Introduction. Various biomaterials and bone graft substitute technologies for use in osteomyelitis treatment are currently used in clinal practice. They vary in mode of action (with or without antibiotics) and clinical application (one-stage or two-stage surgery). This systematic review aims to compare the clinical evidence of different synthetic antimicrobial bone graft substitutes and antibiotic-loaded carriers in eradicating infection and clinical outcome in patients with chronic osteomyelitis. Methods. Systematic review according to PRISMA statement on publications 2002-2023. MESH terms: osteomyelitis and bone substitutes. FREE terms: chronic osteomyelitis, bone infection. A standardized data extraction form was be used to extract data from the included papers. Results. Publications with increased methodological quality and clinical evidence for biomaterials in osteomyelitis treatment were published in the last decades. High 85-95% eradication rates of osteomyelitis were observed for various resorbable Ca-P and/or Ca-S biomaterials combined with antibiotics and S53P4 bioactive glass. Level of evidence varies significantly between products. Antibiotic pharmacokinetic release profiles vary between resorbable Ca-P and/or Ca-S biomaterials. Conclusion. Given the high 85-95% eradication rates of osteomyelitis by various resorbable Ca-P and/or Ca-S biomaterials combined with antibiotics and S53P4 bioactive glass, one-stage treatment is preferred. Surgeons should be aware of variations in mechanical properties and antibiotic pharmacokinetic release profiles between Ca-P and CA-s products. Mechanical, biological and
Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequently isolated organism in periprosthetic joint infections. The mechanism by which synovial fluid (SF) kills bacteria has not yet been elucidated, and a better understanding of its antibacterial characteristics is needed. We sought to analyze the
Aim. Antibacterial activity of coatings based on metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) often depends on materials and biotic targets resulting in a material-specific killing activity of selected Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including drug-resistant strains. In this perspective, the NPs loading amount, the relative elemental concentration inside the nanogranular building blocks and the deposition method are of paramount importance when the goal is to widen the antimicrobial spectrum, but at the same time to avoid high levels of metal content to limit undesired toxic effects. Aim of the present study was evaluation of the
Introduction. Implant associated infections are responsible for over 10 % of recorded orthopaedic revision surgeries across the UK, with higher infection rates commonly observed for other endoprostheses such as cranioplasties. To prevent colonization and biofilm formation on implant surfaces, the use of silver coatings has shown positive results in clinical setting due to its synergistic function with conventional antibiotic prophylaxes. Additive manufacturing allows manufacture of entirely new implant geometries such as lattice structures to enhance osseointegration, however this limits the ability to uniformly coat implants. Direct integration of silver into the powder feedstock for selective laser melting (SLM) may allow manufacture of a biomedical alloy with innate, long lasting
INTRODUCTION. Biomaterial-related infections are an important complication in orthopaedic surgery [1], and Staphylococcus sp. accounts for more than half of the prosthetic joint infection cases [2]. Adhesion of bacteria to biomaterial surfaces is a key step in pathogenesis of such infections [3]. Titanium alloys are widely used in orthopaedic implants because their biocompatibility [4]. Surface incorporation of ions with
Implant-associated infection is a major source
of morbidity in orthopaedic surgery. There has been extensive research
into the development of materials that prevent biofilm formation,
and hence, reduce the risk of infection. Silver nanoparticle technology
is receiving much interest in the field of orthopaedics for its
antimicrobial properties, and the results of studies to date are
encouraging. Antimicrobial effects have been seen when silver nanoparticles are
used in trauma implants, tumour prostheses, bone cement, and also
when combined with hydroxyapatite coatings. Although there are promising
results with Cite this article: