Osteomyelitis is an inflammatory condition accompanied by the destruction of bone and caused by an infecting microorganism. Open contaminated fractures can lead to the development of osteomyelitis of the fractured bone in 3-25% of cases, depending on fracture type, degree of soft-tissue injury, degree of microbial contamination, and whether systemic and/or local antimicrobial therapies have been administered. Untreated, infection will ultimately lead to non-union, chronic osteomyelitis, or amputation. We report a case series of 10 patients that presented with post-operative infected non-union of the distal femur with or without prior surgery. The cases were performed at Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India. All the patients’ consents were taken for the study which was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The methodology involved patients undergoing a two-stage procedure in case of no prior implant or a three-stage procedure in case of a previous implant. Firstly, debridement and implant removal were done. The second was a definitive procedure in form of knee arthrodesis with ring fixator and finally followed by limb lengthening surgery. Arthrodesis was planned in view of infection, non-union, severe arthritic, subluxated knee, stiff knee, non-salvage knee joint, and financial constraints. After all the patients demonstrated wound healing in 3 months along with good radiographic osteogenesis at the knee arthrodesis site, limb lengthening surgeries by tibial osteotomy were done to overcome the limb length discrepancy. Distraction was started and followed up for 5 months. All 10 patients showed results with sound knee arthrodesis and good osteogenesis at the osteotomy site followed by achieving the limb length just 1-inch short from the normal side to achieve ground clearance while walking. Our case series is unique and distinctive as it shows that when patients with infected nonunion of distal femur come with the stiff and non-salvage knee with severe arthritic changes and financial constraints, we should consider knee arthrodesis with Ilizarov ring fixator followed by limb lengthening surgery

Osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint is a common disorder in elderly, resulting in pain and disability. Arthrodesis of this joint shows satisfactory results, with relieve of pain in approximately 85% of the patients. However, the compensation mechanism for loss of motion in the MTP1 joint after MTP1 arthrodesis is unknown. A reduced compensation mechanism of the foot may explain the disappointing result of MTP1 arthrodesis in the remaining 15% of the patients. This study was conducted to elucidate this compensation mechanism. We hypothesize that the ankle and forefoot are responsible for compensation after MTP1 arthrodesis. Gait was evaluated in eight patients with arthrodesis of the MTP1 joint (10 feet) and twelve healthy controls (21 feet) by using a sixteen-camera Vicon-system. The four-segmental, validated Oxford-Foot-Model was used to investigate differences in range of motion of the hindfoot-tibia, forefoot-hindfoot and hallux-forefoot segment during stance. For statistical analysis, the unpaired t-test with Bonferroni correction (p<0.0125) was performed. No differences in spatiotemporal parameters were observed between both groups. In the frontal plane, MTP1 arthrodesis decreased the range of motion in midstance, while an increased range of motion was observed in terminal stance for the hindfoot relative to the tibia in the transversal plane. Subsequently range of motion in the forefoot in preswing was increased. This resulted in less eversion in the hindfoot during midstance, increased internal rotation of the hindfoot during terminal stance and more supination in the forefoot during preswing in the MTP1 arthrodesis group. Motion of the hallux was restricted in the loading response (i.e. plantar flexion) and terminal stance (i.e. dorsiflexion). As hypothesized, both the ankle and the forefoot are responsible for compensation after MTP1 arthrodesis, because arthrodesis causes less eversion and increased internal rotation of the hindfoot and increased supination of the forefoot. As expected, both dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the hallux was restricted due to arthrodesis. These findings suggest a gait pattern in which the lateral arch of the foot is more loaded and the stiff hallux is avoided during the stance phase of gait. Our results indicate that proper motion of the forefoot and ankle joint is important when considering arthrodesis of the MTP1 joint. Therefore, we emphasize careful assessment the range of motion in the forefoot and ankle joint in the pre-operative situation, since patients with a decreased range of motion in the forefoot and ankle joint have a less functioning compensation mechanism. We currently perform a study to evaluate the strength of the positive correlation between the pre-operative range of motion in the forefoot and ankle joint and the clinical outcome

Objectives

Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion.

The implementation of knee arthrodesis has become synonymous with limb salvage in the presence of chronic sepsis and bone loss around the knee. This can be seen in failed trauma surgery or knee arthroplasty as an alternative to trans-femoral amputation. There is no prior literature assessing which factors affect knee arthrodesis using external fixation devices.

Sixteen consecutive patients (four women and twelve men) made up of eleven infected knee implants, three internal fixations of the tibial following fractured tibial plateau as well as 2 infected native joints were identified. The mean age at initial surgery was 56 years (range 25 to 82 years). All procedures were performed under the direct supervision of the limb reconstruction teams using a standard protocol with either a Taylor spatial frame or Ilizarov frame. The patient records, microbiology results and radiographs of all patients who underwent knee arthrodesis at this institution between 1999 and 2010 were reviewed.

Of the 16 patients in this study knee fusion occurred in eleven patients (69%). The five patients where arthrodesis failed all had significant bone loss on the pre-operative radiographs and confirmed at surgery. We found a relationship between a significant infection of the knee with MRSA and failure to fuse. Three of the five patients had MRSA isolated from inside the knee at some stage during their treatment.

The five patients where fusion failed were on average older (mean age 63 years against 51 years) and had more extensive bone loss. Those who failed to fuse had more co-morbidities. We would conclude that where there is little or no bone loss, arthrodesis of the knee can be reliably achieved with the use of circular frame fixation. A greater number of negative factors also prolongs the amount of time spent in the external fixator. The presence of significant bone loss, infection, increased age and multiple co-morbidities requires careful evaluation and consideration of trans-femoral amputation as an alternative.

Intra-operative fluoroscopy in thumb metacarpophalangeal joint arthrodesis has been recommended as a means of achieving optimal alignment more consistently. This is not our current practice. A patient attending dissatisfied with an arthrodesis in excessive flexion performed outwith our unit highlighted the potential for problems, and we therefore elected to review our own outcomes.

An evaluation of the alignment achieved in thumb metacarpophalangeal joint arthrodeses, to determine if current outcomes satisfactory or if fluoroscopic assistance should be considered.

Radiological review of alignment of thumb metacarpophalangeal joint arthodeses carried out by two Consultant Surgeons with specialist interests in upper limb surgery in a District General hospital. Cases were predominantly identified retrospectively from sequential review of operating lists. The radiological images were, or had been taken, as part of routine follow-up and were not standardised. The alignment was also assessed independently by a junior doctor with no involvement in the patient's surgical treatment and no knowledge of the intended alignment. Recommended positions for arthrodesis have covered a range from 0 to 30 degrees, so for the purposes of analysis that range was considered acceptable.

14 cases had an average fusion position of 18 degrees flexion (range 6 to 30 degrees). 6 underwent concurrent ipsilaterel trapeziectomy.

The series achieved satisfactory alignment radiologically without the routine use of intra-operative fluoroscopy.

Subtalar arthrodesis known as talocalcaneal fusion is an end-stage treatment for adult hind foot pathologies. The goal of the arthrodesis is to restrict the relative motion between bones of the subtalar joints, aiming to reduce pain and improve function for the patient. However, the change of the subtalar structures through the fusion is considered a disturbance to the joint biomechanics, which have been suggested to affect the biomechanics of the adjacent joints. However, no quantitative data are available to document this phenomenon. The purpose of the current study was to quantify the effects of subtalar arthrodesis on the laxity and stiffness of the talocrural joint in vitro using a robot-based joint testing system (RJTS) during anterioposterior (A/P) drawer test.

Six fresh frozen ankle specimens were used in this study. The lateral tissues of the specimens were removed but the anterior and posterior talofibular ligaments and calcaneofibular ligament were kept intact. A/P drawer tests were performed on each of the specimens at neutral position, 5° and 10° of dorsiflexion, and 5?and 10?of plantarflexion using a robot-based joint testing system (RJTS), before and after subtalar arthrodesis. The RJTS enabled unconstrained A/P drawer testing at the prescribed ankle position while keeping the proximal/distal and lateral/medial forces, and varus/valgus and internal/external moments to be zero. This was achieved via a force-position hybrid control method with force and moment control, which has been shown to be more accurate than other existing force-position hybrid control methods. The target A/P force applied during the A/P drawer test was 100N in both anterior and posterior directions. The stiffness and laxity were calculated from the measured force and displacement data. The anterior and posterior stiffness of the talocrural joint were defined as the slope beyond 30% of the target A/P force, and the peak displacements quantified the laxity of the joint. Comparisons of laxity and stiffness between the intact and fusion ankle specimens were performed using Wilcoxon signed rank test (SPSS 19.0, IBM, USA) and a significance level of 0.05 was set.

Subtalar arthrodesis did not lead to significant changes in the stiffness and laxity in both anterior and posterior directions (P>0.05). The mean anterior stiffness before arthrodesis was 9.54±1.17 N/mm and was 10.35±2.40 N/mm after arthrodesis. The mean anterior displacements before and after arthrodesis were 9.68±0.94 mm and 8.97±1.42 mm, respectively.

Subtalar arthrodesis did not show significant effects on the A/P laxity and stiffness of the talocrural joint in both anterior and posterior directions. This may imply that the motion of the subtalar joints do not have significant effects on the A/P stability of the talocrural joint, which is the main joint of the ankle complex. This agrees with the anatomical roles of the subtalar joints which provide mainly the varus/valgus motions for the ankle complex. The current study provides a basis for further studies needed to evaluate the effects subtalar arthrodesis on the varus/valgus stability.