported using BPTB autografts, two used quadriceps tendon autografts and eight used various types. Seven studies reported using allografts, while the two remaining used both BPTB autografts and allografts. Overall, 1192 patients with a mean age of 28.7 years (22.5 to 39) and a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (2.0 to 9.6) were treated with autografts, while 269 patients with a mean age of 28.4 years (25 to 34.6) and a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (2.3 to 6.0) were treated with allografts. Regarding allografts, irradiation with 2.5 mrad was used in two studies while the graft was not irradiated in the seven remaining studies. Reconstructions following the use of autografts had better outcomes than those using allograft with respect to laxity, measured by KT-1000/2000 (MEDmetric Corporation) and the rates of complications and re-operations. Those following the use of allografts had better mean Lysholm and Tegner activity scores compared with autografts. If irradiated allografts were excluded from the analysis, outcomes no longer differed between the use of autografts and allografts. Comparing the types of autograft, all outcomes were similar except for HS grafts which had better International Knee Documentation Committee scores compared with BPTB grafts. Conclusion. Autografts had better outcomes than allografts in revision ACL reconstruction, with lower post-operative laxity and rates of complications and re-operations. However, after excluding irradiated allografts, outcomes were similar between autografts and allografts. Overall, the choice of graft at revision ACL reconstruction should be on an individual basis considering, for instance, the preferred technique of the surgeon, whether a combined reconstruction is required, the type of graft that was previously used, whether the tunnels are enlarged and the availability of allograft. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:714–23

The clinical success of osteochondral autografts is heavily reliant on their mechanical stability, as grafts which protrude above or subside below the native cartilage can have a negative effect on the tribological properties of the joint [1]. Furthermore, high insertion forces have previously been shown to reduce chondrocyte viability [2]. Commercial grafting kits may include a dilation tool to increase the diameter of the recipient site prior to insertion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of dilation on the primary stability of autografts.

Six human cadaveric femurs were studied. For each femur, four 8.5 × 8mm autografts were harvested from the trochlear groove and implanted into the femoral condyles using a Smith & Nephew Osteochondral grafting kit. Two grafts were implanted into dilated recipient sites (n=12) and two were implanted with no dilation (n=12). Insertion force was measured by partially inserting the graft and applying a load at a rate of 1 mm/min, until the graft was flush with the surrounding cartilage. Push-in force was measured by applying the same load, until the graft had subsided 4mm below congruency. Significance was taken as (p<0.05).

Average maximum insertion force of dilated grafts was significantly lower (p<0.001) than their non-dilated equivalent [28.2N & 176.7N respectively]. There was no significant difference between average maximum push-in force between the dilated and non-dilated groups [1062.8N & 1204.2N respectively].

This study demonstrated that significantly less force is required to insert dilated autografts, potentially minimising loss of chondrocyte viability. However, once inserted, the force required to displace the grafts below congruency remained similar, indicating a similar degree of graft stability between both groups.

Abstract

The optimal method of tibial fixation when using a hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is unclear. This study aimed to compare the risk of revision ACL reconstruction between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side.

Prospective data on primary ACL reconstructions recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry between April 2014 and December 2019 were analyzed. Only patients with a hamstring tendon autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side were included. The rate of revision ACL reconstruction was compared between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side. Univariate Chi-Square test and multivariate Cox regression was performed to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for age, gender, time-to-surgery, activity at the time of injury, number of graft strands and graft diameter.

6145 cases were analyzed, of which 59.6% were fixed with a suspensory device on the tibial side (n = 3662), 17.6% fixed with an interference screw with a sheath (n = 1079) and 22.8% fixed with an interference screw without a sheath (n = 1404). When compared to suspensory devices (revision rate = 3.4%), a higher risk of revision was observed when using an interference screw with a sheath (revision rate = 6.2%, adjusted HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.20 – 3.52, p = 0.009) and without a sheath (revision rate = 4.6%, adjusted HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.02 – 3.23, p = 0.044). The number of graft strands and a graft diameter of ≥8 mm did not influence the risk of revision.

When reconstructing the ACL with a hamstring tendon autograft, the use of an interference screw, with or without a sheath, on the tibial side has a higher risk of revision when compared to a suspensory device.

Abstract

Most previous studies investigating autograft options (quadriceps, hamstring, bone-patella-tendon-bone) in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are confounded by concomitant knee injuries. This study aims to investigate the differences in patient reported outcome measures and revision rates for quadriceps tendon in comparison with hamstring tendon and bone-patella-tendon-bone autografts. We use a cohort of patients who have had primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injuries.

All patients from the New Zealand ACL Registry who underwent a primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with minimum 2 year follow-up were considered for the study. Patients who had associated ipsilateral knee injuries, previous knee surgery, or open procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and MARX scores at 2 years post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were all-cause revision and time to revision with a total follow-up period of 8 years (time since inception of the registry).

2581 patients were included in the study; 1917 hamstring tendon, 557 bone-patella-tendon-bone, and 107 quadriceps tendon. At 2 years, no significant difference in MARX scores were found between the three groups (2y mean score; 7.36 hamstring, 7.85 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 8.05 quadriceps, P = 0.195). Further, no significant difference in KOOS scores were found between the three groups; with the exception of hamstring performing better than bone-patella-tendon-bone in the KOOS sports and recreation sub-score (2y mean score; 79.2 hamstring, 73.9 bone-patella-tendon-bone, P < 0.001). Similar revision rates were reported between all autograft groups (mean revision rate per 100 component years; 1.05 hamstring, 0.80 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 1.68 quadriceps, P = 0.083). Autograft revision rates were independent of age and gender variables.

Quadriceps tendon is a comparable autograft choice to the status quo for primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injury. Further research is required to quantify the long-term outcomes for quadriceps tendon use.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate systematically the literature concerning biopsy, MRI signal to noise quotient (SNQ) and clinical outcomes in graft-maturity assessment after autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and their possible relationships. Methods: The systematic review was reported and conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies through May 2019 evaluating methods of intra-articular ACL autograft maturity assessment were considered for inclusion. Eligible methods were histologic studies of biopsy specimens and conventional MRI studies reporting serial SNQ and/ or correlation with clinical parameters. Ten biopsy studies and 13 imaging studies, with a total of 706 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Biopsy studies show that graft remodeling undergoes an early healing phase, a phase of remodeling or proliferation and a ligamentization phase as an ongoing process even 1 year after surgery. Imaging studies showed an initial increase in SNQ, peaking at approximately 6 months, followed by a gradual decrease over time. There is no evident correlation between graft SNQ and knee stability outcome scores at the short- and long-term follow-up after ACLR. The remodeling of the graft is an ongoing process even 1 year after ACLR, based on human biopsy studies. MRI SNQ peaked at approximately 6 months, followed by a gradual decrease over time. Heterogeneity of the MRI methods and technical restrictions used in the current literature limit prediction of graft maturity and clinical and functional outcome measures by means of MRI graft SNQ after ACLR.

The aim of our study was to examine the outcome of ACL reconstruction by using four strand hamstring tendon autografts.

Material and Methods: the study included 44 patients (29 males,15 females;mean age 26;18–45 years). The diagnosis was based on clinical examination and imaging techniques. The operation was performed arthroscopically 4–62 weeks after the injury. The tendon was fixed in the tibia with an interference screw and in the femur with three different methods cross pin in 16 cases, transfix pin in 11 cases and Endo button in 17 cases.

Results: The mean follow up was 28 months (12–42). The mean Lysholm score was improved from 35–65 (mean 49) preoperativelly to 55–100 postoperativelly (mean 88).

5 patients had laxity > 3mm when compared to the healthy knee by using the KT-1000 arhthrometric testing. 2 of the latter patients complained of a feeling of knee joint instability which occurred due to inaccurate positioning of the femoral tunnel. In 2 cases the transfix pins were displaced and removed on the 4th and 15th post-operative month.

The tunnel expansion was measured by an X-Ray or a CT scan. The tibial tunnel expansion was 0–2.5mm (mean 1.2) or 18% and the femoral tunnel expansion was 0–3 mm (mean 1.4) or 26%. 8 patients reported mild pain which did not restrict their activities. A 5 degree loss of extension was noticed in one patient who continues physiotherapy.

28 of the above patients suffered also from a meniscal injury that was managed arthroscopically.

Conclusion: ACL reconstruction by using four strand hamstring tendon autografts is safe, highly successful with very few complications when proper graft preparation and accurate tunnel placement is achieved.

Limb salvage is the gold standard to treat sarcoma patients, but bone stock should be retained for the future, as many of these patients are young and active.

For this observational clinical study, 107 patients that presented with 108 malignant or locally aggressive benign bone tumours were treated by wide en-bloc resection of the affected bone, extracorporeal irradiation with 300 Gy to eradicate the tumour, and reimplantation of the bone as an orthotopic autograft. The irradiated bone was rigidly fixed to the remaining bone with classical intramedullary or extramedullary osteosynthesis material. We made a subdivision between intercalary, composite and osteoarticular grafts. The pelvis was considered a third separate entity, as it was considered both an intercalary and an osteoarticular graft when the acetabulum was involved.

The incidence of local recurrence with the use of an orthotopic autograft comprised the primary endpoint of this study. Secondary endpoints: preservation of bone stock with graft healing and evaluation of factors that determine preservation.

No local recurrences could be detected in the irradiated grafts. One local recurrence was detected in the surrounding soft tissue. At 5 years follow-up, graft healing occurred in 64% of cases, providing stable and lasting reconstruction. Eleven percent of the grafts had to be removed due to several incidents, but none could be proven significant. All patient subgroups displayed comparable results. Early infection appeared to be a significant determinant for the development of pseudarthrosis. Pelvic reconstructions showed a worse outcome. According to the results, guidelines for indications and surgical guidelines, such as rigid fixation and bridging of the graft, are proposed for using this technique. In general sarcoma resection, extracorporeal irradiation, and reimplantation provides a stable and lasting reconstruction with preservation of bone stock.

Structural bulk autografts restore the severe bone loss at primary hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips and have shown to have good long term outcomes. There are only a few reports of revision arthroplasty for these sockets that fail eventually. We report on a series of such primary hips which underwent cemented revision of the socket for aseptic loosening and their outcomes.

A retrospective review was performed from our database to identify fifteen acetabular revisions after previous bulk autograft. The mean age at revision was 53.9 years (range 31–72.1). The mean duration between the primary and revision arthroplasty was 12.4 years (range 6.6 – 20.3). All procedures were done using trochanteric osteotomy and three hips also needed the femoral component revision. All fifteen hips needed re-bone grafting at the revision surgery to restore the new socket to the level of the true acetabulum. Of these ten hips had morsellised impaction allograft, and the remaining five also needing a structural bulk allograft.

Two sockets underwent re-revision at mean 7.5 years for aseptic loosening. One patient had a dislocation that was reduced closed. At a mean follow up of 5.7 years, one socket showed superior migration, but was stable and did not need further intervention. Two other sockets also showed radiological evidence of loosening, and are being closely monitored.

The medium term results of cemented acetabular revision in this younger age group are satisfactory, with repeat bone grafting being required to restore the true acetabular position. Though the primary arthroplasty with bulk bone graft recreates the acetabular bone stock, significant bone loss due to the mechanical loosening of the socket needs to be anticipated in revision surgery.

Introduction and purpose: Cortical strut autografts provide primary stability to resolve fractures or pseudoarthrosis associated with major bone loss, or fractures close to joint prostheses.

Materials and methods: We present 8 cases in which strut autografts were used: one pseudoarthrosis of the humerus, three periprosthetic fractures in TKR and four fractures associated with hip prosthesis surgery.

We resolved the humeral pseudoarthrosis with struts and a PCL plate plus cancellous tissue graft. For the periprosthetic fractures of the knee and hip we used revision prostheses with extension stems plus struts, held in place with cerclage wires or compression bands, with or without plates.

In all cases functional rehabilitation started early. The mean non-weight-bearing period for lower limbs was 10 weeks (8–12 months).

Results: Primary stability made it possible to begin rehabilitation early in all cases. Total consolidation of the grafts in a mean time of 5 months (4–7 months), with complete recovery of bone stock. Excellent functional outcome with full return to daily activity as before surgery.

Conclusions: The use of strut autografts associated with osteosynthesis and/or revision prosthesis implantation makes it possible to resolve cases that require a large amount of bone graft and provides sufficient primary stability for fast rehabilitation. The proper final consolidation of the grafts and complete recovery of bone stock provides stability with full guarantee of long-term success.

Bone loss can be treated in one of two general ways. Missing bone can be replaced either with bone graft applied to the host bone or augmentations attached to the revision implants. The ideal treatment of bone defects during revision TKR surgery: 1) makes immediate full weight bearing possible; 2) provides longterm support for the implants; 3) Restores original bone stock.

Bone grafts achieve these goals when the defects are CAVITARY. Therefore, bone grafts rather than metal augmentation devices are the surgical treatment of choice when these types of defects are encountered during revision TKR surgery.

Although bone grafts may achieve these goals when the defects are SEGMENTAL, the results are uncertain and more difficult to achieve. Metal augmentations make possible immediate full weight bearing and provide reliable long-term support for revision TKR implants. When these augments are made of Tantalulm, a metal with 80% porosity, the restoration of bone stock is also possible.

There are advantages and drawbacks to each approach. The advantages of bone grafts are that they: 1) restore bone stock; 2) are relatively inexpensive (especially if autogenous graft is used); 3) can be applied with relatively simple instrumentation; and 4) allow defects of a wide variety of sizes and shapes to be treated. The disadvantages of bone grafts are that they: 1) have limited application in large, segmental defects where structural support is necessary; 2) do not always unite predictably, particularly when the host bone is osteopenic or when angular deformities exist; 3) are shaped and inserted without the benefit of precise instrumentation; and 4) may require limited weight bearing or restricted activity for a period of time following surgery. The advantages of augmentation devices are that they: 1) can be manufactured in a wide variety of shapes and sizes; 2) provide immediate stable fixation; and 3) can be inserted using precise cutting instruments. Therefore, the indications for metal augmentation devices are: 1) uncontained defects (segmental) that require structural support for the knee implant; 2) knees with osteopenic bone or large angular defects; and 3) older patients in whom the importance of immediate mobilization and unrestricted weight-bearing is more important than the restoration of bone stock.

1. A method is described for the in vivo and in vitro study of osteogenesis by implanting a modified transparent chamber in half lop-eared rabbits (as originated by Sandison 1928). This method allows the daily observation and photography of the developing bone and the study of its intimate connection with the vascularity of the area.

2. The osteogenetic potential of a variety of substances can also be investigated by this method. The tissue in the chamber can easily be prepared for its final examination by optical and electron microscopy and by other laboratory techniques.

Introduction

The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional and oncological outcome of extracorporeally irradiated autografts as a method of pelvic reconstruction after internal hemipelvectomy.

The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. A systematic review was performed to compare bone-patella tendon-bone and 4-strand hamstring grafts. Medline (1966 onwards), EMBASE (1980 onwards) and the Cochrane database were searched retrieving 6312 possible articles but only 6 studies fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. To be included, the study had to be prospective, randomised or quasi-randomised, comparing 4SHS and central third BPTB autografts, inserted using an arthroscopically assisted technique and have a minimum 2-year follow up for all patients. These studies recruited 526 patients and 475 were followed for at least 2 years with 235 patients receiving a bone-patella tendon-bone graft and 240 receiving a 4-strand hamstring graft. Overall, there was a greater chance of extension loss (p=0.007) and a trend towards increased patellofemoral joint pain (p=0.09) with a patella tendon graft. With a 4-strand hamstring graft there is a greater loss of hamstring power (p=0.008) and a trend towards an increased chance of a pivot shift > 1 (p=0.12). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of lachman testing, chance of returning to the same level of sport, clinical knee scores, graft ruptures or other complications.

The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. A systematic review was performed to compare bone-patella tendon-bone and 4-strand hamstring grafts. Medline (1966 onwards), EMBASE (1980 onwards) and the Cochrane database were searched retrieving 6312 possible articles but only 6 studies fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. To be included, the study had to be prospective, randomised or quasirandomised, comparing 4SHS and central third BPTB autografts, inserted using an arthroscopically assisted technique and have a minimum 2-year follow up for all patients. These studies recruited 526 patients and 475 were followed for at least 2 years with 235 patients receiving a bone-patella tendon-bone graft and 240 receiving a 4-strand hamstring graft. Overall, there was a greater chance of extension loss (p=0.007) and a trend towards increased patellofemoral joint pain (p=0.09) with a patella tendon graft. With a 4-strand hamstring graft there is a greater loss of hamstring power (p=0.008) and a trend towards an increased chance of a pivot shift > 1 (p=0.12). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of lachman testing, chance of returning to the same level of sport, clinical knee scores, graft ruptures or other complications.

Introduction

Augmentation of spinal fusion using bone grafts is largely mediated by the osteoinductive potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) that reside in cancellous bone. Iliac crest (IC) is a common autograft, but its use presents an increased risk for donor-site pain, morbidity and infection. Degenerative facet joints (FJ) harvested during facetectomy might servce as alternative local grafts. In this study, we conducted an intra-individual comparison of the osteogenic potential of MSC from both sources.

Osteochondral allografts (frozen uncontrolled, or cryo-protected with dimethyl sulfoxide) were transplanted into medial femoral condyles of eighteen sheep. Cores from the ipsilateral graft site served as autografts for the contralateral limb. Analysis of graft and host cancellous bone microarchitecture by μCT at three months post transplant demonstrated no significant differences among the treatment groups. Dramatic bone resorption at the graft–host interface, however, occurred in up to 1/3 of condyles from all treatment groups, including fresh autografts suggesting that factors other than donor source or tissue storage played an important role in the bone incorporation of osteochondral grafts.

The purpose of this study was to study the effect of different freezing protocols on periarticular cancellous bone architecture after osteochondral allograft transplantation.

There were no significant differences in graft or host cancellous bone architecture among the groups (autografts, frozen allografts, cryopreserved allografts). Dramatic resorption of graft bone in condyles from all treatment groups suggested that factors other than donor source or tissue storage played important roles during incorporation of osteochondral grafts.

Graft positioning, graft orientation, and recipient bed necrosis may play significant roles during incorporation of osteochondral graft bone.

Osteochondral allografts (10 mm diameter) were transplanted into medial femoral condyles of eighteen skeletally mature Suffolk ewes. Allografts were frozen (–80°C) without cryoprotectant (FROZ) or treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (cryoprotectant) and frozen (–80°C at 1°C · min⁻¹) (CRYO). Osteochondral cores removed from ipsilateral graft sites served as fresh autografts (AUTO) for the contralateral medial femoral condyles. Condyles were harvested at three months and scanned (micro computed tomography –μCT). Three dimensional μCT data of graft and host cancellous bone regions were analyzed for bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, bone surface–volume ratio, and trabecular anisotropy. No morphological differences were found among treatment groups. Excessive bone resorption of graft and interface precluded analysis of some samples from each group (ALLO — 2/9, CRYO — 3/9, AUTO — 6/18). Dramatic bone loss did not correlate with poor graft orientation, placement, infection, or recipient–bed necrosis, but a combination of these factors may contribute to excessive cancellous bone resorption in osteochondral grafts.

Funding: Medical Research Council of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, No commercial funding

Please contact author for figures and/or diagrams.