Abstract
Osteochondral allografts (frozen uncontrolled, or cryo-protected with dimethyl sulfoxide) were transplanted into medial femoral condyles of eighteen sheep. Cores from the ipsilateral graft site served as autografts for the contralateral limb. Analysis of graft and host cancellous bone microarchitecture by μCT at three months post transplant demonstrated no significant differences among the treatment groups. Dramatic bone resorption at the graft–host interface, however, occurred in up to 1/3 of condyles from all treatment groups, including fresh autografts suggesting that factors other than donor source or tissue storage played an important role in the bone incorporation of osteochondral grafts.
The purpose of this study was to study the effect of different freezing protocols on periarticular cancellous bone architecture after osteochondral allograft transplantation.
There were no significant differences in graft or host cancellous bone architecture among the groups (autografts, frozen allografts, cryopreserved allografts). Dramatic resorption of graft bone in condyles from all treatment groups suggested that factors other than donor source or tissue storage played important roles during incorporation of osteochondral grafts.
Graft positioning, graft orientation, and recipient bed necrosis may play significant roles during incorporation of osteochondral graft bone.
Osteochondral allografts (10 mm diameter) were transplanted into medial femoral condyles of eighteen skeletally mature Suffolk ewes. Allografts were frozen (–80°C) without cryoprotectant (FROZ) or treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (cryoprotectant) and frozen (–80°C at 1°C · min−1) (CRYO). Osteochondral cores removed from ipsilateral graft sites served as fresh autografts (AUTO) for the contralateral medial femoral condyles. Condyles were harvested at three months and scanned (micro computed tomography –μCT). Three dimensional μCT data of graft and host cancellous bone regions were analyzed for bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, bone surface–volume ratio, and trabecular anisotropy. No morphological differences were found among treatment groups. Excessive bone resorption of graft and interface precluded analysis of some samples from each group (ALLO — 2/9, CRYO — 3/9, AUTO — 6/18). Dramatic bone loss did not correlate with poor graft orientation, placement, infection, or recipient–bed necrosis, but a combination of these factors may contribute to excessive cancellous bone resorption in osteochondral grafts.
Funding: Medical Research Council of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, No commercial funding
Please contact author for figures and/or diagrams.
Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada
